, we focus on human diversity as reflective of “broad heterogeneity in socialidentities and statuses represented among individuals in a shared engineering experience” [1].We see these dimensions as situated in, interacting with, and influenced by the cultural andsocial norms in which individuals operate. In turn, individuals affect those cultural norms.Understanding these aspects is increasingly recognized as an important part of learning tobecome an engineer. Though traditional engineering education has been, and to a large extentstill is, focused on students acquiring technical knowledge [2] [3], in the workplace engineers arerequired to bring more than technical expertise to solve problems. As part of their work, theyoften draw on different
Students used a variety of means (models, drawings, graphs, concrete materials, manipulatives, etc.) to 0 1 2 3 4 11 represent phenomena. 12 Students made predictions, estimations and/or hypotheses and devised means for testing them. 0 1 2 3 4 Students were actively engaged in thought-provoking activity that often involved the critical 0 1 2 3 4 13 assessment of procedures. 14 Students were reflective about their learning. 0 1 2 3 4 15 Intellectual rigor, constructive criticism, and the challenging of ideas were valued. 0 1 2 3 4 CLASSROOM
material and in-class activities, a cognitivist approach. The final four semesters (n=152) were structured with aflipped classroom approach. Students accessed course material through weekly online modulesand class time was spent in reflective discussion and experiences based on the material offeredonline, a constructivist approach. The survey included 55 items that covered seven sub-scales:understanding of ethical issues, global awareness (world view), communication skills,organization/leadership skills, self-knowledge, creativity, and teamwork. Only student paired(pre and post) data were used in the analyses in this study. Most survey items had a significantincrease from pre to post course survey response in the desired direction. To evaluate
chilled the classroom?• Celebrate every moment spent on critical self-reflection about teaching The ETW places a premium on reflective self-assessment. The assessment of the third participant class relies heavily on self-assessment, with the intent that workshop participants will continue to develop these skills at their home institutions.There are several items on the list that are not currently in the ETW but could andprobably should be incorporated:• Build coalitions with educators who are different from me in terms of race, sexual orientation, gender, religion, home language, class, (dis)ability, and other identities The suggestion of building a coalition is a great one and it could easily be incorporated into the
easy as possible. • Learning and teaching II, acquiring, compiling, and gathering knowledge: In this section of the individual learning career, the student actually applies the abstract knowledge and gathers his or her own experiences. In order to limit the action and reflection possibilities, the learner interacts within a somewhat restricted, artificial environment, which is reduced in complexity and easy to control by the teacher. To provide feedback, the learning environment is designed to include relevant devices where students can deposit their interim products and teachers can inspect them. The emphasis in this model lies on the learning process of the student. Teachers try to help the
answers, whether correct or not. Logistically, the educator follows the guide sequence in general but often limits time forsense making or reflection. For instance, he frequently minimizes or skips sections of theactivities that require whole group discussion, writing, or reflection; thus each activity runs about15 to 20 minutes under the suggested time. He infrequently emphasizes the activity’s purposewith the whole group (Table 4). His use of questioning strategies with the small groups appearsto support development of engineering habits of mind and sense making. The educator often usesquality pedagogical strategies that support youth, such as open-ended questioning (Table 4).Overall the educator facilitates a youth-directed experience
. Companies that she has worked with renew their commitment to innovation. She also helps students an- swer these questions when she teaches some of these methods to engineering, design, business, medicine, and law students. Her courses use active storytelling and self-reflective observation as one form to help student and industry leaders traverse across the iterative stages of a project- from the early, inspirational stages to prototyping and then to delivery.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research
reflections. The cycle was augmented by Greenaway’s Active Reviewing Cycle,a model which provides a different way to examine experiential learning [19]. The keywordsfrom this cycle are shown within parentheses in Figure 1. FIGURE 1. KOLB EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING CYCLE WITH GREENWAY’S KEYWORDSThe concrete experience stage is used to engage students in performing some sort of activitywhere they apply their ideas and skills. Experiences from activities generate facts – the events,moments, and details associated with the activity. Next, the reflective observation stageencourages students to reflect on their experiences through mechanisms such as self-evaluation,peer discussion, and instructor feedback. Reflections generate feelings, an
masters programs at our institution. The primary finding,however, was a need for a complete redesign of the “Introduction to Cooperative Education”course.This paper documents the discovery process and includes a summary of the literature andresearch, feedback from industry partners, and observed trends in U.S. employment sectors thatimpact the changing needs of the engineering profession. The course name was changed from“Introduction to Cooperative Education” to “Career Management for Engineers” to reflect thisnew focus. Along with a new name, came new objectives and learning outcomes. The revisionstransformed the one-credit course from being a short-term focused “nuts and bolts” skill buildingclass, to a long-term focused, comprehensive career
approach has also been implemented in core circuits andelectronics courses, design and project courses and similar courses serving engineering and sciencestudents both inside and outside of ECE.Purpose of the Paper: The purpose of this paper is to present results from a series of pilot studies. Data sourcesincluded post surveys from 86 students at 4 selected institutions, reviews of curriculum modulesused in classes, and interviews with faculty/instructors and students at 5 institutions. Outcomesstudied included a series of variables that reflected both precursors to learning, immediateoutcomes, and initial long term outcomes.Background of the Study In 2013, Howard University, in collaboration with Alabama A&M University, FloridaA
numerous transitional points. In developmentalmodels from the field of psychology, empathy tends to be a peripheral but important component.For example, many of these models emphasize the individual’s cognitive growth as a parallelcomponent to their social development (e.g., Hoffman19, Kohlberg34). Other models integrate allaspects of development into a single unifying staged theory, be it their cognitive/ethicaldevelopment (e.g., Perry35) or their reflective judgement (e.g., King and Kitchener36).Stage models tend to include lower stages or tiers of development that the individual attains inearly adolescence. For example, Hoffman developed a stage model of empathic development, butthis model focused solely on the concept of empathic distress
theanalysis we focus on how these engineers reflect on their fit in each job and how they account fortheir decision to pursue a second term of internship or co-op at an organization or, alternately,how they decided not to return. We highlight the cases of three engineers who represent twodifferent experiences of young engineers: trying lots of internships as a student and finding agood fit before graduation versus trying one internship as a student and perceiving oneself as apoor fit for one’s job after graduation. We therefore use this analysis to examine the relationshipbetween undergraduate work experience, perceived fit in a work environment, andattrition/persistence in engineering.Analyses in this area are important to conduct because there is a
paper is based on Reflective Practice (The ReflectivePractitioner, Donald Schön), both in my approach to prototyping the workshop, and the actualparticipant’s experiences of learning through experience and reflection. I am an inventor withover 30 US Utility patents, and have been teaching the use of patent database searching, as anintegral component of design research for 8 years. Research is an early stage design heuristic andan essential part of the functional-technical process of inquiry for creative projects, especiallythose seeking inventive solutions. This paper is my reflection on seeking to create anintroductory workshop that could evolve into a program for other faculty interested in teachingthe introductory lessons of patent protocol
among graduate students of the range of choices, opportunities, and challenges that women must navigate, and of the impact of culture, community, and context on women, whether in their personal lives, in higher education, or in the workplace. 2. Encourage and support the development of community among graduate students.The first goal is more specific, and reflects a desire to promote Michigan State University’s corevalue of inclusiveness.4 Graduate students participating in this program were encouraged toreflect on the unique choices and challenges posed to women in STEM fields, and to considertheir own goals and measures of success. The second goal reflects broader efforts within theCollege of Engineering and Michigan State
, emotional, and self-reflective livesof engineers themselves that fail to “fit into” prevailing professional paradigms of thought andpractice.Cannons refers then not only to military annihilation but also to the systematic drowning out ofvoices/perspectives that diverge from, challenge, or oppose the engineering status quo. Wepropose that these voices and perspectives are essential for the development of technically andmorally robust engineering research and practice. In fact, they are the very thing that wouldenable engineering to truly hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public, andrealize philosopher Charles Harris’ proposed ideal of bettering “the material basis of humanwell-being or quality of life.”3This paper engages in a
Paper ID #16372Making an Impact on Engineering Education Communities: Learning fromthe Past and Looking ForwardDr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching Ken Yasuhara is a research scientist at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a campus lead for the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), and an instructional consultant in the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching
], Engineering and Science IssuesTest [10], and Reflective Judgment Model [11]. However, assessment using these instrumentshas traditionally occurred after students start college and thus do not provide information abouttheir levels of ethical development in relation to previous experiences [12]. Other studies haveexamined how volunteering, community service, participation in student government, studyabroad, and/or family have influenced students’ decisions to continue in engineering [13],[14].But again, these studies did not examine how those influences specifically shaped engineeringstudents’ ethical reasoning.Work outside the field of engineering has also shed light on students’ understanding of ethicsand social responsibility. Perry’s four-year
are derived primarily throughthe use think-aloud protocols, have little association with one another. Correlations between thetwo types of measure typically range from -.07 to .31 (Veenman, 2005). Several explanationshave been proposed for these low correlations: • Verbal reports obtained during task performance may lack reliability and would not validly reflect people’s cognitive or affective states; • responses to questionnaires typically reflect people’s beliefs or perceptions about their general learning and do not capture specific learning tasks; or • questionnaires and think-aloud protocols measure different kinds of metacognition.The first of these explanations has been addressed by several researchers, most
reflecting on a Capstone experience with the purpose ofsuggestions for improving the experience. The contrast of the ACM literature and the ASEEliterature is that software projects tend to be more focused on design and verification, where theengineering papers tend to have more focus on process such as funding and project launch. Inboth the ACM and ASEE literature review it was most common for Capstone experiences tospan two semesters with some literature suggesting that going to a two-semester program wouldbe beneficial [11].In the literature, the following common question groups were observed, and informed theanalysis and narrative of the case studies in this work: • Project format: How are projects assigned? Are students working independently
coursework.ImplementationTheoretical Framework:The current version of the project was implemented as a cornerstone project (a term commonlyused to refer to a culminating first-year engineering design experience) in 2014 within the secondsemester Programming 2 course of Ohio Northern University’s first-year programmingsequence. To ground the project in a pedagogical framework, this section will outline thetheoretical underpinnings of the project design.As mentioned in the Introduction, the Kolb Cycle of Experiential Learning, illustrated inFigure 1, was used to help organize the series of cornerstone activities into a cyclic pattern ofexperiences and reflections. The cycle was augmented by Greenaway’s Active Reviewing Cycle,a model which provides a different way to examine
comes out or begins transitioning between the ages of 18 and 24[14]. This itself is a process with additional social and material support needs which canovershadow the demands of the classroom.Resiliency and social support Resiliency refers to the processes used to overcome challenging situations and adapt tothe demands of life, with particular attention on the unique strategies employed by marginalizedgroups [16, 17]. Transgender and gender nonconforming students are often written about throughdeficit framing which define their lives in terms of their trauma or perceived academic failure[13, 18]. In contrast, resilience is “reflected by achievement in career development, happiness,relationships, and physical well-being in the presence
included. People have images in their heads about the meaning of thegender terminology--sex, gender-role, male/female, masculine/feminine, but these images aredefined by the fact that they reflect an individual’s familiar world.d. Previously dismissed or under-explored psychological factors like character and emotionalresponses may be very important in understanding complex 21st Century issues of leadership andentrepreneurship.We begin by briefly discussing how this preliminary investigation came into being— one of theauthor’s personal path into it, the creation of collaborative FIE and ASEE sessions, and how theevolving design of the research methods parallel the key features of an approach tounderstanding leadership, gender and teams.The
University. In addition to technical research interest in applied surface chemistry, her engineering education research interests include the learning of engineering modeling, the impact of reflective practice in learning engineering, authentic assessment methods, and "girl-friendly" education.Judy Sutor, Arizona State University Judy Sutor is a graduate student in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at Arizona State University. She earned her BSEE degree at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, then spent 22 years working in Research and New Product Development in the Semiconductor industry. Her principle research area is in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and
system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 2 (design an activity or demonstration to teach a concept using creativity and innovative ideas) 3 ABET f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (need for outreach and science education to the public, professionalism) 4 ABET g. Ability to communicate effectively. (to a non-technical audience, with multimedia presentation and in written report) 5 ABET i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning. (reflect on experience and continuing outreach after graduation) The undergraduates performed the outreach activity at a local Junior High
the K-12 level. Page 23.313.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Competition Based Learning in the ClassroomIntroduction Traditional engineering courses at most universities have been taught for decades with a3-hour lecture format, usually meeting for either three 50-minute lectures, or two 75-minutelectures each week. In both formats, the course is generally taught with passive, abstract(theoretical), verbal, and sequential teaching styles, in other words, the instructor presents thematerial with little time for experimentation or reflection
(Prepare, Teach One Another, Ponder and Prove)were used to create the course and each module of instruction.Best Practice 1: Be Present at the Course Site6Each module of the course includes a lesson reflection where students can post an evaluation ofthe lesson. A question and answer discussion board is also an important aspect of the coursewhere students can ask each other questions as well as receive responses to questions from theirinstructor. Further contact with instructors can be made with email. Page 23.431.13Students expect that their instructors will be present in an online course multiple times a week,and at best, daily. A flipped
-city children, cancer patients, and individuals struggling with gender and immigration issues.The original study that proposed photo elicitation supplied the photographs to participants,asking them to use the photos as a starting point for their responses and reflections.20 Otherstudies have followed suit, particularly when examining gender issues.29 The benefits of thisform of the method include not relying on participants to follow through on the requirement tobring their own photos which adhere to assigned categories; having control over being able togeneralize the study’s results; and ensuring a baseline for comparison. However, this version ofthe method limits two of the main benefits of photo elicitation in general: empowerment17
, china, comparative education research, culture, engineering education,ideology, internationalization, policy, policymakingIntroduction: The History and Politics of Policy Borrowing in ChinaPolicy borrowing has been a prevailing strategy for reforming education policies in mostdeveloping countries, reflecting a more general tendency toward dependence on foreignexpertise, information, and financing.1 As a developing country, China has been borrowingeducation policies from developed countries since the mid nineteenth century, including in the Page 24.497.2field of engineering education. In fact, one critical question throughout the modern history
reflect on and modify their curricula prior to implementation in their ownclassrooms. The STEM summer camps included students from grades 4-8, and teachers wereable to pilot their curricula with a group of approximately eight students for two 2.5 hoursummer camp sessions. During the fall, the teachers made changes to their curricula based ontheir pilot experiences, so they were ready to implement the curricula in their classrooms.ParticipantsOur sample includes 10 participants who developed 5 curricular units during the summerinstitute. The participants are affiliated with 8 schools within 2 large districts in the Midwest.Table 1 provides information about the participants and their schools. Only units that wereimplemented into the classroom by
a real-world manner. FE learning modules provide specific instructions onhow to build the FE model of the engineering problem to increase student performance in theanalysis for “Concrete Experience” on Kolb’s Cycle. Page 24.212.7 4 Figure 1. Kolb Learning CycleLearning StylesEach FE ALM developed in this work is designed to span a spectrum of different characteristicsin which students learn. The Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles25 is composed of fourdimensions: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global