reviewing and discussing the Code of Ethics, students watch the documentary“The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley”. After viewing the documentary, the students areprovided writing prompts that encourage reflection on the ethical issues raised in the film.Additionally, students are encouraged to explore and compose their own reflections on ethicalconsiderations.Writing Prompts:1) Research what protections exist for whistleblowers and briefly describe them.Research the risks for whistleblowers and describe them. Knowing the level of protection andrisks for whistleblowers, would you choose to whistleblow if in an unethical situation? If youwere in the whistleblower’s shoes, how would you choose to whistleblow? What choices do youhave? Would
, to this room, today? February2023 CoNECD Conference 5My Results2016- Precipice ofPrivilege2020- I’mneurodivergentToday- I believe inequityFebruary2023 CoNECD 6Step One: Reflect Buildinselfreflectioninto yourdailyleadershippractice. Askyourself, “what”and“how”questions. Go forbetter: The dichotomyofright andwrongare not the onlysolutions, there is also better. Be onthe lookout fornewdata. February2023 CoNECD
. 11We hypothesize a theory of action for an ecological belonging intervention. 12 The intervention conveys the message thattypical adversity is normal and surmountable. Students form/in teams (10 min)(5 min) Independent reflective writing activity Introduction (5 min) Students listen to stories from previous students (10 min)“It can be easy to feel overwhelmed or to sometimes wonder to yourself ‘do I really belong
Director Harris onboardingin May 2022, he has redefined the DELTA as a BRIDGE program with an emphasis onsupporting students throughout their first year (not just two weeks in the summer).The above sample size focuses specifically on the Black/African-American populationwithin the College of Engineering, numbers reflecting first year students entering thecollege (on the left are those that participated in DELTA Bridge, on the right are thosethat did not). 13 Keys to Success
, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Linda Vanasupa is professor of materials engineering at Olin College. She also served as a professor at the California Polytechnic State University for 27 years. Her life’s work is focused on creating ways of learning engineering that honors the whole.Khalid Kadir, University of California, Berkeley ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 View from the Kaleidoscope: Conceptualizing antiracist priorities forengineering as a collective across vantagesIn this session entitled, “View from the Kaleidoscope: Conceptualizing antiracistpriorities for engineering as a collective across vantages,” we will reflect on theformative meeting of an advisory board of a
, Garbers et al. [8]conduct a simulation-based production system design study for Sanatela, a medical solutionscompany. A research team developed a new biomedical process for a product called Matrix, agauze-like, biological tissue made from a substance in human umbilical cords known as Wharton’sJelly. Matrix is a product with promising medical applications including the diagnosis andtreatment of cancers such as leukemia and the promotion of the growth of stem cells. Having theprototype of the process for producing the Matrix product in a lab, the company tasked our teamwith the design of an efficient full scale production system that would be ready to go uponimplementation.Upon reflection of the process that our team went through in the design of
equipped with skills in constraint-based computer modeling to keepinnovating high level technology and systems [2]. As industries lean further into the world of 3Dmodeling, students need to learn how to effectively design in computer systems to communicatetheir visions. Therefore, universities need to keep up with the growing use of CAD and updatecurriculum to reflect the demands of industry including creative visualization skills,communication, and technical prowess [3].Experience is widely considered as the path to becoming an expert in any given field [4-6]. In thecase of CAD and more specifically modeling in CATIA, beginners start to build theirunderstanding of the program and the basic skills that go into 3D design. As these learners
recommended steps to build trust withstudents. In this type of environment students feel that they are important, that their needscan be met, and that others experience joy and satisfaction in helping them get theirneeds met. It is also argued that when the teacher is able to focus on assisting the studentsin meeting their needs, teacher’s own needs get met. In concluding, the author presentshis own reflections based on his experience as an engineering student and a facultymember. The author has a firm conviction that the only professor who belongs in aclassroom is a caring professor.IntroductionA caring faculty understands, encourages and supports students’ individuality and issensitive to students’ needs. A caring faculty understands that the
tutorials in which two components of motivation aremanipulated: task value and control beliefs. To manipulate task value, the module hastutorials on two quite different topics that would have different levels of interest forstudents: osmosis and the Northern Lights. Before the task value tutorials, the moduleasks students to rate their interest in the two topics. We anticipated that the NorthernLights topic would be more interesting for most students, but it was not for all students,and it was not necessary for that to be the case. After completing the two tutorials thatinclude pre and post tests, students answer questions about their reflections on task value.For the control beliefs manipulation, the module includes two topics about which
the path for student success. As in any PBL courses, Ineeded to play a role closer to that of a coach – using praise when groups were trying butfrustrated, but also honest feedback when groups were coasting or making excuses.I hope that the picture I have painted is of a course that was unique and rich with learningopportunities, and that criss-crossed from the technical to the non-technical many times.But one more aspect was critical – reflection. Every two weeks, the I conducted a shortreflection meeting with the students. The goal was to extract lessons learned. Some wereindividual, private and more formal, while others were informal public discussions. Incourse evaluations, students shared that it was during these reflection periods that
will allow for added laboratory activities.Assessment and Evaluation of the GPMTBased on the evidences and findings from the current project, the newly-developed structure forassessment and evaluation is helpful in adopting evidence-based instructional methods, whichhave a more student-centered learning format. For example, the traditional-transmission learningformat, in which the degree of a student’s success depends only on the performance of quizzes,tests and projects in class, does not truly reflect the effectiveness on learning.We adopted more collaborative approaches for this NSF project to break away from traditionalnorms in education, while assessing students’ abilities in various summative cases; many aspectsin learning effectiveness
no statistically significant changesbetween student responses on the post-course and one year survey regarding knowledge,confidence in developing solutions, and interest in pursuing further studies or careers in globalhealth. Additionally, student comments on the one year survey reflected high levels ofenthusiasm for the subject and provided insight into the impact of the experience on the studentsover the period of one year.BackgroundRecently, there has been significant interest amongst engineering programs regardingopportunities that develop and enhance the global perspectives of undergraduate students. Thisinterest is in part to address ABET student outcomes criteria 3h (the broad education necessaryto understand the impact of engineering
Faculty Communities Exploring Data and Sharing Their StoriesMotivation and Project OverviewThis NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE: EHR) Institutional andCommunity Transformation (ICT) capacity-building project is designed to support faculty tocollaboratively explore questions on student learning and success in introductory and gatewayundergraduate STEM courses, such as early engineering courses as well as prerequisite math andscience courses. The project is motivating faculty to consider evidence-based teaching strategiesby including them as co-designers of learning analytics tools and storytellers inspired by the dataand their reflections. Learning analytics uses data about learners and learning to draw
. They areeasily modifiable to reflect instructor’s comfort and convenience. The tools are effective ingenerating more enthusiasm among students because they provide alternatives to traditionalapproaches to clarifying difficult and unintuitive concepts.Index Terms – AC Machines, AC Concepts, Visualization.1. IntroductionThe present generation of students has a mindset that lends itself to interactive displays andvisually rich environments. Engaging them in the classroom has become an ever-wideningchallenge.As it is widely assumed that this trend will continue1 the possible impacts of various ways forengaging students through technology has been explored. Visualization in particular or the useof computer simulation is found to substantively
Conference Table 2. Round 2 Piloting Process Note Change The protocol did not spark much reflection among A question was added: “If you could ask your future the participants. self who has already completed the course a question about Statics, what would you ask?” Participant 3 mentioned their anxiety about the Additional questions were added to the section on course and its anticipated challenges. well-being and outside commitments. When asking participants about their engineering The question was moved to an earlier section. story
community. The multi-tiered mentoring community provided them access topeer, graduate student and faculty mentors the students could seek out for representation,guidance and encouragement throughout the program. A presurvey indicated that the students didnot feel confident in their technical skills coming into the program, and a survey following theirinternship experience reflected a significant increase in their perception of their skills. Freeresponse question answers highlighted the program’s value to the students related toskills/experiences they obtained and their knowledge of biotechnology careers. Overall, thedesign of the program successfully provided community college students with a foundation topursue a STEM degree as well as a pathway
University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education
effectivenessin streamlining grading and reducing the time required for grade finalization.Future WorkThe paper concludes with a reflection on the potential of these AI tools to contribute to theongoing discourse on peer assessment and grading in educational settings. While the study is inits preliminary stages, it opens up avenues for further exploration and enhancement of thefindings. Future work will focus on examining discrepancies between student-provided reviewsand sentiment analysis output, the impact of modified peer feedback on student performance, andquantifying the efficiency gains achieved by using AI-highlighted reports. The paper underscoresthe promising role of AI in augmenting human input, transforming educational practices, andenhancing
semester by goingthrough this process and to provide a thoughtful conclusion on how this exercise can help themin the future. Reports were reviewed from four engineering communications sections, eachtaught by a different instructor, from the Fall 2023 semester for a total of 89 reports. Notes weretaken on anything that students indicated to be useful about the assignment, including things theylearned, applied, reflected on, etc.The secondary aims of the study will be addressed using quantitative data collected from first-year engineering students enrolled in the engineering communication course at *university*during the Fall 2021, Fall 2022, and Fall 2023 semesters. Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 gradesfrom the Teamwork Report assignment will be
research projects. We also explorewhether a dual advising structure with a research mentor and a communication teaching assistantenhances student’s self-efficacy in computing. For both of these questions, we define key variablesto quantify student mastery and their computational thinking using qualitative student feedbackand student reflection using GPT-3. We provide a reproducible blueprint for using large languagemodels in this task to assess student learning in other contexts as well. We also correlate our resultswith a pre- and post-course Likert survey to find significant factors that affect student self-efficacyand belonging in AI.With our course design and dual advising mentoring model, we find that students showed a sig-nificant
underscores the program's commitment to advancing STEAMeducation by empowering educators to inspire the next generation of innovators and problem-solvers in their classrooms and communities.Mobile Roadshow InitiativeThe AIR Program at Pittsburg State University is pioneering a mobile roadshow initiative toenhance access to its transformative workshops. Recognizing barriers to STEAM education, theprogram aims to bring robotics opportunities directly to underserved communities [3].This initiative offers condensed versions of the Summer Youth Workshops in a portable format,making STEAM learning more accessible to communities facing resource limitations orlogistical challenges. Beta-tested in October 2022, the roadshow concept reflects the
project, anticipated capstone specific products and deliverables, design and testingapproaches, timelines, and plans for demonstrating each of the ABET Student Outcomes. EPICScourse standard assessment practices applied to capstone projects include notebook documentationof work and accomplishments, weekly and summative reflections, design review presentations,transition documents, and peer evaluations. The notebook is filled with data on all the project-related activities the students are actively involved in, often with links to specific work artifacts,explanations of them, and concise narratives explaining the student's specific individualcontribution to them. The weekly and summative semester reflections ask students to write brieflyabout
. Engineering Design Process.PATHWAYS are thematically based curricular units reflecting categories of injustices that havegreat impact at the individual and community level which can also be connected to each other tohighlight systemic consequences. There are five PATHWAYS: Health, Traffic & Transportation,Economics, Gentrification, and Environment. The PATHWAYS have historical roots and policydecisions intended to sustain inequities which led to engineering artifacts that continue to haveimpact on students and communities today. One such example is the evolution of transportationsystems across the nation. The gentrification PATHWAY highlights a phenomenon that is a rippleeffect of redlining, which has connections to housing, schools, pollution
employ a qualitative methodology calledInterpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), which allows for a detailed exploration of theparticipants' experiences. This method involves organizing and preparing the data, reducing it to keythemes, and interpreting it through discussions and visual representations which is a similar analyticalapproach commonly found in qualitative research [14]. The data analysis will follow a structured process:managing and organizing the data, reading, and noting emerging ideas, describing and classifying themes,developing interpretations, and visualizing the data. In addition to IPA, the research methods will includecertain aspects of reflective lifeworld research [15]. The research will address the following
visualized in Figure 2.An early result of this exploration of Industry 4.0 skill area needs on the manufacturing floor wasthe fact that manufacturers have separate expectations for the engineer and the technician in thatwork environment. The cluster of skill areas for technicians, as identified in Figure 1 are additivemanufacturing, autonomous robots, cybersecurity, Industry Internet of Things, and simulation.This alphabetized but not prioritized list may catch the reader off guard. However, manufactureridentified Industry 4.0 application technician skill needs reflect on the size of the manufacturerand where that company is in the broad spectra of new advanced technology applications. Inaddition, for the over 130 small to medium manufacturers in
,project management, team management, etc.The author of this paper has been teaching Software Engineering for a number of years. Insteadof leaving the team formation up to chance, the author took the deliberate approach of designingteams in light of information the students provided about their personality and skills.The paper presented here reflects on the results of this experimental approach. It demonstrateshow the results of a specific psychological test, the Myers-Briggs personality test, can beemployed successfully to attribute test indicators to traits and qualities that are desirable in aproject’s team.IntroductionThe author of this paper has been teaching project-oriented Software Engineering classes at thejunior/senior university level
parts,Figures 1 and 2.Figure 1. Completed “suspension” bridge. Figure 2. Loaded “beam” bridge.The teams and groups will compare what they have accomplished. Did the designs reflect whatthe clients requested? Did the construction reflect the drawings? It is hoped that the elementaryschool students will be encouraged to enroll in the after-school program.After-School Program. The after-school program is envisioned to be two 90 minute long twosessions that will lead to the sandcastle competition. The after-school sessions will have twocomponents, additional lectures and activities that describe the design and constructionprofessions and industry. This will be an opportunity to present simple engineering concepts andsupplement their
) outputs of the EDU controller. An active IR sensor is located on the 'pan and tilt'and can be used to determine approximate direction and distance for the arm to reach andgrip objects that have reflective IR tape installed in them. These sensors provided byBanner Engineering [5] use a modulated IR transmitter and a synchronous detector toobtain a range of 50 feet in most lighting situations.Two infra-red distance sensors (GP2Y0A02YK donated by Sharp Electronics [6]) arelocated so the rover can sense objects to the left and in front of the rover. The sensors arecapable of detecting distances between 0.15 m and 1.5 m. The output voltage is not alinear function of distance and students will forced to provide an interpolation routine toobtain an
aninstructor-provided problem statement and problem illustration. The student had specific placeson the page to: a) gather information, b) organize their approach, c) sketch the system, d) analyzethe problem symbolically, e) solve the problem with numbers, f) report final numerical answers,and g) reflect on the answer. Parts a, b, and c together were worth 2/10 points. Part d was worth4/10 points, part e was worth 3.5/10 points, and part g was worth 0.5/10 points. To create theproblems, graduate research assistants browsed several dynamics books to understand the typicaltypes of problems used, and then created problems similar in scope and content. The homeworksolution template was designed to force students to utilize the problem-solving approach
. According to McPherson7 (2005) “Service learning is a method of teaching throughwhich students apply their academic skills and knowledge to address real-life needs in their owncommunities.” Eyler & Giles4 (1999) highlighted the importance of service learning as “a formof experiential education where learning occurs through a cycle of action and reflection asstudents work with others through a process of applying what they are learning to communityproblems, and at the same time, reflecting upon their experience as they seek to achieve realobjectives for the community and deeper understanding and skills for themselves.” It is essentialtherefore to provide a structured environment in which participants will be able to discover theirown styles of