Paper ID #49600Designing and Developing Summer K-12 STEM Outreach Programs Througha Tenure-Track Faculty’s PerspectiveDr. Nathan Galinsky, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Nathan Galinsky is a tenure-track faculty in the chemical engineering department at WVU Tech since 2019. He has been actively involved in outreach within the university running six summer outreach programs since 2021 and being actively involved within the department and university in K-12 outreach, recruitment, and retention efforts. His educational research interests are on K-12 outreach, developing more engaging out of class
degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois University and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technology, Jamaica. Her research interest is eliciting conceptual understanding of AC circuit concepts using active learning strategies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching Circuit Concepts Using Evidence-based Instructional Approaches: A Systematic ReviewAbstractAn educational strategy is evidence-based if objective evidence is used to inform the design ofan academic program or guide the instructional practices. Studies show that the unsatisfactoryperformance of engineering graduates in competency
+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviors among Instructors of Fundamental Engineering Courses (FECs)Abstract This research paper illuminates the different contexts elicited by seven instructors whotaught fundamental engineering courses (FECs) when discussing their test usage beliefs andbehaviors, beginning to address a gap in engineering education research on instructors’ beliefsand behaviors and
time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2158244018824506, 2019. [6] E. K. Marler, M. J. Bruce, A. Abaoud, C. Henrichsen, W. Suksatan, S. Homvisetvongsa, and H. Matsuo, “The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2021. [7] L. A. Gelles and A. Walker, “Return to in-person learning and undergraduate student sense of belonging during the fall 2021 semester,” in 2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference, 2022. [8] D. A. Copp and A. J. Headley, “Test anxiety and its impact on diverse undergraduate engineering students during remote
team: Goalorientation and gender-correlated task division. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Washington, DC, 2010, p. F4H–1[17] Buckley, J., Trauth, A., Grajeda, S. B., & Roberts, D. (2019, June). Gender and racialdisparities in students’ self-confidence on team-based engineering design projects. In 2019ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[18] Trauth, A., Headley, M. G., Grajeda, S., Roberts, D., & Buckley, J. (2020, May). IndividualDesign Experiences Improve Students' Self-Efficacy on Team-Based Engineering DesignProjects. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference.[19] Headley, M. G., Trauth, A., Malladi, H., & Buckley, J. (2021, July). Examining the me inteam-based projects: Students’ perceptions
120 secs – Support Chief weekly “hacks”.”https://kahoot.com/blog/2017/02/24/extending-time-limits-beyond-120-secs/, 2017 (Accessed:January 16, 2019).20 Kappers, W. M. and Cutler, S. L. “Poll Everywhere! Even in the classroom: An investigationinto the impact of using PollEverwhere in a large-lecture classroom.” Computers in EducationJournal, vol. 6, no. 20, p.140-145, 2015.21 Sun, L. and Tang, Y. “Enhancing conceptual understanding by using a real-time online classresponse system in engineering courses.” Proceedings of the ASEE 125th Annual Conference andExposition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015.22 Popescu, O., Chezan, L. C., Jovanovic, V. M. and Ayala, O. M. “The use of Polleverywhere inengineering technology classes to stimulate
Research in the USA.” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, May 10-11, 2007.[7] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-19,” accessed at http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018- 2019/, January 15, 2018.[8] A. C. Estes, T. A. Lenox, K. J. Fridley, and R. O. Anderson, “Accreditation Insights and the Next Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, June 2016.[9] J. S. Russell, J. M. Rogers, T. A. Lenox, and D. K. Coward, “Civil Engineering Master’s Programs: A Comprehensive Review of Types and Requirements,” Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of ASEE, June 2011.[10
sessions in the international conferences for the past 30 years. Professor Zilouchian is currently an associate editor of the International Journal of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering out of Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating Design into the Entire Electrical Engineering Four Year Experience Zvi S. Roth, Hanqi Zhuang, Vichate Ungvichian and Ali Zilouchian Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida
- partment. His teaching focus is in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics but has also taught classes such as numerical methods and introduction to engineering. His interests include student pathways and mo- tivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. He has also developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms and incorporat- ing the entrepreneurial mindset into curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A First-Year Power Plant Design ProjectAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper discusses the development and refinement of a first-yearengineering design project related to
Foster Epistemic Change in an Engineering Senior Design Course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 209–215, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2898151.[4] F. Khan, N. Birchfield, and K. V. Singh, “Revitalizing the Engineering Curriculum Through Studio Based Instruction,” in Volume 5: Education and Globalization; General Topics, Houston, Texas, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Nov. 2012, pp. 131–138. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2012-89547.[5] K. Cummings, J. Marx, R. Thornton, and D. Kuhl, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 67, no. S1, pp. S38–S44, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1119/1.19078.[6] C. Argyris, “Teaching and Learning in Design Settings,” in Architecture Education Study, vol. 1, W. L
Distinguished Summer Faculty at SPAWAR San Diego, CA. He has over 55 publications covering areas such as adaptive and intelligent controls, robotics, an ocean wave energy converter, green technology, education, wireless sensor networks and image processing. He is a co-inventor on 3 US patents related to control systems. Dr. McLauchlan is a member of ASEE and was the 2012-2014 Chair of the Ocean and Marine Engineering Division. He is also a member of IEEE (senior member), SPIE, Eta Kappa Nu, ACES and Tau Beta Pi, and has served on the IEEE Corpus Christi Section Board in various capacities such as Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary and Membership Development Officer. Dr. McLauchlan has received the Dean’s Distinguished Service
-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100017, 2021.[16] P. Johanes and L. Lagerstrom, “Adaptive learning: The premise, promise, and pitfalls,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[17] C. Richardson, “Council post: The next revolution in global e-learning,” Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/25/the-next-revolution-in-global-elearning/?sh=66f38d357c25[18] Y. Niu, L. Ying, J. Yang, M. Bao, and C. Sivaparthipan, “Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 6, p. 102725, 2021
capabilities instilledby programs around the U.S., but the competencies these programs overlook. Engineeringprograms must find new methods of focusing on cross-disciplinary skill sets that are essential toengineering success. As recently as 2020, the ASEE survey for skills gaps in recent graduates echoed theseconcerns, listing communication skills and the ability to manage a project as areas that were lackingfor most newly graduated engineers [1]. This survey tasked educators to fill gaps in their curriculumat a pre-capstone level in response to these needs. Our present work responds to this gap. We seekto effectively develop our student engineers’ ability to think and communicate creatively withintheir knowledge of engineering. This
curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience Conference. He is affiliated withthe Transportation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department. He is the advisor for NYU student chapter of the Institute for Transportation Engineers.Prof. Jen-Yeu Chen, National Dong Haw University Dr. Jen-Yeu Chen’s research interests span over the areas of networking, control and communications. In particular, in recent years, he focuses
: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 89, no. 5, p. 774, 2014.[31] L. S. Behar-Horenstein, X. Feng, A. Prikhidko, Y. Su, H. Kuang, and R. B. Fillingim, "Assessing mentor academy program effectiveness using mixed methods," Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 109-125, 2019.[32] A. Briliyanti, J. Rojewski, D. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, "STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills for Graduate Students," in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2020.[33] J. Trejo et al., "A system-wide health sciences faculty mentor training program is associated with improved effective mentoring and
vision impairment, speech impairment; learning or psychiatricconditions). The majority of students do not report their disabilities to their university [1]. Astudy by Love et al. found that 75% of students who self-disclosed a disability in a survey, chosenot to inform their instructor [2]. Similarly, UIUC’s 2019 survey found that 8% of students hadindicated having a disability while 28% of them stated their disability needs were not being met[3]. Additionally, Dewantoro et. al. found that SWD were less prepared for online courses, whencompared to SWOD [4]. These studies highlight the need to further investigate whichinstructional features can foster success for SWD, especially when a large proportion mayhesitate to disclose their disability
domainthey teach (and therefore represent to their students) matters has been a subject of bothspeculation and scholarship for many years (Cosgrove & O’Reilly, 2020; Duschl, 2008;Lederman, 1999). Teachers’ conceptions of engineering knowledge and practice have beenfound to relate to their design of engineering instruction for their learners (Author 2 et al., 2021).Wendell et al. (2019) found that teachers’ epistemological stance is consequential for the waysthat they enact engineering learning and experience in their classrooms. We conceive of teachersas engineers themselves, who engage in engineering work for the sake of student learning, but doso while implementing epistemic practices of authentic engineering nonetheless. Their enactmentof
, and practice of teamwork and intercultural communication are taught inengineering classrooms; in short, they are not. Although engineering programs work towardhelping their students develop teamwork competencies, teamwork in engineering classrooms hasbeen largely bereft of direct teaching about the communication-rooted components of teamwork(Kedrowicz & Nelson, 2007), tending instead to focus on the process and organizationalelements of teamwork and various levels of assessment, such as peer-assessment and observation(Chowdhry & Murzi, 2019). Intercultural competency in engineering classrooms suffers asimilar fate (Warnick, 2011; Ndubuisi, et al., 2020) and is often discussed in essentialist termswherein intercultural competency is
affirming stories,but also institutionally realized leadership catalysts. By making four types of EL developmentcatalysts explicit, we provide engineering educators with authentic, industry-embeddednarratives to support their programing. This project is significant to the ASEE LEAD divisionbecause it provides us with a way of scaffolding leadership development opportunities for all ourstudents, even those who may resist the notion of engineering as a leadership profession.Keywords: career paths, engineering leadership, situated workplace learning, leadership narrativesIntroductionThe majority of engineers working in industry encounter supervisory or managerialresponsibilities within four years of graduation [1-4], yet research suggests that many of
Paper ID #32864Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Engineering Students’ Preparedness forLeadership CompetenciesMr. Hwangbo Bae, University of Florida Hwangbo Bae joined Simmons Research Lab at the University of Florida in August 2019 as a Ph.D. student. He received a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degrees in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech in 2018 and 2019, respectively. His major interest in research is under- standing professional values of construction workforce and the role of leadership that promote employee motivation for work, as well as job satisfaction and wellbeing.Dr. Madeline
women in STEM doctoral programs,” Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 23, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7020023.[4] D. R. Johnson, “Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM),” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2011, no. 152, pp. 75–85, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1002/ir.410.[5] K. G. Wilkins-Yel, J. Hyman, and N. O. O. Zounlome, “Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 113, pp. 51–61, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.018.[6] A. C. Arnold et al., “Examining the effects of STEM climate on the mental health of graduate women from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds
wasperformed on feedback from undergraduate students and observational notes were gatheredon these students for two iterations of the camp in the Summer of 2018 and 2019. The resultsof this work, along with background information on mentorship, computational thinking,and SEL skills is provided in the rest of this paper.2 Background 2.1 Near-peer mentorshipNear-peer mentorship is the process of having students in a more advanced level of theireducation mentor students of novice level. The relationship between the mentor and menteeis said to be successful because the participants are close in their matriculation. Thiscloseness helps the mentor communicate and the mentee views the mentor as more relatable.The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
present have four undergraduate programs in engineering and two in design. Three of four programs have ABET accreditation. The next project is working with the graduate programs in the school to firm up the assurance of learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26882Dr. Ang´elica Burbano, Universidad Icesi Angelica Burbano C.,holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She holds a MSOM from Universidad Icesi and a BS in industrial engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana both in Cali, Colombia. She is a Fulbright Scholar 2007 and a
the First Year of a NSF-sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Discussion Board Topics and ResourcesDiscussion Board Topic 1 – Experimental MethodologiesPlease pick one of the four experimental methodologies listed in page 6 of the Amy Aponpresentation handout and discuss how it could be applied to a computer science researchproblem. Please choose a methodology that someone else has not yet selected, until all four havebeen covered to ensure that we cover all four. By _____, please make your primary post. By_____, please reply to two other posts (at least one of which should be on a
Haute, Indiana. He received BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering at University of Missouri-Rolla, a second MS in Civil Engineering at Purdue University, and a Ph.D. from Georgia In- stitute of Technology. Kevin was a geotechnical consultant with Soil Consultants, Inc. of St. Peters, Missouri from 1984-1988. He also served as Director of Engineering Services for SCI Environmental of Chesterfield, Missouri from 1988-89 before leaving practice to pursue his Ph.D. Kevin was an Assistant Professor at University of Kentucky from 1993-1998, and has been a faculty at Rose-Hulman since then. Kevin has served the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE for over 10 years and was Division Chair in 2010-11. He has also served on a
- nator of the Puerto Rico Climate Change Council. Served as Administrator of the Natural Resources Administration. Specializes in coastal dynamics, coastal hazards mitigation and nearshore environments processess assessments. Served as Regional Lead Author of the US Caribbean chapter of fourth National Climate Assessment Report ( NCAR-Ch:20). Has published extensively on coastal issues, sea level rise, climate vulnerability assessments and adaptation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Education and Building Capacity for Improving Resilience of Coastal InfrastructureAbstractCoastal environments in the Caribbean and around the World host