/week.TT is the estimated total time spent by the faculty member on teaching activities in hours/week.EWC is the number of equivalent work credits. (1 EWC = 3 hours/week)CN is the number of contact hours for the particular class section per week.TS is the hours of work required per contact hour for the type of section taught. For section types in our department, 3.0 is used for lecture sections and 2.0 is used for laboratory sections.The constant 0.5 and subsequent 0.5 multiplier of (AE/NS) provide the 50-50 division betweenwork which is independent of enrollment and work that increases in proportion to enrollment.AE is the actual number of students in the class section as of the official university tenth day count
“pitfalls” which may be encountered. Manufacturingeducators are encouraged to carefully plan to use IMM systems as an aid to teaching their classes. The explosive growth in the capabilities of personal computers has helped bring thecomputer into nearly every facet of the operation of a business. Manufacturing educators haveused computers as tools to solve industrial problems for years. Computer instruction onprogramming and the use of software packages is a major element of accredited programs inmanufacturing engineering technology. Manufacturing laboratories at a two year or four yearinstitution use computers for engineering design, manufacturing planning and control,calculations and productivity analysis, quality control, cost analysis
to the latest COVID-19 guidelines of higher education institutions, the number of coursesoffered in in-person delivery mode was lower. There were several limitations while deliveringthe laboratory components with strict social distancing regulations. Several educators indicatedthat the FC model helped them provide an efficient and successful learning environment[3][4][5].Lately, the popularity of web-based education and communication tools has helped the universityprofessors consider virtual teaching [6][7] and develop their instruction/laboratory materials withthe use of several MOOC (massive open online course) components [8], remotely accessiblelaboratory links [9], and ZOOM/TEAMS communication tools [10].This paper studies how FC
H-bridge motor controller and contact sensors) to the frame, and build the digital logic on the supplied solderless protoboard. The teaching pendent used for programming is shown to the right.II. Course ImplementationEE 101, Introduction to Electrical Engineering, is a two credit-hour course - one lecture hour andone lab hour - presented over 14 weeks. There is no text; all material is presented using lectureand lab notes. There are no tests or final exams. Student evaluation is performed via individualhomework assignments, team lab assignments, and a team project.The laboratory has six stations each consisting of a computer, an oscilloscope, a bench-top digitalmultimeter, a hand-held digital multimeter, a logic probe, a 32
Bearing Base School Girls Isolation system for Earthquake • Christos Valiotis, Improving Conceptual Engineering Demonstration Understanding and Problem Solving • Constantin Ciocanel, et al., Teaching Skills in Introductory Physics Courses Engineering Laboratories Based On A Using the Socratic Dialogue Method Problem Solving Approach • Jeffrey S. Burmeister, et al., What is • Larry Jang, Internet-based Control Engineering? – a MESA Program/Johns Systems with Demonstration of Real- Hopkins University Partnership time, Real-world Control
ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1-6, 2008.7. Macias-Guarasa, J., Montero, J., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., & Nieto-Taldriz, O. A Project-Based Learning Approach to Design Electronics Systems Curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 389-397, 2006.8. Jenkins, B., Field, C.T. Practical Circuit Design in an Elementary Circuit Theory Lab. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2000.9. Firebaugh, S., Jenkins, B., Ciezki, J. A Comprehensive Laboratory Design Project for Teaching Advanced Circuit Analysis. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2004.10. Michaud, Francois, et al
attend each week.The approach used in the engineering courses allows some 120 senior undergraduate students totake on the role of teaching assistants, where they accept the responsibility of co-teaching atutorial or laboratory. Teaching assistants always work in pairs or threes, and as often aspossible, experienced teaching assistants are matched with new ones. Unlike in many othercourses where teaching assistants simply work problems and review material in tutorials, theteaching assistants in the engineering courses are assigned new material that must be covered forthe students to succeed. The TA is given the task of teaching students new material not coveredin lecture, and is responsible for answering questions in class and on the web, and
and ability to teach course content. Instead, the SPVEL connects students’ 1)appreciation for laboratory discipline content and relevance to their career aspirations, 2)engineering role identity development as a function of participation within the lab, and studentsociocultural identities (race, ethnicity, and gender).Research QuestionSPVEL was used to answer two research questions. How do student’s sociocultural identitycharacteristics relate to their perceptions of value in a virtual engineering lab? How are students’perceptions of virtual lab value related to the sociocultural identities and lab report grades?Research Methodology and EnvironmentThis study was conducted in a capstone senior Mechanical and Aerospace engineering
course sequence is used for ABET accredited majors.This paper presents the approach used by the Electrical and Computer EngineeringDepartment at the Naval Academy to improve the technological literacy of non-engineering students. Electrical engineering fundamentals and applications areemphasized with the relevant mathematics introduced as needed. Applications of thefundamentals evolve to stress the relevance of a particular topic area. Key technicalconcepts are reinforced with practical laboratory exercises. The final practical exercisetakes place aboard a Naval Academy patrol craft. The students explore the electricalsystems on the ship and relate them to the fundamentals studied during the semester.Course outcomes show that students across a
AC 2007-2028: ARIZONA-TEXAS CONSORTIUM FOR ALTERNATIVE ANDRENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIESLakshmi Munukutla, Arizona State University Lakshmi Munukutla received her Ph.D. degree in Solid State Physics from Ohio University, Athens, Ohio and M.Sc and B.Sc degrees from Andhra University, India. She has been active in research and published several journal articles. She is the Chair of the Electronic Systems Department at Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus.Richard Newman, Arizona State University Richard L. Newman recently retired from the Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus as Director of Training Operations for the Microelectronics Teaching Factory. Prior to joining
classes were recently involved in the redesign of a university laboratory site tofulfill the requirements of an architectural based design project. This project is a workingexample of how an interdisciplinary relationship between the Physics Department and the Schoolof Engineering Technology provided an ideal opportunity to support the practical goals of boththe ACE (Academic Common Experience) and the industrial format. To provide real-lifeexperience, students benefited from visits to the site of the proposed physics laboratory and apresentation by the laboratory director. Following the industrial model, student developedpreliminary design drawings based on the architect’s existing multi-layered AutoCAD workingdrawings. These preliminary
this by teaching students to make key hardware/software tradeoff designdecisions. This is achieved with the following ICED components: 1) a 2-3 year long projectspanning six or more hardware and software courses; 2) required coursework including advancedsoftware topics such as compiler design, as well as a full slate of hardware courses; 3) the use ofmodern commercial EDA (Electronic Design Automation) tools2; and 4) custom hardware3 andsoftware to enhance the laboratory experience of the students. Page 5.654.1ICED was begun in 1997 with funding from the National Science Foundation. In 1999 furtherfunding was obtained from the Champlin
. Scores of educators and industrial personnel have contributed 213experiments and demonstrations for demonstration then publication as NASA ConferenceProceedings. Through a collaborative effort among education, industry, and national laboratories,all of the experiments from the first ten years of NEW:Updates are now available for easy use onCD-ROM in the popular Acrobat Reader format; the same format used for the Annual ASEEConference Publications CD-ROM.This presentation provides an overview of the now completed Experiments in Materials Science,Engineering and Technology CD-ROM (EMSET CD-ROM) and a tutorial of how to use the CD-ROM to support teaching of materials science, engineering, and technology. The 213experiments and demonstrations are
enhance both individual and team learning in these settings from both student andfaculty perspectives. The working premise was that Tablets have added benefit, in comparisonto laptops, since much engineering content consists of equations and diagrams, entry of which iscumbersome at best with a keyboard and/or mouse. A secondary objective was to ascertain howstudents would adopt and adapt to this new computing platform. Three distinct studies arediscussed in the following pages.Study 1: A First-Year Engineering Design LaboratorySince Spring 2005, Tablets have been utilized in the laboratory section of a first-year engineeringdesign course. This course is a requirement of our electrical and mechanical engineering majors.To date, ~250 students have
methods required in one application. The Texaco Lab also includes computer simulations of laboratory experiments. Page 9.904.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education4. The IDEALS courses (Integrated Design, Engineering Analysis, and Life Skills) teach the theory of mechanical engineering analysis and then directly apply those skills to an engineering design problem. The IDEALS concept has been applied in ME 31, Thermodynamics II, and in a senior lab course where students must identify
teaching staff to run EG&CAD for 750-800 students/year has always been achallenge. EG&CAD runs twelve to twenty sections each semester; concerns aboutequality of instruction and evaluation between the sections always existed. Over the lastten years, several methods of instruction and teaching material have been developed tohelp ensure the uniformity of the learning experience for the students[2][3][4][5][6][7]. In thelast year, the focus of the course development has been on providing intervention tostudents who struggle in the early lessons[2]. In this paper, the software implementationdeveloped to provide students with immediate feedback to their laboratory work isdiscussed. By writing macro programs in Visual Basic and taking advantage
three phase circuits, synchronousgenerators, and transformers. The grade breakdown includes four homework assignments, fourquizzes, two midterm exams, final exam, and laboratory. The results show that performance did notget affected much during the pandemic when teaching suddenly transitioned to an online platform dueto the fact that students had access to recorded lectures they could access multiple times. Theperformance after the college reopened its in-person teaching seems to have dropped. No studentsdropped before, during, or after the first wave of the pandemic, but the performance seems to havedropped after students came back for in person classes. Fig. 6 Assessment of Power Systems Fig. 7 Assessment of Power
is also active in ophthalmology research - having co-formed and currently serving as a Technical Director for the ophthalmology-based medical device design lab (ORBITLab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Anthony holds a B.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengi- neering.Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and currently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medical devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She co-teaches both bioengineering
materials, and (2) improving engineering education through innovative teaching and research techniques, with emphasis on attracting under-represented minorities and women. Through years he has published more than 70 refereed papers with funding support from NSF, NASA, ARPA, AFOSR, ARO, U.S. Army TACOM-TARDEC and ARDEC-Picatinny Arsenal, AT&T, Digital Equipment Corporation, Alliant Techsystems, Frontier Performance Polymers, NYS GRI and PSC CUNY. In addition to being active in research, he had also served as the ECSEL Project Director at CCNY in 1993-2001. The main charge of the NSF-funded ECSEL Coalition is to improve undergraduate engineering education through design across the
microcontrollers with microtrainerssystems. This approach has two deficiencies. First, students must be in the laboratory todebug real-time code and physically connect peripherals, leaving little opportunity forextracurricular experimentation. Second, treating only the microcontroller distances thestudent from the ubiquitous PC and its standards. A new approach to teaching computer systems and assembly language for sophomoreelectrical engineering students is being investigated at Auburn University. Due to curriculumrestrictions, the sophomore level course has no formal hardware laboratory. From the outset,four issues were addressed: treating PC-related issues via the 8086 microprocessor (ourtraditional approach), introducing embedded systems with simple
the conventional machine tools that populate the typical manufacturing engineering laboratory. Many processes require quite different machine tools (e.g., manufacture of electronic devices or nano-scale products). Others at least require resolution, tolerances and control well-beyond the traditional norms (e.g., micro-manufacturing). A simple or universal solution to the equipment challenge does not seem to be available. University budgets everywhere are under great pressure, and coaxing out the significant new investments necessary will likely be at long odds. There are very few opportunities to compete for grant funding for teaching apparatus -- not nearly enough to serve the needs of even a significant fraction of
. This maker space provides additive manufacturing support for design courses, laboratory courses, and entrepreneur initiatives. This facility houses several differ- ent technology 3D printers that capable of printing parts from polymers, fibers, composites, and metals as well as 3D scanning and subtractive manufacturing equipment. His research focuses on machining and manufacturing with a specific concentration on the use of additive manufacturing processes for ad- vanced materials. He emphasis on design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), topology optimization, lightweight applications, and finite element analysis in additive manufacturing processes. Dr. Vora exten- sively teaches the additive manufacturing
) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation and Usage of an Online Environment in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractWe have developed an online system to serve as a hub for student activities in our chemicalengineering
, and implementationsaccomplished via this workshop.The State of the Art The mission for all instructors is to educate their students the best way possible.Their teaching techniques should challenge, educate, and promote the students'innovative thinking1. The lecture-based format of teaching, which predominates inengineering education, may not be best to achieve these technical learning goals2.Through the lecture method, an instructor introduces students to course work byproducing notes on a chalkboard or overhead projector. The instructor then hopes thatstudents can regurgitate this collected information on their homework or exams. Someclasses, if students are lucky, have accompanied laboratory practices where they can gainhands-on
Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.11. S. J. Lee, E. L. Allen, and L. He, “A Bottom-up Approach to Interdisciplinary Engineering Education in Nanotechnology,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.12. V. Mitin, X. Liu, D. Vo, H. Van, and A. Verevkin, Presentation: “Undergraduate AFM/STM Laboratory,” The 3rd International Seminar on Teaching Nanoscience with Scanning Probe Microscopy, Chicago, IL, March 28, 2007.13. N. Jaksic, “Nanoscience, Nanoengineering and Nanotechnology Education at Colorado State University – Pueblo,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.14. N. Jaksic, “A Design
relationships through physicochemical characterization. The focus is mainly on hydrogen and direct methanol fuel cells for stationary as well as automotive applications.Richard Newman, Arizona State University Richard L. Newman recently retired from the Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus as Director of Training Operations for the Microelectronics Teaching Factory. Prior to joining Arizona State University, Richard served as an Associate Director at the NSF funded Maricopa Advanced Technology Education Center (MATEC) and twenty years as a faculty member and administrator within the Division of Technology and Applied Sciences at Arizona Western College and the University of
manufacturing process for their own designs.Course lectures were followed by hands-on laboratory assignments where students were given aproblem to solve using the concepts learned in the classroom and utilizing the design andmanufacturing facilities at the lab. The first laboratory sessions provided students with hands-onexperiences in programming and operating manufacturing equipment such as CNC milling andrapid prototyping machines. The manufacturing laboratories were performed in teams of 2 to 3students.Students taking the Manufacturing Processes course have been exposed to CAD softwarethrough a pre-requisite course. However, it was observed during the teaching of the controlgroup that their exposure to CAD software was limited and this caused
if each Course Outcome has been “tested”. It has also been our experiencethat the process is typically not completed until the beginning of the next term. This is not aproblem and typically necessary due to the need to review teaching evaluations which are notreturned to the faculty until early the following semester. The first time, the development ofFCARs also generated much confusion for the faculty, as does any new process. Severalrepetitions of this process were required after each semester (fall and spring) to develop thedesired result and the faculty all agreed that the process truly made them consider what they wereteaching, what they wanted the students to learn and whether the student were actually learningthe material sufficiently
close relationship with the Nuclear University Consortium that is part of the BEA team.In summary, the opportunities for developing a new paradigm for national laboratory anduniversity interaction and cooperation lies ahead. Successful development of the partnership willlead to effective implementation of the INL mission and of a viable future for nuclear energy inthe nation and the world.--------------------------------------Biographical InformationJay Kunze is the Dean of Engineering and Associate Director of the Idaho Accelerator Center atIdaho State University (ISU). He spent 20 years of his career at the INL predecessor laboratories,then 5 years as president of a geothermal energy company. During that period he was an adjunct(teaching
-on laboratory demonstrations and projects. Topics include aerospace propulsion, astrodynamics,aerodynamics, stability and control of aircraft and spacecraft, structures and materials, and computer-aided design (CAD). Each of these topics includes either computer or traditional laboratory componentsto keep the students engaged. Some examples of the accompanying hands-on work include the designand construction of balsa wood gliders following the lecture on aerodynamics, and the designing of trussbridges using CAD tools, which are subsequently formed from ABS plastic using a rapid-prototypingprinter. These particular activities end with a friendly competition between students using both their balsaglider, flown for maximum glide distance, and