sessions in the international conferences for the past 30 years. Professor Zilouchian is currently an associate editor of the International Journal of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering out of Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating Design into the Entire Electrical Engineering Four Year Experience Zvi S. Roth, Hanqi Zhuang, Vichate Ungvichian and Ali Zilouchian Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida
- partment. His teaching focus is in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics but has also taught classes such as numerical methods and introduction to engineering. His interests include student pathways and mo- tivations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. He has also developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms and incorporat- ing the entrepreneurial mindset into curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A First-Year Power Plant Design ProjectAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper discusses the development and refinement of a first-yearengineering design project related to
Foster Epistemic Change in an Engineering Senior Design Course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 209–215, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2898151.[4] F. Khan, N. Birchfield, and K. V. Singh, “Revitalizing the Engineering Curriculum Through Studio Based Instruction,” in Volume 5: Education and Globalization; General Topics, Houston, Texas, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Nov. 2012, pp. 131–138. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2012-89547.[5] K. Cummings, J. Marx, R. Thornton, and D. Kuhl, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 67, no. S1, pp. S38–S44, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1119/1.19078.[6] C. Argyris, “Teaching and Learning in Design Settings,” in Architecture Education Study, vol. 1, W. L
Distinguished Summer Faculty at SPAWAR San Diego, CA. He has over 55 publications covering areas such as adaptive and intelligent controls, robotics, an ocean wave energy converter, green technology, education, wireless sensor networks and image processing. He is a co-inventor on 3 US patents related to control systems. Dr. McLauchlan is a member of ASEE and was the 2012-2014 Chair of the Ocean and Marine Engineering Division. He is also a member of IEEE (senior member), SPIE, Eta Kappa Nu, ACES and Tau Beta Pi, and has served on the IEEE Corpus Christi Section Board in various capacities such as Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary and Membership Development Officer. Dr. McLauchlan has received the Dean’s Distinguished Service
-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100017, 2021.[16] P. Johanes and L. Lagerstrom, “Adaptive learning: The premise, promise, and pitfalls,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[17] C. Richardson, “Council post: The next revolution in global e-learning,” Jul 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/25/the-next-revolution-in-global-elearning/?sh=66f38d357c25[18] Y. Niu, L. Ying, J. Yang, M. Bao, and C. Sivaparthipan, “Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 6, p. 102725, 2021
curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience Conference. He is affiliated withthe Transportation Engineering program in the NYU Civil and Urban Engineering Department. He is the advisor for NYU student chapter of the Institute for Transportation Engineers.Prof. Jen-Yeu Chen, National Dong Haw University Dr. Jen-Yeu Chen’s research interests span over the areas of networking, control and communications. In particular, in recent years, he focuses
: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 89, no. 5, p. 774, 2014.[31] L. S. Behar-Horenstein, X. Feng, A. Prikhidko, Y. Su, H. Kuang, and R. B. Fillingim, "Assessing mentor academy program effectiveness using mixed methods," Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 109-125, 2019.[32] A. Briliyanti, J. Rojewski, D. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, "STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills for Graduate Students," in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2020.[33] J. Trejo et al., "A system-wide health sciences faculty mentor training program is associated with improved effective mentoring and
vision impairment, speech impairment; learning or psychiatricconditions). The majority of students do not report their disabilities to their university [1]. Astudy by Love et al. found that 75% of students who self-disclosed a disability in a survey, chosenot to inform their instructor [2]. Similarly, UIUC’s 2019 survey found that 8% of students hadindicated having a disability while 28% of them stated their disability needs were not being met[3]. Additionally, Dewantoro et. al. found that SWD were less prepared for online courses, whencompared to SWOD [4]. These studies highlight the need to further investigate whichinstructional features can foster success for SWD, especially when a large proportion mayhesitate to disclose their disability
domainthey teach (and therefore represent to their students) matters has been a subject of bothspeculation and scholarship for many years (Cosgrove & O’Reilly, 2020; Duschl, 2008;Lederman, 1999). Teachers’ conceptions of engineering knowledge and practice have beenfound to relate to their design of engineering instruction for their learners (Author 2 et al., 2021).Wendell et al. (2019) found that teachers’ epistemological stance is consequential for the waysthat they enact engineering learning and experience in their classrooms. We conceive of teachersas engineers themselves, who engage in engineering work for the sake of student learning, but doso while implementing epistemic practices of authentic engineering nonetheless. Their enactmentof
, and practice of teamwork and intercultural communication are taught inengineering classrooms; in short, they are not. Although engineering programs work towardhelping their students develop teamwork competencies, teamwork in engineering classrooms hasbeen largely bereft of direct teaching about the communication-rooted components of teamwork(Kedrowicz & Nelson, 2007), tending instead to focus on the process and organizationalelements of teamwork and various levels of assessment, such as peer-assessment and observation(Chowdhry & Murzi, 2019). Intercultural competency in engineering classrooms suffers asimilar fate (Warnick, 2011; Ndubuisi, et al., 2020) and is often discussed in essentialist termswherein intercultural competency is
affirming stories,but also institutionally realized leadership catalysts. By making four types of EL developmentcatalysts explicit, we provide engineering educators with authentic, industry-embeddednarratives to support their programing. This project is significant to the ASEE LEAD divisionbecause it provides us with a way of scaffolding leadership development opportunities for all ourstudents, even those who may resist the notion of engineering as a leadership profession.Keywords: career paths, engineering leadership, situated workplace learning, leadership narrativesIntroductionThe majority of engineers working in industry encounter supervisory or managerialresponsibilities within four years of graduation [1-4], yet research suggests that many of
Paper ID #32864Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Engineering Students’ Preparedness forLeadership CompetenciesMr. Hwangbo Bae, University of Florida Hwangbo Bae joined Simmons Research Lab at the University of Florida in August 2019 as a Ph.D. student. He received a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degrees in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech in 2018 and 2019, respectively. His major interest in research is under- standing professional values of construction workforce and the role of leadership that promote employee motivation for work, as well as job satisfaction and wellbeing.Dr. Madeline
women in STEM doctoral programs,” Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 23, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7020023.[4] D. R. Johnson, “Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM),” New Dir. Institutional Res., vol. 2011, no. 152, pp. 75–85, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1002/ir.410.[5] K. G. Wilkins-Yel, J. Hyman, and N. O. O. Zounlome, “Linking intersectional invisibility and hypervisibility to experiences of microaggressions among graduate women of color in STEM,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 113, pp. 51–61, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.018.[6] A. C. Arnold et al., “Examining the effects of STEM climate on the mental health of graduate women from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds
wasperformed on feedback from undergraduate students and observational notes were gatheredon these students for two iterations of the camp in the Summer of 2018 and 2019. The resultsof this work, along with background information on mentorship, computational thinking,and SEL skills is provided in the rest of this paper.2 Background 2.1 Near-peer mentorshipNear-peer mentorship is the process of having students in a more advanced level of theireducation mentor students of novice level. The relationship between the mentor and menteeis said to be successful because the participants are close in their matriculation. Thiscloseness helps the mentor communicate and the mentee views the mentor as more relatable.The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
present have four undergraduate programs in engineering and two in design. Three of four programs have ABET accreditation. The next project is working with the graduate programs in the school to firm up the assurance of learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26882Dr. Ang´elica Burbano, Universidad Icesi Angelica Burbano C.,holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She holds a MSOM from Universidad Icesi and a BS in industrial engineering from Pontificia Universidad Javeriana both in Cali, Colombia. She is a Fulbright Scholar 2007 and a
the First Year of a NSF-sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.Appendix A. Discussion Board Topics and ResourcesDiscussion Board Topic 1 – Experimental MethodologiesPlease pick one of the four experimental methodologies listed in page 6 of the Amy Aponpresentation handout and discuss how it could be applied to a computer science researchproblem. Please choose a methodology that someone else has not yet selected, until all four havebeen covered to ensure that we cover all four. By _____, please make your primary post. By_____, please reply to two other posts (at least one of which should be on a
Haute, Indiana. He received BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering at University of Missouri-Rolla, a second MS in Civil Engineering at Purdue University, and a Ph.D. from Georgia In- stitute of Technology. Kevin was a geotechnical consultant with Soil Consultants, Inc. of St. Peters, Missouri from 1984-1988. He also served as Director of Engineering Services for SCI Environmental of Chesterfield, Missouri from 1988-89 before leaving practice to pursue his Ph.D. Kevin was an Assistant Professor at University of Kentucky from 1993-1998, and has been a faculty at Rose-Hulman since then. Kevin has served the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE for over 10 years and was Division Chair in 2010-11. He has also served on a
- nator of the Puerto Rico Climate Change Council. Served as Administrator of the Natural Resources Administration. Specializes in coastal dynamics, coastal hazards mitigation and nearshore environments processess assessments. Served as Regional Lead Author of the US Caribbean chapter of fourth National Climate Assessment Report ( NCAR-Ch:20). Has published extensively on coastal issues, sea level rise, climate vulnerability assessments and adaptation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Education and Building Capacity for Improving Resilience of Coastal InfrastructureAbstractCoastal environments in the Caribbean and around the World host
Bachelors of Arts degree in International Development Studies at UCLA, she began a successful career in banking and finance at Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. She has completed various post baccalaureate certifications through UCLA Anderson and the Harvard Business School; most recently, she completed her MPA at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and MBA at Cornell Tech. She has published in multiple academic journals including ASEE, ROPPA, and AP- PAM. Additionally, her scholarly work has been featured in Forbes magazine. She believes that research can inform diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and programs to one day have a workforce that is representative of the society it aims to
, women make up 14% of the engineering workforce (15% internationally),according to SWE Research Fast Facts, 2022. In 2020, 24% of bachelor’s degrees in engineeringwere earned by women, and women of color earned 10% of the total engineering degrees.However, there is no existing data particularly dedicated to international women of color inengineering. Women of Color are often presented as a monolith in all the statistical reports.While the overall number of STEM workers in the United States increased by 44.5 percentbetween 2000 and 2019, the number of immigrant STEM workers more than doubled over thesame period. By 2019, there were almost 2.5 million immigrant STEM workers, compared to just1.2 million in 2000. Women workers still remain
course plan includes five quizzes prior to the midterm and three quizzes post-midterm. This plan allows students to study Particle Dynamics before the midterm and studyRigid Body Dynamics after the midterm. The course typically experiences a failure rate ofapproximately 20%, with an average grade falling within the range of 2.5 to 2.9 out of 4. Inresponse to this challenge, one of the authors of this paper with another colleague implemented astrategy in the Fall semesters of 2019 and 2020 aimed at elevating the overall outcomes of thecourse. This involved offering second-chance quizzes and midterms to students who struggledwith the initial assessments.As described in a prior study authored by one of the contributors [54], the rationale
researchers anticipate that additional factor analysis and future studieswill be beneficial to transfer students, their advisors, and stakeholders of higher education.6 AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) CISE-MSI award CNS-2219623 and an ASEE CyBR-MSI mini-grant under NSF award CNS-2139136.References [1] K. Reid, “Reaching the uncertain student,” Eduventures Principal Analyst at Encoura, 2021. [2] J. D. Edwards, R. S. Barthelemy, and R. F. Frey, “Relationship between course-level social belonging (sense of belonging and belonging uncertainty) and academic performance in gen- eral chemistry 1,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, pp. 71–82, 2022. [3] E. Höhne and L. Zander
. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage, 1985.[17] M. F. Fox and V. C. Ferri, “Women, Men, and Their Attributions for Success in Academe. Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 55 ED-3, pp. 257–271, 1992.[18] A. Joshi, “By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 59 ED-2, pp. 202–239, 2014.[19] C. S. Bolton, E. Miskioğlu, K. M. Martin, C. Aaron, and A. Carberry, “Practicing engineers’ definition of their expertise: Emergent themes and frequency by gender identity and role change into mamagement,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference &
. 1, pp. 1–19, 2011, doi: 10.1037/h0100597. 12. (G. Illescas, A. Alvarado, y J. Portillo, “Active, topic-centered learning”, en 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2020. 13. K. Durkin y B. Rittle-Johnson, “Diagnosing misconceptions: Revealing changing decimal fraction knowledge”, Learn. Instr., vol. 37, pp. 21–29, 2015. 14. R. M. Welder, “Improving algebra preparation: Implications from research on student misconceptions and difficulties: Improving algebra preparation”, Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 112, núm. 4, pp. 255–264, 2012. 15. K. Falkner, L. Levi, y T. Carpenter, “Early childhood corner: Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra”, Teach. Child. Math., vol. 6, núm
." National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2009, pp2 -7.2. J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, (2019, June), “A System Approach to Instructional Change in Academia” Paper presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, (Florida), USA: 2019. https://peer.asee.org/320053. M. C. Wright, “Measuring teaching effectiveness” in Advancing the Culture of Teaching on Campus: How a Teaching Center Can Make a Difference, ed. C. Cook and M. Kaplan, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2011, ch. 2, pp34-42.4. C. E. Cook and M. Marincovich. "Effective practices at research universities: the productive pairing of research and teaching," in A Guide to Faculty Development. 2nd ed. K. J. Gillespie and D. L. Robertson, San