discussed in this paper with the hope that early results and lessons learnedfrom implementing these strategies will be helpful to other ET programs intent on increasing thelevel of ET faculty scholarship within their program.Faculty Associate for Scholarship (FAS)To lead the effort towards increasing the scholarly productivity of CAST faculty, the Dean of theCollege appointed an ET faculty member with experience in scholarly activities to the position ofFaculty Associate for Scholarship (FAS). The FAS was first presented to the department chairsat the Dean/Chairs meeting at the beginning of the academic year; at this meeting the FAS wasintroduced as a resource to help the Chairs move their faculty along in the scholarship arena andthe proposed plan
competitions provide to students many opportunities for learning, both in the robot designand preparation phase and in the competition itself. Specific learning outcomes related to contestparticipation for Trinity students include: (1) the ability to set design specifications based on Page 9.504.2contest rules; (2) the ability to work as team members; (3) the ability to perform independentProceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationstudy and research; (4) the ability to plan work and set deadlines; and (5) the opportunity to meetand to
document, (j) conduct research to see what prior work has been completed on the topic oftheir project, (k) complete the first half of a research paper outlining the nature of their project,prior work completed in this area, and the design methodology they are taking to solve theirdesign problem.During CS408A, each project team must: (a) complete a detailed test plan, (b) adjust their projectschedule to ensure completion, (c) write software to complete the computer science portion oftheir project, (d) test, integrate, and fix software errors, (e) complete a detailed user manual, (f)field an initial version of their completed project, (g) correct problems and errors in the initialversion, (h) field a final version of their completed project, (i
8 - Incremental Analysis 19 12 Chapter 9 - Other Analysis Techniques 22 13 Chapter 10 - Depreciation 23 14 Chapter 11 - Income Taxes 22 15 Chapter 12 - Replacement 21 16 Selection of the MARR 9 17 Retirement Planning - Part 1 - Introduction 5 18 Retirement Planning - Part 2 - Retirement Capital Needed 12 19 Retirement Planning - Part 3 - Saving Strategy 13 20 Retirement Planning - Part 4
anyway. As a studentnoted, “After a project is completed, you gain a sense of accomplishment knowing you hadsomething to do with the process.” This project could be part of a student design competition,such as a steel bridge or a concrete canoe, or it could be developing and implementing anoutreach activity or planning a chapter’s annual banquet. These types of projects help students todevelop a “can do” attitude while still in the relatively sheltered environment of the university,where faculty assistance is readily available and the consequences of missteps are not severe.An effective university education extends beyond the classroom and encourages cooperativeactivities between students2. Fully 70% of those students who indicated club
university research group including students at all levels from sophomores toPhD candidates. Each case involved a major research experiment involving new measurementtechniques, which had to be conducted during a specific time in a professional testingenvironment. To avoid missing many classes, each student could only participate for two days atmost, so that each team member had to be well-informed. The processes used to develop eachexperiment, train the team and conduct the project are discussed in the paper. KI techniquesincluded development of a Live Test Document, internet-based exchange of experimental detailswith the customers, mission planning using the internet, and training of the team using scaledmockups of the experimental configurations.I
practicing industry professional (the industry fellow) in the joint curriculumreview, planning and teaching of a course related to the professional's domain of expertise. Thebalance of this paper is structured as follows. In the next section, I provide an overview of theIndustry Fellows model. This is followed by a description of three instantiations of the modelthat define the range of kinds of participation by the industry fellow that this model supports.Following this, I discuss the key characteristics common to the model, with links to supportingresearch: viewing education as increasing participation in practice communities20, division oflabor along lines of expertise8, using authentic artifacts of practice to mediate humaninteraction29,30, and
helping them translate their research experiences and new knowledge of engineering into classroom activities 7.”The RET site at TTU is called RETainUS and is a multidisciplinary program focused onreintroducing manufacturing in its modern view, “a field full of challenging opportunities.” Theprogram pairs faculty mentors from different departments with high school teachers. The teacherjoins the mentor’s research group, develops a research question and for six weeks during thesummer months conducts research, much as a graduate student or Research Experience forUndergraduate (REU) student would. During that time, the teacher also develops a lesson plan,using the Legacy Cycle pedagogy8 that will be implemented in the succeeding school
Paper ID #2108Research in Progress: Transforming and Integrating: Evolving ConstructionMaterials & Methods to the Next LevelChung-Suk Cho, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Chung-Suk Cho is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Engineering Technology. His teaching and research focus on project scope definition, pre-project planning, sustainable construction, project administration, construction safety, construction simulation, and project management. He has prior teaching experience at North Carolina A&T State University in construction management and
University Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore. In Aug. 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of
(Based on Final table? Planned SLO Exam and Labs) Y/N1.Become familiar with the Labs 1-11 70% of 81.7% of students Y None planned at this time. basic elements and Exam 1, Exam 2, students will scored 70% or betterterminologies used in data HW 1‒ 6, score 70% or on this questioncommunications, such as Reading assig, better on this blocksource, transmitter, Iclicker quiz, Final questiontransmission medium, receiver Exam – Qs:1-40
, goals, and objectives of theonline STEM journal, while Section III outlines its aims and scope. Section IV presents a seriesof workshops organized to teach students the process of conducting academic research. SectionV outlines a future evaluation plan used to rate the journal’s performance. Section VI discussesthe journal’s potential impact on STEM education, and Section VII provides concluding remarks.II. Purpose, Goals and Objectives This section discusses the purpose, goals, and objectives of creating an online, open-accessSTEM journal for the 7-12 grade audience. The journal is designed to enhance middle school andhigh school students’ and teachers’ awareness of modern engineering and science practicescurrently ongoing in academia and
for incorporatingcomputers into classroom activities is time10,11: time to learn the technology and time to modifylectures10. One suggested solution towards reducing the time requirement for incorporatingcomputers is to create and distribute lesson plans involving structured computer use12, whichprovide roadmaps for future faculty adopting technology. Similarly, reporting the experiences ofindividual instructors incorporating technology into their classrooms (e.g., 13,14) can result in a setof “best practices” that can be used by future instructors.In this paper, we take the latter approach and report on the experience of an instructor newlyassigned to teach in a computer-infused classroom (referred to as “new instructor” in this paper
the new methods. This is animportant endeavor because it allows the instructor to not lose touch with her/hisstudents’ learning process, and it allows students to participate in their own learningprocess by providing feedback to instructors. In this sense, assessment works as acommunications tool between faculty and students 15 .The assessment was prepared by both authors in close consultation with one another.Early on during the conceptual development of the project, and before the course hadbeen fully planned, an assessment plan was developed. The plan (see Table 3 below)contains objectives and outcomes for the course, as well as relevant assessment methods.The ABET 2000 criteria addressed in the plan and the Civil Engineering
; and (4) developing an action plan. Most of us when faced with a problem, no matter how complex, immediately want tojump to an answer. Students are no different. Most students’ initial response is to try toformulate a solution, even if it’s trivial or ill-conceived. In most cases, this initial solutionformulation should be encouraged. One should allow the students to spend some time inthinking about what the solution might be, or at least what the solution might look like. All ofthis should be recorded for later use and revision. After students have exhausted their initial efforts at solving the problem, they should beguided into thinking about what they know at that particular moment, about the problem thatmight help them solve
comprehensive assessment plan, the data gathered viaoutcome indicators are evaluated with respect to the program’s intended outcomes, andinterpreted to draw inferences and provide informed feedback to the constituents of theprogram.18,19 Triangulation, or the use of multiple assessment methods, is an importantconsideration in the selection of a set of outcome indicators utilized by a comprehensiveassessment plan.18 At the Virginia Military Institute, triangulation is provided within theElectrical Engineering Department’s assessment plan by the use of surveys and the department’scourse assignment database.While the specific mechanisms and strategies of assessment vary from program to program, theuse of surveys is a common approach. As outlined by
. 2. Create generalized lesson plans for methods in recovery, separation, and purification of bioproducts, and a certificate in industrial cleaning, sanitization, and sterilization. 3. Develop a series of soft-skills and career readiness modules in conjunction with the Niswonger Foundation and BioBuilder. 4. Implement lessons and develop modules suited to non-traditional and non-matriculating students. 5. Prototype modules suitable for integration into a four-year degree in bioengineering or biomanufacturing. 6. Implement a nexus between our educational programs, the ETSU Research Corporation, and local and prospective industry. 7. Identify the effectiveness of the proposed scope of work on student learning
approaches such as project-based learning and flipped classroom. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024An Exploratory Analysis of an Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum using Bernstein’s Instructional DiscourseAbstractThis paper analyzes the undergraduate electrical engineering technology curriculum at anengineering technology college at a private R2 (based on Carnegie Classification) university inthe USA. The purpose of this analysis is to identify key elements of the curriculum being studiedincluding selection, sequencing, pacing of the course content, and evaluation criteria. Data forthis work include the undergraduate plan of study, course outlines, and course syllabi for
three sections that: (1) asks students to write apaper on a treatment plan including an orthopedic implant for a provided patient profile, (2) createa presentation presenting this plan to the stakeholders, and (3) determine the biomechanicalproperties that the implant and any selected materials need to satisfy. Using a pre- and post-projectsurvey from two cohorts of students, we determined the effectiveness of the assignment andgauged the extent to which students believed that their demographics influenced their motivation.Demographic-based influences are defined here as whether students believe that they are moremotivated to be successful in their major based on their race, gender, community, etc. Our datademonstrate that EML scores, which is
for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively.The grant team committed to weekly meetings to plan activities and events, develop resources,and address any concerns related to the program. This consistent commitment to weeklymeetings not only fostered team building among the grant team members but also contributed tothe long-term sustainability of the program.Scholar SupportEach year, in addition to financial assistance, the scholars receive strategically curated academicsupport and professional development resources. The level of support and resources evolve withthe changing needs of the students. Since the program's inception in the Fall of 2022, only onecohort has completed a full year of study, and the second has begun their first year
data through exploratory factor analysis allows grouping teaching into related modules. Priorstudies have focused on areas such as STEM PhD students’ perceptions of their skills in relationto their career plans and self-perceptions of graduate students’ teaching skills in regard todetermining the efficacy of a teaching workshop, but prior studies have not investigated the generalself-perceptions of engineering PhD students regarding teaching [14-15].This study is a part of a bigger project focused on understanding engineering doctoral students’perceptions of their preparedness to teach. In this study, the focus is only on the design anddevelopment of the survey instrument and validated the survey instrument by exploratory factoranalysis. In a
opportunity to build another company as acontractor, but that did not go as planned either. I decided to go back to school again for the lasttime in 2021 and have been in school since then.In the Summer of 2023, I was contacted by Dr. Jaafar, with the opportunity of undertakingundergraduate research with his mentorship. I was given the grant proposal to go over to find outif I would be interested. The proposal also provided an idea of what would be expected from me,and what the research goals were. I accepted the offer since I felt that it would be beneficial tome, especially since I intend to further my studies after graduation. I also felt that my experiencedoing research in industry would help me in this regard. I was excited to start work on
ethical issue? The possible responses were “yes,” “probably,” “maybe,” “unlikely,” and “no.”• How relevant is this ethical issue to your career plans? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably,” “somewhat,” “hardly,” and “not.”• How important is this ethical issue to society? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably,” “somewhat,” “hardly,” and “not.”The ethical issues can be described as macroethics in the sense that these problems demand thecollective actions of engineers and society, as opposed to microethics that typically involves onlyindividuals. Undeniably, the study of macroethics is significantly different from topics thatmight emerge in a more conventional engineering ethics course and requires new content
AC 2011-497: ENGINEERING STUDENT SUCCESS: AN INTERVENTIONCOURSEDianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State University Dr. C. Dianne Raubenheimer is Director of Assessment in the College or Engineering and Adjunct As- sistant Professor in the Department of Adult and Higher Education at NC State University. Within the College of Engineering she serves as the coordinator of ABET and other accreditation processes, acts as a resource/consultant to faculty in the different programs, develops and implements assessment plans, and serves as the primary educational assessment/data analyst adviser on the Dean’s staff. A particular interest is in helping faculty to develop and implement classroom-based assessment and action
outside and inside of class elements was used to try and create the most favorablesetting for in-class discussions. The questions were chosen by the professor and planned ahead oflecture to uncover how to approach problems and derive insights. Two discussions varying inlength from five to ten minutes were planned for each class meeting. When asked onself-assessments, students found this learning approach unsettling because they were put on thespot and felt embarrassed if they could not give what they believed was a correct answer.Nevertheless, students found value in practicing verbal skills and in being guided. Thediscussions gave the professor an opportunity to quickly change the pace and mode of learning inthe classroom, to personally interact
similar sense, promotion can be very important in the generation of external funds fromalumni and industrial professionals. At Cal Poly, emphasis is placed on laboratory- and field-based instruction. A program with such an emphasis can become expensive. Thus, a promotionplan was developed with the specific goal of raising the funds necessary to run the program.Finally, besides money, program support can come in other forms. Some examples include:field trip ideas, guest speakers for courses, class design projects, senior project ideas, serviceproject ideas, and equipment donations. All of these benefits have been recognized at Cal Poly,even though the faculty have spent only a relatively small amount of time developing apromotion plan.3.4 Acquire
SEEM TO MATTERABSTRACTIn this paper we explore engineering student gains in confidence in professional andinterpersonal skills and intrinsic psychological motivation to study engineering. These twofactors were selected because they have been shown in other work from the Academic PathwaysStudy (APS) sponsored by the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) tobe directly related to post-graduation plans and to several dimensions of the undergraduateexperience. We focus on students with positive confidence and/or motivation gains during theirfirst two years of college, and show that these students are distinct from those with negative orno gains in terms of persistence in the engineering profession, confidence in math and
. Page 15.519.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Enhancing the Undergraduate Research Experience in a Senior Design ContextAbstractThe paper presents an instructional framework developed by the authors that engagessenior students in a 5-credit Research and Development course incorporating projectdevelopment, implementation, entrepreneurship, innovation, creativity, teamwork, andcommunication. The paper discusses the development and accomplishments of the courseover the past four years in the context of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) - aninitiative at the University of Houston intended to encourage the development andenhancement of undergraduate research skills. The philosophy behind the course is
ideas for possible improvementstrategies. This realization called for a structured FDP at IIT-M for familiarizing faculty with thepedagogy and other skills concerning effective teaching-learning processes.Initial Faculty Development Programs at IIT-MThe idea of the FDP at IIT-M emerged from conversations among faculty members who stronglyfelt the absence of knowledge of teaching and learning in planning of their courses. Facultyconversations about teaching and learning were complemented by simultaneous conversationsamong the IIT-M administration with experts in faculty development from Texas A&MUniversity. From conversations within the administration emerged a conviction that assistance infaculty development was needed. IIT-M faculty
guarantee these results; rather it is effectivementor interactions that influence learning positively. We need to know how to direct ourmentors to activate learning, team formation, and team performance.Our research question then is: “What roles and practices can mentors take to activate team formation, team performance, and individual learning?”Effective mentor roles were surfaced using a qualitative method case study. The case involved aclass of 44 students and six mentors. Each week the mentors conducted the lab, recorded theirinsights of effective mentoring practices, distilled “best practices,” and incorporate these into thenext week’s lab plan. The mentor best practices and an end of treatment student questionnairewere used to