solutions can be produced without stakeholder input,and it is engineers themselves who have a role to play in developing outcomes that are notproblematic for stakeholders. These quotes expressed an awareness that engineering efforts canoverlook stakeholder interests (i.e., engineers are part of the problem), which led to theassignment of four descriptive codes into the third level of the 4-stage model.Intentions to Act. Only one student (3%) expressed intentions to act by stating how theirinspection of the three candidate sites helped them envision a new future when considering theimpacts on the community. The student wrote: “By seeing the way that roads would form andexpand led to a mental image in mind of new traffic patterns as well as ways that
in this research. Studies have argued that a theoreticalframework is essential for informing the study's logic (Svinicki, 2010; Crepon, 2014). This studyfollows a modified version of Piaget's functioning framework. Based on Piaget's theory ofcognitive development, four major stages correspond to an aging childhood period. Stagesequences are universal across cultures and follow the same order. With this concept in mind, theresearch must consider the different stages of cognitive development as pre-college studentsinteract with engineering education. Ideally, the framework should be able to capture thedifferent stages of the learning phase and holistically define what a quality pre-collegeengineering education should consist of.Research
apowerful tool allowing us to solve important engineering questions such as how electrical chargeis stored in a capacitor, strain energy of a deformed material, or how to compute moments ofinertia for non-standard shapes.One instructor has a lesson on “how to integrate a potato” which is entertaining, enlightening,and memorable as it is something the students can visualize and relate to their everyday lives.This visual representation is beneficial to students to help keep the big picture in mind as they gothrough the various mathematical derivations and proofs to unlock these powerful tools. Theapplications are motivation to keep pressing on in their math and science studies.Part of this connection with the mathematical world is made through use of
Paper ID #18272Work in Progress: Engineering Invisible Mountains! Mental Health andUndergraduate-Level Engineering Education: The Changing Futures ProjectDr. Jane Andrews, Aston University Dr Jane Andrews is currently a Senior Lecturer in Engineering Education at the School of Engineering & Applied Science, Aston University, UK. The only Sociologist in the UK to hold a lectureship in Engi- neering, Jane’s research interests include all aspects of engineering education with a particular focus on elementary level engineering education and gender issues within engineering.Prof. Robin Clark, Aston University
AC 2007-2550: FIRST-YEAR EXPERIENCE AND BEYOND: USING THEENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS TO SUPPORT LEARNING ANDENGINEERING SKILL DEVELOPMENTPaul Pagano, Western Michigan University Paul Pagano is a second-year student in Civil Engineering at Western Michigan University. He is active in the student ASCE chapter, assists student teams in the Student Projects Lab, and plans to gain his professional engineers license and employment in a geotechnical engineering firm after graduation.Amanda Rossman, Western Michigan University Amanda Rossman is a second-year student in Civil and Construction Engineering at Western Michigan University. She serves as a tutor to first-year, at-risk students, and is
AC 2009-1327: ENG2: ENGINEERING ENGAGEMENT FOR STUDENTSUCCESS--BUILDING A COMMUNITY FOR FIRST-YEAR FRESHMEN IN THECOLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGSummer Dann Johnson, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Ms Dann is currently employed by the Dean's office at LSU as the STEP program coordinator. Ms. Dann earned her bachelors and masters degree in Mechanical Engineering at LSU and employed in private industry prior to her current position.John Scalzo, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Mr. Scalzo is the Associate Rector of the Engineering Residential College and an instructor in the Department of Electrical Engineering. He earned his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Virginia Tech in 1992
AC 2009-270: A LEGO ROBOT PROJECT USING CONCEPT MAPS ANDPEER-LED TEAMS FOR A FRESHMAN COURSE IN ENGINEERING ANDENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYMehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi Dr. Mehrubeoglu received her B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Bioengineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively, from Texas A&M University. After working as a research engineer and software engineer at Electroscientific Industries, where she developed new algorithms for machine vision problems, she joined Cyprus International University as the Chair of Department of Computer Engineering. After returning to Texas she
fundamental to the quality of any curriculum. Current empirically-based education theory is essential to effective instruction and thus to the improvement of curricular quality. 4. A rational sequence. Educational activities should be carefully ordered in a developmental sequence to form a coherent curriculum based on the stated, intended outcomes of both the curriculum and its constituent courses.With these principles in mind, we describe the process by which a curricular framework for theMcBride Public Affairs minor for engineering students has been developed. As shown in Table1, this framework is the outcome of more than a year of activities involving all relevantconstituencies within the McBride community, including current
e3Initiative than their continuing education peers. Based on the target student population of the e3Initiative (low income and first generation engineering students), we would like to see firstgeneration students being more likely to voluntarily participate as this program was specificallydesigned with their unique needs in mind. Females comprised only 33% of the survey sample, yet were significantly more likely tovoluntarily participate in the e3 Initiative. Male students, although being the gender-majority inthis study, were less likely to participate. Women continue to remain underrepresented inengineering fields, starting at the undergraduate level [24], but our results support past researchthat women are more likely to participate in co
would address in the Engineering Applications course the following year. During thisproblem identification phase, Ms. Green had the idea of building a tiny house in mind and wasworking on a proposal for the grant that would ultimately support the project. However, sheintentionally did not propose the specific idea to students. Instead, she led students through aseries of exercises in which they identified and researched various problems within theircommunity, including housing scarcity. Observing students’ genuine interest in the problem ofhousing scarcity, Ms. Green arranged for the class to meet with a potential “client”, anAmericorps member who worked at the school as part of the MakerVista program. This visitorshared the challenges she
Medicine (IM) voice the needfor professional development programs to develop teachers’ knowledge and skills for integratingengineering into instruction 5. Therefore, providing professional development for in-serviceteachers has the potential to improve teachers’ engineering knowledge and increase studentinterest in engineering. Previous studies underscored the importance of teacher guidance for students inimproving students’ views of engineering and choosing STEM fields for their future career path6,7 . Bearing in mind that teachers lack knowledge about engineering and how to integrate it intotheir lessons 8,9, researchers have created professional development (PD) programs to improveteachers’ knowledge. For example, in one study, a two
to the workplace:How students become engineers among other forms of self. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuestDissertations & Theses (Order No. 3669254), 2014.[23] A. Byars-Winston, Y. Estrada, C. Howard, D. Davis, & J. Zalapa. “Influence of socialcognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science andengineering: a multiple groups analysis”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5: 205–218, 2010.[24] L. I. Rendón. “Academics of the heart: Reconnecting the scientific mind with the spirit'sartistry”. The Review of Higher Education, 24(1): 1-13, 2000.[25] Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. Changing the Conversation:Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering
Paper ID #15752A Qualitative Study Investigating How First-Year Engineering Students’ ValueBeliefs Influence their Choice of Selecting an Engineering MajorMr. Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin - Purdue University, West Lafayette ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT and served as the Head of the Process Engineering Department from 2010 to 2014. He holds an MS in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany) and is currently enrolled as a graduate student in the Engineering Education Doctoral Program at Purdue
. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304.Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.2. Rethink your gender attitudes. Nature Materials, 2014. Page 26.88.9 83. Shen, H. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature, 2013.4. Moss-Racusin, C.A., et al., Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, 2012.5. van Anders, S.M., Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive
Paper ID #16999Towards a Global Virtual Community of Female Engineering Students andProfessionals: II. Overview of Leadership Camp for Liberian UndergraduateWomen Studying EngineeringMs. Sara P Rimer, University of Michigan Sara P. Rimer is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Univer- sity of Michigan. She works with Professor Nikolaos Katopodes in the area of computational modeling and control of fluid flow in civil infrastructure systems. She is also pursuing a Certificate in Engineering Education Research and a Certificate in Computational Discovery and Engineering from the
undergraduatestudent outcomes have been varied and at times inconclusive. Pre-college engineering experiences havebeen shown to positively influence high school students’ decision to pursue a degree in engineering,increased awareness of engineering and the work of engineers, provided context for mathematics andscientific knowledge and applications, helped in the development of engineering habits of mind andincreased technological literacy [10]. However, looking for relationships between academicperformance and pre-college engineering experiences like FIRST Robotics and Project Lead the Way,Salzman & Ohland found no significant correlation [11]. Other studies have looked for connectionsbetween pre- college engineering and undergraduate retention
solutions to apparentsocial issues, will help engineers develop these sociotechnical skills in context along with theirdeveloping engineer mindset [1], [8]. That is, opening engineers’ minds while they are students,still developing their ideas about their roles and responsibilities as future engineers, will helpthem more readily embrace their opportunities to effect global change [1]–[3]. The SDGsprovide an ideal framework for developing this multi-faceted perspective on what it means to bean engineer in today’s society, and how to prepare to tackle today’s global challenges [2], [3].Course pedagogyTraditional engineering education has not emphasized the development of multidisciplinaryskills or consideration of challenges from multiple
andpost-lab assessment survey for the Service Restoration Experiment follows:Sample Open-Ended Questions: 1. What comes to your mind when you hear “service restoration” in a general context? And in a power engineering context? 2. What is your understanding of fault in an electric power system? 3. How is service restored to homes after a fault has occurred?Sample Likert Style Questions: Agree nor Disagree Disagree
AC 2010-91: A PILOT VALIDATION STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICALBELIEFS ASSESSMENT FOR ENGINEERING (EBAE): FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENT BELIEFSAdam Carberry, Tufts University Adam R. Carberry is a Doctoral Candidate in Engineering Education in the Tufts University Math, Science, Technology, and Engineering Education program. He holds an M.S. in Chemistry from Tufts University and a B.S. in Material Science Engineering from Alfred University. He is currently working at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach as a research assistant and manager of the Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program (STOMP).Matthew Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor in
Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers, National Academy Press, 1995.3. Ferguson, E.S., Engineering and the Minds Eye, MIT Press, 1993.4. Sherwin, C. W. and Isenson, R. S., Final Report: Project Hindsight, Director of Defense Engineering, Washington, July 1967.5. Bright, J.R., Ed., Technological Forecasting for Industry & Government, Prentice Hall, 1968.6. Council of Competitiveness, Picking Up the Pace: The Commercial Challenge to American Innovation, 1988.7. Keating, D.A., Stanford, T.G., Cope, R.S., Leadership of Systematic Technology Innovation and the Advanced Professional Education of Engineers, IEE Conference Proceedings No 435: Fifth International Conference on Factory 2000, Churchill College, Cambridge University
-professional Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationflavor in mind and interviews and demonstrations are between the Design Engineers and theUpper Management of this imaginary company.Each project is split into at least two phases – an investigative phase and the finalimplementation. The actual names and time duration of these phases differ for each of the threeprojects. The investigative phase is a ‘paper design’ phase during which the students explore thevarious avenues that could achieve the objectives of the design brief. At the conclusion of thisphase each group is individually interviewed to assess
tested demonstrated preferred Page 7.512.1learning styles generally associated with an engineering or research scientist profile. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationAdditional research has been completed which shows students learn best if taught by methodswhich match their style of learning. Mismatched instruction tends to significantly impact studentscores6. With this in mind, consider research completed by Allen, et. al. 7, who evaluated 319engineering students at San Jose State
AC 2012-4411: TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY AS AN ELEMENT IN THESTRUCTURE, ASSESSMENT, AND EVALUATION OF ENGINEERINGAND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEGREE PROGRAMSDr. John W. Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University John Blake is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tenn. He served as Department Chair from 1994-2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Tennessee. Page 25.1266.1 c American Society for
willbecome familiar with the language, tools, and mindset of engineers, which could be important intheir careers as well as for personal growth in a 21st century society. In addition, the academicand demographic diversity in the classroom enhances our activities and discussions.With all of these goals in mind, we developed two first-year engineering courses. One class,APPL 110 Design and Making for Engineers, focuses on design and fabrication through a seriesof design projects using the campus makerspace. The second class, APPL 101 ExploringEngineering, provides an overview of engineering, while focusing on other aspects of the designprocess, such as biomimicry to brainstorm design ideas, modeling and simulation to addressdesign questions, and
responsibility of the team leader to insure that all team membersunderstand the goals for the project and their contribution to achieving them. Motivating others to workwith you is crucial to the success of a project. It is a critical skill that the effective engineer-leader mustdevelop.Counseling In order to properly motivate members of team, the team leader must be mindful thatcounseling of individual team members may be required. Engineers are highly trained and self-motivated.However, a team member may not clearly understand his or her role on the project. The effectiveengineer-leader must insure that each member of the team is aware of the project goals and that success isdependent on the important contributions of each team member
AC 2010-207: WHAT CAN TEACHERS LEARN FROM ENGINEERINGEXPERTS? USING A THREE-PHASE MODEL TO IMPROVE K-12 TEACHER'SKNOWLEDGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYElsa Head, Tufts University Elsa Head is a Master's student in the Math, Science, Technology, and Engineering Education program at Tufts University. She holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Environmental Studies from Tufts University. Elsa participated in the Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program (STOMP) as an undergraduate at Tufts and currently works at Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach as a co-manager for STOMP.Adam Carberry, Tufts University Adam R. Carberry is a Doctoral Candidate in Engineering
AC 2010-2217: ENGINEERS AS TEACHERS: BRINGING CUTTING-EDGE MATHAND SCIENCE TOPICS INTO UNDERPRIVILEGED CLASSROOMS VIASTUDENT AND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSLindsey Jenkins-Stark, Iridescent Ms. Lindsey Jenkins-Stark, Vice President. Ms. Lindsey Jenkins-Stark has a multi-subject credential from the University of California at Dominguez Hills, and an undergraduate degree in sociology with a focus in law from the University of California at San Diego. She was a Teach for America corps member in Los Angeles from 2006-2008. She is a distinguished middle school teacher who has taught math, science and social studies. She has been a member of a Los Angeles Unified District School decision-making
. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering EducationGCSPs develop designers with an innovative skillset and mind set needed to address the mostpressing societal issues of the 21st century with engineering solutions. GC Scholars: a)contextualize engineering design and entrepreneurship within local, national, and globaleconomies, b) integrate engineering and technical innovation skills, and c) relate tohumanities and policies prompting individual and collective action. The 21st CenturyEngineering Grand Challenges are calls to action and serve as focal points for society’s
Paper ID #19473Influencing Student Motivation Through Scaffolded Assignments in a Qual-ity Analysis Course and Its Impact on LearningDr. Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven Nadiye O. Erdil, an assistant professor of industrial and systems engineering and engineering and oper- ations management at the University of New Haven. She has over eleven years of experience in higher education and has held several academic positions including administrative appointments. She has ex- perience in teaching at the undergraduate and the graduate level. In addition to her academic work, Dr. Erdil worked as an engineer in sheet metal
AC 2012-5126: AN EXERCISE FOR IMPROVING THE MODELING ABIL-ITIES OF STUDENTS IN AN OPERATIONS RESEARCH COURSEDr. Leonardo Bedoya-Valencia, Colorado State University, Pueblo Leonardo Bedoya-Valencia is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Engineering at Colorado State University, Pueblo. He received his M.Sc. in system engineering and his Ph.D. in engineering manage- ment from the National University of Colombia and Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va, respectively. His research interests include scheduling, operations research, and modeling and simulation in health care and energy planning. He has participated in several funded projects through various sources such as NASA, the Department of Homeland Security