and Assessing ABET “Soft Skills” in the Technical CurriculumAbstractTAC-ABET accreditation requires that each program develop program outcomes that embraceABET criteria 2a to k. Several of those, such as diversity, internationalization, and ethics, areoften referred to as the soft skills. Generally students exposure to these items is through theirelective (or required) courses in the humanities and social sciences. However, ABETaccreditation also requires that the achievement of the outcomes be assessed and evaluated.Obtaining direct evidence of achievement of the outcomes by the students can be problematicalas the other departments may not be doing assessment. Even if they are, the technology studentsin a humanities
to design and conduct experiments to analyze and interpret experimental dataC-2 to use modern engineering tools, software, and laboratory instrumentationC-3 to communicate effectively through written, oral, and graphical presentationsStudent Outcomes for Objective D: Students will be introduced to the following issues throughtheir undergraduate education in this department and will gain:D-1 an ability to work in teams to solve multi-faceted problemsD-2 an ability to understand and contribute to the challenges of a rapidly changing societyD-3 an understanding of ethical and societal responsibilities of professional engineersD-4 an understanding of the need for lifelong learning and continuing professional educationThe department
, University of Pittsburgh Harvey Wolfe is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. After many years working in the area of applying operations research methods to the health field, he is now active in the development of models for assessing engineering education. He is a co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press, 1997). He holds the B.E.S. in Industrial Engineering, M.S.E. in Operations Research, and Ph.D. in Operations Research (Johns Hopkins University).Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Mary Besterfield-Sacre is an Associate
andparticipation in an ethics workshop. The ethics workshop provided BMERET teacherswith the opportunity to consider the role of the scientist and engineer in the educational,political, health and social realms, the ethical challenges facing scientists/engineers todayand in the near future, and the role and responsibility of scientists/engineers to society.Throughout the BMERET program, an education specialist (faculty) from theuniversity’s school of education worked with the teachers on translating their new foundknowledge and technological skills into lesson plans and classroom activities. Theschool of education faculty assisted the teachers in designing scientific curricula thataddressed state science standards and to demonstrate to 6-12th graders the
engineering program mustdemonstrate that graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering -- TDC participants apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering in the development of the designs to meet NASA requirements (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data -- TDC participants must analyze and interpret data that results from their design trade studies in order to choose from design alternatives (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health
example of a program with PBSL opportunities is Worcester Polytechnic Institute’sGlobal Perspective Program.10 The program requires three projects, which may be completedoff-campus: 1 in the arts and humanities, the Major Qualifying Project, and the Interdisciplinaryor Interactive Qualifying Project that explores inter-relationships between science andtechnology. Students typically spend 2 month abroad working full time on their project. Themain method of assessment is faculty review of the student project report using a detailedevaluation rubric. The projects conducted off-campus via the Global Perspectives Programshowed much stronger evidence of ABET criteria d (multidisciplinary teamwork), f(understanding of ethics and professional
. Page 14.619.2Gustafson, McCaul, and Soboyejo conducted a survey of 280 alumni during the academic year2000-2001. Asked how their undergraduate experiences could have better prepared them fortheir professional careers, their top four responses included5: ≠ Changes in the content of engineering courses, including the use of current technology and software, more industry interactions, and real-world context; ≠ More involvement in professional organizations; ≠ An increased use of trade/professional publications within the curriculum; and ≠ Increased focus on professional skills, including ethics, teamwork, and communication.Several have reported the need to teach and encourage students to use library resources such astrade
; e-mail: gmn3@pitt.edu.Harvey Wolfe, University of Pittsburgh Harvey Wolfe is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. After many years working in the area of applying operations research methods to the health field, he is now active in the development of models for assessing engineering education. He is a co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press, 1997). He holds the B.E.S. in Industrial Engineering, M.S.E. in Operations Research, and Ph.D. in Operations Research (Johns Hopkins University).Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh
plagiarism and increases an ethics sprit inside the students. Similar to turnitin.com, it matches the submitted papers from the term papers available online. ≠ MyDropBox.com7: This is also an online service that prevents plagiarism. When a paper assignment is submitted into this site, computer compares the paper against the online paper mills.2. Plagiarism in Programming: As mentioned before, students cheat in their programming assignments [16], since it is very easy to copy and paste the programming code that will be hidden from a compiled executable file. However, it is very difficult for instructor to find out the plagiarism in code files rather than in writing assignments. Therefore, few companies
objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a commitment to quality As we entered the 21st century and experienced the challenges of more jobs were movedoverseas. The cheap labor costs of Southeast Asia (India, Malaysia, and Pakistan) are keptcalling more and more US employers who are seeking to lower support costs and improve profits.In 2003
Page 11.157.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Active Teaching, Active Learning: Infusing the Design Process in a First-Year CourseAbstractThe overall goals of most first-year engineering design courses are to introduce students to theengineering design process through hands-on learning activities, to familiarize them with thevarious disciplines in engineering, and to inspire and instill an appreciation for the engineeringprofession, its ethics, and practices –all with the hopes of improved retention. At NortheasternUniversity, our team of instructors has developed a set of classroom activities that illustrate eachstep of the engineering design process though exercises which dynamically
that has been taught by the capstone engineering professors. Three years ago, wedecided to bring in outside experts to lecture on topics such as project management, ethics andstandards to augment the training for our capstone students. The following year we decided toextend this concept and turned to experts trained in the field of business communications tobetter train students in how to effectively operate as a team.This paper describes an ongoing pilot project to integrate professional training on teamdynamics, team conflict and team leadership into our existing engineering capstone curriculum.Business Communications professors from the School of Management developed curriculum andpresented to engineering students in the Biomedical and
CostBenefit Analysis Building Codes or Law 3 Construction Law; Introduction to Ethics; Engineering Ethics Ethics 3 and its Impact on Society Civil Engineering Capstone Design; Capstone 3 Capstone Design Other (safety, Construction Safety & Equipment; mechanical, electrical, 1 Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing and plumbing systems
Issues, Solutions, and Impacts need to be able to understand the impact of their solutions (ISI) on current issues and vice versa. Ethics Students should consider ethical situations inherent in the (Ethics) practice of engineering. In K-12 engineering education, it is important to develop Teamwork students’ abilities to participate as a contributing team (Team) member
Theoretical models Experimental approaches Data analysis Design Learning from failure Creativity Use of engineering tools and resources (psychomotor) Safety Communication Teamwork Ethics Sensory awarenessThe above objectives can be divided into three broader categories: Those involving cognition(the first five), those involving psychomotor skills (use of tools and sensory awareness), andthose involving behavior and attitudes (the remainder). Feisel and Rosa [4] argue that all threedomains are necessary for the development of effective engineers through laboratoryexperiences. Problem-based learning activities in first-year engineering courses should beexperiential in nature and should seek to
supporting evidence. 4.25 4.43 0.18 I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 3.96 4.39 0.43* I understand science. 3.71 4.00 0.29 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.18 4.07 -0.11 I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.82 3.93 0.11 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 3.82 4.07 0.25 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 3.79 4.29 0.50* I have skill in science writing. 3.43 3.89 0.46* I have self-confidence
the industry9. This isfurther evidenced by ABET Criterion 3 student outcomes: (d) an ability to function onmultidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (g) anability to communicate effectively, (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context, (i) arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge ofcontemporary issues10.To address these needs, a more active approach can be adopted by faculty to enhance the studentlearning experience11,12. Through this approach, students undertake a particular problem in classand learn vital skills that they can apply more
Describe assemblies rules and behaviors that Create proper patterns contribute to engineering drawings effective to communicate a teamwork design Identify the “Explode” an relevance of assembly and to professional animate the explosion ethics in to show the intended project work
jobsite to experiencing the stress of a factory assembly line while studying theindustrial revolution in school. In academic settings, simulations have been used in many formsover the years (Troka & Nedelman, 1975). In the sciences, experiential learning simulations takethe form of experiments that allow students to test hypotheses as they engage in the scientificprocess of inquiry (Bell & Smetana, 2008). Political science professors use simulations to engagestudents in ethical dilemmas (Wheeler, 2006). Although they often take the form of a face to faceor computer generated experiences, a simulation presents students with a situation that representsa circumstance faced in real life (Ellington, Gordan & Fowlie, 1998). Simulations in
Program: Preparing the Future Professoriate andPedagogical Practices in Contemporary Contexts (Contemporary Pedagogy). Preparing theFuture Professoriate, taught by Dean DePauw, provides students with context and fundamentalknowledge of modern issues they may face as a future faculty member in the United States orabroad. The semester begins with discussions about the structure of the university and facultyresponsibilities within the university. The remainder of the semester gives an overview of highereducation, including topics such as shifting student demographics, diversity and inclusion, theimpact of technology in the classroom, ethical standards in research, and paradigm shifts ineducation and university policy. In Preparing the Future
engineering work. It is found that experiences promoting a service ethic andbroadening oneself outside of engineering are important predictors of interest in impact-driven work. What is lessexpected is the significant importance of innovation interests and innovation self-efficacy for engineering studentsinterested in creating societal impact. Deeper exploration reveals that certain academic experiences and proximalinfluences have a direct and significant effect on a student’s interest in impact-driven work, and this relationship isstrengthened by the partial mediation of innovation self-efficacy. As such, this study suggests that the developmentof innovation self-efficacy is important in cultivating engineering students who are interested in impact
enhanced by ensuring a scaffolded and recursive process forePortfolio creation that incorporates ongoing dialogue with mentors and peers.Introduction We learn by doing, if we reflect on what we have done. — John DeweyAuthentic experiences combined with reflection and continual integration acrosstime and contexts are essential for deep, transferable learning, development ofexpertise, and ethical development. Ambrose [1] identifies these elements as coreprinciples from the learning sciences that should be foundations for high qualityundergraduate engineering education. A well-designed curriculum, among otherthings, has "authentic experiential learning opportunities to
–139.[34] N. Fryer and M. Boot, “Beyond you and I: role play and reflection-in-action in communication training,” Reflective Practice, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–11, Nov. 2016.[35] D. Nestel and T. Tierney, “Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 7, p. 3, 2007.[36] K. S. Kesten, “Role-Play Using SBAR Technique to Improve Observed Communication Skills in Senior Nursing Students,” J Nurs Educ, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 79–87, Feb. 2011.[37] B. Joyner and L. Young, “Teaching medical students using role play: Twelve tips for successful role plays,” Medical Teacher, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 225–229, 2006.[38] K. M. Brown, “Using role play to integrate ethics into
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
].ABET mandates that students have a “major design experience” [1] as part of the universityengineering curriculum. This experience usually consists of a capstone design course (orcourses). These courses are often used to assess the achievement of student outcomes, and anumber of methodologies and rubrics have been developed for this purpose [19-24]. Within thecontext of design skill assessment, specific traits have been studied, including professionalism[25], ethics [26], teamwork [27] and life-long learning [28].Despite the amount of work devoted to assessing design at certain points of student development,typically in introductory and capstone design courses, relatively little exists to measure thechange (and hopefully improvement) of design
design derived from the exercises.There are many ways of using class exercises in the classroom setting. For a small class size, theteacher may simply use an exercise to engage students in discussion and hands-on practice. Forlarger classes, the students can be assigned to small groups using the class exercise as aninstrument leading to group projects. Woods and Howard [12] effectively used class exercisesfor Information Technology students to study ethical issues. Day and Foley [13] used class timeexclusively for exercises, having their students prepare for class with materials provided online.Bishop and Verleger [14] presented a comprehensive survey of the research that revieweddifferent ways of using class exercises in the classroom, often
, initiative, continuous learning, and ethics”(Electrical Engineering Self-Study Report, p. 23). “Softer” skills, such as networking and careerpreparation, are developed outside the major’s curriculum in extracurricular workshops,advising, or in ENGR 101, a freshman-level course called Introduction to Engineering(Electrical Engineering Self-Study Report, p. 23). This focused is echoed in the computerengineering and software engineering majors (Computer Engineering Self-Study Report;Software Engineering Self-Study Report). The documents across the software, computer, and electrical engineering majors discussthe need to produce engineers who are well-rounded; that is, students who will have “an abilityto design a system, component, or process to
solutions that desired needs within realistic meet specified needs with consideration constraints such as economic, for public health and safety, and global, environmental, social, political, cultural, social, environmental, ethical, health and safety, economic, and other factors as manufacturability, and sustainability appropriate to the discipline SO (b) an ability to design and conduct SO-3 an ability to develop and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and appropriate experimentation, analyze interpret data and interpret data, and use engineering
Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor and Chair of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in synthetic and biological polymers, materials selection, and fracture mechanics. He has conducted educational research in the areas of ethical decision making, reflection and innovative pedagogies for the past 19 years. He serves as Associate Editor of the journal Advances in Engineering Education. He has served as division chair for the Community Engagement Division and Materials Division of ASEE. Dr. Harding was invited to deliver a workshop on Ethics in the Engineering Curricula at the 2009 NSF Engineering Awardees Conference and to
understanding different typesof disability, including hidden disabilities, to determine what is needed to overcome mobilitybarriers. Students are expected to gain competencies in identifying and assessing the physical,information, and communication needs of persons with disabilities in both standard andemergency situations and to know different techniques for providing situational assistance ontransport to people with different disabilities. Reading materials for this portion of the courseinclude the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [7]. Thecompetency area contains an ethics component, which focuses on proper communicationsetiquette as well as awareness and tolerance for physical, social, ethnic, and cultural