faculty-to-student ratio and the faculty members teach all of the courses including labs.The ratio is typically 12-to-1 and the typical size of this course is 30 students. The faculty arerequired to actively engage with the students and have multiple office hours during the week.This paper will present a literature review of similar engineering courses offered online at otheruniversities and compare and contrast the implementation with the one described here. Inaddition, the methods will be described with respect to the objectives, outcomes, format, andassignments. The qualitative and quantitative results of student performance as measured by theassignments and end of course surveys will be compared to the on-campus format. The authorhas also
Institutional Research, Planning,and Assessment (IRPA) Office and the other worked as a member of the Center for the Practiceand Scholarship of Education (CPSE). For the IRPA placement, the funding was provided Page 26.1569.4through grant support, while for the CPSE placement, funding was secured through multipleinternal sources (e.g., collaboration with other programs). As mentioned previously, the fourstudents all participated in meaningfully different projects (detailed in Table 1). In each case, thestudent had contact with faculty, staff, members of the upper administration, and undergraduatestudents at RHIT. Table 1
Paper ID #13909UAS Applications in Arctic Remote SensingDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks MICHAEL C. HATFIELD, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing University of Alaska Fairbanks; Fairbanks, AK 99775.5919 Email: mchatfield@alaska.edu; Office phone: 907.474.6098 1. PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION Ohio Northern University, Electrical Engineering (Math major), B.S. 1984 California State University Fresno, Electrical Engineering, M.S. 1987 University of Alaska Fairbanks, Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering, Ph.D. 1999 2. APPOINTMENTS 2013-present: Assis- tant
Page 26.1621.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Understanding Curricular Approaches to Communication as a Global Competency: A Study of the Teaching and Learning of Communication Skills at Three UniversitiesIntroductionAs society grows more global and interconnected, the challenges that must be addressed by thenext generation of engineers are becoming more complex [1-2]. Engineers need deep technicalexpertise, of course, but they also need what have typically been called 21st-century skills, forexample, critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork, and communication. Technicalknowledge and “soft” skills are
while the semanticinconsistency was easily identifiable, the various conceptual inconsistencies wouldrequire multiple papers to resolve. And if the process is supposed to develop anevolutionary roadmap for the engineering education enterprise, it may be helpful more toask what social evolutionary goals exist than accepting implied direction from anarbitrary process dependent solely on the authority of the participants.Systemic and Structural FlawsThough the process is still at its beginnings, it is important to recognize that there areserious systemic and structural flaws in both the process and product. These are: 1. Dependence on unsupported expert authority for KSAs and their priorities.Few would argue that many of the KSAs are important
of Habitat projects.IntroductionHabitat for Humanity, often referred to as Habitat, is an international non-profit organization thatbuilds and repairs housing for low income families by utilizing the labor of volunteers andpartner families, donated materials and professional labor, efficient building methods, modesthouse sizes, and no-profit loans. Founded in Americus Georgia, Habitat has more than 1,400affiliates in the United States and around the world. The organization has built over 800,000homes and shelters. According to Habitat, the “houses are simple, decent and affordable to low-income families around the world, and, whenever possible, build sustainable, energy-efficientand healthy housing” [1].As part of community outreach efforts
with just 1 egg, while a group that was encouraged to iterate was provided a full carton of eggs. This was the only example found of the egg drop challenge with an explicit process of iterative design; understandably so due to the mess involved of many broken eggs. In addition, no cases were found where instrumentation was used to identify causes of failure in an egg drop project and used to improve the design iteration. Hamon et. al.8 evaluated the effectiveness of physical prototyping vs. simulation for a 4 bar linkage challenge, but this type of assessment has been lacking with projects similar to the egg drop exercise. This paper
sabbatical depends on at least three factors: (1) The situation in the applicant’s department,college, and university (staffing, and the institution’s emphasis on curriculum revision, newcourse development, and/or externally funded research); The availability of a site willing to hostthe faculty member, and perhaps provide funding for parts of the expenses of the sabbatical; (3)Career factors of the applicant. Such factors might include: A shift in career emphasis A research need (concentrated time, lab time or equipment access, collaboration, etc.) Page 26.1351.3 Time for learning a new topic or technique, for teaching or research
between student and teaching assistantperceptions or between subgroups of students.MethodsA mixed methods survey was implemented with 12 Likert scale questions paired with a freeresponse portion (Appendix A). The study was designed using a concurrent triangulationstrategy (Fig. 1) as described in Creswell (2012)15 because it was anticipated that quantitativeresults would need to be corroborated and expanded by qualitative responses. Quantitative Qualitative Quantitative Qualitative Data Collection Data Collection Quantitative Qualitative Data Analysis
design byconsidering its various related layer properties, Analyze the product based on the factors used andto be able to obtain Results based on real time data. To meet this objective, interactive hands onsessions were used with the help of three graduate research assistants at XXXXXX. The stepsfollowed to achieve the said objective are illustrated in Figure 1. The information contentprovided to the students was designed to make them acquainted in the fields of Computer Aidedmodelling, Additive Manufacturing and Statistical Analysis. The main intention here wasincrease their interest in the field of STEM by providing them with sufficient technicalknowledge to successfully complete their assigned project
Education columns 1, discussing thephilosophical, practical, and institutional effects badging might have on the academy. Olneck,for example, describes badges as ‘insurgent credentials’ capable of subverting the traditionalinstitutional monopoly on recognition of knowledge and achievement. 2 Science’s editor in chiefhas suggested a badge-like approach to creating a STEM challenge award program that “mightprovide 100 different challenges to choose from at each level of schooling…on subjects fromreptiles to Web design,”3 modeled loosely on the Boy Scout merit badge system that givesstudents a variety of options to demonstrate their mastery of a subject.The Open Badge System Framework describes some of the core functions of badges:capturing an
Page 26.295.4establish the requisite policies and processes that nurture the innovative and creative process, andwill provide no more than a manageable level of resistance to change. Students must berecognized as having diverse needs, skills, and abilities, and must be given the appropriate accessto innovation space resources. Given the entrepreneurial nature of innovation spaces, intellectualproperty rights regulations and policies must be strictly adhered to.1 Further, issues might include limited funding or the fact that there may be innovationopportunities that are not considered in scope of funding. Space limits might also be aconstraining factor; problems arise with resource constraints if spaces are not flexible enough ordo not
suggestions to expand the hub to provide additional value.These suggestions collectively pointed to the need for a broader framework to enable continuedgrowth beyond the communications focus. The CDHub 1.0 chapter ended with the conclusionof the initial grant funding following the 2012 conference. With support from a small NSF grant, Page 26.335.2a new team of capstone educators is pursuing CDHub 2.0, the next iteration of the capstonedesign hub platform.Scope and TimelineThe scope of the CDHub 2.0 initiative was to plan, develop, and pilot test the next version of theonline capstone design hub, as illustrated in the timeline in Figure 1. Unlike its
writing process. The first two workshops were held in the Fallof 2014. The whole series is based on Dr. Patrick Bahls’s research and ideas. Professor Bahls wasan integral part of Workshop #1, in which he presented strategies of integrated writing assignmentsin regular, non-writing-intensive courses. The 8 faculty recruits were from science-relateddisciplines across the university. Each faculty member teaches between 1 and 3 courses thatinclude a writing assignment. Student participants were be drawn from the faculty members’courses, for an approximate total number of 160-200 students.Genres in Academic and Workplace Engineering Environments Various writing genres have been identified during faculty discussions and activities overthe course
, and projectmanagement with several milestones and demonstration checkpoints. As part of the final project,the teams were required to keep agendas, meeting minutes, and progress memos. The teams alsoperformed group processing, alternating roles, and effective decision making. The final project forFall 2015 is shown in Figure 1. The term culminated with a final projects competition where theteams used their project to compete in various game rounds. Table 1 summarizes the schedule forthe freshman design course as well as connections between the assignments and other courses orconcentrations in their discipline. Figure 1: Simon Electronic Memory Game Final Project One major change from the original version of the course was
Sciences havemade strides to assess gender differences in science and engineering by examining thedistribution of federal research funds32. PCAST (President's Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology) called for more spending at every point of the Science and Engineering pipeline.Universities have been called to 1) increase retention rates among undergraduates who declare aninterest in science and engineering degrees and 2) improve the climate for women. Without theimplementation and enforcement of Title IX, institutions will continue to miss the mark forattracting and retaining women and underrepresented populations.Sevo’s 2009 Literature Overview provides much of the history and development of theapplication of Title IX to Science and
: Qualitative Results from a Multi-Year SurveyAbstractWe identify and discuss themes that emerged from a study of undergraduates participating in asummer research program at Michigan State University. The goals of this study were: (1) toexamine the degree to which program participation diverted students from summer activities thatdid not further their academic or career goals; (2) to better understand students’ goals forparticipating in research; and (3) to assess student satisfaction with the research program.Students were asked to complete pre- and post-experience surveys; these two survey instrumentswere deployed during multiple summer programs over a four-year time period (2011-2014),resulting in four sets of pre- and post-survey data from more
design costs wereroutinely reaching the tens of millions of dollars 3. Given these constraints, how can we aseducators hope to provide a meaningful SoC design experience in a 10-week quarter?This paper attempts to answer that question by detailing a 1-quarter SoC design course I pilotedin Spring quarter 2015, CPE 439 Real Time Embedded Systems. As discussed in EnablingTechnology, I based the course around a new type of technology called a Programmable SoC(PSoC). PSoCs abstract away many of the low-level design decisions and development work thatgoes into a traditional SoC bring-up, allowing students to focus on developing custom IP,connecting it to the processor through an industry standard interconnect bus, and writing driversoftware to control
achieve prescribed learning outcomes. A significant aspect ofeach of these three elements relies on interactions between the instructor and the students sopedagogies or technologies that significantly modify the nature and extent of interactions canhave effects on the model. Table 1 illustrates methods for coding student behaviors that areindicative of the three elements of the model. Table 1 Community of Inquiry Coding Template Elements Categories Indicators (example) Cognitive Presence Triggering Event Sense of puzzlement Q4, Q5 Exploration Information exchange
engineering curriculum complete the program2. At ouruniversity, we typically lose 40% of our electrical and computer engineering students during thefirst two years of their undergraduate engineering program. The attrition rate continues to trenddownward during the 3rd year of their engineering program. Figure 1 shows a snapshot of thepersistence and graduate rates of the ECE undergraduate program at our university for the 2014-2015 academic year. Graduation rates reflect the number of students who graduated each year asa percentage of the original entering cohort; and the persistence rates reflect the number ofstudents who graduated and/or enrolled each semester as a percentage of the original enteringcohort. Even though Figure 1 captures the
transitioning from a two-year to a four-year institution. In general, the top three reasonsstudents leave an engineering-based discipline are: (1) a perceived lack of belonging in theprogram, (2) issues related to difficulty of curriculum and (3) poor teaching or advising.1 Theseissues are often exacerbated in the transfer process as transfer students adjust to their newacademic environment and begin taking advanced engineering courses.2Engineering transfer students typically transfer from a community college or state college to theuniversity level in the third year of the program. Nationally, and among all disciplines, only 42%of transfer students go on to complete a bachelor’s degree. For STEM transfer students with anassociate’s degree, only 32% go
head and a two piecetop. Figure 1 shows student built examples. Because the intent of the labs is not to traintechnicians but rather to train engineering students in the connection between design andmanufacturing, each lab has an engineering theme in addition to the hands-on training.The birdhouse project focuses on standard print structure with a six page print package includingan assembly drawing, bill of materials, component level drawings, and standard materialcontrolled dimensions and tolerances. The example is given for rapid product developmentthrough standard parts and drawing revisions. The stop focuses on weld dimensioning. Thehammer head focuses on geometric dimensioning and tolerance (GD&T). The concept ofdeveloping
) theoretical understanding and (ii) creativity andinnovation 1, 2, 3. Industry evolution has proved that the need for well-prepared engineers withgood practical skills is constantly increasing. A study of the Royal Academy of Engineering,“Educating Engineers for the 21th Century”, reported that industry seeks for engineeringgraduates who have practical experience of real industrial environments3.As the complexity of microelectronic systems is steadily increasing, universities must updatetheir curriculum to cope with the increased demands of the industry. Further, the technicalcurriculum is in a constant state of flux due to the rapid and continual increases in the complexityand amount of knowledge students must assimilate. New technologies and tools
“and that's why we’re emphasizing math and science. That's why we’re emphasizingteaching girls math and science.” This was followed by the White House creation of theSTEM Master Teacher Corp as a new initiative in July 2012. However, it is still not wellunderstood exactly what factors affect persistence in undergraduate STEM majors andwhere the focus should be placed in order to improve persistence. There is a need forfurther research to help shape policies directed at improving the participation of womenin STEM undergraduate studies.NSF-20122 data for the 2009 high school graduating class showed that women are nowwell represented in advanced math and science high school courses. Table 1 presents thepercentage of male and female students that
details, student blogs, and information on financing their education.Marketing the ProgramEffectively spreading the word about your program to a large audience of prospective students isnot the easiest task to accomplish on traditionally limited recruiting budgets. Thus, defining yourapplicant pool and determining the most cost-effective way to reach these students are critical.When considering the four professional master’s programs, the applicant pools varysignificantly. As shown in Figure 1, the Structural Engineering M.Eng. program draws studentswith very focused backgrounds, traditionally in civil, structural, or architectural engineering.Whereas the Healthcare Systems Engineering and Energy Systems Engineering programs recruitstudents
proactively support students versus optional support designed todevelop a student’s self-awareness. Our findings suggest that career service professionals usetheir beliefs about students as a basis for decisions on how to support students. Implications ofour study include considerations for how we inform students regarding knowledge and skillsassociated with successfully obtaining a first job post-undergraduate degree and how thoseknowledge and skills may be different from ones necessary to obtain an engineering degree.IntroductionA diverse and highly skilled engineering workforce is needed to address today’s grandchallenges involving sustainability, medicine, information technology, and learning.1 Yet manysmart, capable engineering graduates leave
available through the university and customized using Google Script. The tool’sfeatures were incorporated to address the key barriers to remote collaboration and aligns withbest practices in virtual teams.17 Two prior empirical studies support the effectiveness of theintervention (scaffolds) by empirically showing that a combination of the collaboration tool andembedded scaffolds have significant impact on teamwork skill development for engineeringstudents.18 We extend this study by exploring qualitatively how the scaffolds supportedcollaborative work and what elements of the intervention made an impact to the differentprocesses that teams go through when working in projects. Figure 1: Example of a Team Site with Embedded
research from academic medicine intoengineering education, while retaining the core concept of bringing ‘theoretical knowledge andexperimental breakthrough to practice.’IntroductionThe global society we live in presents today’s engineer with many complex challenges toresolve, including the following infrastructure concerns: Availability of Clean Water - Water related diseases affect more than 1.5 billion people every year, and nearly 1 million people die each year from water, sanitation, and hygiene related disease.1 In lower and middle income countries (LMICs) one-third of the healthcare facilities lack a safe water source.1 A review of rural water system sustainability in eight countries in Africa, South Asia, and
and testing the experience environment models, experience building tools thatsupport defining effective learning scenarios, learner interactions and events, and learningassessment tools to measure the efficacy of the experience. The authors describe the capabilitiesof the tools and provide an evaluation of their capabilities based on the update of an existingexperience, the development of new educational experiences, and the application to learningassessment in a class environment.1 introductionSystems engineering and technical leadership (SETL) is a multidisciplinary practice that is asmuch an art as a science. While a traditional model of education can teach the fundamental bodyof knowledge, it is not until this knowledge is put into
reformation in general, and to the use of modern pedagogicalskills in particular. The paper also argues that any meaningful change in Region’s classroompractices today (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated andsupported by the university administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for thedepartment or college, to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearlyarticulated expectations, opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and anequitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies ofengagement. The theme advocated here is that