on long-term overallperformance standards rather than focusing on comparison to peer performance, assistingstudents in identifying strengths and unique accomplishments and providing opportunities forgroup support with others experiencing academic difficulty. In addition, it was recommendedthat opportunities be provided within programs that complement the individual’s preferredlearning styles (Marsh & Craven, 1997). A number of researchers have examined metacognitive approaches using awareness ofindividual student learning styles as the focus for increasing levels of academic achievement,retention and academic self-concept (Lenehan, Dunn, Ingham, Signer & Murray, 1994; Nelson,Dunn, Griggs, Primavera, Fitzpatrick & Miller
suggest that increasing interactions among students withphysical disabilities can considerably improve their peer interaction and social skills.In the rest of this paper we elaborate on our methodology and outcomes and look at howthe service-learning project improved communication and teamwork skills amongparticipating engineering students.2. BackgroundService-learning is defined as a credit-bearing educational experience in which studentsparticipate in an organized service activity in such a way that meets identified communityneeds 1. Studies suggest that service-learning can significantly impact various educationaloutcome measures, including academic performance (GPA, writing skills, criticalthinking skills), values (commitment to activism and
Fall 2013. The fourth-grade teachers chose theSolid as a Rock: Replicating an Artifact (see http://www.eie.org/content/rocks) unit with a focuson materials engineering. The fifth-grade teachers chose to implement Now You’re Cooking:Designing Solar Ovens (see http://www.eie.org/content/energy) with a focus on greenengineering. Teachers chose units because they best aligned with district pacing guides andrelevant content standards. During the professional development, teachers engaged in andplanned the EiE units with their grade-level peers and the research team. These collaborationscontinued after the summer session ended through use of a team blog, email collaboration, ateam meeting during the fall semester and a team meeting in Spring 2014
integration of students and development of student-faculty bonds. It is expectedthat eight seminars will be held per academic year. Potential seminar topics are: (1) The CSET-STEMProgram, (2) Applying for Graduate School and Financial Aid, (3) Finding a Mentor, (4) Ethics, (5)Public Speaking, (6) Understanding Group Dynamics, (7) Managing Intellectual Property, (8) TimeManagement, and (9) Technical Writing.(b)Graduate School and/or Employment Preparation -- Scholars will be urged to register with the SCState Career Center. This will ensure that they are prepared to connect with graduate schoolrepresentatives and employers.(c)Academic Mentors – Each scholar will choose an academic mentor from a list of available mentors.This list will include faculty
,the MESA Program has made a substantial contribution to the success of our engineeringprogram.Once our MESA Center was established, it soon became apparent why this space was a criticalcomponent of the MESA Program. It has served as a focal point for student study groups and acentral location for promoting student scholarships, engineering design competitions, internships,and summer undergraduate research opportunities. The Center has been host to tutoring sessionsfor difficult courses, student success seminars, resume writing and job search workshops, as wellas meetings of several science and engineering oriented student organizations on our campus.The Center has also served as a forum for presentations by faculty and student researchers
on studentteams in engineering education into contact with the research on Black male experiences inengineering education. For example, while a key asset to Black men is their ability to draw onsame-gender support networks and friendships, Cross and Paretti (2020) observed that theirexperiences on student teams involved limited opportunities to develop friendships amongtheir peers. Additionally, while the positive expectations of mentors and professors could serveas a “self-fulfilling prophecy” (Burrell et al., 2015) students in Cross and Paretti’s study usedproactive efforts to dispel stereotypes among their peers in order to prevent negative self-fulfilling prophecies.To situate our proposed research among the broader scholarship on Black
afternoon[5]. Other studies show that morning classes are more likely toexceed their later peers in academic performance [6].This indicates a potential correlation between class timing and academic outcomes. For example,one study examined this with third-year Bachelor of Science in Information Technology studentsand concluded that when class met, especially in the morning, impacted student performance[7,8]. There were additional variables, such as gender, major, Instructor, and term, that acted ascontributing variables[9]. This current study builds upon these findings to further examine class time impacts on studentengagement for two second-year engineering courses.Research MethodsThis study analyzes data from multiple semesters of two second year
, we examine the mathematics, styles in order to feel more in control of theirphysics, and English secondary school grades of learning and learning environment [6, 8]students during the final year of Grade 10, justbefore they entered the program, and their E-learning has been found to be the most effectivesubsequent secondary school grades in these means of instruction by some. Differentsubjects throughout their Grade 11 year, as they educational pedagogies, such as peer and self-participate in the program in order to determine the instruction, were studied by Kroesbergen and it waseffectiveness of the e-learning intervention. found that self-instruction was the most
engineering companies, the need for marketing and business development, project procurement, and project financing b. Legal aspects of engineering: contracts and agreements, terms and conditions of engineering services, legal adjudication including Alternate Dispute Resolution c. Professional risk management techniques: insurance requirements for design professionals, peer review processes, and product quality management d. Personnel/career management including professional licensure and society participation Additionally, the course presented an overview of future trends and challenges to theengineering profession, focusing mainly on
-majorclasses.”Instructors also had trouble motivating students to participate in activities (e.g., solving problemsor group discussion). The instructors stated this happened partly because students weredisconnected from instructors and peers and did not experience instructor or peer pressure asthey did in face-to-face classes. Some instructors received student complaints about “time-wasting” activities.The time commitment required by the instructors for online active learning was another issue.Instructors reported it was time-consuming to design and search for effective learning activitiesand materials to engage online students. Meanwhile, they shared that estimating the amount oftime required for online activities was harder than in-person.Checking
-income, first-generation collegestudents. Engle and Tinto8 address barriers to college success for low-income students. Theyclaim that “After six years, only 11 percent of low-income, first-generation students had earnedbachelor‟s degrees compared to 55 percent of their more advantaged peers.” Some of theirrecommendations include additional financial aid to students and cohort development. Engstromand Tinto9 show that the learning community model improves the persistence of low-incomeand/or first generation students to stay in college and graduate. Statistics for science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM), low-income, first generation college students have not Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering
to providing hands-on learning experiences that enhance engineering education. As a student leader, I actively promote collaborative initiatives that empower my peers to engage in meaningful projects, fostering a deeper understanding of engineering principles and their impact on society.Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, GA. Dr. Redahegn Sileshi is an associate professor of engineering at University of North Georgia, Gainesville. His research experiences and interests are in the areas of water quality analysis and stormwater management, largely focusing on small and large-scale infiltration studies. He has done extensive
graduatelevel engineering students. The course met for 50 minuets three times a week for a 16-weekperiod. The course used the Kotler and Lee 7 th edition Social Marketing; Behavior Change forSocial Good book to guide students through the 10 steps of social marketing. 10 Along withreadings and class lectures a semester long group project with small deliverables throughout thesemester was utilized. The link between the 10-steps and the semester long project can be seen inTable 1. The course also utilized class discussions, quizzes, peer to peer teaching (i.e. smallgroups of students from the class were responsible for teaching a given topic), online modulesfrom the Pan American Health Organization,11 and guest presentations from social
engineering companies, the need for marketing and business development, project procurement, and project financing b. Legal aspects of engineering: contracts and agreements, terms and conditions of engineering services, legal adjudication including Alternate Dispute Resolution c. Professional risk management techniques: insurance requirements for design professionals, peer review processes, and product quality management d. Personnel/career management including professional licensure and society participation Additionally, the course presented an overview of future trends and challenges to theengineering profession, focusing mainly on
accessed inconstant-time rather than variable-time. This would disable any attacker from writing a spy program tobrute force the key and data out of the cache data stored during execution of the DCF algorithm. DCFalgorithm can be implemented successfully using C++ programming language. In the implementation ofDCF algorithm, cache is flushed periodically during encryption or decryption time. This would disablethe attacker from tapping the cache for data. On the downside, there was a (not so noteworthy)performance hit on the encryption process, but on a brighter note, the DCF algorithm stands strongagainst the cache timing attack. Page 7 of 8References[1] J. Daemen and V. Rijmen, “AES Proposal: Rijndael
]. The methodologies include activities such as reading, writing,expected [3] competences of a production engineer, according problem solving, issue resolution, promotion of discussions,to the Ministry of Education (MEC) guidelines, include the among others [6].ability to use mathematical and statistical tools to project,implement and improve systems, products and processes, in Perceiving the constant need for change and students’ andorder to stay up to date with technological advances, to professors’ demands
course, the summative assesses student performanceat the end of the instructional period. The formative assessments include: 1. Pre-test questions at the first lecture about students’ biology background to gauge their prior knowledge about course topics. 2. In-class exercises and conceptual questions to continually gauge students’ understanding and progress throughout each lecture and allow them to practice skills 3. Peer Teaching: Students explain their understanding or perspective on a topic to a classmate, helping both the teacher and learner to assess comprehension. Additionally, graduate students in the course and ME department deliver guest lectures. 4. Teachers observe students during activities and take notes
student success.Given this flexibility, educators may prioritize group formation methods based on convenience,student preference, or heterogeneity. For instance, randomly-selected groups can streamlinelogistics when simplicity is important, whereas allowing students to self-select partners mayenhance motivation and group cohesion in settings where peer relationships are valued.Alternatively, tools like CATME can be employed when the goal is to create groups of studentswith similar past academic performance or accommodate scheduling constraints. The resultshighlight the potential for focusing on other factors, such as group dynamics or instructionalmethods, to enhance the effectiveness of collaborative learning. However, this study's findingsare
research [1], [9]. Unlike earlier interventions that took place in controlled labenvironments, our ecological approach is implemented directly within the courses that haveknown demographic disparities in academic outcomes. The intervention materials, such asstudent narratives or “stories” of struggle, are created and tailored based on focus groups madeup of students who have previously taken the course [2]. Rather than being delivered by externalresearchers, our ecological belonging intervention approach is led by the course instructors. Thisallows instructors to connect more meaningfully with students and engage in open discussionsabout challenges and how to overcome them. Instructors also facilitate peer conversations tofoster a sense of
). Each student had at least two tours to choose from, as well asopportunity to explore the campus on their own.A mini-resource and graduate fair was also held during the poster-presentation sessions. Both C6and CPSLO students could visit with representatives from Cal Poly STEM-related programs aswell as from graduate programs at Cal Poly and other partner universities.Equally as important, C6 students, faculty and staff were given time to network with those fromother campuses. To encourage these interactions, each C6 student/faculty/staff member wasprovided with a name badge having the C6 logo and the logo of their particular college. Inaddition to their first name, students were also asked to write their major on their badge toencourage
rigid body kinematics and machine learning for design of mechanisms and robots. He has published 109 peer-reviewed conference and journal papers and his research has been funded by National Science Foundation (NSF), NY-state SPIR, NY-state Center for Biotechnology, Sensor-CAT, SUNY Research Foundation, industry, Stony Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the best paper in Theoretical Kinematics at the 2017 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and the MSC Software Simulation award for the best paper at the 2009 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC) . He is the recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Teaching by Stony Brook
shared belief in agroup’s ability to succeed [21]. It is important for teacher educators to understand howinteractions with students and peers can influence elementary PSTs’ teaching self-efficacy. PSTscan interact with K-6 students during traditional field placements and also in non-traditionalsettings like afterschool clubs where they are likely to find highly motivated students.Afterschool programs can also afford PSTs the opportunity to collaborate with peers in teamsunder the close supervision of their instructors. Teaching a small number of highly engagedstudents in a low-stress, collaborative, and supportive environment can result in masteryexperiences that strengthen their self-efficacy [22-23]. This study explores how PSTs’ self
school had programming experiences.Finally, this study presents the impact of project type and the use of an iterative design project onthe changes in student comfort with additive manufacturing and three-dimensional modeling.IntroductionThe Maker Movement arose from individuals who expressed interest in the creation, design, andmanufacturing of new objects, and the further sharing these experiences with their peers [2].These individuals go by makers. As a result, physical locations that serve as meeting spaces forthese maker communities have been commonly referred to as makerspaces. Makerspaces provideaccess to technology, different trainings, inspiration for ideas, and collaboration among memberswhen developing projects [2]. In 2016, the
, Engineering Education, Sustainable Infrastructure, Resilient and Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction, and Circular Economy. He also holds professional credentials in LEED Green Associate for sustainable buildings and ENV SP for sustainable infrastructures as well as several micro-credentials in the commercialization of research. As a Ph.D. Candidate, Piyush has published a dozen peer-reviewed journals and several conference papers.Mr. Mohamed Elzomor, P.E., Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International University (FIU), College of Engineering and Computing and teaches at the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustain- ability. Dr. ElZomor completed
. You may also be asked to write details about your research project. It will be agood idea to have a collaborator for your research at the host institution and to have a detaileddiscussion before finalizing your project proposal details. It is better to be very specific about theresearch project with the understanding that some of the minor details may change due to thelimitations and interests of the colleagues at the host institution during your stay. If you arerequired to share course material such as syllabi or course outline, in this case, it is a good idea tolook at the courses that the host institution offer so that the material you present is relevant andshows how your teaching experience of these courses will be beneficial for them
. Recently, researchers at CalPoly Pomona used surveys and focus groups to assess theutility of an online video tutorial library [6]. Specifically, they were curious about the impact ofan educational video library on populations that were underrepresented, under supported, andhad lower persistence rates than their peers. Change & Eskridge (2015) reported on a number ofsurveys, focus groups, interviews and observations to determine the space needs of engineeringstudents at North Carolina State University [1]. Instructors at Pennsylvania State University usedsurveys and focus groups to assess the quality and effectiveness of first year seminar classes inthe School of Engineering. Though not library-specific, the study did examine how the
uneven ground rather than shorter than their peers disrupts Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 3deficit-based thinking in education.4The point is that simply throwing resources at underrepresented and racially minoritized studentsin engineering does not equate to liberation. Liberation involves understanding structural racismand other isms are the problem (in this analogy, the uneven ground) and barriers (the fence) likecultural stereotypes13 need to be dismantled.Underrepresentation is often intersectional.14 Students with dis/abilities are oftenunderrepresented in STEM and engineering.15 Universal
have authored over 150 peer-reviewed technical articles and two have been recognized as best papers in American Society of Mechanical Engineers journals. He is a Fellow of ASME. Ali has taught 11 different courses and leads an engineering- based study abroad course in Brazil as well as the jointly-funded NSF-DoD REU site on Hypersonics (HYPER). Ali is well-known for engaging undergraduates in research, and he is UCF’s 2019 Champion of Undergraduate Research inaugural awardee. At UCF and in the broader higher education community, Ali focuses his efforts on expanding the pipeline of graduate students qualified to pursue careers in academia. Just before joining UCF as an Assistant Professor, he earned a PhD in Mechanical
leads departmental activities in ABET accreditation. He is Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET Commissioner and served as program evaluator representing IEEE since 2005. Grinberg has over 57 peer-reviewed journal and conference publications and numerous presentations in his field. He is IEEE Senior Member and currently holds a position of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Zone 1 Chair and ASEE Board of Directors member. In addition, he is recognized scholar and author in World War II military history. The book he co-authored, Red Phoenix Rising: The Soviet Air Force in WWII, was named an Outstanding Academic Title by the Choice Magazine.Saquib Ahmed (Dr)Joaquin Carbonara
(Appendix A) and interviews(Appendix B) with those who have participated in STEM research. These STEM disciplinesinclude: Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, Earth Sciences, NaturalResources, Computer Science, Computer Engineering, Genetics, Engineering, Neuroscience,Psychology, Biochemistry, and all associated sub-disciplines. The survey will be broadlydistributed to the entire University community to include neurotypical and neurodivergentindividuals.We hypothesize that more direct communication and additional mentor training are needed tooptimize mentor time due to the assumption that untrained mentors often perceive thatneurodivergent students need additional mentoring or communication compared to theirneurotypical peers. A