undergraduate engineering degree, and in this study are limited to students age 25 and older. The presence of adult students enriches undergraduate engineering programs because their added life experience allows them to approach their studies with unique perspectives, motivations, and strategies compared to their 1younger peers. Because of the added challenges that adult students face, their presence in undergraduate programs must be supported to improve retention of this valuable group of 2students. Prior studies have shown that identifying with engineering is linked to both 3educational and professional persistence. Our research focuses on the development of engineering
the most productive at exchanging heat. The green-energy solar collectorswere set up and made fully functional.Energy Efficiency Design MethodologyFigure 1 shows a graph of both panels’ efficiency percentage versus the difference of inlet andambient temperatures. The most productive operation of a collector is when the temperature of theinlet liquid (Ti) is the same as the surrounding temperature (Ta). Flat panel collectors are usuallyare 75% effective when Ti equals Ta, whereas evacuated tubes have a proficiency of around 50%.Collectors tend to operate 30°F to 80°F above surrounding temperatures to deliver end-usetemperatures from 100°F to 130°F. Efficiency is poor when the inlet temperatures have risen. Thiscauses the heat exchange from the
without any books? One academic library branchrecently had to learn the answer to that question for itself.LITERATURE REVIEWThe idea of a “bookless library” has been around for at least fifteen years, with engineeringlibraries making up the bulk of this trend. Stanford University made what is considered the firstattempt with their renovation of their engineering library in 2009. However, since some bookswere still kept on site, the library is not considered fully bookless.[1]In 2010, the University of Texas at San Antonio’s Applied Engineering and Technology Librarybecame the first to officially eliminate all physical books within its space.[2] Located in theinstitution’s Applied Engineering and Technology Building, the library occupies what
classroom settings, and clarified their approaches to culturallyresponsive and student-centered STEM teaching. This work contributes to our understanding ofenhancing pre-service and in-service teacher education, supporting the development of diverse andinclusive STEM learning environments. 11. IntroductionTeacher beliefs play a critical role in shaping instructional practices, as established by Dewey(1933) [1] and Rokeach (1968) [2]. Building on Bandura's social cognitive theory (1986, 1997)[3], which highlights the influence of outcome expectancies on actions, this study examines howpre-service teachers’ beliefs evolve and inform their engagement with
verticalalignment process is detailed in Appendix A. Each district’s VA plan addressed the following key questionsdeveloped by the workforce development organization: 1. What robotics, coding/programming, electronics, and engineering tools will students use, and what skills will they learn at this grade level? 2. How will you expose students to careers in the semiconductor industry? 3. What employability skills are important at this grade level, and how will they be developed? 4. What additional resources or connections will you incorporate?The VA plans outlined how semiconductor-related activities and career connections would be implementedfor an entire school year, covering grades K-12. Two example summaries of district VA plans are providedin
newapplications and developing new lecture topics. In addition, manual grading does not provideinstant feedback to the students on their performance and understanding. More and morehomework has moved online in recent years, and many textbooks come with online homeworkassignments with automated grading.Some research has shown that automated grading is helpful for students, while others show amore neutral effect. Arura et al. show that online homework significantly improved students’grades in a statics course [1]. Multiple attempts at homework problems have been shown toprove the scores in an economics class [2]. Magalhães et al. [3] provide a literature review of thebenefits and pitfalls of online homework. They noted that others found that the ability
construction.This statistic shows that having a family member in the construction industry is a stronginfluence when it comes to students deciding what academic route to follow [1]. Another highlyinfluential factor in the students' reasoning for enrolling in construction science is having work-related experiences with construction, specifically, working in construction outside of aninternship capacity [2].That is an effective approach to learn about the construction industry and the kind of people thatwork in it every day. Unfortunately, not every student can work in or around construction beforethey need to decide if they will go into construction science. The portion of students outside ofthat category select construction science for varied reasons
series on the topic.By weaving these practical, community-focused projects into engineering education, we canbetter prepare students to apply their skills meaningfully, contribute to public health awareness,and foster a commitment to community service. This study’s insights into effective infographicdesign thus serve as a springboard for innovative educational practices that bridge the gapbetween engineering expertise and societal needs, reinforcing the importance ofmultidisciplinary approaches in addressing global health challenges. Table 1: CDC Infographics AnalysisCategory Name Type Elements EffectivenessAntibiotic Antibiotic Static Uses colorful Very
supportinginitiatives to advance student learning in undergraduate engineering education [1]. As thecultures of academic engineering departments adapt to promote pedagogical change to bettermeet the future needs of their diversifying student populations and develop them intoexperimental and innovative engineers, a primary goal for these departments must be providingfaculty members with the necessary tools and resources to innovate in their teaching andeffectively support their students. Faculty development, an established approach utilized inachieving change in teaching practices, is aimed at providing faculty with broad pedagogicalskills or motivation and resources for self-improvement [2]. Common goals of change strategiesproposed by faculty development
most useful for addressingchallenges that are complex, require many people, and in which there is a high degree ofuncertainty about the best approach.1 This set of conditions holds true far beyond productdevelopment.One such scenario is that of planning and implementation of organizational interventions –anenvironment in which “strategic planning” is often the tool of choice but one which is ineffectivein a networked (rather than hierarchical) context. An alternative approach described in this paperis “strategic doing”. As in agile product development, the approach uses iterative cycles ofimplementation, learning and reflection, and improvement, with a focus on rapidexperimentation and gradual scaling up of solutions. While not designed for
for members ofunderrepresented populations (i.e., women and minorities), and is further exacerbated when enteringgraduate students come from different schools than those which they are entering to pursue a graduatedegree 1. In other words, while the transition to graduate school is a challenge for everyone, certainfactors can amplify this challenge for different individuals. Thus, this article articulates a framework of apilot summer graduate engineering bridge program and the assessment of its impact.The transitions to new educational contexts are not unique to graduate education, and studies haveexamined the transition from high school into undergraduate program, particularly among engineeringstudents 2, 3. Conclusions from these studies
three areas in whichengineering education must justifiably direct considerable attention.4 The Enterprise model, bydesign and in practice, requires a high degree of interaction among team members and betweenstudent team members and faculty advisors and industry mentors. Research establishes that theseinteractions are the most predictive measures of positive change in college students’ academicand personal development and satisfaction.1 The Enterprise program, as a core imperative foreducating engineers for the future, teaches and trains students for professional practice – withpractice understood as the “complex, creative, responsible, contextually grounded activities thatdefine the work of engineers at its best”.7The program, with its emphasis
communication is challenging on several fronts. Students have notacquired the necessary object language, they, like many, struggle to describe shapes, and theylack sufficient repertoire.Study context and methodsThis study was conducted in a private undergraduate university within its Engineering Schoolunder the approval of the Institutional Review Board. The seven students who volunteered toparticipate, four males and three females, were Mechanical Engineering juniors within a requireddesign course.Each student was asked to describe three common items from a hardware store: The first was alow-flow garden sprinkler assembly, the second was a steel electrical junction box, and the thirda pair of slip joint pliers. These items are shown in Figures 1-3
threats, and implications includingnext steps.II. Background and context for change in faculty perspectivesThe PRD process follows eight basic steps, and seeks to center the curriculum on the learner,rather than the educator (Fowler, Macik, Turner, & Hohenstein, 2015). The steps are describedas the CVEN department faculty, students, and administration involved in this study experiencedthem.Step 1) Select team members and orient them to the process. The department chair andcurriculum team leadership met with the educational developer on PRD to review and furtherdefine the steps of the process and reach agreement. A graduate student, pursuing a professionalmaster’s degree in civil engineering, was hired to support the effort in September of
practical teaching tools andmethods for educating students as well as radio engineers and researchers about new trends inwireless communications with a focus on spectrum sharing.1 IntroductionWireless communications research is investigating how to make better use of the radio frequency(RF) spectrum. Increasing the throughput per unit bandwidth (spectral efficiency) is a popularchoice that is continuously improved and employed in practice. Reusing frequency bands oppor-tunistically (dynamic spectrum access or DSA) is still in the research phase, but is likely to makeits transition to practice in the near future based on the currently ongoing license auctions for theAWS-3 and other bands in the United States.These techniques are covered in
University of New Hampshire wasestablished in 1973 as a centralized research facility within the Office of the Senior Vice-Provostfor Research. The UIC, located at the main campus of the University in Durham, NewHampshire, houses much of the shared, high end scientific, analytical instrumentation for theuniversity. The main campus is approximately 1 hour from the Manchester campus where theET Program resides.The mission of the University Instrumentation Center (UIC) is to support the research, teaching,and engagement missions of UNH by providing access to the best analytical instruments,scientists, and engineers. In support of the university’s engagement mission and as a broaderimpact requirement for many federal grant programs, the UIC partners
the ways first-year engineering students develop their identity.Research on first-year students suggests the first semester plays a major role in student retention,particularly in fields such as engineering, as many students know whether or not they willcontinue studying engineering by the end of the fall semester and few students transfer intoengineering after the first year.1 Motivational psychologists such as Deci (1995) have argued thatautonomy is essential to student identity development, as well as lifelong learning.In this study researchers investigated how first-year students spent six hours of free time as partof a first year, first semester course at a small engineering college. The instructor designed thesesix hours to encourage
of Education (HCDE), and the Southeast TennesseeDevelopment District (SETDD). The holistic approach taken by the partnership addresses allaspects of workforce development: recruiting high school students into the power sector careers;training the next generation of technicians, engineers, and managers; and instructing the existingworkforce in new technologies.UTC is ideally situated for collaborations with the power industry. Situated less than a mile fromboth TVA’s operations center and from the headquarters of EPB, the local power distributorwhich was a recipient of a $112 million DOE smart grid grant 1, UTC regularly pulls from theseorganizations for adjuncts and research partners. In 2006, UTC gathered a group of leaders fromthe local
software is loaded to perform the necessary processingand no hardware modification is required. This approach allows for ease of adaptability, shortensdevelopment effort and greatly reduces cost and complexity. The generic architecture of an SDRsystem is shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1: General SDR ArchitectureThe advantages of using SDR in commercial applications also applies to its use in an academiclaboratory setting. Many recent papers describe the use of SDR systems for academicinstructional purposes. These include various analog and digital communications experimentsand projects3,4,5,6 based on the popular Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) platform(available from Ettus Research/National Instruments7
ideas rooted inSystems Engineering.The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE)1 defines Systems Engineeringas “an interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems.”The Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), created by Body of Knowledge andCurriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) project2, notes that systemsengineering includes the “full life cycle of successful systems, including problemformulation, solution development and operational sustainment and use.” As noted in theSEBoK, a host of criteria such as continuous process improvement, considerations fortradeoffs, system integration, safety, recycling, etc., are needed while developing solutions fortechnical problems. In fact
(continues, ordinals, and dichotomous ones) based on detailed information aboutstudent grades in their first-year courses. Among these variables we included ratio ofpassed versus enrolled credits, variation of grades from first to second semester in bothpassed and failed courses, and difference between the final grade and the minimum gradefor passing, which in this case is 4, where 1 is the minimum and 7 the maximum of thescale. The decision about how much academic data to include in the model deserves somediscussion. In our case, a consecutive failing can only happen in the second semester. Theearlier we are able to detect those likely to fail a course twice in a row, the better. On theother hand, with more time to capture academic data
neurological issuesassociated with TBI and developing technologies. They identify current research to better Page 26.731.2understand these issues and neural engineering efforts to support the needs of patients affectedby TBI. Students explore normal brain function, the impacts of brain injuries, and the potential ofneural engineering devices through the use of a Brain Box model (see Figure 1). In this activity,students build a physical model of the lobes of the brainusing PVC pipe and then use craft materials to constructmodels of the neurons within the lobes. After building theBrain Box model, students connect neurons within andacross lobes and then
Political Science Electrical Engineering Psychology Environmental Engineering Public Policy Environmental Studies Shipbuilding and Ocean EngineeringInitially, there were 15 teams established at the workshop. Of the 15 teams, 5 teams chose not tocontinue with their projects due to lack of commitment and/or lack of time due to their busyschedules in school after the workshop was completed.Below are descriptions of the remaining 10 teams that continue to work on their projects: 11 1. The “FoodSlowers” team is from Koç University. This team is working on multiple projects relating to the “slow food” concept. They are introducing the concept of “slow food” to their
with advisors and mentors, and provided brainstorming and support to help negotiatethese relationships. The assessment data were hand-coded to identify common themes2 and theresults include some striking perspectives of graduate women in STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, Math) and suggestions of ways to better support members of this group throughco-curricular programs.IntroductionIn 2013, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU) was awarded a mini-grant to support a co-curricular program for graduate students that used the best-selling book,Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead 1 as a framework for promoting professionaldevelopment and community building. “Lean In” encourages both men and women to examinethe
count of the tons of recycled steel used during thecurrent calendar year. Currently, Nucor (in conjunction with two foreign-owned steel companies)operates a facility in Crawfordsville, Indiana that continuously casts sheet steel directly frommolten steel without the need for heavy, expensive, and energy-consuming rollers. The processknown as Castrip30, if successful, would allow an entire mill to be built in 1/6 the space of a'mini-mill' and at 1/10 the cost of a traditional integrated mill. They call this concept a 'micro- Page 26.137.6mill'. Also, Nucor has two pilot projects, one in Western Australia and one in Brazil, which aredeveloping low
transformative experience. Thetransformative experience is a learning experience, after which a student will : 1) apply ideasfrom a course in everyday experience without being required to (also called motivated use); 2)see everyday objects or situations differently, through the lens of the new content (expandedperception); and 3) value the content in a new way because it enriches everyday affectiveexperience (affective value)3. The transformative experience stems from John Dewey’s seminaltheory of experiential learning, and influenced by his work on the value of aestheticexperiences4,5. In other words, we want students to be able to perceive concepts they havelearned in the larger world, put those concepts to work, and enjoy the experience. Framing
(STEM) disciplines. Across all groups, womenparticipate at lower levels than their co-ethnic male counterparts.1-3 Most activities to rectifysuch a deficiency in STEM disciplines have focused on K-16 initiatives to address lack ofpreparation, inability to balance coursework and external commitments, self-efficacy, andfinancial limitations.4-6 However, there has been minimal focus on issues faced by graduatestudents or the need for effective mentoring of post-docs and new faculty in engineering toattract and retain them in academic careers. This is alarming as one approach to increase thenumber of underrepresented minorities who graduate with a STEM degree is to use hierarchicalmentoring, i.e., undergraduate mentor to faculty mentor.7 This is a
of aeronautics to their major. They madeconnections between aeronautics and their major where previously they thought none existed.This had the effect of changing their attitude towards the course and the material, a positiveoutcome.IntroductionWith the implementation of EC2000 requirements for the assessment of engineering programs,the Criterion 3 Student Outcomes a-k have become an important part of any engineering majorand are essential for accreditation.1 Several of these criteria, listed below, present challenges to Page 26.598.2any program: The program must have documented student outcomes that prepare graduates to attain
Page 26.1100.3industry mentors who advise each team on technical and professional issues.These multi-disciplinary, multi-university AerosPACE teams have demonstrated many of theadvantages of learning in such an environment. They have also identified some specificchallenges and opportunities that academic institutions and industry partners must be aware of.The end of the paper contains a “Looking Back” section where former undergraduate studentswho have spent 1-3 years in industry provide their feedback on how effective this DBF projectwas at preparing them to succeed professionally.Projects SummaryIn order to better understand the student experiences and impact, it is important to review thevarious student activities in the context of their
collected from thirty-five student interviews, we developed aconceptual framework for CCD progression. The Culturally Contextualized Design frameworkrepresents three levels of sophistication – novice, aware, and informed – for each of the fiveCCD aspects: (1) human-centered, (2) collaborative, (3) intentional, (4) open to flexibility andambiguity, and (5) invested and committed. The goal of this paper is to present the examples ofthree engineering students with different backgrounds and experiences and to map theirdevelopment within the framework. We also discuss the potential utility of this new frameworkto understand how engineering students learn to integrate culture and design and to assess theimpact of educational practices.Introduction and