Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Architectural Engineering Starts with Design from Day OneAbstractThis paper describes the implementation of an event for first year students of a new engineeringprogram to build teamwork skills and introduce the iterative design process. The university ofthe author group has recently implemented a new Architectural Engineering (AE) program,which is believed to be the first program of its kind in Canada to integrate core engineeringeducation with open ended design studio courses throughout the program’s entirety. An eventcalled AE Design Days was held during the first two days of classes for the incoming AEstudents. Much like the program itself, the event sought to combine
Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. In 2013, Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh was honored as a promising new engineering education researcher when she was selected as an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty.Ms. Phyllis Beck, Mississippi State UniversityMs. Amy K. Barton, Mississippi State University Amy Barton is Technical Writing Instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program at Mis- sissippi State University. In 2013, she was inducted into the Academy of Distinguished Teachers for the Bagley College of Engineering. She is an active member of the Southeastern Section of ASEE. Her research focuses on incorporating writing to learn strategies into courses across the curriculum.Dr. Bryan A
, embedded cyber-physical systems, and engineering education. He is the lead author of the textbook Introduction to Embedded Systems: Using Microcon- trollers and the MSP430 (Springer 2014). From 2013 to 2018 served as Associate Dean of engineering at UPRM. He currently directs the Engineering PEARLS program at UPRM, a College-wide NSF funded initiative, and coordinates the Rapid Systems Prototyping and the Electronic Testing and Characterization Laboratories at UPRM. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Luisa Guillemard is a psychology professor at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus. She has a M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Caribbean Center of
Survey to Assess K-12 Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Familiarity with Teaching Design, Engineering, and Technology,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2006.[3] S. Yoon Yoon, M. G. Evans, and J. Strobel, “Validation of the teaching engineering self- efficacy scale for K-12 teachers: A structural equation modeling approach,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 463–485, 2014.[4] T. A. Litzinger et al., “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 123–150, 2011.[5] “PLTW Engineering (9-12),” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.pltw.org/our- programs/pltw-engineering-curriculum. [Accessed: 22-Nov-2019].[6] C. W
Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty Advisor of the Year Award. He received the Excellence in Engineering Education Award and Faculty Advisor Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). He was also nominated for the MTSU 2005 and 2009-11 Outstanding Research Award. He received two Academic Excellence awards from the Tennessee Board of Region in 2010-11. Foroudastan has also won many College of Basic and Applied Science awards. In addition to this, Foroudastan also reviews papers for journals and conference proceedings of ASEE, ASEE-SE, and ASME, and he has been a session moderator for several professional conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Experimental
modeling strategies and spatial visualization abilities in undergraduate students. He has con- ducted CAD and Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing workshops for both industry and education professionals. Dr. Branoff served as President of the International Society for Geometry and Graphics from 2009-2012. In 2013 he was elected into the Academy of Fellows of the ASEE, and in 2014 he received the Distinguished Service Award from the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE. In April of 2015 Dr. Branoff received the Orthogonal Medal for distinguished service in graphic science from the Technology, Engineering & Design Education faculty at North Carolina State University.Dr. Kevin L Devine, Illinois State
to use story as a way to allow students to develop their engineering identity, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands, and has a project to improve undergraduate student training for and exposure to research opportunities. Michelle is a current NSF ASCEND Fellow, a current KEEN Fellow, was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Kenneth W. Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Kenneth is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona and a licensed
We Teach: Thermodynamics,” Asee.org, Jun. 15, 2019.https://peer.asee.org/how-we-teach-thermodynamics (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[6] M. A. Vigeant, D. L. Silverstein, K. D. Dahm, L. P. Ford, J. Cole, and L. J. Landherr, “HowWe teach: Unit Operations Laboratory,” peer.asee.org, Jun. 23, 2018.https://peer.asee.org/how-we-teach-unit-operations-laboratory (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[7] Silverstein, David L., Vigeant, Margot A., and Mary Staehle, "How We Teach ProcessControl: 2015 Survey Results", Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,2016.[8] D. Lepek, M. A. Vigeant, D. L. Silverstein, and J. M. Keith, “How We Teach: TransportPhenomena and Related Courses,” peer.asee.org, Jun. 14, 2015.https://peer.asee.org/how-we-teach-transport
-Based Learning into A Freshman EngineeringDesign Course. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference& Exposition.[2] D. Belfadel, R. Munden, M. Arambulo, M. Zabinksi, and James Cavallo. Use of the Arduino Platformin Fundamentals of Engineering. ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019.[3] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, D. Nordmeyer, and J. Phung, “Student learning trends in a freshman-levelintroductory engineering course,” in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON),April 2017, pp. 152–156.[4] D. Belfadel, M. Zabinksi and R. Munden. Walking on Water Term Design Project in Fundamentals ofEngineering. ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada. June
, June 16-19, 2002.3. Navaee, S., “Alternate Approach in Analyzing Structures Unitizing LabVIEW,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Con- ference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23, 2004.4. Hibbeler, R.C. Engineering Mechanics (STATICS & DYNAMICS), 15th Edition, Pearson, 2022.5. Logan, D.L., A first Course in the Finite Element Method, Enhanced 6th Edition, CENGAGE, 2023.6. Paz, M., & Kim, Y.H., Structural Dynamics, 6th Edition, Springer, 2019.
Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Stumbling Our Way Through Finding a Better Prompt: Using GPT-4 to Analyze Engineering Faculty Members’ Mental Models of AssessmentAbstractIn this full research paper, we discuss the benefits and challenges of using GPT-4 to
an overall issue that needs to be dealt with. Some of these NSF entitiesare the National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing, the Micro-Nano TechnologyEducation National Center, the BEST Center, and The Future of Work and CORD [16-19].These groups are all struggling with this issue to one extent or another, most likely from a lack ofexpertise about the topic themselves.Additionally, the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) has been involved with afairly, long-term major initiate concerning Industry 4.0 (i.e, ASEE Industry 4.0) [20]. However,that effort became dominated by four-year college faculty and really had very little input fromtwo-year faculty or relevance to the two-year college technology education mission in the
Engineering Education (ASEE) [1]. World War II curtailed the activities of bothgroups. After the war, however, the engineering librarian communities in ACRL and ASEE grewquickly, offering new opportunities for professional development, networking, informationsharing, research, and advocacy.This paper seeks a deeper understanding of the academic engineering librarian community in the1940s and early 1950s through the analysis of data compiled from the Directory of CollegeEngineering Library Personnel [2], published in 1949 by the Engineering School LibrariesSection of ACRL and supplemented by data from other sources such as Who’s Who in LibraryService [3]. The Directory is a rich source of data that includes details such as position titles,degrees
ninety percent of learners stronglyagree or agree that the Learning Management System (LMS) is great for their engagement withother learners and the instructor. Additionally, the results expressed student satisfaction withonline admission, registration, and advising. The surveys identified that the impact of the onlineengineering graduate program in the case study on the learner included a job promotion andsalary increase for most of the survey participants.Keywords: Online Education, Software Engineering Education, Case Study Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference 1 Copyright © 2023, American Society for Engineering EducationINTRODUCTIONTechnology can significantly
excellence, leadership skills, and professional and personalgrowth among students. The success of the program may be attributed to a well-planned set ofactivities designed to create a learning community among scholars. Participation among scholarsin these program activities has been high, and most of the activities were perceived byparticipants to be valuable.As a follow up to the first round of the five-year NSF S-STEM grant, Cañada College applied forand was awarded a second five-year S-STEM grant from 2014 to 2019. Now in its third year ofimplementation, the program continues most of the activities developed in the first S-STEMprogram, with additional emphasis on stronger engagement of faculty mentors and additionalsupport from a Retention
communication skills to the test. The competition, created in the Fallof 2019, had as a primary goal to get students involved in extra-curricular activities and have themconnect professionally and socially with their peers across the campus. As a primary goal of thecompetition, students are challenged to work in a team environment to design, build anddemonstrate a remote-controlled water vehicle. Their vehicle must use bi-directionalcommunications over WiFi for control of the platform. Each team is limited to commontechnologies and a $100 budget to ensure that all teams compete on a level playing field. For thefirst offering of eSMART in Spring 2020, ninety-four students across multiple academic programsregistered and competed. This paper describes the
with her family and dogs.Dr. Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Paul Nissenson (Ph.D. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2009) is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He teaches courses in the thermal-fluid sciences, computer programming, and numerical meth- ods. Paul’s main research interests involve studying the impact of technology in engineering education. He has served on the ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Board of Directors since 2014, including as the PSW Section Chair for 2018-2019.Brooke JonesJeffrey A. PhillipsHarmony Nguyen, The Pennsylvania State University
ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 1, ITiCSE ’22, page 19–25, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450392013. doi: 10.1145/3502718.3524766. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.3524766.[13] Brian P. Helmke. Specifications grading in an upper-level bme elective course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, number 10.18260/1-2–33278, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/33278.
ME studentsExecuted in the fall of 2019, the intervention began with recruitment of six student “clients”majoring in entrepreneurship or involved in the entrepreneurship club. These clients pitchedtheir ideas to engineering students enrolled in the CAD course during an event facilitating briefinteractions with both sets of students. Small groups (3-4) of engineering students rotated amongpotential clients, hearing and responding to the clients’ pitches. Some clients openly expressed adesire to recruit engineering students to their entrepreneurial teams for purposes beyond thebounds of the CAD course project. Both the entrepreneurial student clients and engineeringstudent “consultants” rated each other, and the ratings provided a means of
, “LearningEquity in First-Year Engineering Design,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access, 2021. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37425[10] K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, M. L. Morris, A. M. A. Casper, R. A. Hensel, J. C. Schwartz,and R. A. Atadero, “Examining the effects of equity, inclusion, and diversity activities infirst-year engineering classes,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. Available:https://peer.asee.org/32782Appendix A Activity 1: COMMUNICATION GAMEIntroduction : For our first activity, you will be playing a communication game with your groupthat highlights the idea of Respectful Teaching. Please keep in mind the following: • Your teammates will not know exactly what you are trying to
research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Wayne Gersie As the inaugural Vice President for Diversity and Inclusion at Michigan Technological University, Dr. Wayne Gersie is responsible for providing vision, strategic leadership, and thoughtful change management for campus diversity, equity, inclusion
knowledge gained from reading publications from professional journalssuch as the International Society of Automation (ISA) - InTech Journal, in implementingIndustry 4.0 in the ET curriculum. (2) Present the results along with a reflective analysis of theimplementation in the pilot Summer III 2022, Control Systems course. (3) Present the process forintegration of additional professional journals such as IEEE, Journal of Engineering Technology(ASEE), and Journal of Manufacturing Processes (SME), in the concentration-specific courses inthe ET Program. (4) Deliberate the importance of integration of professional journals as ateaching strategy to augment the classroom learning experience in the department’s ETAC(Engineering Technology Accreditation
Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 394–425, 2013, doi: 10.1002/jee.20020.[3] R. S. Moog and J. N. Spencer, Eds., Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). Oxford University Press, USA, 2008.[4] S. R. Simonson, Ed., POGIL: An Introduction to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Those Who Wish to Empower Learners. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[5] E. Mazur, “Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 981–988, Mar. 1997, doi: 10.1063/1.53199.[6] E. Mazur, “Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 359–360, Apr. 1999, doi: 10.1119
Activity for a First-year Mechanical Engineering Course”, Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Con- ference, doi:10.18260/1-2--29666.[31] Mechanismic Inc., 2022, “MotionGen Pro”, URL http://www.motiongen.io.[32] Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M., 2019, “An introduction to variational autoencoders”, Foun- dations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 12(4), pp. 307–392.[33] Deshpande, S. and Purwar, A., 2020, “An Image-Based Approach to Variational Path Syn- thesis of Linkages”, ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 21(2), doi:10.1115/1.4048422, URL https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048422, 021005.[34] Deshpande, S. and Purwar, A., 2019, “Computational Creativity via Assisted Variational
design, and engineering education. He is currently on the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc, a senior member of the IEEE, and a member of ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Educating Engineering Students Innovatively: A Model for Improving Retention and Academic Performance of Black Upper-Level StudentsA. IntroductionIn a study of the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering pre-engineering program, almost 700 engineering students were analyzed that were enrolled throughthe HBCU (FAMU) partner of the joint college [1]. Of the students who completed the pre-engineering program, 72% eventually graduated from the university with a
representation of diverse viewpoints in the focus groups. With the results from this study, our research team will use the data collected to considerpossible changes in Introduction to Mechanical Engineering teamwork projects during Fall 2022.We also hope to involve other Introduction to Engineering courses from different disciplines(i.e., Biomedical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, etc.) in a follow-upstudy to create a larger sample size and have a bigger impact.References[1] B. Beigpourian and M.W. Ohland, “A systematized review: Gender and race in teamwork inundergraduate engineering classrooms,” presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida, June 15, 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32011[2
.[6] M. S. Fausing, T. S. Joensson, J. Lewandowski, and M. Bligh, "Antecedents of shared leadership: empowering leadership and interdependence", doi: 10.1108/LODJ-06-2013-0075.[7] ABET International, "Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.," Jan. 02, 2016.[8] J. Tsenn, H. S. Lewis, and A. Layton, "An Analysis of Factors Impacting Design Self-Efficacy of Senior Design Students," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32055.[9] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. M. Smyser, and H. L. McManus, "Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomes and Student Perceptions," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2019, doi
-2016." Journal of InformationSystems Education, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 131, 2016.[2] Mitri, Michel, and Susan Palocsay. "Toward a model undergraduate curriculum for theemerging business intelligence and analytics discipline." Communications of the Association forInformation Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 31, 2015.[3] Tosic, Predrag T., and Julie Beeston. "Designing undergraduate data science curricula: Acomputer science perspective." In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition June 23-27,2018. [Online]. Available: file:///Users/emilonas/Downloads/designing-undergraduate-data-science-curricula-a-computer-science-perspective%20(1).pdf[4] Milonas, Elizabeth, Duo Li, Qiping Zhang. “Content Analysis of Two-year & Four-year DataScience Programs in