, active learning days took on a variety of formats including bothindividual and group work. Some examples of activities are detailed in Table 2. Activity Name Activity Description Group or Individual? Kahoot Quiz Game Students work through Options for both team and problems and submit answers individual play via their phones or other devices and compete with their classmates on a leaderboard Gallery Walk Students work through Group problems in a small group and write out their
identified as an important time in forming self-efficacy and identity which willaffect career choices made in high school and college [3]. Other work [4] suggests that open- © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceended STEM exploration in a group collaborative setting is conducive to positive STEM identitydevelopment, due to the identity formation that occurs in the context of relationship-buildingwith peers during STEM activities.The University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a large, public land-grant university in the Midwest,located in Lincoln, Nebraska, which contains a sizeable public school district, servingapproximately 40,000 students. A significant
underrepresented students must develop together in the class activities. CRPempowers the teachers' role as a designer in implementing policies and sociocultural research fordeveloping three main competencies in classrooms. The first competence that CRP teachers haveis student learning. Ladson-Billings redefined this term in 2021. She writes that it means howmuch the student grows in one scholarly period that begins in the fall and finishes in the spring-measuring this individual growth. CRP highlights this growth and avoids demerits of thestandards test; CRP considers that standardized tests do not measure other meaningful learningthat students could have acquired during the academic year. The second competence, CulturalCompetence in the context of CRP
incorporating inclusive design ideas into theengineering curriculum, educators may prepare students to create technically sound, sociallyresponsible, and globally beneficial solutions. In line with engineering's practicality and solution-oriented approach, this integration directly addresses DEIBJ values. This work-in-progress paperdescribes a multi-week activity on DEIBJ and ID in a 100-level multidisciplinary engineeringdesign course. Our course introduces basic engineering principles and methods through lecturesand labs. Coursework includes computer-aided design, MATLAB programming, andtransdisciplinary project creation through hands-on projects. The course uses technical writing,oral presentations, and team-based problem-solving. These strategies
school student joined as a part of their co-curricularinternship opportunities. The group found that the shredded rubber tires can be shredded into thedesired size to enhance the load carrying capacity of weak soils. The study resulted into 7presentations and a peer reviewed publication. Shown in Figure 3 are the photographs of rubbertire mixed soil and increase in density of soil after mixing shredded tire, 10% by weight. TheCSUF seniors are graduating this year and pursuing graduate study whereas the CSUF graduatestudent is pursuing PhD at a renowned US university. The community college student isapplying to transfer into a civil engineering program, whereas the high school student gotadmission into an engineering program at the university of
approach we will again use the conservation of mechanical energy for the mass bulletsystem and write kinetic and potential energy and set them equal to each other as below. (MB + mb) gH = ½ (MB + mb) VB2 (8)where the symbols MB, mb, and H were defined previously in solution 1 and 2. VB is the speed ofthe bullet and the block after collision. From Eqn. 8, we also obtain the same value for the finalvelocity of the block and the bullet (VB) equal to 4.43 m/s as in solution 1 and 2. Now, byapplying conservation of linear momentum as in Eqn. 4, we obtain the initial speed of the bullet(vb) as 143 m/s.Critical evaluation of solutionsIn this new problem solving approach, instead of presenting the correct
designed to help bridge the gap between students’ high schoolmath, science, and writing skills, and those needed to navigate the rigorous undergraduate STEMcurriculum at NYU-Poly. However, in past years some GS students continued to struggleacademically after participating in the summer program, and especially in math courses. Toaddress this, NYU-Poly developed a mandatory online summer math component in 2010 tointroduce GS students to math at the college-level. The e-Math Forum was designed to increasestudent mastery of mathematics by providing an opportunity to review and deepen themathematics they learned in high school. 467A secondary goal of the GS online summer program was to provide an
and introductory engineering technologycourses. The entering students were exposed to a multi-dimensional course whose basic purposewas to efficiently provide not only an understanding of what is involved in the ‘design process’performed in industry but also the opportunity to employ and develop those design functions andskills at the very outset of the students’ undergraduate experience. The several components ofthe course were integrated to include: Use of technical resources Technical report writing and oral delivery Research into the functions of technical societies Comprehensive discussions of fundamental manufacturing processes followed by design projects that would employ a given process towards the redesign
LabView or otherprogram to precisely control the heating and cooling cycle. This precision control will allowcadets to better coordinate the electric fields of the two crystals in order to increase the energy ofthe deuterium gas ions and increase the probability of D-D fusion. Copyright ASEE Middle Atlantic Regional Conference April 29-30, Farmingdale State College, SUNYAssessmentCadets are assessed on their experimental, research, and independent study effort through timeinvested, progress made, and the final product of the research. Typically, cadets must write apaper worthy of a peer-reviewed journal, construct and present a poster at a professionalconference and give a presentation to the
learning) with the other halfused for site visits, guest speakers, and in-class worksessions. There are no exams or quizzes.Grades are based solely on the interim reports (assignments) and the final project report.Course Grading and AssessmentDuring the 2001 and 2002 fall semesters, student evaluation and grading were done solely by theinstructor. Peer evaluation of group work was conducted using a paper-based form whichevaluated the contribution of other team members. Assessment included the standard NDSUStudent Rating of Instruction (SROI) form, as well as, an additional paper-based form, created bythe instructor which requested student feedback concerning the course delivery, perceived studentlearning, and evaluation methods [3]. During the
be provided for those elements of the course that are qualitative in nature such as theDiscussion Assignments. Other elements such as multiple choices, True False questioning methods aregraded on a points earned basis and this does not require any rubric.In the Figure 6 we illustrate the initial discussion grading rubric. Note there is a rebuttal grading rubric aswell which is similar but uses different submission length and frequency. After repeated use by severalfaculty members we can conclude that due to the rubric student communication is cognitively deep,embedded with peer references, and indicative of a student oriented environment. Moreover, studentswere using high level cognitive skills such as inferencing and judgment as well as
consisting of process engineers to upper management and from multinationalcompanies to start up companies. This allowed the “instructors” to determine which KSA’s to focuson in the course. IntroductionMainstream graduate STEM education programs are traditionally designed to train students foracademic careers as they focus on knowledge and skills related to laboratory research practices,writing technical journal papers, and presenting results at conferences to academic peers. Thismethod of education has value in preparing students for academic careers but falls short in Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at
Paper ID #38245[Full Research Paper, Ethical Engineering in Industry and AppliedContexts] Responsibility and Accountability: Faculty Leaders, EthicsFrameworks, and Disciplinary EnculturationDr. Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida Laurie A. Pinkert is an Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric and Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at the University of Central Florida. Her research examines the role of communication practices and writing infrastructures in disciplinary development within fields such as engineering.Prof. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Associate Professor
workingprogram for use as an assignment for students in beginning computer classes.Ada Lovelace: A Short BiographyAda Lovelace was the only legitimate daughter of George Gordon Lord Byron, the famous poet,peer, and politician [4]. Lord Byron achieved an immense reputation for his poetry and playboyantics in his own lifetime and is still regarded as one of the most important British Romanticpoets. Shortly after Ada’s birth, Lord Byron separated from his wife [4]. He died tragically ofdisease while fighting in the Greek War of Independence in 1824, when Ada was eight years old[4]. In 1833, the novelist Edward Bulwer Lytton wrote of Byron’s death: “When Byron passedaway, we turned to the actual and practical career of life: we awoke from the morbid
and biomechanics(bicycle). My initial lab was utilized as a first year engineering course, conceived tointroduce new students to the devices which engineers have created, and thus to defineengineering early as an activity dominated by device design, fabrication, and repair,rather than by math , chemistry, and physics5. Having now incorporated devices from a range of engineering disciplines, a nextbroadening arose through collaboration with the English department to create a first yearcourse in reading and writing about technology, engineers and scientists, and history.The joint offering of device lab with the English instructor’s writing course allowed a yet
feedback from the target audience: students. This textbook was co-authored by a studentwho had recently taken the class. This student was able to draw from their own experiences fromtaking the course, to better focus the book on student learning and expectations. Being cognizantof these recent experiences, the emphasis of the text was an example-based approach to learningin addition to making the text interactive and engaging. It is noted the student co-author isemployed by the University of Pittsburgh Study Lab, a free tutoring service which is offered to alluniversity students. Through the Study Lab, the co-author received certification from the CollegeReading and Learning Association in peer tutoring and new tutor training. The student co
thinking, creativity and innovation skills, inInnovations in Technology Conference.14. Vurkac, M. (2014). Integrating philosophy, cognitive science, and computational methods ata polytechnic institution: Experiences of interdisciplinary course designs for critical thinking, inProceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.15. Bayles, T.M. (2013). A reflective writing assignment to engage students in critical thinking,in Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.16. Cajander, A., Daniels, M., Peters, A.K., and McDermott, R. (2014). Critical thinking, peer-writing, and the importance of feedback, in Frontiers in Education Conference.17. Piergiovanni, P.R. (2014
thecourse material. Lord and Orkwiszewski (2006) implement inquiry-based methods in a collegebiology lab, where students were asked to develop a laboratory to investigate osmolarity. Theresults were compared to a control group which performed the original lab, and it was found thaton average students not only better enjoyed the inquiry lab, but also scored slightly higher on apost-lab quiz. Gormally, et al. (2009) showed that students who participated in an inquiry-basedintroductory biology course demonstrated more improvements in science literacy and researchskills when compared to peers who enrolled in a commensurate traditional course. Interestingly,the students in the traditional course were more likely to have more confidence in the
commentariesfocused on concepts like “research quality,” “rigor,” and “systematic research,” as well asaccompanying shifts in the various criteria used to evaluate funding proposals and peer reviewedpapers. The field’s topical foci are also something of a moving target given a long and episodichistory of efforts to reinvent the form and content of engineering curricula. As the methods anddesired outcomes of engineering instruction change, so does the engineering education researchagenda. Further worth noting are rising pressures to relate research to practice, as reflected inmandates to identify the “broader impacts” associated with scholarly work in the field.This paper speaks to these challenges through the lens of our team’s recent experiences workingon a
disciplinary-based education research forher professional development. The area of her focus is in an advanced area of her discipline (e.g.,not the first-year experience), although she will not have a Ph.D. in this area. During her M.S.degree (which was disciplinary, rather than education focused), she undertook a substantial revi-sion to the way in which disciplinary writing conventions were taught and assessed in an upper-level undergraduate course.Julian is a full professor in an engineering department at teaching-focused college (in the area inwhich he earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.). Julian’s primary efforts involve teaching undergrad-uate courses, participating in major departmental efforts and innovations, and contributing tolarger
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) in Electrical Engineering in 2012. She was an Assistant Professor at the Electrical and Instrumentation Department of Los Medanos College during 2016-2017 academic year. She was an Adjunct Faculty at San Francisco State University and Diablo Valley College during 2015-2016 academic year, and an instructor at UWM from January 2014 until May 2015. She has taught Control Systems Design course several times, and has adopted different methods of teaching in her classes. She is a member of IEEE, and has several publications in IEEE and peer reviewed journals. Her primary research interests include nonlinear control, adaptive control, and robust control, and simulation of linear and
pursuing one. To serve this population, and enable theirrich practical work experiences to enhance the education of our traditional on-campus students,we are implementing the following scenario.Local technical workers stay in their offices at lunch-time sitting at computers armed withheadphones and microphones to attend, and participate in, an electric circuits class via aninternet connection. Other students, on the university campus, sit in a traditional classroomsetting augmented with room microphones. Both groups of students view the electronicwhiteboard that is generated by the instructor writing on a Tablet PC projected to the campusclassroom through an LCD projector and to the off-campus students through Adobe Connectsoftware. Two students
tools, toolevaluation and web information seeking.2. Literature Review2. 1 Novice Researchers’ DifficultiesNovice researchers in a new field usually face various kinds of challenges. Hockey7 portrays thefirst year of PhD as the most crucial and difficult period because students “initially encounterand experience intellectual and social processes at their point of maximum novelty”(p1). Muchresearch has been done about the challenges and issues first-year PhD students or junior researchstudents face, including social isolation, productivity, financing, discrepancies with advisers, andunequal accesses to peer culture and academic culture7,9–13. An important area of doctoral studythat has received little attention is the development of
AC 2012-5469: INTERDISCIPLINARY PEDAGOGY FOR PERVASIVE COM-PUTING DESIGN PROCESSES: AN EVALUATIVE ANALYSISDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech where she serves as Assistant Department Head for Graduate Education and co-directs the Virginia Tech Engi- neering Communication Center. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include: interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design, writing across the curriculum in stat- ics courses, and a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios
; ≠ familiarize the students with basics of engineering design; ≠ promote interaction with engineering faculty and staff; ≠ develop technical writing and communication skills.2. Course OrganizationThe course is scheduled as a 6 hour laboratory, meeting three times per week for two hours persession, with four faculty instructing. As the course supports a large number of students (96students at most in the current organization), and large class sizes would limit student-facultyinteraction, the students are distributed into six approximately equal smaller groupings. On anygiven day of the week, these six groups are distributed among three classrooms and activities,each of which has a different emphasis: ‘learn’, ‘plan’, and ‘do’. The two groups in
State was theemphasis on more active engagement of students in their own learning. The general educationcurriculum has always been and still is defined by skills and content areas or “knowledgedomains,” constituting a substantial 45 credits of the university-wide degree requirements.These include writing and speaking, quantification, health and physical activity, natural sciences,arts, humanities, social and behavioral sciences, and international and U.S. cultures. The new,Faculty Senate-approved requirement, however, stipulated that active learning elements shouldbe incorporated into the delivery of all courses carrying general education credit, namely activeuse of writing, speaking and other forms of self expression; opportunity for
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationcompared to their peers in foreign countries. Alienation from engineering and science begins earlyfor many students who might eventually, in their maturity, be active decision-makers in policy.High technological advances require engineers with satisfactory levels of math and science.Students are rarely motivated to appreciate the value of studying math and science. Math, scienceand engineering courses are intellectually more demanding and require more application and studythan some other fields of study. Our modern society needs problem solvers. Mathematics, scienceand engineering are integral part for problem solving methods. Improving the problem solvingskills will improve the quality of
2003, American Society for Engineering Education Liberal Arts Electives 33.8% Figure 2. Percentage of Average Curriculum Allocated to Liberal Arts Topics Liberal Arts Elec. 1 Liberal Arts Elec. 2 Liberal Arts Elec. 3 Liberal Arts Elec. 4 Liberal Arts Elec. 5 Liberal Arts Elec. 6 English Comp. I English Comp. II Speech Comm. Technical Writing Economics Open Elec. 1 Open Elec. 2 Open Elec. 3 Open Elec. 4 History Philosophy/Religion 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0
, and scholarly work. Teaching can be evaluated on the basis o fstudent evaluation, peer evaluation, improvements in teaching style, writing teachingsupplements for a course, and other similar activities. Page 7.165.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationService to the Faculty can be judged based on the willingness and participation of teachers in theimprovement of the Faculty both in the academic areas as well as improving the image of theFaculty. Helping in the preparation of proposal for
professionals to maintain the countries’ relevance in these fields, thus anannual increase in the number of students who graduate with a STEM degree is required to meetthis demand. These calls also emphasize the need to increase graduation rates for studentsbelonging to groups that are underrepresented in STEM, as they currently leave STEM majors athigher rates than their represented peers. Undergraduate research experiences are frequentlyimplicated as a means for increasing interest in STEM fields and STEM graduate programs, andare correlated to students persisting to graduation. While research experiences can positivelyinfluence persistence in STEM fields, there are inequities in who gets to participate in theseexperiences. The limited number of