Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rania Al-Hammoud, University of Waterloo; Soukaina Jazouli; Andrea Atkins, University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

] conducted a literature review summarizing the findings of 58 articles from 13 differentcountries about the different equity-oriented approaches in education from 2010 to 2020. Thepapers were categorized into 4 different education interventions: programmatic configurations,curricular settings, pedagogical approaches and learning activities. The programmaticconfiguration category refers to integrating equity methodically into the most important elementsof education programs, for instance curriculum design, admission process, internships, andteaching. The program curricula category refers to off-campus experiences and academic courses.The pedagogical approaches category refers to fundamental rules, models, or educational teachingstrategies. The

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dimantha Kottawa Gamage, Montana State University - Bozeman; Durward Sobek, Montana State University - Bozeman

number of mutually tested learning objectives, there were a few learning objectives that were not tested for each cohort. Figure 2: Proportion of competency level achievement by Furthermore, only two each cohort for objective X in the quizzes proportions at a time can be considered for a directionalhypothesis test. Therefore, each cohort was compared against every other cohort generating threegroups of tests (AB, BC and AC). For each group, these tests were carried out

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Okere, University of Cincinnati

://doi.org/10.28945/4628 (accessed January 2022).4. N. Chick, Learning Styles. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. 2010, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/learning-styles-preferences/.5. M. A. Peshkin, Lightboard home, from https://lightboard.info/ (accessed January 2022).6. F. M. Fung, Adopting Lightboard for a Chemistry Flipped Classroom to Improve Technology-Enhanced Videos for Better Learner Engagement. Journal of Chemical Education, 94, 956−959. 20177. T. R. Corkish, M. L. Davidson, C. T. Haakansson, R. E. Lopez, P D. Watson, and D Spagnoli, A How-To Guide for Making Online Pre-laboratory Lightboard Videos. Advances in Online Chemistry Education. ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shelly Gulati, University of the Pacific; Carla Strickland-Hughes, University of the Pacific; Emily Brienza-Larsen, University of the Pacific; Edith Sparks, University of the Pacific

Paper ID #37532Work in Progress: An Integrative Learning-CenteredAdvising Experience for First Year StudentsShelly Gulati (Associate Professor and Chair) Dr. Shelly Gulati is Associate Professor and Chair of Bioengineering. She is also serving as the Faculty Fellow, Academic Advising. She has been at Pacific since 2010. She received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a PhD in Bioengineering from University of California, Berkeley. She also spent two years as a postdoctoral fellow in London at Imperial College. Dr. Gulati’s research expertise is biomicrofluidics. More recently, her

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Pedogogy and Training

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Francisco Bueno, Saint Louis University; Henry Wright, Saint Louis University; Shaun Samuel, Saint Louis University; Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University

the risk of bodily injury. During this course, emphasis was placed on developing theability to choose the correct tooling that is required to complete a part in the most efficient andprecise manner. The material selected to build thrust stand was 80/20 because it is designed to belight, sturdy, and easily implemented. However, machining was necessary to make the parts forthe stand. This was achieved with the use of two machines (Bridgeport vertical mill and Jet Toolshorizontal bandsaw). The proper usage of those machines was also covered in the class. Introduction to electrical engineering (ECE 2001) covered DC circuits and analysis methodssuch as mesh analysis, node analysis, and circuit reduction methods. AC circuits were alsoexplored

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory and SoC Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University; Craig Chin, Kennesaw State University; Sheila Hill, Kennesaw State University

, “A colloquy on learning objectives for engineering education laboratories”, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. doi: 10.18260/1-2--11246.[3] T. Kotulski and S. Murray, “The national engineering laboratory survey”, (2010).[4] J. L. Chaytor, M. Al Mughalaq, and H. Butler, “Development and Use of Online Prelaboratory Activities in Organic Chemistry To Improve Students’ Laboratory Experience”, J. Chem. Educ., vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 859–866, (2017).[5] L. S. Nadelson, J. Scaggs, C. Sheffield, and O. M. McDougal, “Integration of Video-Based Demonstrations to Prepare Students for the Organic Chemistry Laboratory”, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 476–483 (2015).[6] M. Stieff, S. M. Werner, B. Fink

Conference Session

Remediation and Curricular Changes to Improve Student Learning and Outcomes

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandie Han; Boyan Kostadinov, New York City College of Technology; Janet Liou-Mark, New York City College of Technology; Johann Thiel, New York City College of Technology

a household incomeof less than $30,000. Eighty percent of the first-year students and sixty-seven percent ofthe returning students received need-based financial aid. Fifty-five percent reported workingtwenty or more hours per week. Sixty-two percent self-reported that they are first generationcollege students [19, 17, 18]. 1 City Tech, designated as a college of technology, has a strong science, technology, engi-neering, and mathematics (STEM) focus. It offers both associate and baccalaureate degreeprograms in a flexible comprehensive ”two plus two” curriculum. This option provides ac-cess to college education even if a student has not completed the college preparatory coursework; the student

Conference Session

Computers in Education 9 - Technology I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University; Mandy Korpusik, Loyola Marymount University; Masao Kitamura, Loyola Marymount University

maze editor will appear. • The locations of any ghosts and Pacman are randomly assigned to remaining open cells.Figure 6: Pacman Trainer Student Labeler interface in which students in a lobby click the movebutton for Pacman that best accomplishes the prompt for the presently shown maze state, Xi . Uponcreating a label, they are then shown the next state Xi+1 until reaching desired number of samples.Pacman Agent (PA) Figure 7: Outline of Pacman Agent steps.Following successful data collection using the Pacman Trainer app, students are now tasked withtraining a deep imitation learner given the samples that they just generated. This phase is ac-complished in a templated Pacman Agent (PA) Python implementation

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Heather Yates, Oklahoma State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Amy Lewis, Oklahoma State University; Irish Horsey, Kennesaw State University

]. Mentoring by non-familyconstruction professionals has also been recommended as an effective recruitment tool [2 and 4], howeverresearch revealed that this type of mentoring has a small impact on individuals in under-representedgroups to decide to enter the industry [5]. Despite this, many schools and associations have createdprograms (e.g., the Architecture, Construction, Engineering [ACE] mentoring program) aimed to increasewomen’s interest and participation in construction degree programs [6].Others assert that colleges and universities have not made enough of an effort to recruit women, despitetheir acknowledgement of the need to increase minority enrollment to meet industry demands [2 and 7].In their study of schools with construction

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Machine Learning, IoT, Writing Center Peer Tutors, Conceptual Modeling

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; Lifford McLauchlan, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; G. Beate Zimmer, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi; David Hicks

, and as an ONR Distinguished Summer Faculty at SPAWAR San Diego, CA. He has over 55 publications covering areas such as adaptive and intelligent controls, robotics, an ocean wave energy converter, green technology, education, wireless sensor networks and image processing. He is a co-inventor on 3 US patents related to control systems. Dr. McLauchlan is a member of ASEE and was the 2012-2014 Chair of the Ocean and Marine Engineering Division. He is also a member of IEEE (senior member), SPIE, Eta Kappa Nu, ACES and Tau Beta Pi, and has served on the IEEE Corpus Christi Section Board in various capacities such as Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary and Membership Development Officer. Dr. McLauchlan has received the Dean’s

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tonisha B. Lane, Virginia Tech; David Bruce Lewis, University of South Florida; Johnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Tech; Rebecca Steele, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x[13] N. A. Roberts and M. S. Plakhotnik, “Building social capital in the academy: The nature and function of support systems in graduate adult education,” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, vol 122, pp. 43–52, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.333[14] E. F. Cataldi, C. T. Bennett, X. Chen, and S. A. Simone, First-Generation Students College Access, Persistence, and Postbachelor’s Outcomes, Statistics in Brief, National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education, Washington D.C., 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf[15] H. Haeger and C. Fresquez, “Mentoring for inclusion: The impact of mentoring on

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Freeborn, The University of Alabama; Claire Major, The University of Alabama; Miriam E. Sweeney; Debra Moehle McCallum, The University of Alabama; Sarah T Dunlap, The University of Alabama

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, no. 3. pp. 281–291, 2000.[9] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based learning: influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 253–280, 2011.[10] F. Martinez-Rodrigo, L. C. Herrero-De Lucas, S. De Pablo, and A. B. Rey-Boue, “Using PBL to improve educational outcomes and student satisfaction in the teaching of DC/DC and DC/AC Converters,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 229–237, 2017.[11] R. M. Berry, A. D. Levine, R. Kirkman, L. P. Blake, and M. Drake, “Navigating bioethical waters: two pilot projects in problem-based learning for future bioscience and biotechnology professionals,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanos Matsumoto, Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division (SWED)

learning introductory programming in higher education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 77–90, May 2019. [3] K. Quille and S. Bergin, “CS1: How will they do? How can we help? A decade of research and practice,” Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 254–282, May 2019. [4] M. Hertz, “What do “CS1” and “CS2” mean? investigating differences in the early courses,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Mar. 2010. [5] M. C. Parker, M. Guzdial, and S. Engleman, “Replication, validation, and use of a language independent CS1 knowledge assessment,” in ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER), Aug. 2016, pp. 93–101. [6] M. S. Kirkpatrick and C

Conference Session

Design Thinking and Student Design Teams

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nourhan E. Elatky, Rowan University; Juan M. Cruz, Rowan University; Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

perceived empowerment of students.REFERENCES[1] J. V. 1. FARR JVF et al., "Using a Systematic Engineering Design Process to Conduct Undergraduate Engineering Management Capstone Projects," J Eng Educ, vol. 90, (2), pp. 193-197, 2001.[2] D. M. Grant, A. D. Malloy, M. C. Murphy, J. Foreman, and R. A. Robinson, "Innovations in Practice Editor: Anthony Scime Real-World Project: Integrating the Classroom, External Business Partnerships, and Professional Organizations," vol. 9. 2010.[3] R.E. Bruhn and J. Camp, "Capstone course creates useful business products and corporate- ready students," vol. 36, June 2004.[4] J. R. Goldberg, V. Kariapa, K. Kaiser and G. Corliss, "Benefits of Industry Involvement in Multidisciplinary Capstone Design

Conference Session

Computers in Education 5 - Online and Distributed Learning 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Shamsul Arefeen, Texas Tech University; Tim Dallas P.E., Texas Tech University; Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, E. Fernandez-Macias, and M. Bisello, Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? European Commission, 2020.[8] O. B. Azubuike, O. Adegboye, and H. Quadri, "Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria," International Journal of Educational Research Open, p. 100022, 2020.[9] G. Watts, "COVID-19 and the digital divide in the UK," The Lancet Digital Health, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. e395-e396, 2020.[10] T. Hussain, "Education and COVID-19 in Nigeria: Tackling the digital divide," SOAS Blog (retrieved from https://www. soas. ac. uk/blogs/study/covid-19-nigeria-digital- divide/), 2020.[11] J. Hall, C. Roman, C

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nagash Antoine Clarke , University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

protégé and mentor perspectives: a strategy to increase physician workforce diversity," Journal of the National Medical Association, vol. 110, pp. 399-406, 2018.[29] S. U. Guptan, Mentoring 2.0: A Practitioner’s Guide to Changing Lives: SAGE Publishing India, 2018.[30] C. Penny and D. Bolton, "Evaluating the outcomes of an eMentoring program," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 39, pp. 17-30, 2010.[31] O. Madison-Colmore, "E-Mentoring: A Mentoring Model for African American College Students at a Predominantly White Institution," Peer Facilitator Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 49-51, 2003.[32] M. Valentin‐Welch, "Evaluation of a National E‐Mentoring Program for Ethnically Diverse Student

Conference Session

MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Liza Boyle, Humboldt State University; Jason Patrick Marcus Reid, Humboldt State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

interestin continued education and jobs in the field of study [1] [2]. The majority of these interactionstypically take place in the classroom, but also happen during office hours and extracurricular ac-tivities.Office hours provide a valuable opportunity for students to ask questions, obtain help for theirspecific situation, get mentoring, and engage with course content with an expert. This activeinteraction with a faculty member can provide valuable learning for students, and previous studieshave found that office hours can improve student course performance. A study by Guerrero andRod found that for each office hour attended students saw a 0.77% increase in their grade evencorrecting for overall GPA, gender, race, and family income [3]. A study

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Computation in the First Year

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Ada Barach, Ohio State University; Connor Jenkins, Ohio State University; Serendipity S. Gunawardena, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

of 0.000 was found betweenstudents who had taken a CS course in HS and those who had not. Thus, students who took a CScourse in high school typically reported that they had stronger programming skills. This result isalso illustrated in Fig. 3. In the below chart, the red bars represent students who reported taking aCS course in high school while the grey bars represent students who did not report taking a high Figure 2: High School Computer Science Course Experience by Genderschool CS course. The distribution of the red bars is farther to the right (corresponding to a higheraverage reported skill level) than the gray bars indicating that students who took computer sciencein high school reported having better programming

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Pedagogy 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keith S. Pate, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jose M. Garcia, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Farid Breidi, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

has plans to actively continue the development of practical teaching tools that bring industry applications to the classroom.Dr. Farid Breidi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Farid Breidi is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University. Farid received his B.E. in Mechanical Engineering degree from the American University of Beirut in 2010, his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2012, and his Ph.D. in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from Purdue University in 2016. The primary focus of Farid’s research is modeling and design of fluid power and mechanical systems. He is interested in integrating machine learning and data

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Thomas Neil Dempsey, Forestville Central School; M. Raymond Ng, Cathedral Preparatory School ; Zachary Rhodes; Jiawei Gong, Pennsylvania State University; Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

and Academic Sports League competitions from 2010 to 2016.Mr. Zachary RhodesDr. Jiawei Gong, The Pennsylvania state university, The Behrend College Dr. Jiawei Gong is an assistant professor or Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania state university, The Behrend College.Dr. Faisal Aqlan, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College Dr. Faisal Aqlan is an assistant professor of Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State Univer- sity, The Behrend College. He received his PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton in 2013. He has industry experience with IBM Corporation and Innovation Associates Company. His research interests include manufacturing

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lina Battestilli, North Carolina State University; Sarah Korkes, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

Bruyn, E. Mostert, and A. van Schoor. Computer-based testing - the ideal tool to assess on the different levels of bloom’s taxonomy. In 2011 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, pages 444–449, Sep. 2011. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2011.6059623.[20] Errol Thompson, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Jacqueline L. Whalley, Minjie Hu, and Phil Robbins. Bloom’s taxonomy for cs assessment. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education - Volume 78, ACE ’08, pages 155–161, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2008. Australian Computer Society, Inc. ISBN 978-1-920682-59-0. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1379249.1379265.[21] John T. Bell and H. Scott Fogler. The investigation and

Collection

2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Randall Manteufel; Amir Karimi; Pranav Bhounsule

students. In the future, it will probablyoffer private online tutors, so that others will not be able to see what one student posts to a tutor.9. Some students will cheat and more students will cheat if others students get away with it. Thereputation of the program/college/university will suffer where cheating is prevalent. Some facultypretend cheating doesn’t exist or believe cheating only hurts the cheater. Some faculty use manyexcuses to not pursue cheaters. Cheating hurts everyone, especially the borderline D/C student whodoesn’t benefit from a curve because some cheaters “aced” the exam and fooled the instructor intobelieving the exam was more doable that it really was. Cheating also hurts the honest student whograduates from an engineering

Collection

Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference

Authors

Ross A. Lee, Villanova University; Giles Wozniak, Villanova University; Alicia Piscitelli, Villanova University; Anitha Devi Kannan, Villanova University; Andrew Jester, Villanova University, Sustainable Engineering Program

engineering education,” Jun. 2015, doi: 10.14288/1.0064738.[8] R. Allen, Ed., Bulletproof Feathers: How Science Uses Nature’s Secrets to Design Cutting- Edge Technology, 1st Edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2010.[9] M. Braungart, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, 1st edition. New York: North Point Press, 2002.[10] M. P. Coughlan, “Mechanisms of cellulose degradation by fungi and bacteria,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 77–100, Jan. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0377- 8401(91)90012-H.[11] A. L. Gotter, M. A. Kaetzel, and J. R. Dedman, “Electrophorus electricus as a Model System for the Study of Membrane Excitability,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular &

Conference Session

Undergraduate Education Track - Technical Session I

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Ieshya Anderson, Arizona State University; Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Undergraduate Education

turn, has shapedsociety [1], [2]. However, the engineering education system is still challenged to be moreinclusive of women and underrepresented minorities to reflect the demographics of society [3].According to the Census Bureau, women were slightly more than half of U.S. residents, andminorities constituted 36% of the U.S. population in 2010 [4]. The projections also suggest thatminorities will be about half of the resident U.S. population by 2050 [4]. However, womenrepresented 21.4% of enrolled engineering undergraduates, 24.1% of enrolled Master’sengineering students, and 26.2% doctorate students in the United States in 2015 [5]. Thesepercentages have remained steady for decades and do not approach the 50.6% representation ofwomen in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiago R Forin, Rowan University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Harriet Hartman, Rowan University; Kauser Jahan P.E., Rowan University; Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University; Parth Bhavsar, Rowan University; Jeff Hand; Theresa FS Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

New Jersey Chapter of the American Council on Education (ACE) Office of Women in Higher Education (OWHE). She received a Fulbright award in 2015.Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University Dr. Ralph Dusseau is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University in Glass- boro, New Jersey. Dr. Dusseau is also serving as the Associate Chair of the Department of Civil and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #17773 Environmental Engineering and is Coordinator of the Engineering Management Programs at Rowan Uni- versity. Dr. Dusseau was an Assistant and

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental: K-12 Student Beliefs, Motivation, and Self Efficacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer B. Listman, New York University ; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

ability) to perform the following tasks: 0 (not at all confident) to 100 (totally confident) 2. Rate how motivated you would be to perform the following tasks: 0 (not at all motivated) to 100 (extraordinarily motivated) 3. Rate how successful you would be in performing the following tasks: 0 (not at all successful) to 100 (I’ll ace this) 4. Rate your degree of worry regarding performing the following tasks: 0 (no worries) to 100 (I’m terrified)Categories 1 and 3 were similar, which helped identify accurate vs. careless or randomly chosenanswers. In addition, Category 4 required a reverse rating; again, useful to identify respondentswho might answer by checking off all 100s, for example. After removal of such outliers

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5B: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manaz Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University; Chandan Dasgupta, Purdue University; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia MSSEC, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

comfortable in their home, why would they live there. There were no trade-offs as we could rank the criteria how we pleased and we could have had all of them be musthaves or none. “Adept Beginner: Criteria and constraints are acknowledged, but benefits and tradeoffs are notdiscussed. No examples found in this data set.Informed: Use the trade-offs and potential benefits as the main input parameters of thedecision making process. Example: "Increasing U-factor on all surfaces to keep the house cool, decreasing AC energy use. No" Adept Informed: In depth trade off analysis is displayed along with a clear understanding of the drawbacks and benefits of decisions. Clearly recognizing that the refined design is still not a perfect design. Example :) "After I

Conference Session

Labs & Hands-on Instruction II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Lorelei Fernandez, Florida International University; Natalie Paul, Florida International University; Ismail Guvenc, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

assistant professor with Florida International University. His recent research interests include heterogeneous wireless networks and future radio ac- cess beyond 4G wireless systems. He has published more than 100 conference/journal papers and book chapters, and several standardization contributions. He co-authored/co-edited three books for Cambridge University Press, served as an editor for IEEE Communications Letters (2010-2015) and IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (2011-present), and as a guest editor for several other journals. Dr. Guvenc is an inventor/coinventor in 23 U.S. patents, and has another 4 pending U.S. patent applications. He is a recipient of the 2014 Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 1: Methods Refresh: Approaches to Data Analysis in Engineering Education Research

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manoj Malviya, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Methods Method Percent agreement (pa) Expected (chance) IRR agreement correction (pe) Statistical IRR Methods Scott’s Pi 0.7003 0.1446 0.6496 Cohen’s Kappa 0.7003 0.1428 0.6504 Krippendorff alpha 0.7003 0.1446 0.6946 Brenan-Prediger 0.7003 0.0714 0.7190 Gwet AC 0.7003 0.0855

Conference Session

FPD10 -- Pre-Engineering and Bridge Programs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Grimm, Wayne State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2007-1503: AN ENGINEERING BRIDGE PROGRAM: IMPROVING THESUCCESS RATE OF UNDERPREPARED STUDENTS IN ENGINEERINGMichele Grimm, Wayne State University Michele J. Grimm has served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at Wayne State University since 2003. Previously, she was Associate Chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering. Dr. Grimm earned her PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania and her BS in Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Mechanics from The Johns Hopkins University. Page 12.206.1© American Society for Engineering Education