tolerance < 0.05 mm Cost < 10 $/kW Weight < 1 kg/kW Page 24.824.2To meet these requirements, bipolar plates are usually made of graphite, coated or non-coatedmetals or from polymer composites including graphite powder.This paper presents the investigation of a manufacturing process of bipolar plates for PEMFCsusing compression molding of GP55-B (GrafTech Inc.) synthetic graphite used as electricallyconductive matrix and PLENCO 12114 phenol formaldehyde thermoset resin (Plenco PlasticsEngineering Company) used as binder. We
final structure will be completed using SAP2000 and a TimeHistory Analysis of its response to three selected earthquake ground motion will be modeled. Figure 1. Building plan.Design Procedure and ProductThe design of the structure was split into two parts: (a) Apply the ASCE 7-102 equivalent lateralforce procedure to determine the base shear, the period of the structure, and the verticaldistribution of forces on the frame; (b) Select the optimal sizes for the steel plates, HBE andVBE required on each floor by following the AISC codes using MS Excel or MathCAD. TheASCE 7-103 equivalent lateral force procedure was used to determine the minimum lateral forcesused for design of the three-story office building
. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press, 1997.2. U.S. Department of Education, “A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education,”Washington, DC, 2006.3. B. R. Butler, “Introducing Freshmen to Engineering: A Model Course,” Engineering Education, vol. 69, pp. 739-742, 1979.4. E. Soulsby, “University Learning Skills: A First Year Experience Orientation Course for Engineers,” presented at29th ASEE/IEEE: Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1999.5. F. E. Weber, R. M. Bennett, J. H. Forrester, P. G. Klukken, J. R. Parsons, C. D. Pionke, W. Schleter, J. E. Seat,and J. L. Yoder, “The ENGAGE Program: Results from Renovating the First Year
. National ScienceFoundation (Award DUE-1042030). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and/orrecommendations are those of the investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References [1] Kilgore, D., Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T. J., & Morozov, A. (2007). “Considering Context: A Study of First‐Year Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 321-334. [2] Olds, B. M., & Miller, R. L. (2004). “The Effect of a First‐Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 23-35. [3] Pendergrass, N. A., Kowalczyk, R. E., Dowd, J. P., Laoulache, R. N., Nelles, W., Golen, J
Challenges for Engineering project were graded.The first three assignments, to introduce their topic, complete the annotated bibliography, andprepare the summary of their topic, were worth 5% of their final grade per assignment. The finalpresentation was worth 20% of their final grade for the course. Therefore, all four components ofthe project were worth a total of 35% of their final grade for the course. The average grade for allgroups on the overall project was a B. From the signed consent forms, it was noted that theaverage grade for the students that completed the survey was a B+, while the average grade forthe students that chose not to complete the survey was a C.Updates for Future ClassesIn general, the feedback about this project was quite
was found that the combination of styromol coatingin the experimental mullite sand produced the fastest cooling rate, and the combination of theexperimental coat in the control mullite sand produced the cast with the least number of internaldefects. The undergraduate student participated in this research experience received credits towardher senior project capstone culminating experience in engineering technology. Moreover, thestudent demonstrated her compliance with Criteria 3-Student Outcomes: a, b, c, d, f, and g.Currently she is employed by GM Smyrna plant as Production Supervisor & Group Leader.REU BACKGROUNDThe REU project “Industrial Application of Sensing, Modeling, and Control” sought to enhancethe image of the metal casting
in theELLC, remain in good standing with the university, and continue to make academic progresstowards a degree program in the Bobby B. Lyle School of Engineering at Southern MethodistUniversity (SMU).The program directors worked closely with the engineering recruiting office to identify eligibleadmitted students with an interest in pursuing a major in engineering or computer science.Candidates were recruited based on past academic achievement, leadership potential,curricular/extracurricular experiences, demonstrated financial need, and diversity.IDEAL scholars participated in three main co-curricular experiences aimed at buildingcommunity and increasing their leadership skills: block scheduling, academic advising and aweekly seminar. IDEAL
“entrepreneurially minded learning.” A textualrepresentation is given here (with letter enumeration added for clarity later in the paper): ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSET1. Enterprising Attitude a. Exercise curiosity about the surrounding world b. Define problems, opportunities, and solutions in terms of value creation c. Assess risk Page 24.288.4 d. Persist through and learn from failure e. Demonstrate resourcefulness f. Anticipate technical developments by interpreting surrounding societal and economic trends g. Identify new business opportunities coupled with ENGINEERING THOUGHT AND ACTION2. Multidimensional
this question was taken from the initial survey. The students wereasked to define each of the disciplines and then indicate how confident they were in theirdefinitions on a Likert scale where 1 was very unsure and 5 was very confident. Discipline-specific faculty members then rated the students’ definitions, also on a Likert scale. The studentswere also asked their level of interest in each of the four disciplines offered by the university: I am considering pursuing the following disciplines: (Circle the appropriate number): 1- Strongly disagree 2- Disagree 3- Neutral 4- Agree 5- Strongly Agree a) Civil Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 b) Industrial Engineering 1 2
with Arduino Apress, 2012, Ch 4. pp. 69-87[2] K Zachariadou et.al., "A low-cost computer-controlled Arduino-based educational laboratory system for teaching the fundamentals of photovoltaic cells", Eur. J. Phys. 2012 33 1599[3] B. M. Hoffer, “Satisfying STEM education using the Arduino microporcessor in C programming”, MS Thesis, East Tennessee State University, Publication Number: AAT 1520533, 2012.[4] Feedback Inc., Servo Fundamentals Trainer [online]: http://www.feedback- instruments.com/products/education/terms_and_conditions/servo_fundamentals_trainer[5] Quanser QNET DC Motor Control Trainer [online]: http://www.quanser.com/products/qnet_dcmct[6] Sparkfun Inventor's Kit [online]: https
morning sessions in each semester offall, spring, and summer at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry.Teacher professional development for CHiS&EProgram teachers received background content and instruction, STEM pedagogy anddirect guidance in the facilitation of each engineering activity. Upon completion of theprofessional development, teachers were able to a) to identify K-12 learning opportunitiesand challenges, b) describe engineering careers and K-12 engineering activities, c) relatethe connectedness of mathematics and science in the context of engineering designthrough hands-on practice, d) emphasize for students the role of mathematics and sciencein collecting, recording, analyzing, and communicating observations, e) demonstrate
19 ReferencesACT (2012). 2011 ACT national and state scores. Downloaded from http://www.act.org/newsroom/data/2011/states.htmlBryceson, K. (2007). The online learning environment—A new model using social constructivism and the concept of ‘Ba’as a theoretical framework. Learning Environments Research, 10(3), 189-206.Capobianco, B., Mena, I, & Diefes-Dux, H.A. (2011). Elementary school teachers’ attempts at integrating engineering design: Transformation or assimilation? Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, Canada.College Board (2012). The 8th annual AP report to the nation. Downloaded from http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/public/pdf/ap/rtn/AP-Report-to
for Statics, Computers & Graphics, 32(5): 511-‐524, October 2008. 6. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. 2001. Self-‐regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 7. Dollár, A. and Steif, P.S. 2008. An interactive, cognitively informed, web-‐based statics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24 (6): 1229–41. 8. P. S. Steif, A. Dollár, 2009. Web-‐based Statics Course: Study of Usage Patterns and Learning Gains, Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (4): 321-‐333
Worked-Example Instruction in Electrical Engineering: The Role of Fading and Feedback during Problem-Solving Practice, Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 83-92.17. Collins, A., J.S. Brown & A. Holum. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator. 15(3), 6-11,38-39.18. Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.19. Gilbuena, D., B. Sherrett, E. Gummer, and M. D. Koretsky. (2011). Episodes as a discourse analysis framework to examine feedback in an industrially situated virtual laboratory project. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada
of Higher Education [Internet]. 2012 Aug 16 [cited 2013 Oct 17]; Available from: http://chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Struggle- to-Respond/133699/4. Goplerud EN. Social support and stress during the first year of graduate school. Prof Psychol. 1980;11(2):283–90.5. Brandes LCO. Graduate student centers: Building community and involving students. New Dir Stud Serv. 2006;2006(115):85–99.6. Grant-Vallone EJ, Ensher EA. Effects of Peer Mentoring on Types of Mentor Support, Program Satisfaction and Graduate Student Stress: A Dyadic Perspective. J Coll Stud Dev. 2000 Jan;41(6):637–42.7. Mallinckrodt B, Leong FT. International graduate students, stress, and social support. J Coll Stud Dev. 1992;33(1):71–8.8. Felder
. Page 24.937.155. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.6. Frehill, L. M. (2011). Moving Beyond the Double-Bind: WIE and MEP Programs and Serving the Needs of Women of Color in Engineering. Paper presented at the 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada.7. Maine, J. J. d., Freeman, T. L., Keely, B., & Roberts, J. (2001). Affinity Groups: More Bang for the Buck Paper presented at the 108th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico.8. May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for
problem is to solve for the temperatures at A, B, C and D.First, an area on the spreadsheet is selected to represent the mesh (Figure 6). Fig 6Next, the given fixed temperatures are entered into the appropriate cells (Figure 7). Fig 7The basic formula for one of the internal nodes is entered as shown (Figure 8). Page 24.1328.9 Fig 8Finally, the remaining equations are entered yielding the results shown in Figure 9. Fig 9The second homework problem is shown in Figure 10
of newadvanced communication techniques for efficient underwatercommunication and networking to enhance ocean monitoringand exploration applications. The paper presents various 2-Dand 3-D models that can be used as the basis of futureresearch. Lloret [14] compares a proposed communication system Figure 2: Flowchart of Proposed Model of Wireless Underwater Sensorwith other existing systems. Although the proposal supports Communicationshort communication distances, it provides high data transferrates. It can be used for precision monitoring in applications B. Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT):such as contaminated ecosystems or for
studentsto discuss and reflect on their Co-Op experience. The interview protocol can be found inAppendix A. To recruit participants, an invitation email was sent to students currentlyenrolled in the Co-Op program requesting participation in this study. A recruitment surveywas included in the email, designed to help us collect students’ background information.The survey questions can be found in appendix B. Because the aim of thephenomenographic study is to explore variation in experience and understanding, theselection of participants was guided by “an attempt to gain the largest diversity inexperiences”15(p. 41)16. This entails “the use of a purposeful sampling method”14(p. 5).From those who agreed to participate, we selected the final 22 students
Heating, Ventilation, and AirChiller Plant Concepts Conditioning and Building Management Systems of a High Performance Academic Building,” Proc. of the 2012 ASME International MechanicalPossible Fill-in-the-Blank words (not all words will be used) Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov. 9-12, Houston, TX, 2012. [9] L. B. Flick, “The meanings of hands-on science,” Journal of Science Atkinson Carnot vapor-compression Rankine ice
(after ASCE, 2008) Course Outcomes 2 ABET, 2010) (a) Mathematics, science, 1. Mathematics N/A engineering 2. Natural sciences 3. Materials science 6. Mechanics 14. Breadth in civil engineering areas 15. Technical specialization 3. Humanities (1) 4. Social sciences (b) Experiments 7. Experiments (2
friend inside the IPPD lab, even if it’s only for a few minutes. Anyone not on the approved list is never allowed inside the IPPD lab. b. In the UF Non-‐Disclosure paperwork, allowing someone to be privy to information in the lab is breaking the non-‐disclosure agreement. c. Remember, some sponsors have additional non-‐disclosure agreements. Project management requires documentation of project progress. The use of the Trac Wiki, SVN,and E-learning/Sakai requires students to maintain documents. The example below shows asituation in a which a student is in fear of turning in something that is still in progress
have a greater depth of knowledge in the disciplinary tools needed to tackle important parts of the problem. 4. Identify and engage relevant and diverse stakeholders. 5. Explicitly address the political/cultural context and dynamics that are relevant to the problem, recognizing that even the definition of the problem can vary from one stakeholder group to the next. 6. Employ sound scientific methodologies to understand and solve problems. This means that students must be: a) literate in the sciences and in technology; b) able to use social and natural scientific methodologies to build knowledge about the problem and its possible solutions; and c) comfortable working with a variety of
interpretation on their own, the evaluator concluded, we will be able to deemMISO “institutionalized.”B. Re-Use of Products, Use of Social Connections, and Transfer of Learning PracticesThere was a lot of evidence at the higher level of the MISO project (the data analyticscomponent, principal investigator interactions), that MISO is creating a “buzz” in the oftendifficult to access research and publication world. An update from the Data AnalyticsCoordinator indicates that over 150 researchers, nationally and internationally, had accessed theS-STEM survey and the T-STEM survey for their own research. In addition, the PIs arecontinuously looking for opportunities to present their work. For example, in October 2013,MISO team members presented at a state
. The Execute phase within the performance thread of the B. Execute Phase metacognitive model helps to bridge the actual execution of For the conduct of the debate, students serving in a defined the debate with the audience, peer, and self-assessment thatrole were grouped with the side their role’s viewpoint best was conducted immediately following the debate. Thealigned. This resulted in two respective sides with each assessment tasks were lumped into the execution phasehaving mutually supportive and nuanced viewpoints that because of their importance to the overall main objective ofprovided counterpoints to the opposite side. The instructor
dimensions of the rubric are then furtherUSA, (corresponding author, 802-485-6295; fax: 802-485-2260; e-mail:EdwinS@ Norwich.edu). divided into the specific areas for scoring shown in Table 1. A Mike Kelley, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and condensed version of the EPSA rubric is included in AppendixEnvironmental Engineering at Norwich University, Northfield, VT, 05663, B. McCormack et al. explored best practices for administeringUSA (e-mail: mkelley@norwich.edu). Steve Beyerlein is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and using the EPSA rubric6.Engineering at the University of
can be found in Appendix B (Roadmap).Parent ProgramParents are able to hear from College Advisors who provide information on college requirementsand financial planning. Additionally, a panel composed of university students from diverseSTEM backgrounds share their personal experiences and permit the parents to ask questions ofinterest. Parents also get to experience the campus and lab tours.Advertising for the event is normally done through a local science advocate organization and bydirectly contacting partner schools of the university. The cost of the event is free to participants,with local industry and organizations picking up the expenses for food and supplies. The collegestudents and professional attendees volunteer their time
Paper ID #9662Recollecting experience in interviews: the structure and organization of engi-neering ’interview talk’Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral student in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Ore- gon State University. Her research is currently in engineering education focusing on the transference of expertise among working professionals and undergraduate students. Prior to pursuing her doctoral degree at OSU, she worked as an engineering intern and project inspector for Garfield County Public Works and as an AmeriCorps Volunteer-in-Service-to
Paper ID #9656Prevalence of inscriptions in transportation engineering text: Clues to con-textFloraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral student in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Ore- gon State University. Her research is currently in engineering education focusing on the transference of expertise among working professionals and undergraduate students. Prior to pursuing her doctoral degree at OSU, she worked as an engineering intern and project inspector for Garfield County Public Works and as an AmeriCorps Volunteer-in-Service-to-America (VISTA) aiding in
industry partnerships (on average 20-25 partners participate in each vehicle project) contribute to the development of the DO program for both short-term (e.g., what are the pros and cons between options A and B) and long-term aspects (e.g. the type and target market of a vehicle). Their role includes providing realistic examples of problems encountered in industry that convey engineering challenges and future design requirements to provide the students with concrete examples of trade-off which are constantly made in industry. In addition, the industrial collaborators mentor the students and offer feedback during each stage of the