club (or how to find and read a research article), discussions on laboratory etiquette andresearch ethics. Participants were then integrated into their research mentors laboratory, andspent eight weeks on a research project. The program has two Peer Mentors, who areundergraduates with research experience, that live with the students and participate in theresearch project. The mentors are also responsible for additional social and academic activitiesduring nights and weekends. This paper describes the program, evaluations and critiques fromthe first year (from both research mentors and participants), as well as the challenges andopportunities the program presents to future “Research Experience for Undergraduates”programs. Surveys will continue
meetingover lunch. The interaction with the mentors helps build student commitment to engineering.Creating opportunities for meaningful interaction between freshmen and facultyThrough the Global Workshop and the Grand Challenges Curriculum, students interact closelywith faculty members of the Engineering Freshman Teaching Academy during E2. The GlobalWorkshop, an activity facilitated by both peer mentors and faculty, presents the freshmenstudents with scenarios that pertain to global engineering challenges. One such challengeaddresses the technical as well as the cultural and ethical concerns of building a bridge in avillage in an under-developed country. Through the direction and collaboration of the faculty,students derive solutions to the
,presentation skills, teamwork skills, conflict resolution skills, ethics, professionalism in terms ofattendance and employee responsibilities, problem solving skills and approaches, appreciation ofthe manufacturing process and procedure, customer support, appreciation of diversity, ability toset priorities, understanding of the business fundamentals, and creativity and innovation.The importance of non-technical skills in a technical curriculum is something that has beenconsidered by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), in both itsEngineering Technology and Engineering accreditation standards. ABET currently requires non-technical skill sets that include: an ability to function effectively on teams; an ability tocommunicate
, journals and funded projects. Engineering curricula are crowded, however, and leave little room for new courses. Beginning with the “writing across the curriculum” movement in the 1980’s, the literature reveals that many disciplines have mounted “across the curriculum” movements. These include writing, mathematics, critical thinking, citizenship, ethics and other fields. Given crowded engineering curricula, an “across the curriculum” approach is a logical means to address the need to add entrepreneurial thinking without adding additional courses. Measurement tools are a critical requirement to assess the efficacy or any curriculum intervention. This is especially true when dealing with a new and
lifelong learningh understand professional responsibility understand ethical responsibility understand social responsibilityi 72.3 72.3 knowledge of contemporary knowledge of contemporary societal knowledge of contemporary global respect for diversity professional issues issues issuesj commitment to quality commitment to
intended.IntroductionIn 1996, “Science and Technology,” was added to the NSF content Standards1 to emphasize theprocess of design and to link science and technology. Standard E (Science and Technology)addresses “abilities to distinguish between natural objects and objects made by humans,”“abilities of technological design,” and “understanding about science and technology.” StandardF (Science in Personal and Social Perspectives) addresses the challenges of science and Page 10.909.1technology locally to globally; invention; and the socioeconomic, political and ethical impacts ofscience and technology. Standard G (History & Nature of Science) addresses the
Learning. Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR. June 11–15, 2005. Paper # AC 2005-45. Session #1660.Narayanan, Mysore. (2006). An Effective Assessment Rubric Based on the Taxonomy Triangle of BenjaminBloom" The 18th Annual Lilly-West National Conference, March 17 & 18, 2006 at the Kellogg WestRanch at Cal Poly Pomona, California.Narayanan, Mysore. (2008). Assessment of Air Quality Education using VARK Learning Styles.World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 - Ahupua’A. Honolulu, Hawaii. pp. 1-6, pp. 1-6,doi 10.1061/40976(316)629.Narayanan, Mysore. (2007). Assessment of Ethics Modules in an Engineering Curriculum. ASEE 114th AnnualConference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27
, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes, d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems, g. an ability to communicate effectively, h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning, i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities, j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues, and k. a
substantially more robust and effective. Figure 5 Egg mover project (a) design on paper (not to scale) (b) set up and picks up eggs(c) move and a place grade A large egg Page 15.1292.7ResultsThis course addresses not only engineering design process and technique but also exposes students to areasonable simulation of the design workplace. Because the course involves a continuing interaction of teammembers, issues arise that stimulate discussions and reactions to a wide range of interactions, fromcommunications to ethics. The design courses sequence in the Faculty of Engineering has been developed
to the EAC/ABET general engineering program Criteria 3 (d),and (f) through (j): Page 15.125.2 (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding of professional, and ethical responsibility, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) …to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.1,2Incorporating these outcomes into Civil Engineering curricula has been challenging since mostCivil
, ethics related to engineering and sports are discussed in the freshmancourse. In the engineering materials course at the county college, students perform experimentsin mechanics of materials, as this is the topic of the course. Students later bring in other productsto test a section or material sample. The purpose of this paper is to briefly explain the modulesand their incorporation into each of the courses and evaluate their attitudes and interests in thesports in engineering topics.IntroductionFaculty at two universities and a county college have developed a set of modules for teachingengineering from an applied, hands-on point of view. The basis of the project are the facts thatthe world of sports provides for an exciting platform to study
build on their academic courses and expand them o Project use the set of skills learned in program of study• Projects develop effective communication skills (verbal and written) o Oral/Written presentations are requiredWith regard to the ABET outcomes, the projects meet at least the following criteria:• An ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team Page 15.1379.7• An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility• An ability to communicate effectively• Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.• Knowledge of contemporary issues.• An ability to apply knowledge of
Organization Prioritization Time, project and resources control Knowledge sharing, capitalization and management Team work Multidisciplinary collaboration Intercultural collaboration Written, oral and graphic communication Ethics Sketching Conceptual modeling Analytical modeling Computational modeling Prototyping CraftingThis listing is intended to help the teacher by decomposing the engineering designactivity so each skill can be developed individually or in groups that simplify the learningprocess for the student, acknowledging that the main design skill is
), but Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationworse than these were widespread problems of logical organization. The typical narrative of areport was something like “We measured the frequency response of the first circuit, and here iswhat we got.” There was little or no description of procedure, theoretical background, orcomparison of results with expectations. There were even ethical problems in some reports. Asan example, one laboratory group submitted a report on the frequency response of passivenetworks in which they substituted results of circuit simulation for the required
2importance of engineering to the Air Force and associated ethical responsibilities were stressedalong the way.Course FrameworkThe course is centered on producing the rocket-glider artifact by the end of each semester. Theflying rocket-gliders are models which, under remote radio control, transition at the top of theirboost trajectory into gliders that attempt to make a soft landing on a designated site. Our six-student teams design, build, and fly a fully operational rocket-glider vehicle from scratch.Powered by a 3 second, 3.4 lb max thrust model rocket motor, most boost gliders are about 2 feetlong. Each boost glider has a set of control surfaces mounted with receiver-actuated servos.Flights last from 2 seconds (for an aerodynamically unstable
graduates to be Air Force officers who: 1. Possess breadth of integrated, fundamental knowledge in the basic sciences, engineering, humanities, and social sciences; and depth of knowledge in the selected option sequence. 2. Can communicate effectively. 3. Can work effectively with others. 4. Are independent thinkers and learners. 5. Can apply their knowledge and skills to solve Air Force engineering problems, both well- and ill- defined. 6. Know and practice their ethical and professional responsibilities as embodied in the United States Air Force core values.Our ABET Criterion 3. Program Outcomes will require each systems engineering graduate todemonstrate satisfactory
one way of defining an IT curriculum for all IT17 Ethics programs across the nation. The topic areas with18 Embedded systems high rankings indicates a strong number of19 Holistic mentions for the Core Courses, and indicates to20 Information content these authors that all IT programs should consist21 Social factors of at least one course in at least the top 4 of these22 System administration areas. It is these topics, in combination, that23 General education define the
described above can be used to enrich theexisting curriculum by encouraging critical thinking and problem solving in a multidisciplinarycontext. Page 24.479.8References:1. Kirpalani, N. and S.C. Baxter, Brand Attitude, Attachment, and Separation Distress: A Comparison of Fashion Apparel and Electronics Brands. Society for Marketing Advances Proceedings, 2012: p. 30-31.2. Thilmany, J., Lifecycle Management: It's not just for engineers anymore. PLM Chic. Mechanical Engineering, 2013. 135(3): p. 38.3. Joy, A., et al., Fast Fashion, Sustainability, and the Ethical Appeal of Luxury Brand. Fashion Theory-The Journal Of Dress Body
from alist of social sciences classes, one from a list of arts and humanities classes, and one from a listof cultural understanding classes, in addition to one course each in English composition, speech,and ethics, all taught by faculty from outside of E&T. In many cases, however, there still existsa lack of interaction between engineering faculty and faculty from the School of LA. This hasnot stopped one particular program from endeavoring to build new bridges and open doors thathave traditionally been closed.For example, both E&T and LA have faculty members who are heavily involved in theMotorsports Industry. When E&T’s relatively new Motorsports Engineering Bachelor ofScience degree program was being developed, one of the
professional field. In addition, thecourse is intended to link knowledge and application of engineering principles to professionalethics and values, and to foster the academic and personal growth of the students. Unfortunately,the previous offerings of this course failed to deliver the desired learning experiences due to (1)the disparate nature of the content and delivery from session to session (2) the lack of continuityacross sessions (3) the absence of a common thread to bind the content of the course.In order to overcome these drawbacks and to teach engineering design and practice in the context 1-2of society, ethics, and economics, the course has been restructured by
capabilities in global competence and leadership. His research and teaching interests include developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufac- turing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medical Technology fortune 500 Company. In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality engineer, technical lead, business leader and pro- gram/project manager managing many different global projects. Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from
electrical energy from the reaction of hydrogenand oxygen. Each of the experiments lasts for two weeks.In Engineering Foundations, students are also introduced to a number of professional skills, suchas technical writing, communication, engineering ethics, and the engineering design process.Technical writing is covered by requiring the students to prepare laboratory reports for each ofthe four hands-on experiments. Communication is emphasized through a group presentation thatrequires the students to research one of the fourteen Grand Challenges9 identified by the NationalAcademy of Engineers and to present their findings to the class. Ethics is covered during alecture that uses practical examples and role playing to emphasize the challenges in
problems 7. Able to apply thermodynamic concepts in solving chemical engineering problems 8. Able to apply concepts of transport phenomena in solving chemical engineering problems 9. Able to apply the concepts of chemical reaction engineering 10. Able to use modern chemical engineering tools 11. Able to conducts experiments and analyze the data obtained 12. Able to design components, systems, processes, and products related to chemical engineering profession with careful consideration of the engineering, economic, social, health and safety, energy, environment, sustainability, and ethics aspects 13. Able to provide solutions to various problems occurred wherever they live and work 14. Able to identify the kind of entrepreneurial
, teamwork skills, ethical considerations,and the ideas of service and community. The assignment was intended to blend Cargile Cook’srhetorical literacy of audience adaptation and social literacy of team work in a complexassignment that allowed students to exercise their creativity and ingenuity to solve a real-worldproblem. Projects like this greatly enhance workplace skills. Cargile Cook asserts that exposingstudents to these multiple layers of literacy in assignments repeatedly “prepares them for life Page 24.292.3long learning”9 a challenging graduate attribute to quantify.It can be challenging to engage first-year engineering students in their
CR) • CS 1400 Fundamentals of Programming • CS 1410 Object-Oriented Programming • CS 2300 Discrete Structures I • CS 2420 Into to Algorithms and Data Structures • CS 2450 Software Engineering • CS 2600 Computer Networks I • CS 2810 Computer Organization and Architecture • CS 305G Global Social & Ethical Issues in Computing • CS 3060 Operating Systems Theory • CS 4380 Advanced/High-Performance Computer ArchitectureECE Requirements (38 CR) • ECE 1020 Computer Engineering Problem Solving with Matlab & Labview • ECE 2250 Circuit Theory • ECE 2255 Circuit Theory Lab • ECE 2700 Digital Design I • ECE
33 NoneSystems Engineering 26 Systems for Engineering ManagementEngineering Law and Ethics 22 Engineering Law and EthicsEngineering Economics 21 Engineering EconomicsDecision Making 17 Engineering DecisionsProject Management 17 Project Management for EngineersEngineering Marketing 16 NoneQuality Management 15 Quality in Engineering ManagementEngineering Statistics 15 NoneEngineering Accounting 10 NoneEngineering Finance
related to the engineering core principles as well as specific technical information that was developed to complete the project. • Professional learning – Was there an adequate amount of professionalism developed through completion of the project? This includes written and oral communication, leadership, ethical decision-making, professional responsibility, and teamwork skills. • Measure of success– What was being used as the measure of success for the project; was the primary focus the final product, documentation, or technical learning? • Students’ design experience– How was the overall design experience; was it worth their
dataC. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainabilityD. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teamsE. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsF. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityG. An ability to communicate effectivelyH. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextI. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningJ. A knowledge of contemporary issues, andK. An ability to use the
Yesg Communicate Effectively Yes Yes Yesh Lifelong Learning Yes Yesi Professional, Ethical and Social Yes Yes Yesj Diversity and World Issues Yes Yes Yesk Quality, timeliness, CIP Yes YesProgram Criteria Circuits, programming, etc. Yes Yes“ Apply Physics / Chemistry Yes Yes“ Depth & Breadth Yes Yes Yes“ Various EET Fields Yes Yes
influenced by social,environmental, ethical, economic and policy considerations. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationenvironment5. In doing so, students are given greater confidence in selecting a career path, areable to accept responsibility and leadership, learn to respect and value the different perspectives,strategies, and priorities brought to bear on a problem by those from different disciplines, andattain teamwork, communication, and project management skills. IPRO Projects are based onreal-world topics, most often involving sponsors and clients that reflect the diversity of