critical reflection of the learner on the experience. Unlessembedded within a course as a service-learning activity (e.g. [13]), there may not be structuredreflection. This is particularly true in co-curricular activities, where advisors may worry thatformal reflection would deter college students from participating. However, the reflection couldoccur informally via a group discussion.Giles and Eyler [11] cite Dewey’s [12] four criteria for projects to be truly educative. The fourcriteria are: generate interest, worthwhile intrinsically, problems that demand new information,and cover a considerable time span. K-12 activities are often designed to be fun, so they arelikely to generate interest on behalf of both the college student and K-12 kids
has already been offered to undergraduate students once with successful results. Thestudents were able to remotely access the experiments, perform the experiments and collect data.The successful result of such quantum experiments is also reflected in a course survey, presentedin this paper, even though the quantum mechanics topics offered in this course are unfamiliar toengineering students and hence more challenging. The paper reports, and aims to promote, theintegration of selected quantum technology topics with the mechatronics course for trainingengineering students in this rapidly growing area. 1. Introduction The rapid advances in quantum technologies demand for skilled engineering workforce tosupport the progress. The integration
research interests include: engineering for social justice, engineering with community, innovation, ethics, transformative learning, reflection, professional identity.Mr. Ramon Benitez, Virginia Tech Ramon Benitez is interested in how engineering identity and animal participatory design can be used to recruit Chicano K-12 students to engineering professions. Benitez completed his BS in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), and is now a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT). Benitez seeks to understand how to best instruct and assess ethical reasoning of engineering practices and engineering responsibilities, including wildlife and humanity, in
(e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learningin Undergraduate Science and Engineering, etc.) All of these activities share a common goal of creat-ing curricular and pedagogical structures as well as academic cultures that facilitate students’ interests,motivation, and desire to persist in engineering. Through this work, outreach, and involvement in the com-munity, Dr. Zastavker continues to focus on the issues of women and minorities in science/engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Transformation through Liberal Arts-Focused Grand Challenges Scholars ProgramsAbstractThe National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program
Pilot 3 Sensing connection, Expects confrontation, characterThe stories are organized to reflect the perspective that the author takes toward the problem ofdefining entrepreneurial leadership. Story one, defines the term with an extensive illustration ofthe Film Maker’s vision and approach, outlining the emerging attributes through 5 assertions andsets the stage for the remaining stories. The four remaining story results, presented as mini-composites are utilized for building next research agenda steps.Story two makes the case for the life cycle and career path challenges of the female leader as asenior level administrator in engineering education with a focus on sensing connection andexpecting confrontation, referred to as ‘dean’ for
still emerging, although there have been some paperspublished using this approach15, 16. Tomkins and Eatough17 discuss strategies for use of IPA infocus group settings, highlighting the need for a sensitive approach that acknowledges thedifferences of group-based interactions. Themes from both individual and group interviews arereported in this paper.Positioning and methodological rigor – A key aspect of all qualitative research is the analyst’srole as researcher and research tool, as their understanding and interpretation are central to theproject’s success. To clarify those roles and enact boundaries, IPA calls for a reflective dialoguebetween analyst and participant13. Throughout the process of analysis, the researcher ‘brackets’their
required students to question and analyze assumptions inherent in the technicalmaterial (Lynch & Wolcott, 2001). Other questions required a reflective response thatchallenged students to express and support an opinion in a brief essay-style format (Ralston &Bays, 2010; Romkey & Cheng, 2009; Schafersman, 1991).The SGMA questions on the midterm(s) and final exams were designed to not only promptcritical thinking, but also to review material previously covered and address the full range ofBloom’s Taxonomy (Brown, Roediger, & McDaniel, 2014). They were designed to allowstudents still working on mastery of more fundamental levels of the hierarchy to be able torespond while also presenting a critical thinking challenge for more adept
identifies perceived benefits and challenges for the students engaged in thecompetition. Complementing the report of the team's experience at the 2018 RTZ, this studyemphasizes the importance of teamwork collaboration in the present context of the AEC industrywhile drawing upon concepts of sustainable construction. The study encompasses data collectedfrom: (1) a survey with all the 8 students, (2) interviews with the faculty leader and the studentteam leader, and (3) the reflections of two of the authors of this paper based on their ownexperiences and observations as participants in the 2018 RTZ competition team. Three categoriesemerged from the data and background literature analyzed: teamwork, education and knowledge,skills, and abilities (KSA
theirjobs, and 3) reflection on the tools through journaling. Student evaluations and feedback havedemonstrated the power of these tools for significant improvements and even transformation inorganizational behavior. Future work is needed to potentially isolate effects of such skilldevelopment for engineers as compared with other populations, and to gather data on the relativebenefits of this approach as compared with others. Given the extensive systems skills that engineers have, such systems thinking tools canprovide a powerful way for them to exercise leadership through improvement and optimizationof organizational behavior. Such an approach can complement and augment the prevalentinitiatives for communication, social, and business skill
, thesupport of school conditions, the guarantee of quality monitoring, and the satisfaction ofstudents and customers. The main achievements of engineering education are analyzed, theunderlying problems are analyzed, and countermeasures and suggestions for furtherimproving the quality of engineering education are put forward [4].The “China EngineeringEducation Quality Report” has been released successively since 2014, reflecting the progressof engineering education in China as a whole. In addition, the Chinese academia has alsoconducted research on the issue of quality assurance in engineering education in China,which mainly involves two aspects: existing problems [5] and countermeasures [6].3. Research Method3.1 Literature analysisThe research
, we focus on human diversity as reflective of “broad heterogeneity in socialidentities and statuses represented among individuals in a shared engineering experience” [1].We see these dimensions as situated in, interacting with, and influenced by the cultural andsocial norms in which individuals operate. In turn, individuals affect those cultural norms.Understanding these aspects is increasingly recognized as an important part of learning tobecome an engineer. Though traditional engineering education has been, and to a large extentstill is, focused on students acquiring technical knowledge [2] [3], in the workplace engineers arerequired to bring more than technical expertise to solve problems. As part of their work, theyoften draw on different
Students used a variety of means (models, drawings, graphs, concrete materials, manipulatives, etc.) to 0 1 2 3 4 11 represent phenomena. 12 Students made predictions, estimations and/or hypotheses and devised means for testing them. 0 1 2 3 4 Students were actively engaged in thought-provoking activity that often involved the critical 0 1 2 3 4 13 assessment of procedures. 14 Students were reflective about their learning. 0 1 2 3 4 15 Intellectual rigor, constructive criticism, and the challenging of ideas were valued. 0 1 2 3 4 CLASSROOM
material and in-class activities, a cognitivist approach. The final four semesters (n=152) were structured with aflipped classroom approach. Students accessed course material through weekly online modulesand class time was spent in reflective discussion and experiences based on the material offeredonline, a constructivist approach. The survey included 55 items that covered seven sub-scales:understanding of ethical issues, global awareness (world view), communication skills,organization/leadership skills, self-knowledge, creativity, and teamwork. Only student paired(pre and post) data were used in the analyses in this study. Most survey items had a significantincrease from pre to post course survey response in the desired direction. To evaluate
chilled the classroom?• Celebrate every moment spent on critical self-reflection about teaching The ETW places a premium on reflective self-assessment. The assessment of the third participant class relies heavily on self-assessment, with the intent that workshop participants will continue to develop these skills at their home institutions.There are several items on the list that are not currently in the ETW but could andprobably should be incorporated:• Build coalitions with educators who are different from me in terms of race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, home language, class, (dis)ability, and other identities The suggestion of building a coalition is a great one and it could easily be incorporated into the
easy as possible. • Learning and teaching II, acquiring, compiling, and gathering knowledge: In this section of the individual learning career, the student actually applies the abstract knowledge and gathers his or her own experiences. In order to limit the action and reflection possibilities, the learner interacts within a somewhat restricted, artificial environment, which is reduced in complexity and easy to control by the teacher. To provide feedback, the learning environment is designed to include relevant devices where students can deposit their interim products and teachers can inspect them. The emphasis in this model lies on the learning process of the student. Teachers try to help the
answers, whether correct or not. Logistically, the educator follows the guide sequence in general but often limits time forsense making or reflection. For instance, he frequently minimizes or skips sections of theactivities that require whole group discussion, writing, or reflection; thus each activity runs about15 to 20 minutes under the suggested time. He infrequently emphasizes the activity’s purposewith the whole group (Table 4). His use of questioning strategies with the small groups appearsto support development of engineering habits of mind and sense making. The educator often usesquality pedagogical strategies that support youth, such as open-ended questioning (Table 4).Overall the educator facilitates a youth-directed experience
. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping and then to delivery.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research
reflections. The cycle was augmented by Greenaway’s Active Reviewing Cycle,a model which provides a different way to examine experiential learning [19]. The keywordsfrom this cycle are shown within parentheses in Figure 1. FIGURE 1. KOLB EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING CYCLE WITH GREENWAY’S KEYWORDSThe concrete experience stage is used to engage students in performing some sort of activitywhere they apply their ideas and skills. Experiences from activities generate facts – the events,moments, and details associated with the activity. Next, the reflective observation stageencourages students to reflect on their experiences through mechanisms such as self-evaluation,peer discussion, and instructor feedback. Reflections generate feelings, an
masters programs at our institution. The primary finding,however, was a need for a complete redesign of the “Introduction to Cooperative Education”course.This paper documents the discovery process and includes a summary of the literature andresearch, feedback from industry partners, and observed trends in U.S. employment sectors thatimpact the changing needs of the engineering profession. The course name was changed from“Introduction to Cooperative Education” to “Career Management for Engineers” to reflect thisnew focus. Along with a new name, came new objectives and learning outcomes. The revisionstransformed the one-credit course from being a short-term focused “nuts and bolts” skill buildingclass, to a long-term focused, comprehensive career
approach has also been implemented in core circuits andelectronics courses, design and project courses and similar courses serving engineering and sciencestudents both inside and outside of ECE.Purpose of the Paper: The purpose of this paper is to present results from a series of pilot studies. Data sourcesincluded post surveys from 86 students at 4 selected institutions, reviews of curriculum modulesused in classes, and interviews with faculty/instructors and students at 5 institutions. Outcomesstudied included a series of variables that reflected both precursors to learning, immediateoutcomes, and initial long term outcomes.Background of the Study In 2013, Howard University, in collaboration with Alabama A&M University, FloridaA
numerous transitional points. In developmentalmodels from the field of psychology, empathy tends to be a peripheral but important component.For example, many of these models emphasize the individual’s cognitive growth as a parallelcomponent to their social development (e.g., Hoffman19, Kohlberg34). Other models integrate allaspects of development into a single unifying staged theory, be it their cognitive/ethicaldevelopment (e.g., Perry35) or their reflective judgement (e.g., King and Kitchener36).Stage models tend to include lower stages or tiers of development that the individual attains inearly adolescence. For example, Hoffman developed a stage model of empathic development, butthis model focused solely on the concept of empathic distress
theanalysis we focus on how these engineers reflect on their fit in each job and how they account fortheir decision to pursue a second term of internship or co-op at an organization or, alternately,how they decided not to return. We highlight the cases of three engineers who represent twodifferent experiences of young engineers: trying lots of internships as a student and finding agood fit before graduation versus trying one internship as a student and perceiving oneself as apoor fit for one’s job after graduation. We therefore use this analysis to examine the relationshipbetween undergraduate work experience, perceived fit in a work environment, andattrition/persistence in engineering.Analyses in this area are important to conduct because there is a
paper is based on Reflective Practice (The ReflectivePractitioner, Donald Schön), both in my approach to prototyping the workshop, and the actualparticipant’s experiences of learning through experience and reflection. I am an inventor withover 30 US Utility patents, and have been teaching the use of patent database searching, as anintegral component of design research for 8 years. Research is an early stage design heuristic andan essential part of the functional-technical process of inquiry for creative projects, especiallythose seeking inventive solutions. This paper is my reflection on seeking to create anintroductory workshop that could evolve into a program for other faculty interested in teachingthe introductory lessons of patent protocol
among graduate students of the range of choices, opportunities, and challenges that women must navigate, and of the impact of culture, community, and context on women, whether in their personal lives, in higher education, or in the workplace. 2. Encourage and support the development of community among graduate students.The first goal is more specific, and reflects a desire to promote Michigan State University’s corevalue of inclusiveness.4 Graduate students participating in this program were encouraged toreflect on the unique choices and challenges posed to women in STEM fields, and to considertheir own goals and measures of success. The second goal reflects broader efforts within theCollege of Engineering and Michigan State
, emotional, and self-reflective livesof engineers themselves that fail to “fit into” prevailing professional paradigms of thought andpractice.Cannons refers then not only to military annihilation but also to the systematic drowning out ofvoices/perspectives that diverge from, challenge, or oppose the engineering status quo. Wepropose that these voices and perspectives are essential for the development of technically andmorally robust engineering research and practice. In fact, they are the very thing that wouldenable engineering to truly hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public, andrealize philosopher Charles Harris’ proposed ideal of bettering “the material basis of humanwell-being or quality of life.”3This paper engages in a
Paper ID #16372Making an Impact on Engineering Education Communities: Learning fromthe Past and Looking ForwardDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching Ken Yasuhara is a research scientist at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a campus lead for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), and an instructional consultant in the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching
], Engineering and Science IssuesTest [10], and Reflective Judgment Model [11]. However, assessment using these instrumentshas traditionally occurred after students start college and thus do not provide information abouttheir levels of ethical development in relation to previous experiences [12]. Other studies haveexamined how volunteering, community service, participation in student government, studyabroad, and/or family have influenced students’ decisions to continue in engineering [13],[14].But again, these studies did not examine how those influences specifically shaped engineeringstudents’ ethical reasoning.Work outside the field of engineering has also shed light on students’ understanding of ethicsand social responsibility. Perry’s four-year
are derived primarily throughthe use think-aloud protocols, have little association with one another. Correlations between thetwo types of measure typically range from -.07 to .31 (Veenman, 2005). Several explanationshave been proposed for these low correlations: • Verbal reports obtained during task performance may lack reliability and would not validly reflect people’s cognitive or affective states; • responses to questionnaires typically reflect people’s beliefs or perceptions about their general learning and do not capture specific learning tasks; or • questionnaires and think-aloud protocols measure different kinds of metacognition.The first of these explanations has been addressed by several researchers, most
reflecting on a Capstone experience with the purpose ofsuggestions for improving the experience. The contrast of the ACM literature and the ASEEliterature is that software projects tend to be more focused on design and verification, where theengineering papers tend to have more focus on process such as funding and project launch. Inboth the ACM and ASEE literature review it was most common for Capstone experiences tospan two semesters with some literature suggesting that going to a two-semester program wouldbe beneficial [11].In the literature, the following common question groups were observed, and informed theanalysis and narrative of the case studies in this work: • Project format: How are projects assigned? Are students working independently
coursework.ImplementationTheoretical Framework:The current version of the project was implemented as a cornerstone project (a term commonlyused to refer to a culminating first-year engineering design experience) in 2014 within the secondsemester Programming 2 course of Ohio Northern University’s first-year programmingsequence. To ground the project in a pedagogical framework, this section will outline thetheoretical underpinnings of the project design.As mentioned in the Introduction, the Kolb Cycle of Experiential Learning, illustrated inFigure 1, was used to help organize the series of cornerstone activities into a cyclic pattern ofexperiences and reflections. The cycle was augmented by Greenaway’s Active Reviewing Cycle,a model which provides a different way to examine