Paper ID #25711A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes about a Continuous GradePoint Average SchemeMr. Wan Kyn Chan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Wan Kyn Chan is a undergraduate student in Purdue University currently pursuing his Bachelors in Me- chanical Engineering and will be graduating in Spring 2019. Beyond academic courses he is engaged with, he also pursues research in the areas of Color Changing Metamaterials and Engineering Education. Coming from the Singapore, a country with high educational rigor, the latter area of research has been an interest and passion of
of online delivery of en- gineering content with emphasis on how the material can be modified to provide a personalized learning experience. LaMeres is also researching strategies to improve student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineering. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propa- gation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Colorado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres
again starting with the 2018-2019 freshman cohort. EGR-1200 would remain the same but EGR-1205 would be replaced with a course that eachdepartment would offer their students. The goal was to keep the class hands on and entertaining,but also add major-specific technical work. While departments are free to now introduce topicswhich could be required for later classes, it was hoped that the courses could still be generalenough to allow for students to transfer to other departments after freshman year. The ECEdepartment created their course, ECE-1205 which would introduce the students to Matlab as hadbeen done previously in the 7 week section of the old EGR 1205, but also introduce a new designarea specifically geared for ECE students, in which
students anopportunity to gauge how they perceive the field engineering as it relates to their academiccareer. The tool will be developed from validated surveys from research and the Social CognitiveCareer theory.National Best Practices to Retain Students in Their First Year In 2012, the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) produced a reportentitled Going the Distance, detailing “Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology and Computing Students”[5]. In this report, a literature review andsurvey were conducted documenting over 60 strategies and best practices in retainingengineering students. These strategies were divided into three categories including “student-focused strategies and practices
Women in Engineering (WIE) Division, a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and a member of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Vladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis - Professor and Head of the Department of Engineering Technology in the College of Engineering, has taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, nanotechnology, biomedical engineering, nondestructiveSusan Herring, Bucks County Community College Susan Herring, Executive Director of the Center for Workforce Development at Bucks County Commu- nity College, directs the college’s workforce development activities as they relate to business incumbent worker training, industrial
. Jones, A. M. Ernst, “Physics Innovation and Entrepreneurship (PIE)Introduced into the First-year Physics Course,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings.[25] American Physical Society, “APS PIPELINE Network,” aps.org.https://www.aps.org/programs/education/innovation/pipeline/index.cfm, , (accessed Feb. 3,2019).
Paper ID #28139Facilitating Cross-Course Connections & Knowledge Transfer between Engi-neering Thermodynamics and Mathematics (WIP)Dr. Alexander John De Rosa, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Alexander De Rosa is a Teaching Assistant Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology. Alex specializes in teaching in the thermal-fluid sciences and has a background in experimental combustion. He gained his PhD in 2015 from The Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Denis SerbinProf. Stephanie Lee c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Facilitating Cross-Course
LLMs to draft or writeassignments (28%) or bibliographies (14%) as ethical, and the use of an LLM to generate these isunethical according to our university’s academic integrity policy, faculty should review academicdishonesty with students and be very clear about their expectations and rules regarding LLM useon all types of academic tasks.Summary, conclusion, and future workAt the 2023 ASEE Engineering Dean’s Institute, a dean commented that, “engineers, doctors, andlawyers will not be replaced by AI. They will be replaced by engineers, doctors, and lawyers thatknow and use AI.” [23]. This would seem to be an appropriate approach moving forward both forstudents and practitioners. The students in this study were generally consistent across
learning on the development of first-year students’ ethical reasoning, as well as research on the development of culturally responsive ethics education in global contexts. He is an active member of the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE)Dr. Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology Andrea Gammon is Assistant Professor of Ethics and Philosophy of Technology at TU Delft. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Foreign Language, Ethical Reasoning, and Moral Intuitions in Global Engineering Ethics Education [Global Engineering Ethics
Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 252-271, 2021.[7] B. M. Capobianco, J. Radloff, and J. Clingerman, “Facilitating preservice elementary scienceteachers’ shift from learner to teacher of engineering design-based science teaching,”International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 747-767, 2022.[8] R. Hammack and I. H. Yeter, “Exploring pre-service elementary teachers’ engineeringteaching efficacy beliefs: A confirmatory analysis study (fundamental),” in 2022 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2022.[9] M. Perkins Coppola, “Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach engineering: Impacton self‐efficacy and outcome expectancy,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 119, no. 3, pp.161-170, 2019.[10] D. R
opportunity tostrengthen program structure and encourage deeper connections.Looking beyond individual responses, we see a broader picture. Mentoring, coupled withfostering connections among APEX scholars and participation in other success series programs,has had a profoundly positive impact. Students reported a stronger sense of belonging,connection, and self-efficacy. This comprehensive approach underscores the APEX program'ssuccess in empowering students to navigate their academic journey and thrive in highereducation.References:[1] K. Acton, D. Besser, K. Nepal, and J. Holte, “Board 267: Engineering a Transfer FriendlyExperience with Alternative Pathways to Excellence” in ASEE Annual Conference, Baltimore,MD 2023.[2] N. Walters, A. DeSalvo, and S
[Accessed Oct. 19, 2023][12] A. Srivastava, “Improving departure taxi time predictions using ASDE-X surveillance data,” 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1109/dasc.2011.6095989[13] O. Alsalous and S. Hotle, “Deicing facility capacity and delay estimation using ASDE-X data: Chicago O’Hare Simulation case study,” Transportation Research Record, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/03611981231185147.[14] N. Mirmohammadsadeghi, J. Hu, and A. Trani, “Enhancements to the runway capacity simulation model using the ASDE-X data for estimating airports throughput under various wake separation systems,” AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.2514/6.2019- 3044.[15] R. R. L. Clewlow, I. Simaiakis
Academy of Sciences, 117(12):6476–6483, 2020. [8] Ang´elica Burbano, Katherine Ortegon, Silvia Guzman, and Henry Arley Taquez Quenguan. Active learning: Faculty mind-sets and the need for faculty development. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [9] Michael Prince. Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3): 223–231, 2004.[10] Charles C Bonwell and James A Eison. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. school of education and human development, george washington university, 1991.[11] Jim Eison. Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Jurnal Pendidikantentang Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif (Active
, early-career women in engineering, sustainable design, and improving diversity,equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. She isalso interested in student and faculty development. Elizabeth received an M.S. in CivilEngineering as well as a certificate in engineering leadership from the University of Florida anda B.S. in civil engineering from Clemson University. She is an Engineer in Training (EIT) andLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Associate (LEED-GA)Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, F. ASEE, PMP, LEED-APDenise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, F. ASEE, PMP, LEED-AP is the Associate Dean for WorkforceDevelopment in the Wertheim College of Engineering and a tenured Associate Professor in
ethnicity, without considering the intersectional nature of identities and how theyinteract to shape student experiences (Figard et al., 2023a). Although intersectionality research is growing in engineering education, studiesdiscussing disability as an aspect of intersectionality or identity are almost entirely nonexistent.While higher education research has slowly grown to address disabled students’ experiences oncampus and recognize disability as a social identity and aspect of campus diversity, it has stillfailed to address how ableism intersects with other aspects of oppression to impact disabledstudents’ experiences (Naples et al., 2019). Scholars have called for an expanded use ofintersectionality to study and work with disabled people
(Chair 2012-2014). He is a Life Senior Member of the IEEE, a Member of the ASEE, and is a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Florida.Dr. Cyril B Okhio P.E., Kennesaw State University Cyril B. Okhio is a Faculty at the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Technology, Kennesaw State University and an Adjunct Professor at Clark Atlanta University’s Dual Degree Engineering Program. He earned his B.S. (Engineering) and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) degrees from, and was an (Science and Engineering Research Council) SERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of London. He is registered as a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPE) with the Council of Registered
curriculum implementation, instructional delivery, scientific research, technical writing, and student mentoring to provide students with the tools for academic and professional success. Since 2007, he has had the privilege of mentoring numerous undergraduate and master’s students, a pursuit he is most passionate about. He has applied his established teaching skills to a wide range of undergraduate courses in general physics, engineering physics, electronics for scientists, advanced physics labs and specialized courses in the fields of functional nano material science and nanotechnology. Hari is a member of IOP (UK), JSA, AAPT and ASEE and he is a reviewer for several scientific journals.Dr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern
, doi: 10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1988.tb00632.x[3] D. Jackson, J. Fleming, and A. Rowe, “Enabling the Transfer of Skills and Knowledge across Classroom and Work Contexts,” Vocations and Learning, vol. 12, pp. 459-478, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12186-019-09224-1[4] L.A. Perry, and J.S. London, “The Transfer of Learning Between School and Work: A New Stance in the Debate About Engineering Graduates’ Preparedness for Career Success abstract Paper,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37899[5] M. Taguma, E. Feron, and M.H. Lim, “A Literature Summary for Research on the Transfer of Learning,” in Future of Education and Skills 2030
stakeholders, it translates to narratives about the community that are more accurate andwherein the community has and feels more agency in the process.Future DirectionsThe authors intend to build from this concept paper into a research exploration of engineeringeducator’s experiences with stakeholder analysis. We seek to collect data from gatherings ofengineering educators (e.g. at the ASEE convening), as well as some surveys and interviews ofengineering educators about curriculum and training for stakeholder analysis. We seek to solicitfeedback on our examples and rubric above, as well as learning from educators on theirexperience with ethics and stakeholder analysis. We will further develop the work byelaborating the rubric into more nuanced steps
Paper ID #43011WIP: The Impact of Formative Assessment on Students’ Attitude, AnticipatedAcademic Performance, and Design Skills: Insights from Three Design-OrientedElectrical Engineering CoursesDr. Muhammad S Zilany, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Muhammad Zilany earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, in 2007. He held academic positions at the University of Malaya and the University of Hail before joining the Electrical and Computer Engineering Program at Texas A&M University at Qatar in 2019. His research focuses on signal processing in the auditory system
. Zavala, and J. F. Calderón, “Student response to instructional practices (StRIP) survey in engineering classrooms: Validating a Spanish version,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[5] M. L. Kovarik, J. K. Robinson, and T. J. Wenzel, “Why Use Active Learning? In Active Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum,” American Chemical Society, 2022, pp. 1–12.[6] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin, “Measuring actual learning versus the feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p. 116(39), 2019.[7] H. J. Cho, K. Zhao, C. R. Lee, D. Runshe, and C. Krousgrill, “Active learning
Education Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa, 2019, pp. 10-12.[13] M. W. Mohiuddin, J. Tsenn, S. Balawi, C. R. Corleto, and J. Weaver-Rosen, "Vertical Integration of Teamwork Skills from Sophomore to Senior and Beyond!," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[14] E. Biech, The Pfeiffer book of successful team-building tools: Best of the annuals. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.[15] J. Brox. "The Results Are In: Poor Communication Number One Reason Teamwork Fails." https://www.refreshleadership.com/index.php/2015/09/results-poor- communication-number-reason-teamwork-fails/ (accessed February 10, 2023).[16] B. Groysberg and M. Slind. "The Silent Killer of Big Companies." Harvard Business
do more’: A qualitative meta-analysis of early career engineers’ perceptions of agency in their workplaces,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[4] J. Glass, K. Takasaki, S. Sassler, and E. Parker, “Finding a job: An intersectional analysis of search strategies and outcomes among U.S. STEM graduates,” Res Soc Stratif Mobil, vol. 83, p. 100758, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.RSSM.2023.100758.[5] K. Boudreau, M. P. Quinn, Z. Reidinger, D. Dibiasio, and P. Quinn, “Exploring Inclusive Spaces for LGBTQ Engineering Students,” in CoNECD - American Society of Engineering Education, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/about-us/the- organization/our-board-of-directors/asee-board
://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and- procedure-manual-appm-2023-2024/[2] J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, “A systems approach to instructional change in academia,” presented at the 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 2019.[3] J. E. Groccia and W. Buskist, “Need for evidence‐based teaching,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2011, no. 128, pp. 5–11, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1002/tl.463.[4] M. Borrego and C. Henderson, “Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies: Increasing Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 220–252, Apr. 2014, doi
Playground.ALEKSANDR SERGEYEV is a professor of Mechatronics, Electrical, and Robotics Engineering Technologyprogram in the Department of Applied Computing at Michigan Tech. He is a director of FANUC AuthorizedCertified Robotic Training Center, and a director for Master of Science in Mechatronics degree program at MichiganTech. Dr. Sergeyev is a member of SPIE, ATMAE, IEEE, and ASEE professional organizations, and has mentorednumerous undergraduate senior design projects and student publications.MARK GAUTHIER is the president and owner of Donald Engineering Co., Inc (DE). located in WesternMichigan. After graduating from Michigan Technological University in 1985, he worked as a technical designer atSDRC in Farmington Hills, Michigan in statistical analysis
D. H.Jonassen & S. M. Land, Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1 -23). Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.[8] Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2011). Using Animations and Visual Cueing to Support Learningof Scientific Concepts and Processes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 650-658.[9] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S., Molina, S. Implementation of Visual Supplements to StrengthenPedagogical Practices and Enhance the Physical Understanding of Fundamental Concepts inEngineering Mechanics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl.Paper ID: 24780[10] Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promoteactive learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated
for effective instruction. Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University Press.[13] Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. H.Jonassen & S. M. Land, Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1 -23). Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.[14] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Creating a Learning Environment that Engages EngineeringStudents in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl. Paper ID: 26093.[15] McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and schoolstrategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassPublishers.[16] Walberg, H.J & Anderson, GJ
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.[2] Churches, A., and Magin, D., 2005, “Student Design-And-Build Projects Revisited,” International Conference on Engineering Design.[3] Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1988, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach.[4] Sozen, M., 2016, “A Design-and-Build Project for Heat Transfer Course,” American Society for Engineering Education.[5] Platanitis, G., and Pop-Iliev, R., 2009, “Design-Build Project Approach in a First Year Engineering Design Course,” Canadian Engineering Education Association.[6] Renu, R. S., 2019, “Observations from a Two-Semester Design and Build Project,” ASEE Southeastern Section Conference .
male-female ratio that isreflective of the local work force), there are laws that prevent such goals from unduly harmingnon-targeted groups, from hiring people who are unqualified for the job, or to have rigid quotasfor any job or position (ACLU of Southern California, 2019). That is, while women might haveit easier in a certain job interview at a certain institution, it is typically to account for biasesthroughout the entire pipeline of their STEM career as indicated in the literature and analysisdone in this paper. Such a provision does not in fact make it easier for women in STEM. Suchsentiments are harmful for women as indicated by many in the survey who feel “unsure ofthemselves”, “drive(n) … to do better to prove (their) worth”, “look(ed
between 2018-2019. The remaining 5 participated inremote cohorts between 2020-2021 (see Appendix A for more details on participants’ cohorts). Table 1: Participants’ demographics and CSSI cohortFactor Value #. Factor Value #.Gender Women 10. First-generation college student Yes 4. Men 6. No 12.Race/Ethnicity* Asian 4. CSSI Location In-person 11. Black or African American 4