Recollecting Experience in Interviews:  The Structure and Organization of Engineering 'Interview Talk'

Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal; Jessica Nina Lester; Shane A. Brown

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Publication Date: June 15, 2014
Start Date: June 15, 2014
End Date: June 18, 2014
ISSN: 2153-5965
Conference Session: Methodological & Theoretical Contributions to Engineering Education 3
Tagged Division: Educational Research and Methods
Page Count: 13
Page Numbers: 24.1031.1 - 24.1031.13
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--22964
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/22964
Download Count: 487

Paper Authors

biography

Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal Oregon State University

visit author page

Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral student in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. Her research is currently in engineering education focusing on the transference of expertise among working professionals and undergraduate students. Prior to pursuing her doctoral degree at OSU, she worked as an engineering intern and project inspector for Garfield County Public Works and as an AmeriCorps Volunteer-in-Service-to-America (VISTA) aiding in community-building and data gathering for a low income community in Spokane, WA. She received her bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Saint Martin’s University and her master’s degree in civil engineering - with a focus in transportation - at Oregon State University.
Address: School of Civil and Construction Engineering, 211 Kearney Hall, 1491 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 Phone: 509-499-5187 Email: bornasaf@onid.oregonstate.edu

visit author page

author page

Jessica Nina Lester Indiana University

biography

Shane A. Brown P.E. Oregon State University orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-8407

visit author page

Dr. Brown is an Associate Professor in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. His research focuses on cognition and learning in engineering mechanics with students, faculty, and practicing engineers. He is the recipient of the NSF CAREER Award in 2011 and multiple research and teaching awards.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

The role of recollection of experience to the organization and structure of engineering ‘interview talk’The use of interviews as a means for gathering data in hopes of gaining insight into issues ofinterest (e.g. conceptual understanding, relevant contexts, personal epistemologies, etc.) iswidely utilized within engineering education research. Such research delve into whatengineering experts and novices say in hopes interpreting meanings, intention, andunderstanding. This research paper approaches the interview from a different perspective.Instead of examining what is being said, this research delves into how interview participantsspeak and relay information within the context of an interview. Drawing from a specificperspective in discourse analysis (i.e. conversation analysis), this study provides analysis andinterpretation regarding engineers’ recollection of experiences during ‘interview talk’ in relationto sequential and preference/dispreference organization. Using detailed transcripts and audiorecordings of clinical, semi-structured interviews with engineering practitioners and academicinstructors, the ways in which recollections of experience functioned within the structure of talk-in-interaction is examined in detail. Three patterns of sequence organization were displayed inthe analyzed transcripts: adjacency pair with sequence closing thirds, adjacency pair with post-completion musings, and adjacency pairs with non-minimal post expansions. Further, thelocation of recollection of experiences within these patterns of sequence organization appeared tobe related to whether the engineers attempted to mitigate their responses, delay giving an answer,or perform other actions that indicate preference or dispreference (as noted by CA researcherslike Schegloff and Sacks) through the ongoing conversation with an interviewer. These findingsnote a common structure of talk that occurs within a commonly encountered context inengineering education research. By providing insight into the structure of talk-in-interaction, thisstudy provides a means for analyzing interview data from a theoretical and methodologicalperspective emerging within engineering education research. Further, the findings from thisstudy provide awareness of another level of interpretation regarding interview data beyond whatis being said into understanding how interaction occurs between two individuals participating inclinical, semi-structured interviews.

Citation
Format

Bornasal, F. B., & Lester, J. N., & Brown, S. A. (2014, June), Recollecting Experience in Interviews: The Structure and Organization of Engineering 'Interview Talk' Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--22964

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - The role of recollection of experience to the organization and          structure of engineering ‘interview talk’The use of interviews as a means for gathering data in hopes of gaining insight into issues ofinterest (e.g. conceptual understanding, relevant contexts, personal epistemologies, etc.) iswidely utilized within engineering education research. Such research delve into whatengineering experts and novices say in hopes interpreting meanings, intention, andunderstanding. This research paper approaches the interview from a different perspective.Instead of examining what is being said, this research delves into how interview participantsspeak and relay information within the context of an interview. Drawing from a specificperspective in discourse analysis (i.e. conversation analysis), this study provides analysis andinterpretation regarding engineers’ recollection of experiences during ‘interview talk’ in relationto sequential and preference/dispreference organization. Using detailed transcripts and audiorecordings of clinical, semi-structured interviews with engineering practitioners and academicinstructors, the ways in which recollections of experience functioned within the structure of talk-in-interaction is examined in detail. Three patterns of sequence organization were displayed inthe analyzed transcripts: adjacency pair with sequence closing thirds, adjacency pair with post-completion musings, and adjacency pairs with non-minimal post expansions. Further, thelocation of recollection of experiences within these patterns of sequence organization appeared tobe related to whether the engineers attempted to mitigate their responses, delay giving an answer,or perform other actions that indicate preference or dispreference (as noted by CA researcherslike Schegloff and Sacks) through the ongoing conversation with an interviewer. These findingsnote a common structure of talk that occurs within a commonly encountered context inengineering education research. By providing insight into the structure of talk-in-interaction, thisstudy provides a means for analyzing interview data from a theoretical and methodologicalperspective emerging within engineering education research. Further, the findings from thisstudy provide awareness of another level of interpretation regarding interview data beyond whatis being said into understanding how interaction occurs between two individuals participating inclinical, semi-structured interviews.
AU  - Floraliza Bornilla Bornasal
AU  - Jessica Nina Lester
AU  - Shane A. Brown P.E.
CY  - Indianapolis, Indiana
DA  - 2014/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Recollecting Experience in Interviews:  The Structure and Organization of Engineering 'Interview Talk'
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/22964
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--22964
ER  -