), pp.222- 233.[11] T. Peck, S. Seinfeld, S. Aglioti and M. Slater, "Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias", Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 779- 787, 2013. Available: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016.[12] H. Farmer and L. Maister, "Putting Ourselves in Another’s Skin: Using the Plasticity of Self-Perception to Enhance Empathy and Decrease Prejudice", Social Justice Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 323-354, 2017. Available: 10.1007/s11211-017-0294-1.[13] Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons.[14] G. Behler. "Disability Simulations as a Teaching Tool: Some Ethical Issues and
socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is currently completing a book manuscript on the intersection of engineering and corporate social responsibility. She is the author of Mining Coal and Un- dermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by the National Science Foundation and National Endowment for the Humanities. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Professor Smith holds a PhD in Anthropology and a certificate in Women’s Studies from the University of Michigan and bachelor’s degrees in International Studies, Anthropology and
Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG) utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education
principles to propose novel and practical solutions to medical/human health problems 2. Ability to gain basic understanding of business, finances, intellectual property and regulatory matters 3. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibilities 4. Ability to communicate real-world scientific problems with bigger vision and offer solutions, as well as their impact, effectively to a diverse audience and stakeholders, both orally and in writing 5. Demonstrate moderate to high technical mastery in chosen research area, shown by the ability to identify an important scientific problem, formulate a hypothesis, and design experiments to conduct research and data analysis to test the hypothesis. The student
Paper ID #27026Board 67: Shame in Engineering: Unpacking the Expectations that StudentsCo-Construct and Live WithinDr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr. James Huff is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and teaches courses in design thinking and ethics. In the context of his research lab Beyond Professional Identity (BPI), he mentors undergrad- uate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals in using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) as a qualitative research method to conduct psychological investigations on identity as experienced in and out of professional domains. He received
with younger people with different previous degrees or certifications. Some notedthat there is a need for veterans to come together and talk about these interaction issues anddifferent work ethics. In the military, they noted that if there are some problems, they do not losetheir job but instead get transferred to another. They also noted that not all veterans are the same:Navy veterans are different from Army veterans, etc., but still they have more common ground,and similar work ethic, than they do with the traditional population of students. They noted thatthey prefer classes that are attendance optional and more interactive. They agreed that whileprofessors are clicking through slides fast, it is hard for them to sit and watch a
classifiedas masters institutions by the Carnegie classification system. Out of the total 21 comparativelearning gains in the SURE survey, the EGGN 122 students’ learning gains were higher than theaverage student population for the following 10 areas: tolerance for obstacles, understandknowledge construct, assertions require evidence, understand science, learn ethical conduct,learn lab techniques, understand primary literature, understand how scientists think, learn towork independently, and potential for science teaching.Figure 8. Comparative means on the 21 learning gain items. The mean learning gains from "YourStudents" data are depicted as green triangles. For comparison, the "All Students" means (bluediamonds) represent the n≤3281 responses from
Department of Engineering Sciences and Materials at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus (UPRM). He earned B.S. degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University (1993) and a Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics at Cornell University (1999). Prior to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the Department of Civil engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by
importance of ethics, decision making, team working, design, marketing and communications in solving a real-world problem, 2) Business students learn about importance of engineering technologies and engineering design and their role in innovation and ethics in solving a real-world problem, 3) Both group of students use presentations, project management, team work, and write-ups to enhance their learning experiences. The course also involves elements like real-world case studies, lab exercises, guestlectures and final comprehensive project involving both business and engineering technologiesand concepts. The NAE came up with fourteen grand challenges9, the world is currently facingand started the E4U2 video
oralcommunications and knowledge in engineering ethics from an instructor-led team-orientedenvironment. The industry sponsor also benefits from the project deliverables and anopportunity to interact with groups of students who are often eager for an opportunity to applytheir knowledge and ultimately launch their career. Details of sample projects and feedbackfrom students in meeting course objectives are discussed in this paper.IntroductionOne of the critical steps in the product realization process is the engineering design, whichdeserves special attention in undergraduate education to better prepare graduating engineers insatisfying the rapidly changing demands of the industry [1][2]. An engineering graduate shouldbe able to apply the knowledge of
enrolled in talent developmentprogram5, using web-based instructional materials to learn with Rube Goldberg projects in K-12classrooms6, using Rube Goldberg projects as a design based learning tool for freshmenengineering students7, providing early experience in multidisciplinary teaming and an earlyexposure to ethics in an interdisciplinary freshmen course8, integrating design andexperimentation to freshmen students with an electromechanical Rube Goldberg design project9,introducing design early in the curriculum to improve motivation and increase retention10,assessing engineering students’ understanding of design after a short workshop given precedingthe beginning of their first semester11.Besides K-12 and freshmen level, RGMs were also used in
during the internship, write a finalreport on their capstone project, and deliver a final poster presentation of their capstone project.Rubrics are provided for the students so they understand the expectations for each deliverable.Upon completion of the program, students will be able to 1. Demonstrate broad technical skills 2. Think critically & solve problems 3. Discuss current research 4. Discuss the history, theory, & ethics of stem cell investigation 5. Present and communicate effectively 6. Network with professionals in the fieldInternship MatchingThe centerpiece of this program is the 9-month internship that our students embark on. As such,we worked to develop a formal procedure to facilitate the pairing process to
doing this, including the Ecodesign Strategy Wheel5 and LifeCycle Assessment.6The second category of instructional goals was to use the exercise to develop students’entrepreneurial skills and increase their awareness of the importance of these skills. Fivebehaviors were specifically targeted which support the KEEN Student Outcomes:7 Apply critical and creative thinking to ambiguous problems Construct and effectively communicate a customer-appropriate value proposition Effectively collaborate in a team setting Persist through and learn from failure Discern and pursue ethical practicesThe full set of KEEN Student Outcomes may be found in the appendix.The topic of sustainability provides excellent opportunities to
economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityD. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamsE. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsF. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityG. An ability to communicate effectivelyH. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextI. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningJ. A knowledge of contemporary issues, andK. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.With the addition of these Rep-Rap machines to
Policy, 7(4):427-446.17. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992). Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268 (17): 2420–2425.18. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Muir, G.J.A., Haynes, R.B., and Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312:71-2.19. Upshur, R.E.G., VanDenKerkhof, E.G., and Goel, V. (2001). Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2):91-96.20. Rogers, W.A. (2004). Evidence based medicine and justice: a framework for looking at the impact of EBM upon vulnerable or disadvantaged groups. Journal of Medical Ethics; 30:141-145.21
improvements. water emissions. Tragedy of the Students play out Harden’s Tragedy of the One of our collaborations has developed a Commons Commons using gold fish. Students series of ethics games; one of which is a more discuss ethics of sustainability. Note, this complex version of the simple gold fish is a common exercise available in many module. versions. Page 26.8.4Summary of Critical CollaborationsThe collaborations that enabled a successful first two years of this program aresummarized in Figure 1. Drs. Parrish and Bilec
Outcomes.Cadets possess: a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. an ability to communicate effectively h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
week. Each of the Page 26.65.24 lecture sections, with approximately 150-200 students each, was subdivided into laboratorysections run by a Teaching Assistant (TA) with a maximum of 19 students per lab section. Thelectures were a mix of topics ranging from how to get around campus, student clubs andactivities, time management, general engineering design concepts, engineering ethics,engineering economics, and talks from industry and faculty. Laboratory work consisted ofseveral team-based design projects generally using low cost elements such as Popsicle sticks orsoup cans and tried to teach general engineering design principles. Two full-time
this design project. 0.00 4.76 4.76 66.67 23.81My ability to formulate creative solutions to open-ended problems was enhanced 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.43 28.57by working on the project.The design project encouraged me to be innovative. 0.00 0.00 9.52 42.86 47.62The design project inspired me to deliver a quality design for the community. 0.00 0.00 4.76 61.90 33.33Working with a team on the design project enhanced my leadership skills. 0.00 0.00 19.05 61.90 19.05I became more aware of ethical issues encountered around the world while 0.00 4.76 9.52
Work Experience California Baptist University July 2011-Present: Civil Engineering Department Chair July 2010-June 2011: Civil Engineering Interim Department Chair August 2009-Present Assistant Pro- fessor of Civil Engineering Topics taught: Chemistry, Statistics, Statics, Mathematics, Environmental Engineering, Leadership Cohort, Internship Prep, FE Review, Fluid Mechanics, Water Resources Engi- neering, and Hydrology. University of California, Los Angeles Mar.2008-June2008 Teaching Fellow Engineering Ethics Sept.2007- Mar.2008 Teaching Associate: Engineering Ethics (2 quarters) July 2004-June 2007 Teaching Assistant: Introduction to Water Resources Engineering (2 quarters) Hydrologic Analysis and Design (2
collaboration within a team setting.The Java programming session would be brought into the class right after the App Inventor session.Java was used as a general programming language to reinforce the proficiency of programming andproblem solving skills among students. It also played as a transitional programming language forstudent to continue their study in Computer Science.In addition to programming and problem solving skills, the designed modules also include consid-erable contents on teamwork, social responsibility and ethics. Followings are brief descriptions ofdesigned App Inventor modules:Module 1 is based on the ”Hello Purr” project from Wolber’s book 11 with a few extensions. Itworks as a quick start for students to explore the life cycle of
academic carieer in 2006 as a professor at Tottori University. His current research area is flow and combustion analysis in reciprocating engine, innovations in education and engineering ethics education.. He is also serving as the head of Innovation Center for Engineering Education in joint appointment. Katsuyuki Ohsawa has published over 70 papers including over 40 papers in peer reviewed journals. He received best paper awards from Society of Automotive Engineers in Japan and Japan Gas Turbine Society. He also works as a member of supporting committee in JICA for Pan-Africa University. Prof Ohsawa received Ph D Nagoya University in 1992 and started academic carieer in 2006 as a professor at Tottori University
; catalytic reaction engineering for biomass conversion Chemical Eng.Catalysis & catalytic reaction engineering for reducing SO2 emissionsIntegration of photovoltaic thermal systems in residential buildings for energysaving Civil Eng.Application of seawater-source heat pump in hot climate3.2 Research trainingIt includes a formal training on the scientific method, the development of the research questionand research plan, the research methodology, the importance of social and economic aspects ofthe research, and the professional ethics in research. The training is scheduled to be
extensiveexperience in focus group facilitation. All aspects of this study received ethics approval throughthe institution’s delegated ethics review process. Two focus groups, of four first-year studentseach, were conducted, each lasting approximately one hour. Students were asked theirimpression of each RLO and encouraged to discuss their opinions of each activity including pros,cons and areas for improvement. Each session was audio recorded.The inclusion criterion was enrollment in MSE101, the introductory materials science andengineering course being taught in the Winter 2014 semester at the University of Toronto.Students were not required to have used the RLO. Students were asked to participate on avoluntary basis only.In addition to the audio recording
’: a) ability to use given information and to research for available resources; b) critical thinking and decision-making skills; c) team work and communication skills; d) understanding of environmental engineering and management principles; e) knowledge about engineering professionalism/ethics; f) understanding of engineering design and practice; g) ability to use the computer tools such as Excel and stormwater design tools The SWPPP exercise was: 1. Effective in achieving one or more goals described above (identify and list items
level, three credit, semester long course that introducesengineering students to the foundations of management and organizational theory. Figure 2provides an overview of the course organization. As illustrated in the figure, the course buildson a foundation of management theory. This supports a more complete investigation of the work Page 26.1557.3of managers and theories of motivation and leadership. The topic of ethics is woven throughoutthese materials. Figure 2 - The Relationship Between Core Course TopicsThe course employs a highly inductive teaching approach focused on active learning withalmost all class sessions utilizing
Wright State engineering programs. Moreover, it wasshown that EGR 101 had the greatest effect on the group termed ‘Support Seekers’, composed ofstudents with below median ACT math scores but above median high school GPA’s. The latterindicates greater work ethic and ability to persevere in engineering, while the former mayarguably indicate below median ‘ability’. Thus, the mitigation of ACT math score associatedwith the F04-F06 cohorts was due to the fact that the low ACT math students who enrolled inEGR 101 were predominantly ‘support seekers’, who had the work ethic and perseverancerequired to progress through the remedial math sequence before enrolling in EGR 101. On thecontrary, low ACT math students from the incoming cohorts of Fall 2007
attributed to the development of value systems andvery high ethical standards, teaching others to generate knowledge, and the use of creativity anddiverse backgrounds to bring “unique perspective[s]” to research problems. One engineerdescribed the need for diversity in engineering in order to innovate: “The advances come whenyou’re sort of looking at—you’re applying something new to a different area and you’re bringingin people who haven’t looked at it before.” Others refer to the importance of collaborations andcollaborative work in generating advances in technology, especially between different fields (ex.mechanical engineering and psychology to advance mental health technologies), collaborationsbetween university research facilities and industry
forces on various devices3 Equilibrium Lab: Longboard -Trucks Apply equilibrium conditions to planar systems4 Free Body Diagrams Working with Physical Samples Draw FBDs based on (Small Group Problem Solving) physical systems5 Trusses Hyatt Ethics Case (Small Group Problem Solving)6 Trusses Lab: Bridge Design In a team, design, analyze, build and test a truss
topics: Use the case to illustrate why a particular failure method is important; examples include the I-35W bridge collapse on road-users in the twin cities metropolitan region [24]. Class discussions: Link technical issues to ethical and professional considerations; example includes the Hyatt Regency Walkway collapse [11]. Group and individual projects: Have students research the cases in depth and report back on them. The most successful case studies are those that inspire students to go out, do their own research, and learn more about their chosen profession [5].Research ApproachThe methodology selected for this study included case studies. Case studies can be used to gaininsight on in-depth