co-op. The résumé writing workshop isparticularly helpful to students who have never written a résumé. Table 1 also lists the variousworkshops that are planned for the students each year. Table 1: Seminar and Workshop Series3 (2003-2004) Topic Speaker(s)/Department Seminars Program Intro – Pizza Party Amy Monte & Gretchen Hein Master’s International Introduction Graduate Mentors What to Expect as a First Year Student Undergraduate Mentors The Pros and Cons of Working in Industry Mary Fran Desrochers, Mechanical
solutions, or in some cases merelyusing the appropriate compile/editing programs to enter and then run the particular code.Where more than one solution method is indicated, a group of students would be brokendown into individuals or pairs to accomplish solutions with a particular method, then thestudents would exchange and explain all solutions for a given problem. Thus peer-to-peer learning allows a much broader grasp of the nature of open-ended, multiple-solution-path problems.Laboratory Task Demonstrated Methods Student Solution MethodsPlotting calibration data, BASIC, C, Fortran Excel, MathCAD, BASIC,linear regression, statistical programs, Excel C, Fortran programs
performance factors are consistent withthe creative problem-solving model described by Lumsdaine et al.7 and the project-basedintroduction to design by Dym and Little8. The teamwork attributes are consistent withthe cooperative learning model by Johnson et al.9 The communication attributes areconsistent with recommendations by the writing across the curriculum movement andsummarized by Bean10.Knowledge of the Engineering Design Process • information gathering/understand problem/customer needs • problem definition/goals or requirements defined • idea generation/brainstorming/creativity • evaluation/analyzing ideas/testing/design modeling • decision making/selection/planning • implementation/produce/deliver design to customer • process review
program envisioned by EC2000 relate to the faculty’sperception of the cost/benefit ratio of their work efforts, as determined by each member of thefaculty. Without changing incentives or making appeals to intrinsic motivators, faculty membersinevitably focus on the activities visibly rewarded by their institutions and peers 5-7. Regardlessof type of institution, these rewards focus most often on individual performance rather than oncollective actions such as curriculum reform 6. This observation has led us to examine Criterion7 (Institutional Support and Financial Resources) more closely 2. Traditionally this criterion hasfocused on the adequacy of resources needed "to assure the quality and continuity of theengineering program." We have found
. Once the assemblies are manufactured students runperformance tests on their “products” using statistical design of experiments (DOE) methodologyto evaluate the effects of two factors at two levels (2x2) and determine the setup giving the bestperformance. The project culminates in a written technical report, which the student teams presentorally to an audience of their peers and a panel of faculty and staff evaluators.Introduction BAE202 (Intro to BAE Methods) introduces basic design and problem solvingmethodology for Biological Engineering. The majority of the students are enrolled in theBiomedical Engineering curriculum with the remainder in Biological Engineering, which offersconcentration areas in bioprocessing, environmental, and
concepts of the engineering design process,team work, and engineering ethics. In the last half of the course students worked on adesign project during the design studio time, and instruction was given on the basicoperation of the solenoids, motors, gears and other materials used in the project. Studentswere also instructed on oral presentation skills and on how to write design reports.The Design ProjectA hands-on design project, with students working in teams of 3, is the central focus of thedesign lab. The hands-on aspect allows students to learn, through experience, theimportance of fundamental design principles (esp. design for manufacture, design forrobustness, and design for adjustability) while providing instructors with an objectivemeans
their own set of rules. This paper reports on theeffect of team rules and the concomitant consequences that were developed by the students onteam functioning.Results of a multivariate analysis of variance shows that students perceived that they followedthat rules significantly more than the other members of their group, that they were assigned morework than their peers, that they completed more work that their groups members, and the qualityof their own work was higher. Interestingly, when asked about issues of rule-breaking that aroseout of their groups, many individuals cited issues but ultimately failed to follow the agreed uponprocedures for addressing those incidents.IntroductionTeamwork has long been considered an important element of
project team of three to four students is assigned a corporate mentor.For a period of eight weeks, students are expected to work no less than 8 hours per week, hold atleast one weekly team meeting to discuss progress, and send minutes of these weekly meetings totheir corporate mentor and the University. At the end of the term, each team presents their finalreport and submits a detailed written report on their assigned project to the corporate client andthe University.Each student is supported with a $1,000 assistantship funded by the corporate client and payableupon successful project completion and positive peer evaluation feedback. With $20,000dedicated annually to student assistantships plus $5,000 allocated for University projectmanagement
information. With the help and support of library and academic writing staff, we insist uponsources beyond the Wikipedia or simple web resources. Through the nature of Innocentivechallenges, students quickly find that none of the familiar simple Googling searches are effectiveto provide high quality detailed information. This stage of the project opens up an opportunity toshow the value and depth of really good quality academic review papers or engineering journals.The Assignment: IdeationOnce students have submitted their reports on background research into the problem, we meetduring class and the class is broken into groups of students according to their chosen designchallenge. Depending upon the preference of the instructor, some groups are
Poor, 2-Poor, 3-Fair, 4-Good, 5-Very Good, 6-Excellent 2. Overall, the course is: 1-Very Poor, 2-Poor, 3-Fair, 4-Good, 5-Very Good, 6-Excellent 3. On average, for every hour I spent in this class, I spent about ___ outside of class completing work in this course (including studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, etc.). 1-1/2 hour or less, 2-More than 1/2 hour, but less than one hour, 3-More than one hour, but less than two hours, 4-More than two hours, but less than three hours, 5- More than three hours 4. The course activities (e.g., assigned readings, lectures, discussions, labs, projects, etc.) were effective in helping me accomplish the learning
away the next class. I suggesteveryone come to class with what they want to accomplish forthat day. First things first, as much as I hate limits, Ithink we need a time limit on issues before we start. So Ihope that if we can set a limit, we can continue movingforward and not around in circles like it seems we are doingnow.Despite these comments, the students continued to argue about what to do and how toprogress. The students were required to keep portfolios. The intent of the portfolios was Page 6.937.4for students to write about knowledge acquired in the course and how they couldProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education
distribution was as follows: 3 A’s, 5 B’s, 3 C’s, and 1D’s. The D was earned by thestudent who had received the most complaints about participating in the team projects. Studentevaluations of this course were mixed. While some students enjoyed the in-class activecollaborative teaming experience, most of them were frustrated with the team laboratoryprojects. On the whole the students appreciated the active cooperative assignments given duringthe lecture. They were less enthusiastic about the assigned teams for the laboratory exercises.Some of the student comments about teamwork and the instructor assigned teams were: “Teams are good, but everyone should have to do a write-up that way the instructor can tell if someone ‘gets it
office space also facilitates interaction between the variousproject teams, and promotes some healthy peer pressure.Another need within a business setting is to emphasize that all communications, bothwritten and oral, are professional. Meetings with students have a business format, with Page 6.683.2written agendas, action items and due dates. The emphasis is on accountability. This Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationmeans that student assignments and tasks are completed when an acceptable level
spaces of the mathematicalfunctions, students are asked to write rules to communicate the utility of the models to otherstakeholders including healthcare professionals or basic biomedical scientists.In summary, we have created a unique BME focused text for differential equations and linearalgebra that encourages students to harness their knowledge of physics, biology, physiology,engineering, and mathematics to formulate dynamic models of physiological systems. Our overallaim is to enhance students’ ability to apply and foster a deep appreciation of the power ofmathematics in addressing real-world BME challenges.Background:Ordinary differential equations are ubiquitous for understanding various topics and systemsstudied as part of the
methods allow the individual student to learn from the instructor, peers, and as anindividual student researching and mastering material. Active learners could benefit by activelyparticipating in lab, hands-on activities. Reflective learners can use the PBL and case studies toreflect over the problem or the framework story associated to the module activities. The researchor fact gathering opportunity the students conduct while developing their environmentalsustainability projects would facilitate learning for students who are sensing learners. Intuitivelearners can use the case studies and PBL to investigate “what if” scenarios in their projects.Visual and verbal learners receive both types of learning styles using PBL and case studies.Sequential
opinion was that the participants had improved their teaching.Subsequent Participant FeedbackAt the end of the following fall semester, a questionnaire was sent out to gather feedback on theshort course from the participants after they had had a chance to incorporate what they had seenand practiced in the summer. A sample of the questions with the participants’ averaged responsesare shown in Figure 3. At the time of writing, 16 of 24 participants had responded. TEACHING SELF ASSESSMENTPROFESSOR:_______________________________________________________ DATE:___________Please provide a rating of each aspect of your teaching on a scale of 1 to 5 in accordance with the criteriagiven, and provide any comments you have on
design, build, and test a device orally report to peers and class read and summarize textbooks
whether the practice session should be repeated.Employer expectations modules: In these sessions, the balance between technicalknowledge/experience and workplace leadership skills is taught. Emphasis is placed on theunderstanding and importance of workplace leadership skills for a student early in his/her career.Communication skills are covered in some depth: understanding the difference betweencommunication to management, peers and subordinates; balancing talking and listening; usingverbal and written tools effectively. Teamwork and how to be a team player is also discussed indetail: team success versus individual success, resolving problems on a team, seeking opinions ofothers, and respecting opinions of others. Taking the initiative is
you now describe your analytical and problem-solving skills? Compared with when you first entered this college how would you now describe your interpersonal/social skills? Think back to any internship or co-op experience. Write about a time when social/interpersonal skills (i.e. team work, communication) were important for you or someone around you to accomplish an assignment?III. THE WORKSHOPThe one and ½ hour workshop consisted of three parts. First, findings from the national APPLEsurvey and local Blackboard findings were presented. After the presentation and a brief break,the faculty members were invited to form inter-departmental groups and were provided with aworksheet to guide their conversations of how
: Study Individual Our Stolen DW Time Future book Evaluation: Biofuel LCA management review Group Ethics Case Ethics: case studies, moral exemplar, student honor code vs. Ethics Study NSPE Code of Ethics Course plan to GraduationDrinking watertreatment plant Team Project: Solid Waste – LandGEM – Waste-to-Energy tour write-upGuest Speaker Guest
formally required continuous improvement, effective engineering faculty andprograms utilized many ad hoc procedures to improve their performance. For example,instructors constantly assess student learning through comparison to standards that representcompetency in course material. Self-reflection and peer interaction often occur during and afterteaching a course. These ad hoc procedures and interactions create tribal knowledge that form aninstitutional history. Such a history can enrich and improve the program on a continuous basis.However, in such an environment program administrators are challenged to collate and leveragethe collective knowledge of the program’s faculty in their efforts to steer the overall curriculumtowards greater
learners.” Thisreference also notes it is possible to successfully train engineering students in communicationskills and group work.Haag3 notes that there is widespread interest in the retention and matriculation of female andminority engineering students. One effort to reform education with a goal of improvingeducation to these groups is the NSF-supported Foundation Coalition. Some of the goals include“improvement of the interactions that affect the educational environment through teaming, …integration of subject matter within the curriculum, and the promotion of life long learning.”Some of the challenges in self and peer evaluations in group working include that “some studentswere reluctant to write critical comments about others fearing
CPBL in Digital Design CourseDriven by the feedback from formal assessment as well as classroom observations, discussionswith students, and personal experience with the teaching effectiveness and efficiency the PIshave been continually exploring ways to improve the CPBL experience for our students. InWinter 2009 a relatively major revision of the CPBL in Digital Design is being undertaken toaddress the challenges mentioned above. The major change is that in-class projects must becompleted in one class period. Previously students were given one week to complete their classproject write-up and due to the diverse educational backgrounds, some students were given evenlonger to complete their assignments. Students who could not complete the project
), actions, reactions, and closed systems by building chain-reactions using electrical circuits, Pico Crickets, and found objects. 3. Urban Heat Island: Study the heat island phenomenon and build models to mitigate heat. 4. Exploring Mars: Study the surface of Mars, getting to Mars, exploring Mars, and living on Mars.Units delivered during the two summers comprised: 1. Youth-Docentship: Study science and engineering phenomenon at the Arizona Science Center. Demonstrate knowledge gained throughout this year-round program by engaging younger peers and their families visiting the center through small-scale hands-on workshops on specific project-based challenges. 2. Industry-Internship: Study alternative
institutionsoffer their stakeholders 1 as it both determines and drives outcomes. Despite this, the most notableoutcome of a “review of the literature on curriculum in higher education in the UK, the USA andAustralia … [is that there] is the dearth of writing on the subject” 2. That literature which doesaddress higher education curricula assumes a common understanding of the term curriculum andtargets curriculum related issues such as ‘inclusive curriculum’, ‘learner-centered curriculum’,internationalization of the curriculum or it focuses on the design of individual courses – that is,single units of study 2.Accepting that an important aspect of our role as academics is “not to impart knowledge, but todesign learning environments that support knowledge
actually higherthan the retention rates associated with their majority male peers, although both groups fallbelow RIT’s long-term student retention goals. Our demonstrated ability to keep women hereonce they decide to come indicates that RIT is an excellent place to work at bringing morewomen into engineering. Page 10.28.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3592Women faculty from across
category can be graded by the consistency ofcontents throughout the report. The depth of discussion category closely reflects the integrationof knowledge category so that reports showing good elaborations will have higher scores andreports with many hardware or software specification details will have lower scores.Cohesiveness category can be graded based on how well the report contents flow. The spelling& grammar category can be graded based on common writing basics such as a figure captionshould be under the figure and the table caption should be above the table; figure and tablecaptions and their corresponding figures and tables should be on the same page; and paragraphsshould have adequate lengths.The sources category can be graded based
outcomes will be addressed in a separate manuscript, as thescope of this paper primarily focuses on the conceptualization, design, and integration of theescape room as an educational tool within the field of chemical engineering.By combining the proven benefits of educational escape rooms with a novel virtual approach,our study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on innovative teaching methodsin chemical engineering education. We seek to demonstrate how technology can be leveraged tocreate relatively simple, engaging, cost-effective, and scalable educational experiences that fosterthe development of crucial engineering skills.MethodsLiterature Review: • Conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed articles on educational
Studies. She has served as Chair of her department and Associate Dean for Equity, Inclusion, and Faculty. Dr. Peele-Eady’s research examines African American students’ learning and identity formation and, more broadly, the social, cultural, and linguistic contexts of teaching and learning. Her publications appear in several peer-reviewed journals and edited books, including the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, the Anthropology and Education Quarterly, and the Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning.Prof. Tahira Reid, Penn State University Dr. Tahira Reid Smith (publishes under ”Reid”) is a Professor at Pennsylvania State University in Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design
-141. doi:10.1108/10748120910965502.Guzek, F., Brockway, K., Brockway, T., Guzek, S., (2013). “Broadening STEM Students’Perspectives, and Recruiting with Blended Learning and Study Abroad.” Proceedings of 2013Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Bonwell, C., Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 1-878380-08-7.Donnelly-Smith, L. (2009). Global learning through short-term study abroad. Peer Review,11(4), 12-15. ISSN-15411389Festervand, T. A., & Tillery, K. R. (2001). Short-term study-abroad programs--a professionaldevelopment tool for international business faculty. Journal of Education for