Paper ID #15970Redesigning Engineering Education in Chile: How Selective Institutions Re-spond to an Ambitious National ReformDr. Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile Sergio Celis is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering and Sciences at the Universidad de Chile. He conducts research on higher education, with a focus on teaching and learning in STEM fields. His primary research interest is in how multiple forces, internal and external to the institution, influence what and how we teach in colleges and universities. His doctoral thesis investigated how social and intellectual movements influenced the
suppliesand with E-Girl logistics (food, reserving rooms, etc.), and provided funding to expand theprogram to include more K-12 students. All the components mentioned in this section werecritical to the success of the model and to achieve the desired impact.The sustainability components discussed above were all developed and integrated during the firstyear of the program, and they were improved in the subsequent years. The CPP CoE students,faculty member, administrators and staff engaged in the different symbiotic program componentsto meet the program goals. The success of the complex collaboration was an important outcomeof the project. One of the recommendations for universities or colleges that would like to developa successful and sustainable
Paper ID #12630From Pretending to Engineering: An examination of students’ dynamic en-gagements in Novel Engineering design activities (Fundamental)Mary McCormick, Tufts UniversityDr. Jessica Watkins, Tufts University Page 26.804.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Pretending and Engineering: An examination of students’ dynamic engagements in Novel Engineering design activities (Strand: Fundamental)IntroductionRecent reports, frameworks, and assessment criteria1-3 have
having an integrated lecture-labformat with continuous active participation of the students, immediate reinforcement of theengineering principles provided during lecture is offered. “Students learn best when they areactively involved in the process. Researchers report that, regardless of the subject matter, Page 12.1618.15students working in small groups tend to learn more of what is taught and retain it longer thanwhen the same content is presented in other instructional formats. Students who work incollaborative groups also appear more satisfied with their classes.”11Bibliography1. Vander Schaaf, R. and Klosky, J.L., “Show Me the Money!” Using
,traditional, and in-person expectations. Engineering communities coupled to programs had toadapt to the online switch. RQ1 seeks to identify the community features that were importantfrom the students’ perspective for the engineering program. Research Question 1: What are the key features of a community that are important to undergraduate students in an engineering program?The ways in which the individuals and community adapted may provide insight into foundationalelements of engineering student community. Through categorization and identification of themesin how students adapted to the changes, educational strategies might be identified for guidingfuture course and curriculum adaptations. RQ2 seeks to understand how students understood andmade
for constraint motion were then utilized to arrive at the second orderdifferential equations of motion. SIMULINK, as a user friendly graphical interface, wasused to carry out the integration to obtain angular position, velocity, and acceleration ofthe designed mechanism.The project, though rigorous, is an excellent way to force students to practice theirknowledge of dynamics and numerical methods. The project, certainly, meets the ABETcriteria for implementing design in mechanical engineering curriculum. The authorreceived positive feedbacks from his students with regard to this project.Problem StatementStudents in kinematics and dynamics of machinery class were, first, asked to design afour bar quick-return mechanism to meet a certain design
) educators have soughtinnovative ways for integrating technology in teaching and learning to engage and build theinterest of secondary school students in STEM disciplines as well as to capture their imaginationabout STEM careers. Recent technological advancements have allowed design, development,and commercialization of low-cost mini unmanned aerial vehicles (MUAV) that offer a noveland ideal platform to support STEM disciplines in high school classrooms.1 This paper focuseson one illustrative example wherein four sections of a 9th grade quantitative research course,consisting of 25 to 30 students each, were engaged by a graduate researcher through an ARParrot 2.0 (see Figure 1) MUAV-based lab activity, which considered the research question“How
performance can beimproved through an independent spatial visualization course [1-4]. Students in the EngineeringTechnology program at Illinois State University are required to take TEC116, an introductoryconstraint-based modeling and engineering graphics course. Exercises from Introduction to 3DSpatial Visualization: An Active Approach [5] have been integrated into this course since the fallof 2010. The course also includes an introduction to part modeling, drawings, and assembliesusing Autodesk Inventor. During the fall 2015 through the fall 2018 semesters, students wereadministered the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R) [6] andthe Mental Cutting Test (MCT) [7] as pre and post-test measures. This paper will
), computer-based simulationprojects of similar complexities were used to address the same topics.Creative thinking is an important skill needed for modern workplace in engineering and technology fields[3]. Instructors in higher education consider various ways of integrating creativity and innovation into thecourses they teach to better prepare students for their future careers [4]. Study shows that between the twocommonly-used approaches that enhance creativity, i.e., teaching vs. practice creativity, stimulatingcreativity by practices is considered to be more effective [5]. In addition, many professors used project-based learning [6, 7] when trying to foster creativity in their courses [8, 9].Due to robotics’ multi-disciplinary nature, we think
, and that of McLaughlin et al[24], who found that flipped classrooms are significantly better than traditional ones, is thepresence of a dedicated teaching assistant or team of teaching assistants to run the flippedclassroom. The TAs hold office hours, grade assignments, “functioning at the level of efficiencyand expertise of the instructor, especially as it relates to providing thoughtful written feedback”[24]. This interaction is especially important in mathematics or programming courses, whereworking problems is an important part of the curriculum. Mok [25] is an important example ofthis, having a team of dedicated teaching assistants that roved the classroom, allowing pairs ofprogramming students to engage a TA at will whenever “stuck or
their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Dr. Nathan Hyungsok Choe, The Ohio State University Dr. Nathan (Hyungsok) Choe is a research assistant professor in department of engineering education at the Ohio State University. He obtained his PhD in STEM education at UT Austin. His research focuses on the development of engineering identity in graduate school and underrepresented group. Dr. Choe holds master’s and bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering from Illinois Tech. He also worked as an engineer at LG electronics mobile communication company.Amena Shermadou
. Page 12.386.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Comparison of Three Unique Student Populations in an Engineering Technology Strength of Materials CourseAbstractThe Engineering Technology (ET) department at The University of North Carolina at Charlottehas historically been a plus two program, offering only the junior and senior years of the BSETcurriculum. In the fall of 2004, the department began offering all four years of its programs,accepting freshman students for the first time. That first freshman class has now matriculated tothe junior year, joining a new class of transfer students entering at the same point in thecurriculum.Four-year ET programs also opened the door to transfer students from the
Session 1475 Group homework: A new faculty member’s experiences in an introductory engineering course D. C. Miller Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological UniversityIntroduction As described recently1, most new engineering educators teach in the manner they weretaught. Many recognize that more effective methods of instruction must exist; however, theyoften become overwhelmed with literature that is written in “a language that is foreign to them”and, lacking the time to decipher the jargon
variation, measurementoptions, and other process options seem an integral part of an engineering or engineeringtechnology student’s introduction.Introduction and discussion of engineering concerns at the equipment is meant to link the processoperation to the deeper learning objectives. However, we found that students are increasinglyimpatient with demonstration discussion on engineering considerations and tend to disregard asirrelevant topics beyond what they think they need immediately to operate that equipment.Certainly those of us instructing in the lab (instructor and lab technician) were also frustrated atthe time it seemed to take to introduce important processes, tooling, and the processconsiderations. We were already examining ways to use
is an increasing emphasis being placed on quality instruction in engineering education.This is exemplified by the emphasis given to quality of teaching in promotion decisions 5, by theexpanding number of institutions focusing on curriculum development 13, by the significantnumber of publications in this area 3,6,7,10-12,14-20,24,32, by the commitment of the engineeringaccreditation agency ABET in the assessment area 2, and by the continuing funding emphasis bythe National Science Foundation and other agencies. Much of this effort to enhance engineeringeducation is focused in the following areas: learning styles, multimedia visualization/simulation,hands-on experiences, use of real-world problems, and assessment techniques. Thesecomponents
AC 2012-4126: AN INVESTIGATION OF DATA DISPLAYS FOR INTER-PRETING PARTICIPATION IN ONLINE DISCUSSION: TWO PERSPEC-TIVESErin Shaw, University of Southern California Erin Shaw is a Computer Scientist at the Information Sciences Institute at the University of Southern Cal- ifornia’s Viterbi School of Engineering. Her research focuses on modeling and assessing student knowl- edge in the areas of science and mathematics, and experimenting with new technologies for aiding as- sessment in distance learning. As a Co-principal Investigator on National Science Foundation-sponsored studies, she researches new ways to assess student collaboration in undergraduate engineering courses and new ways to motivate secondary
IEcourses for four consecutive semesters (Fall 2021 - Spring 2022) by creating a set of hands-onlearning experiments and using affordable equipment to actively engage the students in "thoughactive demonstration with the hands-on engagement learning platform." The inclusion of theECP concept in the two IE undergraduate courses was done to show better how scientifictheories like the theories of thermodynamics and Hooke's law are applied in actual situations.According to Cox's research [5], a standard set of tools is frequently utilized in an undergraduateengineering curriculum to give students practical experiences with basic machine sciencetheories that serve as the foundation for automation and robotics. Theories presented in class areintegrated
effects of composition and nanostructure on ionic conduction and surface exchange in ceramic materials. In 2014, he moved to Northeastern University to focus on teaching and developing curriculum in the First Year Engineering program. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work In Progress: Technical Consulting as an Experiential Form of Peer TutoringAbstract This work-in-progress paper presents an initial study on an instructional innovation for first-yearundergraduate engineering. The innovation involves a new, experiential form of peer tutoring whereinupper-class students function as
Paper ID #40217Board 159: Developing An Assessment Toolkit for Pre-college SummerEngineering Workshops (Works-in-Progress)Dr. Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Tamecia Jones is an assistant professor in the STEM Education Department at North Carolina State Uni- versity College of Education with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and infor- mal and formal learning environments.Dr. Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Leah Bug has over 35 years of experience teaching both formal and informal K-20 STEM education, with over 20 years in designing and
from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing.Dr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First-Year Engineering at Purdue University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as
learnersatisfaction3. Social factors such as interpersonal interaction and social integration contributed tomore than 60% of learner satisfaction4. Feeling of isolation due to lack of interaction with peersor faculty and lack of prompt feedback have been long been identified as difficulties of onlinelearning. Students’ personal factors, for example, prior knowledge of technology or the subjectmatter affected their learning online5. Considering these factors, the author of this study hasmade several changes in an upper-level engineering course offered in Fall 2020.The objective of this study is to find if a 400-level engineering course, Engineering Hydraulics,can be taught as effectively as in F2F class. The class has been taught at XXX university only inF2F
in the formulation stage (Stage I) of the solution process.Kyaw Aung2 describes the integration of computational tools, in an engineering thermodynamicscourse at Lamar University, in order to emphasize the design and analysis phases of thecurriculum. However, many engineering students find it very difficult formulating a solutionprocedure to solve engineering problems. It is therefore imperative that engineering educators Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationincorporate some tools of outcome-based learning in order to accommodate a variety of
., 1995, “Something Old, Something New: Integrating Engineering Practice into the Teaching of Engineering Mechanics,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 105-115. 10. Thompson, B. E., 2002, “Pedagogy of an Aircraft Studio,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 91, No. 2, pp. 197-201.TARIQ A. KHRAISHIDr. Khraishi currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of New Mexico.His general research interests are in theoretical, computational and experimental solid mechanics and materialsscience. He has taught classes in Dynamics, Materials Science, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Elasticity andNumerical Methods. For the last two-three years he has engaged himself in the
Paper ID #18184Lessons Learned Creating Youth Jobs in an Afterschool Maker SpaceDr. Amy Hurst, UMBC Amy Hurst is an Associate Professor of Human-Centered Computing in the Information Systems Depart- ment at UMBC. She studies Maker culture, accessibility problems, and builds assistive technologies.Shawn Grimes, Digital Harbor Foundation Shawn Grimes is the Executive Director at the Digital Harbor Foundation where they use technology and maker skills to develop a blend of creativity and productivity in youth and educators.Mr. Darius McCoy, Digital Harbor FoundationNicholas Carter, UMBC As an engineer at heart, I love to
Session 3657 Education and Teamwork Across Disciplines: A First Experience with an Interdisciplinary Course In Human-Centered Design Carolyn M. Sommerich (a), Lawrence H. Trachtman (b), and David Ringholz (b) (a) Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering (b) The Center for Universal Design and Department of Industrial Design, School of Design North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NCIntroductionAs we approach the 21st Century, significant demographic and
begiven in the morning if we visited an offshore oil company later in the day. The combination of lectures,company visits, and travel required adaptation in every student to fully synthesize our learnings. Included in the program were language and history classes, taught one to two times a week bymembers of the Brazilian community. A prominent objective of the program was to immerse students in aforeign culture and allow them to appreciate the engineering curriculum in a new space. These languageand history classes allowed us to do just that. By learning the basics of Portuguese, we could acknowledgethose showing us generosity throughout the visits. A simple greeting and thank you went a long way, andin the end, the experience would not
interesting and beneficial to have these existing global engineering challenges as part of theircourse curriculum. Efforts of SPEED India and IUCEE with respect to grand challenges will becontinuously monitored and measured.Reference:[1] David D Delaine. “The Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED) –Empowering the Global Engineer”, SEFI Annual Conference (2009), Rotterdam, Netherlands.[2] http://iucee.com/ Page 26.661.11[3] Rohit Kandakatla, Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, “Diversification in Engineering Educationthrough Indian Student Forum: An Experimentation Project in India“, 2014 World
design principles recognize that drivers shouldbe aware of the changes that will occur along their path with sufficient time to adequately reactto the changing environment. TTC zones could also include buffer spaces to consider the safetyof the workers and the integrity of the equipment that performs construction activities on thetraffic lanes. Positive protection devices can also be placed to provide workers appropriateprotection from the traffic that goes through the TTC zone. Future engineering professionalsmust learn to analyze road users’ behavior in the context of the work zone to decide the adequateprotection needed for the TTC to increase worker safety.Instructional VideosInstructional videos have become an integral part of higher
Paper ID #25464An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Math-ematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringDr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ashlee N. Ford Versypt is an assistant professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Okla- homa State University. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in ChE at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her B.S. at the University of Oklahoma. She did postdoctoral research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on developing computational models for multiscale tissue physiology and pharmacology
reasoningoutcomes, we turn to ways in which instructors can incorporate ethics into individual courses.Teaching students to analyze situations by applying normative ethical frameworks has long been avaluable strategy in ethics instruction and one which allows students to analyze a variety ofsituations they may find themselves in over the course of their professional careers. In response tothe need to integrate ethics education into a packed technical curriculum as well as facultytrepidation when teaching ethics, we present a series of readings designed to provide studentswith an engaging fictional scenario to serve as a basis for discussing ethical dilemmas in a contentdriven course.Science fiction has long served as a venue for writers to experiment with