. Comparatively, Dvash and Shamay-Tsoorydescribed Theory of Mind as a “a more advanced emotional form of mentalizing, rather than whathas been called ‘emotional contagion”’ [35, p. 286].Scholars have also described the importance of cognitive empathy in intercultural communicationand how it can serve for “bridging cultural differences” [31, p. 2]. Among culturally divergentindividuals and groups, it can create a a pluralistic and pro-social mindset [38–40]. Additionally,relational empathy reifies awareness of their own inability to posses first-hand knowledge ofothers’ emotions or thoughts [41]. In turn, “Individuals instead jointly create interdependentunderstanding of experiences and empathy that are reflective of and shaping of their
Engineering Design course6. These activities related tothe following recognized dimensions of learning styles presented by Felder and Brent4: (1) sensing(concrete, practical, oriented to facts) versus intuitive learners (conceptual, innovative, oriented to theory);(2) visual (pictures, diagrams, etc) versus verbal learners (written and spoken); (3) active (tries things out,works with others) versus reflective learners (learns by thinking through, works alone); and (4) sequential(linear, orderly, learns in steps) versus global learners (holistic, systems thinkers, learns in large leaps).There were over 20 learning modes assessed in both the student and faculty surveys. These modes havebeen described in detail in the previous papers5,6, and are again
developments, such as learning-styles theories.20 In particular, Kolb’s experientiallearning cycle theory has received significant attention from educational researchers.21,22 Thistheory argues that learning originates from real-world experiences and involves four essentialprocesses: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract hypothesis, and active testing.1The experiential learning cycle was recently integrated with some general principles ofneurobiology, as documented in The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice ofTeaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning, by James Zull.18 This synthesis is achieved bydescribing the learning cycle in the context of brain anatomy and physiology. In brief, the humancortical brain can be
ASEE Paper_2019_Final - Google Docs concerns. As such, the co-instructors framed the seminar as helping the LAs (a) learn how to support their students, (b) learn how to partner with course instructors to improve students’ experiences, and (c) develop their engineering skills (e.g reflect on design process, facilitate teamwork, and consider social justice implications). This second iteration of the seminar maintained some of the same learning objectives as the pilot version of the seminar such as (1) identify and critically evaluate claims from readings, (2) carefully observe and document classroom events, (3) analyze classroom events and consider multiple plausible
instructors and students, reviews of course documents,contextualization within the literature on design, and our own reflections on lived experiencesworking with design students. In diverse institutional and course settings, each of the authorshas over 10 years of experience working with engineering design students.II. Engineering design strategiesIn each of the design types above, assuming community engagement contexts, what criteriaare in—and not in—the (implicit or explicit) decision matrices students typically are taught touse when weighing different design alternatives? That is, how does each regard“optimization”—what is being optimized, why, and for whose benefit? What does eachapproach to design emphasize, de-emphasize, and altogether omit?A
architects of change, (b) provide a professional learning vehicle foreducators to reflect on practices and develop content knowledge, (c) inspire a sense of ownershipin curriculum decision-making among teachers, and (d) use an instructional approach that iscoherent with teachers’ interests and professional goals. This preliminary study evaluates theeffects of a CDB professional development program, the PTC STEM Certificate Program, ontwenty-six K-12 teachers who participated in 62 hours of engineering education professionaldevelopment over a six month period. Participants learned about industry and educationengineering concepts, tested engineering curricula, collaborated with K-12 educators andindustry professionals, and developed project-based
design and manufacturing. Chijhi is a teaching assistant in the College of Engineering Education, instructing the Transforming Ideas to Innovation I & II courses, which introduce first-year students to the engineering profession using multidisciplinary, societally relevant content.Dr. Robert P. Loweth, Purdue University Robert P. Loweth (he/him) is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research explores how engineering students and practitioners engage stakeholders in their engineering projects, reflect on their social identities, and consider the broader societal contexts of their engineering work. The goals of his research are 1) to develop tools and
strategies herein reflect an intentional commitment to Educatethe Whole Engineer by promoting an academic advising model that would both complement thecurricular experiences and align with the evolving personal and professional aspirations ofstudents towards career readiness. The approaches described offer valuable insights for both newand existing engineering programs seeking to transform their advising practices to better serve anincreasingly diverse student population. There is urgency in this work for the betterment ofhigher education and engineering education.I. INTRODUCTIONThe value of higher education is under attack and the criticisms are many: cost, inadequatepreparation for job-readiness, outdated and inflexible curricula and degrees
between engineering faculty expertise and the requirements of preparing students to function well in diverse settings and promote inclusive practices. Possible Topics for Future Papers/Collaborations • Given that engaged reflection is essential for students to optimize their learning from intercultural interactions and other diversity interventions, what are the most effective pedagogical strategies for getting students to engage in meaningful reflection? How can we structure reflection assignments so that they are optimally timed, efficient, and focused while still allowing space for
] focuses on assessing student learning and experience to ascertainwhether students have acquired the skills, knowledge, and competencies related to their programof study. The ET department faculty use a combination of direct and indirect methods forassessment and evaluation of the SOs. The results and findings of these evaluations aresystematically utilized as input for the program’s CI actions[1], [13]. Direct methods requirestudents to exhibit their knowledge and skills as they respond to the instrument itself. Objectivetests, projects, laboratory work, presentations, and classroom assignments all meet this criterion[14]. Indirect methods such as surveys and interviews require students to reflect on their learningrather than to display it [12
]. However, performance on an assignmentmight not necessarily reflect a student’s understanding of the specified topic or their participationin class. Traditionally, homework assignments have taken on many forms: projects, readingprompts (in selected articles or chapters from a textbook), or responses to question from a givensource [3]. In recent years, however, many qualities of the homework format have been altered.These aspects include digital submissions or digital assignments entirely. Students have reportedhigher scores from these digital methods, but previous data analysis suggests there are nodifferences between this and the physical forms of homework [32]. Furthermore, these studiescritique the simplicity of these digital characteristics
identified as flourishing in humanitarian spaces[18].However, scholarship suggests that students of color, and students from low and middle incomecountries continue to be underrepresented in Humanitarian Engineering. The humanitarian fieldhas been identified as having a “race problem” providing drastically different financial andleadership opportunities for employees across lines of race and nationality[19], [20]. Furtheractivists are highlighting the residuals of HE’s missionary, colonial, and genocidal lineage thatshape conventions common to the HE field [21], [22]. While there has been increased interest inand reflection of antiracism and social justice activism in Humanitarian Engineering, manydiversity, inclusion, and equity endeavors in
(CDC), over 1 billion people from the world population [2] and approximately 26%of people in the U.S. live with some form of a disability [3]. WHO and the CDC measure andclassify disability through six questions related to hearing, vision, cognitive, mobility, self-care,and independent living [4]. With such a large portion of the population classified with having adisability, there are still a disproportionate amount of people with disabilities participating inU.S. higher education approximately 11%, [5]. This lower participation rate may stem fromsystemic barriers within educational institutions that perpetuate ableism. Ableism “describes, andis reflected in, individual and group perceptions of certain abilities as essential” and
offeringseveral final observations about the opportunities and obstacles to successful Cohort Challenges,as well as our future plans to support others who want to design and deliver this mode ofgraduate education.I. Introduction The interest in “wicked problems” in science and engineering reflects a growingrecognition that the most pressing technological needs of the 21st century do not fall neatly intoany single discipline. Because they sit at the intersection of many competing disciplines andinterests, wicked problems defy easy definition or solution [1]. Rather, they demand challenge-centered research that requires the collaboration of the full range of traditional scientific fields,as well as an understanding that those challenges arise in
requirements areintended to ensure that students enter the course with a basic understanding of culture and theengineering design process. Using these classes as our foundation, we introduce students to theconcepts listed in Table 1. These topics are covered through a combination of lecture and classactivities, including opportunities for role playing which has been shown to provide a more vivideducation experience for students [2]. To demonstrate the influence of culture on the engineeringdesign process, for example, student teams develop simple designs for household cleaning choresand then reflect on the cultural assumptions they bring to the design, whether those assumptionswould be universally appropriate, and whether all engineers would define
, collaborative communication led to an increased sense ofrelatedness among different disciplines, which may be useful for effective public researchcommunication about interdisciplinary engineering projects.IntroductionThere is a general understanding that engineering solves problems, but it is often hard tounderstand the direct context or implications of what engineers do without substantialscaffolding. Meanwhile, STEM is a familiar term within contemporary American educationalsystems, but it does not reflect a monolithic domain unto itself, and it is not always clear howengineering relates to science, technology, or math within this framing. While engineering aloneis a rich area of exploration, contextualizing it with other disciplines can highlight
both chromebooks and Ipads that wereprovided by the research team. The group were split in half to ensure less issues with internetconnectivity, where one group worked on the name tag activity while the other world onanswering the engineering question. Week three consisted of a set of reflection questions intended to help youth identifyproblems they may want to solve by the end of the project workshop. We did this using anotherset of poster boards ideation prompts. The first board prompted youth to walk through their dailyroutine and categorize into six different time periods: waking up, morning, noon, late afternoon,night, and bedtime. Youth were encouraged to add in any parts of their routine for every part ofthe day. Research team
semester with the overall goal ofdecomposing the project into functional modules. In the spring modules are built and tested,integrated, iterated, then the project finally undergoes an acceptance test. While the V-model isintuitive for those with design experience, as a project management model it does not accuratelythe reflect the actual and iterative work of design so it needs to be implemented flexibly and withsignificant scaffolding.Because capstone courses can be very time-intensive for faculty, the instructors have developed asignificant amount of scaffolding over time using an action-based research approach [4] (seenext section). This has resulted in a “hands-off” approach where students have responsibility formost project decisions. While
describe the family life of their co-workeror employer as part of their answer. This background information benefits the interviewer as itwill help frame the context and dynamics the participant had to contend with. However, thisinformation would be omitted from the final narrative as this background is unnecessary for thereader. It is important to remember that although this information would not be included in thefinal constructed narrative, its influence persists through the remainder of the data collection andinterpretation.Smoothing is inherently an iterative and reflective process that researchers often refine throughexperience [11]. Most literature on narrative methods typically discusses the philosophicalunderpinnings of narrative analysis
classroom. Specifically, students were asked torespond with approximately 250 words to the following prompt: Research has shown that identifying personal value in classroom content can significantly improve academic performance (Hulleman et al., 2010). Select a topic covered in class and discuss its relevance to your own life. Be sure to explain why and how the specific information is relevant and or useful to you personally. Literal applications of the content are valid, but you might also use this space to reflect on deeper utilities (e.g., fulfillment, meaningfulness) that are not directly linked to getting a good grade.In line with recommendations from prior research (e.g., Kosovich et al
. While mostcreativity frameworks involve divergent thinking (concept generation), convergent thinking(iterating a prototype), as well as openness to idea exploration, and reflection, in practice andunder constraints most engineering projects focus disproportionately on the first two of these four.Useful interventions might find ways to increase students’ “openness to idea exploration” and“reflection” about design.Studies have shown that students’ creativity increases when risk taking is supported in theclassroom (Daly [65] again, citing others). Increasing incentives for students to take risks andexplore ideas, and providing an environment in which they feel safe doing so, could disrupt the“lockstep” “death march” and enhance creativity and free
arts toevoke and provoke different ways of knowing in the researcher but also in the audience as they reflect on their ownexperiences in relationship to the research interpretations [60]. Arts-based research methods emerged as a branch ofWestern qualitative research theories and practices [66] that occur along a continuum of art-science, which providesflexibility for using creative practices in the research design, content generation, analysis, and/or interpretation. Ichose these inductive and generative creative practices to produce knowledge that mirrors the processes that Nail[61] and CRM [5] describe. Arts-based methods can be used in tandem with traditional qualitative and quantitativepractices or alone [60], which in my work-in-progress
recognizedin the AEC industry. It has the capacity to scan existing spatial conditions and generate densepoint-cloud models. They include ground topography, rock formations, landscapes, forest canopiesand the built environment in general.T-LiDAR scanning devices emit narrow laser beams/pulses that hit, and capture reflected lightintensity, spatial coordinates (x, y, z) and color coordinates (read, green, blue) from distant points.That is, seven quantities are captured per hit point. The laser-based scanners were firstcommercially available in the mid-1990s and they evolved considerably in the last 25 years.Today, modern rotating T-LiDAR scanners may capture one million points per second within a1000-meter range with 5mm accuracy. LiDAR applications
Education from 2005 to 2016. Their “working definition considers interdisciplinaryinteractions as attempts to address real-world cases and problems by integrating heterogeneousknowledge bases and knowledge-making practices, whether these are gathered under theinstitutional cover of a discipline or not” and was adapted from (Krohn 2010). In the literaturethey reviewed, “the reported success factors include taking a system approach, employingreal-world problems as exemplars and tasks, involving reflective dialogue, and aspects ofinfrastructure and collaboration. Reported challenges address institutional barriers, complexity,and acquiring adequate levels of support.” The authors go on to report that “motivation behindinterdisciplinary education … is
critical reflection of the learner on the experience. Unlessembedded within a course as a service-learning activity (e.g. [13]), there may not be structuredreflection. This is particularly true in co-curricular activities, where advisors may worry thatformal reflection would deter college students from participating. However, the reflection couldoccur informally via a group discussion.Giles and Eyler [11] cite Dewey’s [12] four criteria for projects to be truly educative. The fourcriteria are: generate interest, worthwhile intrinsically, problems that demand new information,and cover a considerable time span. K-12 activities are often designed to be fun, so they arelikely to generate interest on behalf of both the college student and K-12 kids
has already been offered to undergraduate students once with successful results. Thestudents were able to remotely access the experiments, perform the experiments and collect data.The successful result of such quantum experiments is also reflected in a course survey, presentedin this paper, even though the quantum mechanics topics offered in this course are unfamiliar toengineering students and hence more challenging. The paper reports, and aims to promote, theintegration of selected quantum technology topics with the mechatronics course for trainingengineering students in this rapidly growing area. 1. Introduction The rapid advances in quantum technologies demand for skilled engineering workforce tosupport the progress. The integration
research interests include: engineering for social justice, engineering with community, innovation, ethics, transformative learning, reflection, professional identity.Mr. Ramon Benitez, Virginia Tech Ramon Benitez is interested in how engineering identity and animal participatory design can be used to recruit Chicano K-12 students to engineering professions. Benitez completed his BS in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), and is now a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT). Benitez seeks to understand how to best instruct and assess ethical reasoning of engineering practices and engineering responsibilities, including wildlife and humanity, in
(e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learningin Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creat-ing curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests,motivation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the com-munity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus on the issues of women and minorities in science/engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Transformation through Liberal Arts-Focused Grand Challenges Scholars ProgramsAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program
Pilot 3 Sensing connection, Expects confrontation, characterThe stories are organized to reflect the perspective that the author takes toward the problem ofdefining entrepreneurial leadership. Story one, defines the term with an extensive illustration ofthe Film Maker’s vision and approach, outlining the emerging attributes through 5 assertions andsets the stage for the remaining stories. The four remaining story results, presented as mini-composites are utilized for building next research agenda steps.Story two makes the case for the life cycle and career path challenges of the female leader as asenior level administrator in engineering education with a focus on sensing connection andexpecting confrontation, referred to as ‘dean’ for
still emerging, although there have been some paperspublished using this approach15, 16. Tomkins and Eatough17 discuss strategies for use of IPA infocus group settings, highlighting the need for a sensitive approach that acknowledges thedifferences of group-based interactions. Themes from both individual and group interviews arereported in this paper.Positioning and methodological rigor – A key aspect of all qualitative research is the analyst’srole as researcher and research tool, as their understanding and interpretation are central to theproject’s success. To clarify those roles and enact boundaries, IPA calls for a reflective dialoguebetween analyst and participant13. Throughout the process of analysis, the researcher ‘brackets’their