, Elizabethtown College Dr. Mark Brinton currently teaches electrical and biomedical engineering courses at Elizabethtown Col- lege. Prior to joining Elizabethtown College, he studied advanced prosthetic limbs at the University of Utah (postdoc, Biomedical Engineering), taught Electrical Engineering at the Salt Lake Community College (adjunct faculty), and studied electro-neural stimulation for organ control at Stanford University (PhD, Electrical Engineering). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Design of Mastery-Based-Learning Course Structure to Assess Student Anxiety and BelongingIntroductionAlmost 1/3rd (31%) of U.S. adults will experience an anxiety
counterparts.This paper will present the details of the program, funding sources, specific training material,how tutors are found, how tutoring partners are found, and more.IntroductionA major barrier for first-generation college students (FGCS) is in place long before they step footin a college classroom. In addition to lacking the first-hand perspective that benefits studentswhose parents went to college, these students are also often low-income and from an ethnicdemographic that is under-represented. Previous research has noted these differences betweenfirst-generation and low-income college students – specifically in Engineering [1]. Others havefound that first-generation college students less academically prepared, lack “basic knowledgeconcerning
forsome kind of grade replacement [1]. In general, the second-chance exam covers the same coursematerial as the first-chance exam at the same difficulty level, but uses new questions.Second-chance testing can be viewed as a form of mastery testing [2], but students are provided asingle re-take attempt.Previous research has found that second-chance testing leads to improved student performancebecause it provides students feedback on the shortcomings of their knowledge and an incentivefor students to remediate those shortcomings [1, 3, 4]. Students can address gaps in theirunderstanding, take a second version of an assessment to demonstrate their mastery, and boosttheir score.In this paper, we investigate whether second-chance testing has affective
Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work in Progress: Designing a Survey Instrument to Assess Graduate Student MotivationTowards Degree CompletionIntroductionThe doctoral degree process can be arduous and time-consuming; often requiring students tomaintain a high level of motivation to obtain their degree [1], [2]. In King [3], attrition rates fordoctoral programs were found to average 43% in the USA, between the years of 1992 and
Charlottethat is currently in its third year. Shaping Experiential Research for Veteran Education (SERVE)program is a partnership between the University of Tennessee (UTK) and the University ofNorth Carolina at Charlotte (UNCC) that provides US military veterans an opportunity to receiveundergraduate research experience in a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fieldat a partner university. The University of Tennessee is also referred to as the lead university.The University of Tennessee is a large public land-grant research university which is also knownas the flagship campus of the system. The University of Tennessee has over 33,805 students,~4,000 of which are considered non-traditional or adult students [1]. As of Fall 2019
to increasethe participation of students from diverse backgrounds in engineering majors. Additionally, theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology recently made a commitment to diversityand is considering changes to curriculum criteria which would require engineering programs todemonstrate a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion [1]. In alignment with USAFA’sstrategic plan and the anticipated accreditation criteria, the authors are developing a newfoundational engineering course as one element of an institution-wide effort to improve students’sense of belonging, make engineering majors more accessible to a wider audience, andultimately increase diversity among engineering graduates.In addition to exploring best practices from
and practitioners, this paper frames the current state ofthe community’s knowledge gaps and provides insights into the discipline’s future directions.IntroductionFor nearly three decades, the engineering community and society have realized that engineering work has a direct impact on societyand the world in which we live [1], [2]. Developing engineers for future work is socio-technical in nature; success in modernengineering projects requires more than technical capability, but also the ability to manage teams of people and lead them towards theaccomplishment of common goals. Adapting to this new socio-technical reality has brought a recognition that holistic engineeringdesign techniques and professional skills development, (to include
, 2023 WIP: Developing a Guide to Support Engineering Student Out-of-Class Participation and Professional LearningIntroductionMany co-curricular engineering research studies have connected students’ participation to specificprofessional (e.g., communication, teamwork [1]–[4]) and personal outcomes (e.g., identity,retention [1], [5]–[7]). This approach has established a foundation for claims that co-curricularengagement is important for engineering students’ overall development but leaves questions aboutwhat drives students’ engagement in these activities. This study leverages a pilot survey to explorestudent reasoning for engaging in co-curriculars and develop an institution-specific co-curricularengagement guide to
difficult tostudy, few studies provide a thick description of these alternative cultural practices and theirimpacts. Our study offers a rare glimpse of student uptake of these practices in a multi-yearScience, Technology, and Society (STS) living-learning program.Specifically, our study explores whether and how cultural practices within an STS program helpstudents develop and sustain a socio-technical systems thinking approach to engineering practice.We ground our work in a cultural practices framework from Nasir and Kirshner [1] which,roughly speaking, understands practice to be “a patterned set of actions performed by membersof a group based on common purposes and expectations, with shared cultural values, tools, andmeanings” ([2, p. 99] as cited
assessement, problem-solving, and equity in the undergraduate and graduate STEM classroom. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Sensemaking of Block Flow Diagrams in Chemical EngineeringINTRODUCTIONAs engineering educators, we all want our students to make sense of the ideas they encounter inour courses. Sensemaking has been shown to help students build new knowledge and createconnections within the knowledge they already have [1]. The process of sensemaking also helpsstudents achieve coherence between a concept and a scenario in the real world [2]. Additionally,sensemaking can positively benefit students’ problem-solving, leading to more efficient,insightful, and accurate solutions [3]. In the
decade, with multiple approaches toits study, from quantitative survey research to qualitative efforts to understand the notion using arange of social science theory. This paper emerges from a three-year multi-method case studythat explores how computing students author, or create, computing identities [1] in the subfieldof cybersecurity through academic, co-curricular, and extra-curricular practices in a specificpost-secondary computer science context.The paper emphasizes the notion of local communities of practice (CoPs) [2] and identitytransformations, or trajectories [3] to illustrate the influence of student agency in situ and toprovide rich detail from student lived experiences regarding cybersecurity and other computingaspirations
, andknowledge generation.Epistemic differences can be difficult to study due to the tacit nature of people’s beliefs aboutknowledge, which results in individuals having a hard time articulating their true beliefs aboutknowledge. Additionally, the ways in which people enact their epistemic beliefs are dependent oncontext and situation [1, 2, 3]. So while an individual may report holding a specific epistemic beliefon a survey or in an interview, they may not always act in ways that reflect these beliefs. Giventhese complexities associated with studying epistemic matters, recent trends among researcherscall for the use of context and situation-specific approaches [4, 5].Ethnography offers research methods that allow researchers to deeply consider both
the academy. We pursue this endeavor through anexplicit standpoint of feminist epistemology, recognizing that our collective positionalitiesimpact our methodological approaches and analyses of these methodologies. As women inSTEM, we utilize two of the four dimensions of Black feminist standpoint theory (BFT): (1)lived experiences viewed as a criterion of meaning and (2) the use of dialogue to accessknowledge claims. We expand these dimensions to all women by leveraging feminist theory,which emerged from BFT. The method presented allows each panelist to contribute their distinctbut overlapping personal, professional, and research experiences to create one unified message.Together, we believe our individual experiences revealed unique insights
research the topic further. Several simulation tools were available including commercialComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software and a suggested open-source alternative CFDcode. The particulars of the assignment such as the simulation software, object, fluid and itsvelocity, and level of grid refinement were left up to the student. The research portion wasexpressed as “do something else”, requiring student to modify either the object or conditions,draw conclusions, and discuss what they discovered. To facilitate the autonomous learning anddevelopment of simulation skills, the assignment was accompanied by (1) numerous simulationexamples and tutorials for the simulation software available, (2) numerous drag coefficientreferences, and (3) a
(COEIT) at the University of Maryland BaltimoreCounty (UMBC). These students, known as teaching fellows, not only have an impact on theirengineering and computing peers (students who they taught), but also develop skill sets in anunconventional way giving them new routes into academics and industry. Many in their third,fourth or fifth year of their program, perform, act and behave as potential future faculty (leadtheir own discussion/class, grade papers, hold office hours etc). In a recent case study [1],students discussed their consideration going into faculty positions and found this programincreased their efficacy in both their professional and technical competencies.In the commitment to teaching and innovation excellence, UMBC decided to
, datacom, wireless, sensing andimaging systems for the cloud and mobile computing, automobile and aircraft, display, medical,and energy industries. This 21st century advanced manufacturing sector is in dire need of amassive increase in its photonics technician and engineer workforce, over the next decade.However, an inadequate pipeline of incoming learners to fiber optic and photonic integratedcircuit (PIC) careers at 2- and 4-year colleges is severely limiting the prospects for rapidworkforce growth (see Fig. 1)[1,2,3,4].To support this near-term workforce demand, a modular library of Virtual Reality (VR) andGame-Based Learning (GBL) digital simulations (sims) and blended (digital and hands-on)learning content have been created that may
were also all full professors in the tenure-line. Theyhad work and leadership experiences outside of university settings, such as being professionalengineers and working in professional development settings. They averaged 2-3 years ofleadership experience, with two Fellows starting this year as the chair of their departments.In Fall 2022, the Fellows participated in four sessions involving critical reflection and dialogueon topics related to power and privilege. The topics of these discussions are described in Table 1.The scope of the discussions was broad, and included both Fellows’ roles as individuals insociety and how they, as STEM disciplinarians, viewed success in STEM education and that oftheir students.Through this work, the Fellows
authors of this paper propose a new academic advising model that assignsstudents to both a professional academic adviser and a faculty adviser, capitalizing equally andmore effectively on the strengths and skillsets of both. Currently in a pilot phase involving twoacademic departments, this model will continue to be refined from lessons learned in the pilot,and ultimately rolled out across all departments in the College of Engineering.Purpose of Academic AdvisingAcademic advisers play a significant role in student success in college [1]. Just as innovations inteaching and classroom pedagogy are considered to enhance student learning, so must the designof intentional educational interventions such as academic advising. Advisers are one thread in
.,2022).Teaming is currently experimental. The group that developed it internally is still using it aftereighteen months. However, while there has been sustained use and experimentation, there hasbeen little formal research (such as research to clearly demonstrate outcomes). To do formalresearch requires additional uses of teaming, and thus we are interested in efforts that lower thethreshold for doing teaming in order to enable more use and thus more understanding of teaming.It is time to (1) consider its wider applicability - the implications section of this paper, and to (2)examine the principles at work in teaming - the research focus of this paper.While teaming, as we have described it, was conceptualized in a local context by a specific
1 Story-driven Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review Abstract Stories have been a pervasive, ubiquitous feature of our lives throughout humanhistory—indeed, storytelling itself is robustly associated with a host of positive benefits,including better mental health (Robertson et al., 2019), increased empathy (Cummings et al.,2022), and a greater sense of belonging (Ritter et al., 2019). As such, storytelling has thepotential to be a powerful tool in a range of settings, including higher education (i.e., story-driven learning). To uncover how story-driven learning has been used in higher education sofar—as well as to discover patterns in pedagogical methods and
learningand sociocultural awareness. It is anticipated that the study would reveal a possible pathway forincreased persistence of females in STEM and DI practices and potentially help create a nationalsystemic mentoring program that addresses academic disparities in STEM education for FTICstudents alongside historically underrepresented and underserved populations.IntroductionThe persistence rate of undergraduate females in STEM consistently ranks higher than their malecounterparts [1, 2]. Since the 1950s, the engineering curriculum involved foundationalmathematics and science gateway courses that led to student attrition [1-5]. Some broad factorsfor student attrition across multiple universities include academic climate, self-efficacy, self
their children in STEM activities and nuclear science programs. These activities haveresulted in deeper, sustained student engagement and understanding of mitigating factors that ourstudents face and need to be addressed to enhance a nuclear workforce pipeline at an HBCU.IntroductionIn the USA, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) continue to award a largeshare of bachelor's degrees to African American students in Science, Technology, Engineering,Arts and Mathematics (STEAM). HBCUs are also the baccalaureate origins of one-quarter toone-third of black science and engineering (S&E) doctorate recipients [1]. However, as shownby the National Science Foundation data [2] for college aged population (18-24 years), blackstudents
StudentsIntroductionStress profoundly affects the experience of doctoral students, who suffer attrition rates as high as43% [1], and experience stress, anxiety, and depression at a rate which is both rising and is muchhigher than that in the general population [2], [3]. While the rates of attrition are somewhat lowerfor doctoral engineering students than for other doctoral students [4], experiences of stress havebeen reported to perhaps be even higher for doctoral students in STEM disciplines [3],particularly for graduate students of minoritized identities [5], [6]. Doctoral student stress hasbeen linked to both attrition and broader mental health issues by previous research [3], [7], [8],yet studies of doctoral student mental health are rare [9].Research on
innovativetechnologies benefiting our society. Unfortunately, a gender gap persists in most STEMdisciplines even though men and women comprise a similar proportion of the total U.S.workforce[1]. In engineering, while there has been an increase in degrees awarded to women,they continue to earn fewer undergraduate and graduate degrees than their male counterparts [1]and comprise approximately 16.1% of the U.S. engineering workforce in 2022 [2].To address the problem of female underrepresentation in STEM fields, researchers have beeninterested in learning how faculty can serve as potential role models or mentors to studentsinterested in obtaining degrees in STEM [3]–[5] . The research proposes that a higherrepresentation of female faculty can positively influence
show that BIPOC students had an immediate increase in their withdraw rates during COVID, depicted in Figure 1, while White students had a decrease in their withdraw rates, depicted in Figure 2. This trend is particularly alarming because historically before COVID, BIPOC withdraw rates were lower than White students withdraw rates. However, during COVID, BIPOC students withdraw rates were higher than White students. Further investigation revealed that when comparing withdrawn students by race, student classification, and residential status pre-COVID (Spring 2017-Fall 2019) and during COVID (Spring 2020-Spring 2022), BIPOC Sophomores and BIPOC residential student populations saw large proportional increases in total number of withdrawn
part.IntroductionThe engineering education community continues to increase efforts to help students build anentrepreneurial mindset. For this work, we define entrepreneurial mindset to be consistent withthe Engineering Unleashed (EU) community, “An entrepreneurial mindset (EM) influences theway you think about the world and act upon what you see. It is a collection of mental habits thatempower you to question, adapt, and make positive change, leading you to: Recognize andidentify opportunities; Focus on their impact; Create value in any context.” [1]The increase in efforts to implement EM in engineering classrooms has been driven in part bythe formation of the growing Engineering Unleashed community. The community is availableonline at no cost with resources
of undergraduate studies.Typically, the students take their first course on signals and systems in their second year. AtVirginia Tech, students who enroll in their first course in signals and systems are second-yearstudents intending to major in electrical engineering and computer engineering. In this course,students learn “mathematical methods for the analysis and design of continuous and discrete linear,time-invariant systems” [1]. The five course learning objectives are shown in Table 1. Topicscovered include continuous and discrete signals and their properties, linear time-invariant systems,Fourier series, Fourier transforms, and filtering [1].Table 1. Learning Objectives for Course LO Learning Objective (LO
discussed. Keywords—community college students, engineering, role model intervention,writing prompts I. INTRODUCTION Attrition in engineering remains high, with approximately half of the engineering majorsleaving the field before graduating [1]. To address this problem, interventions targeting students’motivational beliefs have shown promise for increasing persistence and retention in STEM [2]. Acritical component of the motivation interventions is asking students to complete writing promptsbecause doing so allows the student to internalize the message [3]. For example, utility-valueinterventions have been shown to promote students’ interest and performance in the course [4,5]. Utility-value
success in pair programming? We analyze keyfactors—gender, prior programming experience, confidence in programming, as well aspreferences toward deadlines, communication, and leadership. We then provide several bestpractice suggestions toward the optimization of pair programming.2. Related Work/BackgroundResearchers have generally assessed pair programming to be positive for both in person [11, 20,25, 27] and remote [1, 3, 5] modalities. In one meta-analysis of 18 studies, positive effects foundincluded decreased time spent on low-complexity programming projects and increased quality ofcode for high-complexity programming projects [15]. However, there is reason to be cautious inthinking of out-of-the-box pair programming as a panacea for
-progress paper, we describe our efforts to implement a coach and peer-to-peer mentoringmodel to provide structured faculty development in entrepreneurial mindset (EM) integration throughmakerspaces.As faculty members try to innovate and update their classes, a recent merger of the Maker movement andthe Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM) movement has provided specific training and opportunities to revitalizethe engineering curriculum. Studies have suggested facilitating EM projects with the makerspace areexcellent opportunities to develop student skills in areas related to entrepreneurial mindset such asopportunity recognition, learning from failure, stakeholder engagement, and value creation [1, 2]. Whilemakerspaces are a proven conduit for EM, they are