to help practitioners navigate their careers, help practitioners betterunderstand their students and colleagues, and help administrators/mentors develop an asset-basedand systemic-based understanding of neurodivergence.References[1] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown, and A. Stenning, Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.[2] A. Cuellar, B. Webster, S. Solanki, C. Spence, and M. A. Tsugawa, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access to Engineering Education through Narratives,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2022.[3] T. Sorg, “Where are We, and Where to Next? ‘Neurodiversity’ in
Teachers Association (NSTA), 2016. https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx (accessed Aug. 12, 2023).[2] Next Generation Science Standards Lead States, Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.[3] W. Aminger et al., “Preservice secondary science teachers’ implementation of an NGSS practice: Using mathematics and computational thinking,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 188–209, Feb. 2021.[4] R. S. N. Lindberg, T. H. Laine, and L. Haaranen, “Gamifying programming education in K‐ 12: A review of programming curricula in seven countries and programming games,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1979–1995, Jul. 2019.[5] Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S
Significance of Scholarship Programs in STEMIntroductionIn this Work-in-Progress paper, we share our ongoing work with an NSF Scholarships in STEM(S-STEM) program related to an iteration of analysis that looked across specific aspects in amore summative manner than our typical analyses during the five years of the project that aremore formative. As the project will soon enter an extension into a sixth year to use existingscholarship funds, we took this opportunity to begin to reflect on overarching goals toward thedevelopment and submission of a new S-STEM proposal to continue this work. The StudentPathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) program in the ClemsonUniversity College of Computing, Engineering
/toolkit. Ourgroup and the various tasks each sub-group performs have been described in our past ASEEconference papers11-13.Some of the exercises we have developed and now assign to students every semester are listed inTable 1 below: TOPIC PROBLEM(S)Moment in 2D, Free-body Diagram SeesawEquilibrium of 1 rigid body or Frame Arm & PurseTruss: Method of Joint & Method of Section Minneapolis BridgeDistrib. Load, Centroid New Orleans Levee, Space StationFrame KeyboardCombined Frame & Truss BicycleFriction
., Yarbrough, D., Rothmyer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutching B., and Moeykens, S., “Development of Hands-On CFD Educational Interface for Undergraduate Engineering Courses and Laboratories”, ASEE, AC 2004-1526, 2004.11. Blekhman, D., “Lessons Learned in Adopting a CFD Package”, ASEE, AC 2007-830, 2007.12. LaRoche, R., Hutchings, B., and Muralikrishnan, R., “FlowLab: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Framework for Undergraduate Education” , ASEE, AC 2002-1520, 2002.13. Ormiston, S., “Incorporating CFD into the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Programm at the University of Manitoba”, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada: CFD2001, pp. 333
Termination Board MSTB 010 06 C1Z Micro-controller GND Error amplifier Control Signal Feedback Network PS2520G + VIN Programmable Power R S l C2 RL1 C1 L1
school system‟s ability to involvestudents as well as individual teachers‟ ability to meaningfully involve students in different kinds ofclassroom learning opportunities.”5Several key questions guided the research such as: (1) What content makes a successful online learningenvironment for students? (2) What can institutions do to better impact student engagement in thesesystems? (3) And what types of tools do students really desire in these systems?MethodsData collection was first conducted via an electronic student survey of undergraduate students in theSchool of E & T at IUPUI. The survey was a voluntary activity and available for student participationfor exactly three weeks. A participation rate of 17.2% was recorded from all 2,418
sin 𝜔1 𝑡 + 𝜔2 𝑡 + 𝜙𝑖𝑛 𝑡 + 𝜙𝑉𝐶𝑂 (𝑡) 2 (Eq. 3)Where, Vin(t) is the input signal Ain is the amplitude of Vin(t) 1 is the radian frequency of Vin(t) (rad/s) in(t) is the phase angle of the input signal (rad) Vvco(t) is the VCO signal Avco is the amplitude of Vvco(t) 2 is the radian frequency of Vvco(t) (rad/s) vco(t) is the phase angle of the VCO (rad) VPD(t) is the output signal of the phase detector KPD is a multiplier in the phase detectorSignal Vin(t) is represented by a sine function and Vvco(t) is represented by a cosine
opportunity toupgrade the college facilities.Stanford‟s d-school, short for „Design School‟ has been a leader in quick prototyping and hands-on activities dedicated to merging engineering, arts, and business. The d-school K-12 projectincludes projects that facilitate teacher workshops and classes for non-profits. In addition, theschool provides a unique space dedicated to K-12 innovation19.In recent years more emphasis has been placed on hands-on and project-based learning9, 10, 11, 12, Page 22.1201.321 ; however, this approach has not yet reached a tipping point in most school systems. Onereason for the shift is that kids are not acquiring
a strong programming capability. The benefits of such a laboratory course are twofold.Firstly, students learn simulation, which is widely used by engineers in the industry to verify andvalidate system designs. Secondly, these laboratory projects have been designed following theGagne‟s nine events of instruction15 which leads to an enhanced learning environment. Also,when compared to hardware based labs, such as with EMONA TIMS16, Mobile Studio17 andEttus USRP18, Simulink has the advantage of lower cost and ease of maintenance.Simulink Laboratory Projects for Communication Systems CourseSix Simulink laboratory projects are constructed to teach Simulink skills in parallel with thetheory. Table 1 enumerates topics covered in the six labs and
this page, I rasterized the pdf lab exercise to 300 dpi (unfortunately, Word does not retain eps or pdf; use Adobe Pagemaker instead of Word if you are able) and placed it, generated ps and made a pdf document. Using Exchange, I made the links and was done.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe author would like to thank Dr. S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, WMU Chairman of Electrical andComputer Engineering Department for his help and encouragement.REF E R E N C E S[1]. “The Practical Xilinx Designer Lab Book”, by Dave Van den Bout, Prentice Hall, 1998.[2]. “Publishing Via PDF”, Special Pull-out, Computer Arts
. Figures 3and 4 show the basic components provided by Fischertechnik and a constructed scale model of acargo crane.3.0 AS/RS Model DesignThe development of an AS/RS model can be divided into three stages: planning, preliminarydesign/testing, and final design/evaluation.3.1 PlanningIn the planning stage of this study, the scope and scale of the problem were investigated. Inaddition, a preliminary study of the problem was conducted. A typical AS/RS system consists ofthe following components: storage structure, storage/retrieval (S/R) machine, storage modules(e.g., pallets for unit loads), and pickup-and-deposit stations. The primary issue was to whatdegree the AS/RS model should mimic the real system. After careful consideration, the
turned out to be a problem. These engineeringeducators are a bunch of travellin’ dudes--getting all of them together in the same place at thesame time is impossible! First, Chuck Roth will fill you in on the Personalized System of Instruction, or PSI, aself-paced system of instruction best known as the Keller Plan. Fred S. Keller developed thismethod in the 1960s in Brazil, and he and Gil Sherman refined it later at Arizona StateUniversity. Billy Koen at the University of Texas first applied it to engineering education in1969, and his success encouraged Larry Hoberock, Chuck Roth and Gerry Wagner to use themethod in their classes. Later, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation provided a sizable grant toexpand this activity, and ultimately, 19 PSI
resulting from the explosion of the global economy in more recentyears. The need to educate engineers that are technically strong and can face the challenges of aglobal economy is a common theme in engineering education.8 Engineers and technologypractitioners create and disseminate the knowledge required to fuel the engine of the globalknowledge economy. Engineering education has an important role to play in sustainablyreducing poverty and enhancing the world´s economies. The resulting enhancement in thequality of life serves to promote stability and peace throughout the world3. Latin America andthe Caribbean have lagged compared to other parts of the world such as Asia and India in the
. • Extensible – MAME shall provide a capability to add new functions. • Traceable – Everything in MAME shall be recorded and tracked. (This enhances reliability). • User friendly – MAME shall be able to provide default items (such as pre-defined work lists) so that MAMs can easily tailor the items according to the projects. • Maintainability – Easy to fix bugs, update to new versions and different platformsMAME’s major features are discussed below: Create Role ModelMAME has two kind s of users: Administrators and Users. Users are organized according to pre-defined role model. This model will be used to control: Approval, Permission. The pre-definedrole model shall be editable.Administrator can add new roles, and new
decisions.Bibliography1 Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J. & Reid, K. Comparison of Four Methodologies for Modeling Student Retention in Engineering. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. (2010).2 Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J. & Malyscheff, A. Artificial Intelligence Methods to Forecast Engineering Students’ Retention based on Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.(2008).3 French, B. F., Immekus, J. C. & Oakes, W. An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students' Success and Persistence. Journal of Engineering Education (2005).4 Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Mary, B.-S., Shuman, L. J. & Larpkiattaworn, S
outperformed by 16other industrialized nations in science, and by 23 nations in mathematics (only 30 nationsparticipated). Narrowing the curriculum is not advancing the U.S.’s educational system and isinadequately preparing students to compete in a 21st century world.Lateral TransferRather than reduce the curricula, research indicates that systematically pairing specific subjectsmay improve both learning and motivation. For example, research consistently demonstrates astrong correlation between second language (L2) learning and increased first language ability onstandardized achievement tests. L2 learners have greater: syntactic awareness (Bialystock, 1988,Galambos & Goldin-Meadow); phonological awareness (Bruck & Genesse, 1995; Campbell &
modules will be used within our outreach program to students withinhigh needs inner-city schools in the Buffalo Public Schools system. The developed modules willexploit a shared undergraduate nanotechnology education laboratory.IntroductionThe integration of nanotechnology and Sensing Data Storagephotonics continues to advance. Pho ton s Opt ical Lithog rap hy
is inherently an abstract concept: the ability to store energy in an invisible electricfield. Commercial capacitors reveal little about what is inside, and looking at one doesn't help atall in understanding the formula C = εA/S. When students construct a parallel-plate capacitor, asshown in Figure 4 below, using a book-sized piece of window glass and aluminum foil, they cansee, understand and appreciate the meaning of dielectric constant (ε), plate area (A) anddielectric thickness (S). Figure 4 – Parallel-Plate Capacitor Constructed of Glass & Aluminum Foil; MicrometerFormula for Capacitance of a Parallel-Plate CapacitorThe standard textbook formula for a parallel-plate capacitor in which fringing of the electric fieldcan be neglected
, 3.5 MHz,and 5 MHz are used. The diameters of all transducers are 12.7 mm.Equipment used: ‚ DAEDAL XYZ S Scanning System (800 mm x 900 mm x 350 mm Travel). ‚ Pulser/Receiver: Panametrics Pulser/Receiver 5073 PR. ‚ Oscilloscope: Tektronics TDS220 Digital with the GPIB board. ‚ Pentium 4 PC.The placement of the transducers is controlled by the LabView 6 virtual instrument (V I) (Fig.2).The precision of the stepper motors of the Scanning System is 10-4 mm per step, which allowsthe displacement of the transducers from one position to another very accurately. Initially,transducers are installed at 400-mm distance between each other and are perfectly aligned. Then,one of the transducers or the reflector is moved by 50 mm
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Time (s) Actual Readings Calculated Values Page 10.878.2 Figure 1 Temperature history of a thermocouple Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 2 Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationThe students recognize that the first order differential equations could be
need to develop a GeneralEngineering Technology (GET) program to provide educational opportunities to students with awide variety of educational and work backgrounds. The availability of this program andcommunications with the U. S. Department of the Navy resulted in the formulation of anasynchronous CD-ROM based General Engineering Technology program under the auspices ofthe Navy College Rating Partnership program. ODU is partnered with other institutions toprovide the program to personnel located aboard ships and at other facilities. Naval experienceand schooling are used extensively to satisfy some of the lower-division technical credits. Theupper-division courses will be offered on CD-ROM, with both audio and video. The program hasan
). Efficient communication of this information isfacilitated by drawing a rectangle and labeling it model. One then draws a series oflabeled input and output arrows.What is (are) your system model(s)? This is the most challenging question because itrequires writing relationships (mathematical formulations) that indicate how the systemoutputs are functions of the system inputs. However, this step is most definitelyfacilitated by examining the answer to the previous question.What are your assumptions? This question is important because whenever one writes amathematical relation for an engineering system there are usually accompanyingassumptions, e.g., steady state, V-L equilibrium, Newtonian fluid, etc. If one changes theassumption(s) then the model(s
Present Worth, Annual Worth,Benefit-Cost Ratio and Rate of Return analyses.Provided the cash flow diagram of a project opportunity is available, its present worth may bedetermined by solving the following equation: PW[i] = S [ St /(1 + i)t ] (1)Here “i” is an appropriate interest rate, the S t are cash vectors (some positive, some negative) attime t, and the summation extends over the life of the project, i.e., for t = 0, 1, … N. Page 7.966.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
their previous experiencewith teams. The average of the responses (1.89) indicates that the respondents have effectivelyused teams to improve student learning in their courses. Table 1. Faculty Attitude Questions 13. I believe that working in a team prepares students for the workplace. 14. I think teams are an effective way to teach engineering. 15. I believe that teaming experiences in the engineering curriculum will contribute to my students’ career success. 16. I believe teaming activities will assist my students in attaining the goals of the course(s). 17. The use of teams requires far too much work. 18. Assigning students to teams is an effective way to
simple systemsconstructed out of LEGO ®s that are controlled by small computers. In addition, severaldesign experiments immerse the teachers in the world of engineering design, problemsolving, and optimizing their “product” through calculated trade-offs. These laboratoryexperiences are designed to lead participants by hands-on experimentation through theuse of technology in support of many everyday activities. The lab experiences are simpleenough to isolate and illuminate the underlying basic principles and complex enough torepresent real-world examples. Another engineering experience provides for the use of anexpensive piece of equipment, not usually available to K-12 classrooms. A scanningelectron microscope (SEM), accessible on the web, is
feels the reaction force and moment necessary to prevent the rod from moving. Bothof these experiments are designed to improve students' ability to sense reaction forces andmoments intuitively. The major component of this work is the second set of tools: the Visual Simply SupportedBeam (VSSB) and the Visual Cantilever Beam (VCB). These beams involve hands-on experienceand visualization of reaction forces and moments, as well as deformations and stresses. Bothbeams are instrumented with load cells, which measure force and moment reactions that occur atthe support(s). In order for students to analyze a variety of configurations, beams of differentcross-sections can be interchanged in both the Cantilever and Simply Supported set-ups, and
). TheStates calculator will indicate the option for unit system and even within a selected unit systemall kinds of unit conversions are possible with a touch of a key. Single-Flow, Generic, Open System: H2O Steady-State Daemon HOME. TEST. Daemons. Systems. Open. SteadyState. Generic. SingleFlow. H2O Fig. 1 Thread of selections of a thermodynamic system in TEST™ softwareSample ProblemSteam at 5 MPa and 600 C enters an insulated turbine operating at steady state and exits assaturated vapor at 50 kPa. Take the mass flow rate as 0.1 kg/s. Neglecting potential and kineticenergy changes, determine work developed by the turbine. Repeat the problem a) if the turbineis not well-insulated turbine and there is heat loss at a rate of 10 kW
importance, we envision someexpansion of this topic in the course in coming offerings and fine-tuning of the instructionalmaterials.Education in process control – typical courses in the U.S.In the mid-1980’s, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) modified the criteriafor accreditation used by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) toinclude a required component in the undergraduate program in process dynamics and control. Page 7.1166.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering
Freshman HRS SEM HRS SEMENG 1302 Composition II 3 ALL ENGR 1400 PC Applications in Engineering 4 F,SENGR 1401 Engineering Graphics 4 F,S PHYS 1307 General Physics I 3 ALLHIST 1305 US History to 1877 3 ALL PHYS 1107 General Physics Lab I 1 ALLPSY 1303 General Psychology 3 ALL HIST 1306 US History after 1877 3 ALLMATH 2401 Calculus I 4 ALL EET 1411 Circuits 4 F 17