,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 100, no. 1, January 2011.[3] K. Beddoes and M. Borrego, “Feminist Theory in Three Engineering Education Journals:1995-2008,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, April 2011.[4] L. R. Lattuca, D. B. Knight, H. Kyoung Ro, B. Novoselich. “Supporting the Development ofEngineers’ Interdisciplinary Competence.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1,January 2017.[5] M.A. Boden, M. A. Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science. Oxford University Press,2006.[6] M. Moack, “Difference Engine Leaves Computer History Museum,” Mountain View Voice,January 28, 2016[7] J. J. O’Connor, E. F. Robertson, "Luigi Federico Menabrea," MacTutor History ofMathematics archive, University of St Andrews
the recitation would be devoted to students working on special homework problems(“section problems”) which we describe next.Each week, one of the students’ homework problems, written by E. B., was more authentic than a typicaltextbook problem. Students would be required to make their own assumptions and set their own designcriteria, and might have to look up information to solve the problem (i.e. in handbooks, published researcharticles, etc.). In general, they would have to make design decisions with limited information, just as anengineer would do in the workplace. An example problem is in Figure 1. These section problems were 50%of students’ weekly homework grades. Students would be given 15 minutes in section each week to workon these
, and the worker can no longer come in contact with them. The bottom of the grinding belt can no longer be accessed while the machine is in operation. Figure 2a: Machine guard with mesh sieve at Figure 2 b: Machine guard with adjustable the bottom frameAnother group proposed a similar concept, which they considered ergonomic. It includes an adjustableframe adjusted by wing nuts and one bolt for securing the machine (figure 2b). Making the guard adaptableallows the operator to set the exact amount of belt he or she needs to be exposed, ultimately reducing thework envelope and reducing the contact with the belt. Using wingnuts allows the operator to make
25.5 19 17 16 15 11 11 C o m p ute r- A ide d 3 D P r i nting F a b r ica tion E l e c trica l C o m p uter A r d u
modified. Instead ofcutting slots to receive the door, channels were created from waste wood (Fig. 1b). Thecompleted design showing the angled roof and two food trays is shown in Fig. 1c. Testing of theredesigned dehydrator on a sunny to partly sunny 91 °F day produced internal air temperatures of122 °F, above the recommended minimum temperature for dehydrating fruits and vegetables. (a) (b) (c)Figure 1. Phase 3 SFD: (a) walls redesigned using 1x6 in pine; sections attached together using5/16 in wood dowels; (b) waste wood was used to form channels for the sliding door, shown inplace; (c) completed design showing the angled roof covered in plastic, and two food trays.A Phase 4
these three stages, and mechanism involved shall be analyzedin further study.AcknowledgmentThe authors wish to thank Mr. Prithivi Bir Thapa and Ms. Sushma Kadel for their assistanceduring the field study.References[1] B. N. Upreti, and M. R. Dhital, “Landslide studies and management in Nepal,” International Centre for integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal, 1996, 87 p.J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.[2] H. Dangi, T. Bhattarai, and P. Thapa, “An approach of preparing earthquake induced landslide hazard map: a case study of Nuwakot District, central Nepal,” Journal of Nepal Geological Society, vol. 58, 2019, pp. 153-162
course, the community ofpractice [33] is very strong. To achieve this, the teams in the second round are formed bymembers of three different teams in the first round. Even with a more complicated and difficultsetting for the game, the improvements in both the reports and the game result is very significantand a great way for the students to experience this increase in knowledge themselves as well.The goal of the course is to broaden the insight of maritime technology and economics studentsin the direction of each other. This has been translated into a set of learning goals, which arecovered by the five elements of the course as can be seen in Table 1. The first two learning goals(a,b) relate to the more technical aspects of the course. Learning
Fellowshipfrom the MSU HUB for Innovation in Learning and Technology, along with support from theMSU College of Engineering and MSU Honors College. Much of the course content wasadapted from or informed by the “Entering Research” and “Entering Mentoring” curricula andmaterials developed by the National Research Mentoring Network (https://nrmnet.net) andmaintained by the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research(https://cimerproject.org).References[1] M. Haddara and H. Skanes, “A reflection on cooperative education: From experience to experiential learning,” International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 67, 2007.[2] B. F. Blair, M. Millea, and J. Hammer, “The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic
carefully evaluate andselect keywords for indexing publications to improve the research topic relevancy and publicationvisibility for broader impact.References [1] J. Webster and R. T. Watson, “Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review,” MIS quarterly, vol. xiii-xxiii, 2002. [2] A. Ortiz-Cordova and B. J. Jansen, “Classifying web search queries in order to identify high revenue generating customers,” Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1426–1441, 2012. [3] G. Chen and L. Xiao, “Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 212–223, 2016. [4] H. N
-life setting (e.g., user experiences, possible barriers, expenses,time), while engineering promotes hands-on experiences for prototyping [20]–[22]. Hence,design thinking in engineering situate students’ ideas within the realities and helps themgenerating feasible products using the engineering knowledge out of the routinized, formalizedway of thinking. Engineering design thinking process as an effective problem-solving algorithm includesseven iterative stages [15], [23]: (a) identify the need and formulate the problem, (b) identify/search for solutions for similar cases in the past, (c) use knowledge and creativity to generatenew ideas, (d) evaluate and decide on the best idea: iterate until there is only one solutionconcept left, (e
Paper ID #32998Goal-match Mentoring: A New Strategy for Faculty of Color in EngineeringAcademiaDr. Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Dr. Sylvia Mendez is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She earned a PhD in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Kansas, a MS in Student Affairs in Higher Education from Colorado State University, and a BA in Economics from Washington State University. Dr. Mendez’s research centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening
needed for a given situation solve complex engineering problems b) Formulate the problem and identify key by applying principles of engineering, issues/variables, model real world situation science, and mathematics c) Solve complex engineering problems 2. an ability to apply engineering design a) Identify problem, criteria, constraints to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of b) Define the problem, review possible solutions, public health, safety, and welfare, as select design well as global, cultural, social, c) Design, assess, refine and conclude the model environmental, and economic factors or prototype
’ unique qualities and traits. The finalized interviewprotocol and probing questions are below: Interview Protocol: 1) Can you please describe for me how you came to pursue STEM, and any challenges and successes you may have faced thus far? 2) Can you describe a time in your program or workplace where something happened that made you feel unsafe or uncomfortable? 3) Could you describe a time when a person in power acted as an advocate or an ally to you or somebody in your community? 4) If you could change STEM to be more inclusive to people like you and me, what would you change? Probing Questions: a. You mentioned _________ earlier. Can you tell me more about that? b. You
undergraduate research. The survey questionswere generated based on recurrent conversations the faculty advisor had with his undergraduatestudents during research meetings, office hours, or arbitrary settings. Moreover, the survey1 Cohort 2 information is in parenthesesincluded an open-ended question that provided students an opportunity to reflect and share abouttheir experiences in engaging in a research group setting. Descriptive statistics were employed foranalysis and presentation of data results. The authors note the following limitations of the study:(a) small sample size; (b) self-developed survey instrument; (c) convenient sampling procedure.The administered survey consisted of nine questions for Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: Question 1: Faculty
the previous paper-based assignment description (Figure 1B). Acomplete description of each component of the restructured course can be found in thesupplemental materials section: full module contents can be found in Supplemental MaterialsPart B, assignment text can be found in Supplemental Materials Part C, and the full video-based assignment can be found in Supplemental Materials Part D.Figure 1. A sample of how the online modules were structured (A) and the new video-based project delivery (B).b. Assessment: Module EffectivenessA custom survey created by the authors was circulated after completion of the project (Week 8)to assess how students perceived the efficacy of the restructured course. The full text
threescholarly journals.Individual Assignment DUE June 19 at 12pm ESTFinal Project Reflection and Contribution Write UpWrite a one page INDIVIDUAL write up on your individual contributions for the project.Reflection on the experience, such as the topic and how it can be relevant for your goals in thefuture (major, coop, career aspirations, environmental impacts). Also discuss the global aspectsof the project and working with the Brazilian students. How did you learn from this overallexperience? Appendix B: Examples of Student Work from ProjectAppendix B.1: Group 5 - Implementation of Solar- Biomass Boilers to improve heat energyand water efficiency pulp plant explanation and imagesAppendix B.2: Group 4 - Implementation of Solar energy for
0V G L MTR CW L MTR CCW CLICK PLC M MTR MODE Sensor/Actuator Trainer M MTR DI Module M MTR AN R MTR CW R MTR CCW US SENSOR THRU BEAM RETRO REFL ENC B ENC A CAP PROX
aspects.References[1] L. A. Braskamp, D. C. Braskamp, and K. Merrill, “Assessing Progress in Global Learning andDevelopment of Students with Education Abroad Experiences,” Frontiers: The InterdisciplinaryJournal of Study Abroad, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2009.[2] I. Clarke, T. B. Flaherty, N. D. Wright, and R. M. McMillen, “Student InterculturalProficiency From Study Abroad Programs.” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp.173-181, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0273475309335583.[3] D. DeGraaf, C. Slagter, K. Larsen, and E. Ditta, “The Long-term Personal and ProfessionalImpacts of Participating in Study Abroad Programs,” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal ofStudy Abroad, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–59, 2013.[4] D. K. Deardorff, “Identification and
) who self-identified as(a) female or (b) underrepresented minority (African American/Black, Native American/NativeAlaskan, Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian, Hispanx/Latinx/Chicanx, and/or mixed raceincluding one or more of these demographics).Across all years, the applicant pools (means ± standard deviation) included 62.1% ± 2.7% femaleand 25.0% ± 2.9% URM applicants, where URM is defined as African American, NativeAmerican, Pacific Islander, Hispanx/Latinx/Chicanx, and/or mixed race including one or more ofthese demographics. Over seven summers (2013-2019), 97 students participated in the ReNUWItREU. Of those, 67 (69%) were female and 38 (39%) identified as URM. These demographicscompare favorably with other environmental engineering REU
streams. This model predicts thewater level h in a tank with water flowing in at an inlet flowrate qin and flowing out through anopened outlet valve. V=dx/dt Δx x Distance Δt t Time (A) (B)Figure 1, (A) model used to predict the driving distance x of a race car over time; (B) modelused to quantify the water level h in a water tank.Both the car model and the water tank model contain only one differential equation. Multipledifferential equation models are further introduced in a general two-step enzymatic reaction. Achemical reaction describes the
citationpractices belie a more complex system of relationships. Historically, they have established powerrelationships among authors, ideas, and larger sociotechnical systems within the university[26].Our citations reflect our reading practices while establishing field boundaries and contours andultimately funneling into the larger economy of the university. They undergird this universityeconomy in a number of ways: (a) we form communities of practice/discourse communities inhow we cite, excluding and including particular ways of knowing; (b) we give particular ideaspower and visibility in how we cite; (c) we decide whose work matters, who should be tenuredand promoted, who belongs; and (d) we teach ethics and intellectual property through citations.These
Days Start Time End Time A Mon, Wed, Fri 11:00 am 11:50 am B Mon, Wed, Fri 10:00 am 10:50 am C Tue 1:00 pm 1:50 pm D Mon, Wed, Fri 3:00 pm 3:50 pm E Tue 8:00 am 9:50 pm F Tue, Thu 11:00 am 12:20 pm Table 2. Schedule openings and calculated durations for the student schedule of Table 1 Schedule Duration Schedule Duration Schedule Duration Schedule DurationDay
ofbest practices.References[1] B. J. Beatty, Hybrid-Flexible Course Design. EdTech Books, 2019. https://edtechbooks.org/Hyflex/.[2] “Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric,” Sixth Edition. Quality Matters. Retrieved from Specific Review Standards from the QM Higher Education Rubric, Sixth Edition.[3] “7 Things about Swivl,” Grand Valley State University Information Technology. Retrieved from https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/7E70FBB5-0BBC-EF4C- A56CBB9121AECA7F/7_things_swivl.pdf.[4] C. Li, “Hybrid Teaching of College English Under the Background of Big Data,” Data Processing Techniques and Applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (DPTA 2019), 445- 450, 2020.[5] S. Singh & A. Arya, “A hybrid
21 6 15 20 4 10 10 5 5 2 3 2 0 0 0 Individual Group Problem Solving Creativity Song Drawing Comic Figure 1. Project Submission Statistics (a) Individual vs group projects, (b) Problem solving vs creativity track, (c
investing and maintenance. The analysishere 1) models the makerspace in a bipartite network, 2) identifies key tools that are being usedand bring students into the space, and 3) identifies initial dependencies of tools.The bipartite network analysis used here is a network analysis technique primarily used in thesocial sciences [13] to determine and interpret underlying structures in complex social networksmade up of "actors" and "events" [14]. Bipartite networks refer to a network that can be brokeninto two separate subsets A and B, with links connecting subset A to B [15]. The bipartiteanalysis was used by NASA to determine innovation networks for the space app challenge,enabling them to identify barriers to innovation and a “catalyst” that aid in
, 2019: Research in Engineering Education Network, pp. 244-252.[12] C. Senior, R. Cubbidge, L. Riebe, D. Roepen, B. Santarelli, and G. Marchioro, "Teamwork: effectively teaching an employability skill," Education+ Training, 2010.[13] D. P. Baker, L. Horvarth, M. Campion, L. Offermann, and E. Salas, "The ALL teamwork framework," International adult literacy survey, measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for assessment, vol. 13, pp. 229-272, 2005.[14] L. Endersby, K. Phelps, and D. Jenkins, "The virtual table: A framework for online teamwork, collaboration, and communication," New directions for student leadership, vol. 2017, no. 153, pp. 75-88, 2017.[15] P. Chopade, S. Khan, K. Stoeffler, D
. M., Eisenberg, D., Perry, G. S., Dube, S. R., Kroenke, K., & Dhingra, S. S. (2012). Therelationships of level of positive mental health with current mental disorders in predicting suicidal behavior andacademic impairment in college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 126-133.doi:10.1080/07448481.2011.6083934. Renshaw, T. L., Eklund, K. R., Bolognino, S. J., & Adodo, I. (2016). Bidimensional emotional health incollege students: A comparison of categorical and continuous analytic approaches. Journal of Psychopathology &Behavioral Assessment, 38(4), 681-694. doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9558-65. Lotkowski, V. A., Robbins, S. B., & Noeth, R. J. (2004). The role of academic and non-academic factors
://bls.gov/ooq.[6] L. Rice, J. Barth, R. Guadagno, G. Smith, & D. McCallum, “The role of social support in students' perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science.” Journal of Youth & Adolescence, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1028-1040, 2013.[7] E. Kock, “Study prompts call for more mobile laboratories to enhance STEM education for youth.” 2017. [Web log message] Retrieved from Science Education Department, Seattle Children’s Institute, Seattle, WA.[8] A. Gomez, & B. Albrecht, “True STEM education.” Technology & Engineering Teacher, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 8-16. 2013.[9] R.W. Bybee, “The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities.” NSTA Press. 2013.[10] N. K. DeJarnette, “Implementing STEAM (science
overall academic experiences and outcomes. Such data reveal theneed for faculty members to consider the limitations and constraints of integrating such projectsand generate proactive solutions to remedy such issues. Furthermore, the intentional inclusion ofprojects in a virtual setting to help simulate in person experiences can greatly benefit students’acquisition of engineering related skills and competencies along with faculty guidance, canencourage them to engage in intentional dialogue with their peers to bolster interpersonal andcritical thinking skills.REFERENCES[1] de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010b). Learning bygenerating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance
of a computerfor extended periods of time. (a) email (b) in-person meetings (c) phone calls (d) social media (e) text messages (f) video conferencingFigure 2. Survey results between 2018 and 2020 for the different means of communication. The mean values are also provided.The most dramatic results are observed in Figure 2f, where the students express their dependence onvideo conferencing for communication during the pandemic. The use of video conferencing insynchronous classes and corresponding projects, in addition to the availability of reliable