provides much moreconstructive feedback as the students who participated in the experiments have a more per-sonal view on the subject matter. Following several questions generic enough to be usedwith any course, feedback with respect to the particular course objectives is obtained aswell. Next, an evaluation of the various teaching and learning methods, lectures, homeworkassignments, reading assignments, designing and conducting laboratory experiments, ana-lyzing and reporting data and results, etc., is conducted in order to help provide a basisfor the effectiveness of the learning tools. Finally, several questions are asked pertaining Page 8.375.6
focusing onteamwork issues, teaching style, students’ belief in their own abilities and desire to continue theireducation, peer interactions, and laboratory projects. While student perceptions are only one partof a comprehensive assessment program, they are certainly important. By addressing studentperceptions of core outcomes and fundamental pedagogical issues, TUBA should be relevant to arange of BMEN programs which offer a wide variety of specialized “tracks,” different areas ofprogrammatic emphasis, etc. Given that there exists a need for a measure such as the TUBA, thefollowing sections will describe the development and subsequent validation and reliabilitytesting that has been thus far performed.Development of the TUBAIn keeping with the
demonstration board. The paper also discusses whywe chose an assembly language over a higher level programming language for the introductorycourse and the set of laboratory exercises that guide the student through the learning process in athird semester engineering technology course.Goal and SituationThe goal is to teach an Introduction to Microprocessors course to third semester EngineeringTechnology students in a way that will catch their interest and provide a background on whichsubsequent courses can build. At Middlesex County College, Introduction to Microprocessors isa 3 credit course taught in a 14 week semester. Classes meet for 2 lecture hours and 3 laboratoryhours each weekMCC previously used a lab manual developed by Prof. Steve Foster
. Recognizing that engineers need material from both semesters of the traditional twosemester sequence, a new one-semester course was developed. This course has been designedaround the pedagogical theme that "The properties of larger particles are based upon theproperties of their constituent particles and their interactions". As such, the students areintroduced to "modern" physics. To deliver a course such as this effectively , we have found thatwe need to adopt innovative teaching techniques including: focusing on the recitation, frequentfeedback, the use of the studio-format, closer integration of the laboratory experience with thecourse, self-directed laboratory exercises, context- based learning, and the use of the internet.The course structure
Aerospace Engineering. He received his BS degree from Mississippi State University and his MS and PhD degrees from the California Institute of Technology. Prof. Koenig teaches introductory courses in aerospace engineering and flight mechanics, and upper division courses in aerodynamics and propulsion. His research areas include rocket and scramjet propulsion and sports equipment engineering.Lorenzo Coley, Mississippi State University Lorenzo Coley is a first year graduate teaching assistant in the aerospace engineering laboratories. He obtained his BS degree in aerospace engineering from Mississippi State University, and is currently enrolled as a candidate for a master of science degree. He
workshop has introductory lectures on the field of process science and engineering andemerging areas of the chemical industry. Detailed lectures on specific topics are presented byexperts from industry. Laboratory experiments and demonstrations are integrated throughout theworkshop. These bench-scale experiments are designed so that they can be effectively integratedinto the curriculum at the participants’ home institutions. The workshop has a computer sessionon the use of simulators in the process industry. The workshop also has sessions devoted tocurriculum development. The workshop instructors utilized an active teaching and learningstyle. Lecture and laboratory sessions were held in Henry M. Rowan Hall, home of the Collegeof Engineering
programs, undergraduate research assistants in traditional researchprograms, laboratory assistants, undergraduate teaching assistants, undergraduate graders, and ahost of other opportunities. The common bond between these experiences is developing apersonal connection between the professor and the student and enabling the student to participateas a stakeholder in their education. The student still does the class work, still gains a strongfoundation in the fundamentals of engineering, but the classroom experience is supplementedand strengthened by working directly with a professor implementing one or more aspects ofher/his education. Rather than regarding these experiences as “extra-curricular” activities, theseactivities should be regarded as “off
Paper ID #32550Switching from Hands-on Labs to Exclusively Online Experimentation inElectrical and Computer Engineering CoursesDr. Dominik May, University of Georgia Dr. May is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute. He researches online and intercultural engineering education. His primary research focus lies on the development, in- troduction, practical use, and educational value of online laboratories (remote, virtual, and cross-reality) and online experimentation in engineering instruction. In his work, he focuses on developing broader educational strategies for the design and
Paper ID #11779Examining the Interaction of Spatial Visualization Ability and Computer-aided Design and Manufacturing Course PerformanceDr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of
, Nergiz Ercil, Elif Aydin, Rusen Oktem, Ali Kara, Marian Alexandru, and Bodo Reiner. "Requirements for remote RF laboratory applications: An educators' perspective." Education, IEEE Transactions on 52, no. 1 (2009): 75-81.[10] Rojko, Andreja, Darko Hercog, and Karel Jezernik. "Power engineering and motion control web laboratory: Design, implementation, and evaluation of mechatronics course." Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 57, no. 10 (2010): 3343-3354.[11] Chu, Rui Hong, DD-C. Lu, and Swamidoss Sathiakumar. "Project-based lab teaching for power electronics and drives." Education, IEEE Transactions on 51, no. 1 (2008): 108-113.[12] NOAA National Geophysical Data Center. (2010) [Illustration of main field intensity
projects in order to integrate hands-on experiments in traditionalthermal science lecture courses and to reorient traditional teaching laboratory courses withdesign, build, and test (DBT) activities. In particular, the following principles and methods areadapted: a hands-on experience integrated to abstract concepts discussed in lectures, a clearlinkage to industrial applications, and Design Build and Test (DBT) projects. Specifically, twoDBT course modules are developed: the heat exchanger and scaled building air-conditioningsystem. The project reforms the current thermal science stem curriculum with changes to threerequired lecture courses in such a way that the contents of the stand-alone ME lab course isintegrated with the lectures through the
departmental laboratory space for teaching laboratory-rich ET subject matter.≠ Recruitment of faculty who can contribute to a general ET program when hiring decisions are based primarily on the ability of a potential tenure-track faculty member to support the research mission of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources – a mission that does not specifically include research related to ET.≠ Recruitment of faculty in a department with no doctoral program and only a fledgling master’s program.The role of adjunct faculty, future evolution of the ET program at UD, and implications forprograms in more conventional settings are also discussed.Introduction:The history of the general ET program at the University of Delaware (UD) goes
media/interactive video) in comparison to a traditional instructor-led course.Several teaching instruments focused on exploiting the role of physical experience in teachingthe concepts. Ji and Bell12 argue that making abstract concepts more observable and tangibleenable students to better learn them. To make concepts observable and tangible, they use threethemes in their teaching: providing simple demonstration models, providing good engineeringexamples, and improving teaching material by including new research concepts. A goodcollection of the teaching material is available online13. Williams and Howard14 emphasize therole of laboratory experience for a physical insight. They outline the design of a versatile andeconomical apparatus for both
mechanical engineering.IntroductionThe application of modern instrumentation is important in engineering education to providestudents with critical skills for use in research and industry. Providing interesting andmotivational learning opportunities in engineering laboratory experiences builds students’enthusiasm while teaching critical skills in modern instrumentation and engineering problemsolving. It is relatively easy to provide students with interesting instrumentation activities todayby using low cost data acquisition hardware and software, and to explore interesting dataacquisition applications while implementing group, project-based instruction. Vehicleinstrumentation applications today embrace a large spectrum of applications with the
curriculum.A recruiting and retention plan is also being developed as part of the new curriculum design. Thedevelopment of this plan is considered to be a crucial and fundamental component of the overallEE program. One of the biggest concerns is the recruitment and retention of underrepresentedgroups in the engineering field.This paper describes the planning and development of the new Electrical Engineering program atEWU including the significance, infrastructure, goals, objectives, laboratory needs, programrequirements, and curriculum.IntroductionThe EE program was conceived on the basis of three factors: industrial demand within the regionand state, the small number of qualified graduates available to enter the workforce, and theincreasing pool of
generalengineering theory from units that students had previously covered. Student teams obtaineddata on materials, strain gauges and amplifier properties using their own investigation skills;carried out their preliminary work in dedicated laboratory space; completed analysis at theirown pace and used the design process to integrate the project with academic teaching andinstruction. The student teams were able to consult with technical and academic staff on amore informal and peer level basis. Staff operated less in an instructive mode and more asexternal consultant engineers, or facilitators to each group.Ongoing Unit RefinementTo fully develop the students’ understanding and appreciation of team work and groupdynamics, it was necessary to include some
society and attend the annual Section meeting at which the cash prize and certificate are presented. The candidate’s contribution to the profession should include at least four of the following: 1. Participation in the development of courses or curricula; 2. Development of teaching equipment or development of a wider application of teaching equipment previously developed; 3. Contribution to the improvement of laboratories or other facilities; 4. Development or authorship of instructional materials or a text that enhances the student learning process; 5. Publication of original work, through any medium, that enhances the engineering education process
Measure- This is a 6-point Likert type scale provided to both the teachers and the undergraduate students that measures multidisciplinarity, power of research experience and leadership. It is aligned to the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges and the NAE’s Engineers for 2020.≠ Rubric for Laboratory Presentations and Lessons- This rubric, also aligned to Engineer’s for 2020, assesses the teachers’ and REU students’ research presentation (and in the case of the teachers, their lesson plan quality.ResultsThis paper presents results of the RET and REU program in two areas: the participant teachersand their perceived impact on the students that they teach. At this point in the data analyses, dueto the fact that the
challenging problems in manufacturing education are related to improving thestudent–instructional technologies interface to incorporate the required learning tools, andimproving teaching and learning effectiveness in online course and training. The majorobjectives of our project are to design and use CNC machine control simulator systems toenhance the cognitive learning of online laboratories and design and use of simulator interfacesfor metrology and quality control systems to enhance the cognitive learning of online labs. Webriefly discuss the development of virtual 3-D laboratory activities (learning modules andtutorials) that provide students with a realistic interaction with CNC machine in the area ofprototyping, metrology, quality control and
were single-session (ca. 160 students), and therewere six to eight identical laboratory sections (ca. 20-40 students). A single instructor taught alllectures, and a common undergraduate teaching assistant workforce (10-12 individuals) sharedcoaching responsibilities across all lab sections. All IDE-related laboratory periods were held inthe program’s undergraduate makerspace [29]. Prior to the start of the IDE, in-class time wasdedicated to safety and tool competency training. In the weeks preceding the IDE, all studentswatched a video-based safety orientation, took an online safety quiz, and completed a self-pacedlaboratory experience that involved them demonstrating competencies in-person to a teachingassistant. All students viewed the same
Information Technologies to Engineering and Science Education, CD-ROM, Vol. 39, No. 3, August 1996.[6] K. R. Desai and R. S. Culver, “Multimedia Hypertext on the WWW and its use in Education,” 1996 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, Paper 7d1.4, CD-ROM, Salt Lake City, November 1996.[7] J. Henry, “Controls Laboratory Teaching Via the World Wide Web,” 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Session 3513, CD-ROM, Washington, D.C., June 1996.[8] M. Rais-Rohani and K. A. Young, “Development of a Multimedia Structural Mechanics Teaching Tool on the World Wide Web,” 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Session 1668, CD-ROM, Washington, D.C., June 1996.[9] J. B. Schodorf, M. A. Yoder, J. H. McClellan and R. W. Schafer, “Using
simply applying a nano or bio “coat of paint” to existingcourses will serve the students well. Given the wide differences between the macroscopic andmolecular approaches to teaching the students may end viewing nanotech and biotech asunrelated, rather than integral parts of their ChE education. We have chosen to address these curricular and pedagogical challenges by bringingundergraduate research and laboratory experiences into the classroom. This has beenaccomplished through the creation of degree projects: projects that will span the entire four yearsof a student’s undergraduate education. For example, students pursuing a nano-emphasis have adegree project entitled “Nanoparticles”, while the degree project for bio-emphasis students is
outlinedin those documents, we propose to describe the broader impacts of this course for the educationof environmental engineers, in particular, and engineering students, in general.Details of the NSF CCLI-sponsored project.Project objective. The objective of our Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Innovation (CCLI)proposal is the development and evaluation of proof-of-concept educational materials exposingundergraduate students in Civil Engineering to state-of-the-art advances in EnvironmentalBiotechnology research and genome-enabled environmental science and engineering.Specific aims. To meet the objective of the project, we are addressing six specific aims (SA)over a period of two years, including: 1. We converted preliminary teaching materials
the value and power of post secondary education and SMET careers. These threefundamental needs were important to satisfy students’ feelings of the interrelationship betweenengineering and physical sciences and the importance of continuing onto post secondary education. The course introduces basic brainstorming processes that improve mathematical skills of thestudents and teach them how to use these skills in engineering analysis such as measurementtechniques. The course covers important technological concepts and experimental issues (includinga number of laboratory sessions) that elevate students’ skills and provide them with hands-onexperience in dealing with experimental measurements and instrumentation. The developed materialfor
skills [4]. For example, virtual laboratories can allow students toconduct experiments in a simulated environment, while augmented reality simulations can providehands-on experience with complex equipment. Several studies have investigated the effectivenessof these technologies in online engineering courses [5], with positive results in terms ofengagement and deeper understanding of course material [6][7]. Despite the potential benefits ofVR and AR technologies, gathering student perspectives and experiences is essential to developstrategies that meet their unique needs and challenges.This study focuses on understanding student perspectives on online teaching in the Principles ofSurveying course, a hands-on course that teaches students to
: metals, polymers,ceramics. The course also taught different types of material failure and how to select materials to avoidfailure. The types of failure topics addressed include yielding, creep, wear, fatigue and fracture. Thecourse text material was based around two popular materials textbooks.15, 16 Traditional teaching inChina tends to be rote learning, more passive than active. This course employed an inquiry-basedapproach with a combination of integrated class/seminars and laboratory-demonstration classes. TheDeakin-led classes consisted in two hours of lecture, followed by a two-hour practical class. Thepractical classes focussed on six aspects of materials science and engineering: Stress and strain in materials Material
Term,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 48, no. 1, August 2005.5. Hiroyasu, et al., “Use of Student Experiments for Teaching Embedded Software Including HW/SW Co-Design,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 52, no. 3, August 2009.6. Akash Kumar, et al., “Project-Based Learning in Embedded Systems Education Using an FPGA Platform,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 56, no. 4, August 2013.7. Christos Ttofis, et al., “FPGA-Based Laboratory Assignments for NoC-Based Many Core Systems, “IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 55, no. 2, August 2012.8. “Pong game”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pong9. “Crossy road game”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossy_Road10. “Frogger game”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frogger11. “Space
course.Additionally a chat room facility will be used for each course to facilitate communication amongstudents and between instructor and students9. Many of the distance-learning courses offerings also make use of the MicrosoftPowerPoint software, application software for demonstrations, and the overhead documentcamera for problem solving. Each site has a designated teaching assistant to handle allcontingencies related to the course. The challenges involved in delivering the laboratory material, differs from program toprogram. For the EET courses, some of the laboratory exercises can be performed using availablecomputers at the remote sites. Those courses that require the use of laboratory hardware havebeen handled by using available equipment
learners andinstructors) is a key factor which defines the success of online education3.But unfortunately, engineering courses such as that are in need of laboratories, team works,construction site visits, field personnel’s technical presentations cannot be offered through onlinemedium. The physical interactions that are needed in the laboratories and construction sitescannot be offered by the online courses. Such collaborations of educational institutions withindustry and Government are necessary for Civil Engineering program’s success. UndergraduateEngineering students love to have hands-on experience for the most of the courses in theirCourse curriculum. The instructors who teach courses that are complemented by laboratoriesreceive high grade
circuitapplications. Students are also introduced to digital logic fundamentals and gain experience indesigning, building and testing simple logic circuits. A three-hour/week laboratory providesactive learning experiences for the students.Initial Process for Assessing the Course Learning ObjectivesECE 345 did not have a good reputation. Students who took the course and the faculty memberswho taught it shared this opinion. Students had difficulty learning the material and seeing how itcould be applied within their major fields of study. Faculty members teaching the course felt thattoo many topics were covered at a superficial level. Feedback from one student captures thegeneral sense of both the students and faculty: “This class was really presented at