PM and3:30 PM−4:45 PM on Tuesdays and Thursdays.The class time was spent on the following: a) students individually answered three to six conceptual questions followed by peer-to-peer discussion and explanation by the instructor [9] - [11], b) students worked on as many procedural exercises out of the six assigned per topic, and c) instructor delivered micro-lectures on topics requiring extra explanation based on what students struggled with in the pre-class assignments.Only the conceptual questions were graded.Summary of ResultsResults and outcomes based on an analysis of the ALP performance metrics, final examination,surveys, and focus groups were determined and are summarized below.The student-level ALP metrics included
Simulation of Construction Works, Virtual Simulation of Construction Works, Prof. Jae-Jin Kim (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-518-1, InTech.9. C. L. Johnston and D. Whatley, (2006), Pulse!! - A virtual learning space project. Studies in health technology, and informatics (MMVR14), 119:240–242, 2006.10. Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Thompson, W. B., (2005), The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Environments. Perception 34, 2,191–204.11. Lee,C.H., Liu, A., Del Castillo, S., Bowyer, M., Alverson, D., Muniz, G., Caudell, T.P., (2007), Towards an immersive virtual environment for medical team training, Stud Health Technol Inform.,125:274-9.
written feedback returned to students during the next classperiod, indicating whether students’ understanding of the reason for their error(s) was accurate Page 26.587.4and responding to any unanswered student questions.At the end of the semester, student surveys were administered in class to learn more aboutstudents’ perceptions of the value of the additional writing assignments. Students answered 11multiple-choice questions, such as: Writing out questions that I had about a problem in the first part of the in-class questionnaire made it a) a lot easier to identify concepts/computational steps with which I had trouble. b) somewhat
Paper ID #30278Insights From a Systematic Literature Review on the Role of ProfessionalOrganizations in Supporting Black Engineering Students’ PersistenceDr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to being a faculty member, London worked at the National Science Foundation, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial
B. H. O'Connor, "The past, present, and future of “funds of knowledge”", in A Companion to the Anthropology of Education, G. Levinston and M. Pollock, Eds. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 481-494, 2011.[10] L. C. Moll, C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez, "Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms," Theory into practice, vol. 31, pp. 132-141, 1992.[11] J. A. Mejia, "A sociocultural analysis of Latino high school students' funds of knowledge and implications for culturally responsive engineering education," PhD, Engineering Education Utah State University, Logan, UT, 2014.[12] J. A. Mejia, A. A. Wilson, C. E. Hailey, I. M. Hasbun, and D. L
-based Learning Curriculum in Microelectronics Engineering”, 14th IEEEInternational Conference on Parallel and Distributes Systems, 2008[3] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 87-102.[4] B. A. Karanian, L. G. Chedid, M. Lande, G. Monaghan, “Work in Progress - Behavioral Aspects of StudentEngineering Design Experiences” in Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, NY,October 22 – 25, 2008.[5] L. Cooper and D. A. Kotys-Schwarts, “Designing the Design Experience – Identifying the Factors of StudentMotivation in Project-based Learning and Project Service-based Learning”, in Proceedings of the
AC 2012-5408: A SUCCESSFUL FOUR-YEAR ACADEMIC SCHOLAR-SHIP PROGRAM FOR UPPER DIVISION ENGINEERING AND COM-PUTER SCIENCE NON-TRANSFER STUDENTS AND GRADUATE STU-DENTSDr. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University Mary Anderson-Rowland is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engineers. She also directs two academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Professor in computing, informatics, and systems design engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. Anderson-Rowland was named a top
AC 2012-3071: THE ROLE OF EXPOSURE TO FAILURE CASE STUD-IES ON STUDENTS’ TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL GROWTH: AMIXED METHOD APPROACHProf. Joshua Gisemba Bagaka’s, Cleveland State UniversityDr. Norb Delatte, Cleveland State University Norbert J. Delatte, Jr., P.E., F.ACI, F.ASCE, is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering at Cleveland State University. He received his B.S. in civil engineering from The Citadel in 1984, a master’s degree in civil engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1986, and a Ph.D. in civil engineering from The University of Texas, Austin in 1996.Dr. Paul A. Bosela P.E., Cleveland State University
.” Computers and Education 72, 2014.16. S. O’Brien, J. Karsnitz, S. Van Der Sandt, L. Bottomley, E. Parry. “Engineering in pre- service teacher education.” In: Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, eds. S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M.E. Cardella. Purdue University Press, 2014.17. B. Chesnutt, C. Faber, and D. Mountain. “Development of a hybrid community of practice course model to prepare pre-service teachers to teach engineering in K-12 (Work in Progress).” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2022.18. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.19. K.D. Gutierrez, P Bacquedano-Lopez, and C Tejedo
Performance on Robotics and Programming Tasks,” JITE:IIP, vol. 15, pp. 145– 165, 2016, doi: 10.28945/3547.[3] G. Potvin et al., “Disciplinary Differences in Engineering Students’ Aspirations and Self- Perceptions,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013, p. 23.438.1-23.438.11. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19452.[4] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/ publications/14_11-47.pdf[5] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278
] ABET website: www.abet.org.[3] D. B. Lenard, and L. Pintarić, “Comparison Of Employers’ And Students’ Perceptions Regarding Communication Skills,” Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes 6, no. 1, pp. 063-082, 2018.[4] E. Wheeler and R. L. McDonald, “Writing in engineering courses.” Journal of Engineering Education 89, no. 4, pp. 481-486, 2000.[5] L. Gordon, “Beyond generalist vs. specialist: Making connections between genre theory and writing center pedagogy,” Praxis, A Writing Center Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 35–39, 2014.[6] D. L. Driscoll, “Building connections and transferring knowledge: The benefits of a peer writing course beyond the writing center,” Writing Center Journal, 35(1), pp. 153
invested in their curricula developmentefforts.Many suggestions have been made in practices to address these concerns. Imel (1995) cited theneed to recognize and leverage the particular strengths of participating institutions.6 This iscertainly something which our consortium has done in pursuing this project. In addition, Shortand Stein (1998) cited four methods for building successful collaborative curriculumdevelopment efforts among six Missouri higher education institutions: “(a) creating a culture ofcollaboration, (b) addressing institutional requirements, (c) establishing and meeting highstandards, and (d) meeting the needs of educators across organizational types”7. These authors,in their 2001 paper, also specifically cited the key role of
, no. 3. pp. 281–291, 2000.[9] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based learning: influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 253–280, 2011.[10] F. Martinez-Rodrigo, L. C. Herrero-De Lucas, S. De Pablo, and A. B. Rey-Boue, “Using PBL to improve educational outcomes and student satisfaction in the teaching of DC/DC and DC/AC Converters,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 229–237, 2017.[11] R. M. Berry, A. D. Levine, R. Kirkman, L. P. Blake, and M. Drake, “Navigating bioethical waters: two pilot projects in problem-based learning for future bioscience and biotechnology professionals,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol
Paper ID #34049Global Impact of Experiment-centric Pedagogy and Home-based, Hands-onLearning Workshop at a Historically Black UniversityDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University fac- ulty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State University and the director of the Civil Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory. He has over eighteen years of experience in practicing, teaching and research in civil engineering. His
. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2013.[2] C. E. Foor and S. E. Walden, “‘Imaginary Engineering’ or ‘Re-imagined Engineering’: Negotiating Gendered Identities in the Borderland of a College of Engineering,” NWSA J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 41–64, 2009.[3] R. M. Marra, K. a Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, 2012.[4] J. P. Gee, “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–125, 2000.[5] P. L. Horta, “Identity in Education
. Dynamic memory allocationThere would also be a multi-week final group project. Unit testingand separate compilation would be stressed in the group labs and Structuresfinal group project. Projects would rotate from a number of areas Linked listsincluding instrumentation, networking, security, image Graphs and applicationsprocessing, and others. Sample networking problems could be: a)implement a small webserver, (b) implement a message passing Dynamic data structuresover network, or c) implement a distributed traffic-light control Abstract data typessystem. A sample
effort to maximize this number by leveraging multiple initiatives that will ensure that thisNRT will broaden participation in STEM. Recruitment-wise, a) leveraging UK’s Center forGraduate Diversity Initiatives and its nationally-recognized Minorities in Agriculture, NaturalResources and Related Sciences chapter; b) continuing to recruit students from HBCUs; and c)close collaboration with two NSF Inclusion across the Nation of Communities of Learners ofUnderrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science (INCLUDES) projects, will broaden –both institutionally and geographically – the recruitment pool of talented and diverse students.Similarly, close collaboration with the U.S.-wide Louis Stokes Alliance for MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) will
slide. Anexample of this is shown in Figure 2 for the “Mini” module, “The Influence of theDepartment/University Mission.” Here, the instructor can use the slides as a template to includeinformation about how the goals of the local university and department missions are related. Page 25.802.4 (a) Title page; this is a sub-topic of the (b) Orientation page; this shows where ‘Interviewing, Networks, and Building informational interviewing fits in with other Relationships’ “Full” module
Statistics.Johnson, I. Y., & Muse, W. B. (2012). Student swirl at a single institution: The role of timing andstudent characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 152-181.Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2006). What matters to student success:A review of the literature, http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdfPerez, Jackie, Teri Reed, So Yoon Yoon, “Enriching the Diversity of the Engineering Workforce:Addressing Missed Opportunities to Support Student Transition from a Two- to a Four-YearInstitution,” American Society for Engineering Education 2016 Annual Conference CD Rom, NewOrleans, LA, June.National Science Foundation (NSF) (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014 (NSV14-01). Retrieved
heat is continuously transferred to the engine at a rate of 100kJ/second. What is the maximum possible rate at which the engine could possibly produce work? A) 100kJ/s B) Nearly 100kJ/s C) Significantly less than 100kJ/s”.A less conceptually based version of the same question might read: “Compute the thermal efficiency of a Carnot engine working continuously with a heat source at 300ºC and a heat sink at 25ºC.” While it is crucial that students develop an accurate understanding of engineeringconcepts, it is also true that typical lecture-based classroom instruction has been shown to have alimited impact on conceptual understanding in technical areas. For example, in a large meta-study of physics students
that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks
, and the vast majority(89%) of students who enrolled in Math 116 over the four years had placed up into Math116, with only 11% of the students taking Math 116 having not improved their mathplacement through the program. Bridge program students who did not take either Math116 or Math 231 were either (a) not enrolled in a math course in the Fall semester, (b)Table 1: Summary Data for the Four Bridge Program Cohorts Considered in this Study. Year No. Students No. Percentage No. Enrolled No. Enrolled Improved Improved in Calculus I in Coll. Alg. Placement Placement (Math 231) (Math 116) 2009 37 25
ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[10] N. M. Trellinger, B. Sattler, and J. Turns, "“I realized that I myself am on the path to being a pioneer”: Characterizing the experiences of graduate students in an innovative interviewing experience.," in 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA., 2015.[11] L. Stone, "Kuhnian science and education research: Analytics of practice and training," in Educational Research: Why ‘What Works’ Doesn't Work: Springer, 2006, pp. 127-142.[12] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, "Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature," Journal of
the National Science Foundation, under grant 2013410. Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of either organization. The authors would like to acknowledgesupport from the Center for Socially Engaged Design, especially Charlie Michaels, SaraHoffman, Tallie Ritter, and Steve Skerlos for their contributions. We additionally thank all of theC-SED staff, graduate facilitators, and instructor partners who make C-SED’s work possible. References [1] B. Amadei and W. A. Wallace, "Engineering for humanitarian development," IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 6–15, 2009. doi
Paper ID #32502Assessing Emphasized Engineering Practices and Their Alignment withEngineers’ Personal ValuesDr. Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a research fellow and lecturer focusing on engineering education at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. in sociology and psychology from Case Western Reserve University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include cultural beliefs about what engineers do and who they are, students’ career thinking and trajectories, and ways to effectively facilitate more diverse, inclusive, and
his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 40 years and for the past 25 years expanded to include a strong focus on engineering education. He has won three innovation awards, two at his institution and one national award from AIChE for innovation in chemical engineeering.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Dr. Prashanta
calculate the initial and final void ratio for each sampleusing their knowledge of phase diagram relationships, further highlighting the range of voidratios for each soil type. Page 23.1294.6 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)Figure 1. GCT from the Soil Structure Content Module: (a) soil samplers; (b)site investigation class exercise; (c) soil swell demonstration; (d) soil vial Page 23.1294.7visuals; (e
Paper ID #30707Ways of Experiencing Ethics in Engineering Practice: Variation andFactors of ChangeDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Her research interests include the professional for- mation of
). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465-492.10. Duesbury, R. & O’Neil, H. (1996). Effect of type of practice in a computer-aided design environment in visualizing three-dimensional objects from two-dimensional orthographic projections. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(3): 249-260.11. Gerson, H., Sorby, S., Wysocki, A., & Baartmans, B. (2001). The development and assessment of multimedia software for improving 3-D spatial visualization skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9 (2) 105-113.12. Kali, Y. & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369-391.13
that theylearned new things from all four segments, but especially learned from the two lectures (althoughthey were rated as less interesting than the hands-on activities).Figure 1. Pilot testing of the Grand Challenges activity and solar module during the June 2015coed Senior Teams and Individuals Guided by Engineering Resources (TIGERS) and Women inEngineering camps. A. and D. Students prepare dye-sensitized solar cells from raspberry juiceand nanoscale titanium dioxide guided by E. W. Davis. B. Students brainstorm on what theythink grand challenges are C. Students learn how shade and solar panel angle affect voltage andcurrent and learn how to calculate power.A preliminary version of a module on the grand challenge of reverse engineering