untenured faculty member should (andlikely will) spend most of their time. Page 11.256.3Tip #1: “Invest In Yourself” – When you successfully defend your doctoral dissertation,you are one of the best in the world in your field of Topic X. Thus, you have the bestchance to make an immediate scholarly impact by: • writing one or two more papers in Topic X. This keeps your publishing record intact and shows you can publish papers on your own (usually a key “deliverable” of a national research grant) • making a “lateral move” into a new, but parallel field of research. When you submit a proposal for review, the reviewers of your proposal
designfor manufacturability.Another aspect of the course involved bringing in outside speakers to give seminars. Several ofthe speakers were practicing engineers from industry. Topics covered by the guests includedProject Management, design for manufacturability, and a Intellectual property.” The challengein presenting some of the research talks was keeping them at a level that undergraduate studentscan comprehend. One seminar was a joint effort with the local ASME section and hosted by adistinguished ASME speaker. If possible, speakers presented on one of the topics mentionedabove as it related to their profession.Early in the academic year, the course was devoted to providing students with importantinformation needed on the design project. Issues
Table 1: BOM for a single workstationIII. Assignments for Controls Systems Experiments The objective of constructing and designing the DC motor system using NI myDAQ and LabVIEW is to enhance students' understanding of the correlation between control system theories taught in the classroom, their practical applications in the real world, and the software tools frequently employed by engineers [5]. Therefore, the lab assignments accompanied with the developed experiment set-ups involve exercises on getting familiar with the LabVIEW programming environment, NI myDAQ data acquisition system, DC motor direction and speed observations, motor identification and modeling
analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Yu Li, University of California San Diego Brian has received his Master of Science degree in material science. He is currently continuing his edu- cation as a Material Science Ph.D. student. As a graduate student, Brian has spent the past three years as a teaching assistant in a variety of undergraduate courses. His research background focuses on medical devices and soft composite development.Dr. Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of
, realistic constraints,collaborative, and includes an artifact or artifact design. The high school program was chosenthrough chain sampling41. Chain sampling for this research involved asking those “in the know”(teacher educators, graduate students as practitioners, the state office of education) torecommend high school programs. The school was chosen from the Mountain West Region. The High School had predominantly White students. The school has a certified pre-engineering program using Project Lead the Way curriculum. There are six courses offered thatbecome available to the students starting their sophomore year: Introduction to Engineering,Digital Electronics, Civil and Architectural Engineering, Computer Integration andManufacturing
teach students arguments and theories about what actions are right (or wrong), and whichstates of affairs are good (or bad) related to the professional practice of engineering. A list ofwhat students need to be able to do to satisfy this outcome is as follows:1. ability to offer and defend a definition of engineering ethics,2. ability to recall the essential elements of a professional engineering code of conduct,3. ability to explain multiple reasons for being ethical in the practice of engineering,4. ability to identify and critically analyze common ethical dilemmas in the practice of engineering, including possible consequences,5. ability to analyze ethical arguments to discover which argument one has the best reasons to believe and
his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering in 2003 during which time he spent two summers and one-year designing equipment for the livestock and dairy industries at Kuhn North America. In 2004, Dr. Digman returned to graduate school to study Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Wisconsin – Madison where he received his master’s and doctor of philosophy degrees in 2006 and 2009, respectively. Dr. Digman has experience in design and evaluation of novel machine forms for production of biofuels, biomaterials, food and livestock feed at the United States Dairy Forage Research Center (USDA-ARS) and, most recently, in a research role at Kuhn North America
StaffDevelopment Council. 2009.[4] L.M. Desimone, Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development:Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 2009, pp.181–199.[5] L.B. Easton, (Ed.) Powerful Designs for Professional Learning. Oxford, OH. National StaffDevelopment Council. 2008.[6] S. Krause, J. Kelly, J. Corkins, A. Tasooji and S. Purzer. Using students' previous experienceand prior knowledge to facilitate conceptual change in an introductory materials course. 39thIEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2009, pp. 1-5, doi:10.1109/FIE.2009.5350761.[7] S. Loucks-Horsley, K. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, & P. Hewson, Designing professionaldevelopment for teachers of science and
an ecosys- tem of training and support for students and to develop innovative teaching practices focused on team- and project-based learning.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington Ken Yasuhara (he/him) is the director of the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning at the UW and serves the College of Engineering as its instructional consultant. Dr. Yasuhara began working as an instructional consultant in late 2015, after several years of experience as an engi- neering education researcher at UW’s Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching.Dr. Per G. Reinhall, University of Washington Per Reinhall (he/him) is a professor and recent chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at
issustainable and scalable for the Library. Despite increased workload for a librarian, the benefitsthat the students derive from the embedded librarian model are worthwhile and impactful. Thestudents learn more in depth research skills from these activities than from typical one shotlibrary lecture style outreach.References 1. Amekudzi, Adjo A., Lisha Li, and Michael Meyer. (2009). "Cultivating research and information skills in civil engineering undergraduate students." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 136.1, 24-29. 2. Texas A&M University. (2016). Diversity Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://engineering.tamu.edu/etid/about/diversity-facts-and-figures 3. Texas A&M University
Educational Objectives andProgram Student Outcomes. Understanding the role of these items in how they define a programis central to understanding the purpose of a program in how it is attempting to relate itscurriculum to the future of its graduates.ABET educational objectives and student outcomes can best be understood from a top-down perspective.[4] Which of these comes first is not at all a chicken-and-egg argument.Educational objectives come first. Then student outcomes can be properly understood andtake on a useful meaning. The educational objectives are defined in terms of the earlycareer paths the graduates of the engineering program are being prepared for andgenerally expected to follow. In other words, once the students leave the academic
Paper ID #42624Oral Examinations in Environmental Engineering Design CoursesProf. James N. Jensen, University at Buffalo James N. Jensen is professor and chair of the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. Dr. Jensen received a BS degree in environmental engineering from Caltech in 1980 and MSPH and PhD degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1983 and 1988, respectively. His research and teaching interests are in assessment, problem-based learning, and drinking water treatment in low-resource environments. He has received numerous teaching and research awards, including the
development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[7] L. Johnson, S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, and A. Freeman, "NMC horizon report: 2015 K-12 edition," Austin, TX, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2015-k-12-edition/[8] C. Barron and A. Barron, "Seven surprising benefits of maker spaces," vol. 2017, ed: School Library Journal, 2016.[9] L. Fleming, Worlds of making: Best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2015.[10] L. Steier and A. W. Young, "Growth mindset and the makerspace educational environment," Masters of Arts in Education Action Research, St. Catherine
, there are a number of studies that have adopted goal orientation as aframework to investigate engineering students’ motivation [21]. Most of these studies, however,targeted graduate, undergraduate, or high school students, and little research has focusedspecifically on younger children. Meanwhile, research on children’s engineering design anddesign thinking (e.g., [22]) and related motivation constructs, such as identity or attitude (e.g.,[23]), has increased in the past few years. Often featuring hands-on, project-based tasks andlearning experiences, engineering design activities provide opportunities for children to work onreal-world challenges using engineering tools and materials within contexts that focus onproblem-solving and systems
. In the series of design courses he teaches, students design mechanical devices for use by disabled clients. The students are required to interview the client and design a device that will address one of the client’s unmet needs. The series concludes with students presenting prototypes of designs. The reactions of the client, as seen in their faces, is the ultimate grade. In addition to academic work, Dr Kleinke is a registered professional engineer and conducts seminars on innovation which are tailored to the needs of automotive engineers. Dr Kleinke’s recent publication, ”Capstones Lessons to Prepare Students for the Changing World of Corporate Innovation”, was awarded fist place as ”best paper” at a 2011
effectively.h) broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The civil engineering faculty developed a list of course learning outcomes for thesenior design sequence. Each of the course learning outcomes was mapped to oneor more a-k program outcomes. The course learning outcomes and thecorresponding program outcomes for each, indicated within parentheses, are listedbelow.1. Identify the engineering problem that needs to be solved (e).2
computer-aided graphics, engineering design, soil and water conservation engineering, and land surveying.His research areas include soil quality evaluation using x-ray tomography, evaluation of best management practicesfor reducing surface and groundwater contamination, and manure management evaluation for environmentalprotection of water resources. Dr. Mickelson has been very active in the American Society for EngineeringEducation for the past 13 years. He received his Agricultural Engineering Degrees from Iowa State University in1982, 1984, and 1991.CARL BERNCarl Bern is a Full Professor of Agricultural and Bioystems Engineering (ABE) at Iowa State University. Heobtained his BS and MS degrees from the University of Nebraska and his Ph.D. from
contexts becomes more widespread and sophisticated. To gain a broaderunderstanding of the impact of ChatGPT on engineering education, we hope to collaborate withother institutions to gain a more complete picture of the academic community's attitudes toward GAIin various educational settings.The proposed conceptual framework for integrating AI into engineering education, as described inthis study, needs to be applied and tested in real educational settings. Application of the conceptualframework in course design and pedagogy, and subsequent evaluation of its effectiveness, canprovide valuable information on how best to integrate AI into engineering curricula.Given the rapid integration of GAI in education, research is needed to inform policy
by instructors to meet their preferredobjectives. Therefore, while they may be prerequisites to second-year courses, first-yearengineering programs are not necessarily integrated into an engineering curriculum. Further,since they are often designed with little consideration for best practices in introductory coursedesign, overall outcomes and content vary widely. This leads to the issue of course developers“reinventing the wheel,” considering successful models are not adequately disseminated. Theproblem is further exacerbated by a lack of definition for first year models. Despite a developerknowing what they want in a course, he or she may not be able to find a course with similaroutcomes with nothing more than "first year engineering" as a
AC 2007-1513: ENHANCING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCE IN CIVILENGINEERINGShashi Nambisan, Iowa State University Shashi Nambisan, PhD, PE: Director of the Center for Transportation Research and Education and Professor of Civil Engineering at Iowa State University (ISU), Ames, Iowa. Prior to coming to ISU, Shashi was at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) from July 1989 to January 2007. He enjoys working with students and he has taught undergraduate and graduate courses in the area of Transportation systems as well as the undergraduate capstone design course sequence. An active researcher, Shashi has led efforts on over 130 research projects that have addressed and responded to
AC 2011-374: INTRODUCTORY PROJECT-BASED DESIGN COURSE TOMEET SOCIOECONOMIC CHALLENGESAli M. Al-Bahi, King Abdulaziz University Dr. Ali M. Al-Bahi is Professor of aerodynamics and flight mechanics in the Aeronautical Engineering Department of King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He has a 25 years teaching experience in Aeronautical Engineering and was graduated from Cairo University, Egypt and ENSAE, France. Prior to joining the department he built a practical engineering experience by working for the aircraft industry in Egypt. He published numerous papers in CFD, applied aerodynamics, and flight mechanic. Since 2002 he became interested in Engineering Education, assessment, and accreditation. He is
sustainable energy technologies. She holds a BS and MS in Engineering Mechanics and a PhD in Biomedical Engi- neering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Robin Dawn Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research.Cheryl Alyssa Welch Alyssa Welch is a Psychological Sciences master’s student in the concentration of Experimental Psychol- ogy, and a Graduate Teaching Assistant in the
University. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Auburn University. His research interests are in the areas of wireless networks and their applications, with current focuses on machine learning and AI in wireless networks, edge computing, and network security. He received IEEE INFOCOM 2014 Runner-up Best Paper Award as a co-author, ASU ECEE Palais Outstanding Doctoral Student Award in 2015, and NSF CAREER Award in 2022. He is currently an Associate Editor for IEEE Transactions on Wireless Com- munications, a Guest Editor for IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, and a Guest Editor for IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.Dr. Daniela
, 2015 An Approach to Teaching People Skills in Senior Design Project Courses Introduction The premise of this paper is that most engineering students are ill-prepared for the demands their careers will place on them to interact with other people one-on-one, within teams, and within organizations—organizations that are often global in character. The senior design project provides an opportunity (literally a last chance) for graduating seniors to recognize and develop people skills needed for success. Because the project is intended to simulate real engineering practice, the faculty member can observe each student’s people skill level in project context and at a minimum provide insights and coaching to each student in order to improve those
in and teachers to identify appropriate learning discipline-specific content. Once teachers formulated a design problem for their assessment curricula, instructional materials, students (third design challenge), teachers worked in small teams to develop instructional and assessment methods. materials and assessment tools such as rubrics for evaluating student performance. E. Alignment to The professional learning institute was developed and implemented by engineering faculty Professional learning for (content experts) and education faculty (educational research and practice experts). As such, research
College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2020.[8] McKinsey & Co. Report, “Women in the Workplace,” 2021.[9] R. Finfrock and N. Klingbeil, “Examining the Impacts of the Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education through Curricular Analytics,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, June 2023.[10] K. Watson, S. Sorby, E. Cady, and J. El-Sayed, “Engineering the Inclusive Mindset for the Future: A Blueprint for Systemic Change in Engineering Education,” National Science Foundation Award #2212721, nsf.gov., 2022. [Accessed February 6, 2024].[11] The Gallup-Purdue Index Report, 2014.[12] P. Kelly and B. Makh, “Course Design Institute
-2016-2017/2. Guilford, W.H., Allen, T.E., & Peirce, S.M. “The Forgotten Steps of Engineering Design: Design-Build Experiences and their Downstream Effect on Capstone Design Projects.” Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28970, 2017.3. Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T., & Volkwein, J.F., Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. ABET: Baltimore, 2006.4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.), How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.5. Karweit, N. “Contextual learning: A review and synthesis”, in Educational Reform and Vocational Education, A.M. Milne, Ed. Washington, DC: U.S
Collaboratory (GEEC) research group. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, comput- ing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and professional practice. Page 23.1017.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Raising Students’ Cultural Awareness through Design ScenariosIntroductionFor many reasons, stakeholders from academia and
://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Innovation-in-the-Classroom-%3A-Design- Thinking-for-Hong/5915beb4273d812802b74be3b0d0f99ffe44fdf9[7] A. Royalty, H. Chen, B. Roth, and S. Sheppard, “Developing a Tool to Measure the Transfer of Design Practice from Training Contexts to Applied Contexts,” in Design Thinking Research: Interrogating the Doing, C. Meinel and L. Leifer, Eds., in Understanding Innovation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 103–121. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62037-0_4.[8] F. J. Figliano and J. G. Wells, “Evidencing STEM Content Knowledge Transfer: Abstraction in Technological/Engineering Design Challenges,” J. Technol. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 19–41, 2019.[9] L. J. Malkiewich and C. C. Chase, “What’s your goal
from Auburn University in 2014. He is a contributor to the Australian Maths Trust, and member of the MASAMU international research group for mathematics.Dr. Carl Pettis Carl S. Pettis, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Al- abama State University Administrative role: Interim Associate Provost Office of Academic Affairs Alabama State UniversityDr. Uma Kannan Dr. Uma Kannan is Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business Administration at Alabama State University, where she has taught since 2017. She received her Ph.D. degree in Cybersecurity from Auburn University in 2017. She specialized in Cybersecurity, particularly on