AC 2008-150: FOSTERING ENGINEERING ETHICS PROBLEM SOLVINGTHROUGH COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY HYPERTEXT: AN APPLICATION OFMULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES, MAKING CONNECTIONS AND CRISSCROSSINGRose Marra, University of Missouri ROSE M. MARRA is an Associate Professor in the School of Information Science and Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE) and Assessing Women In Student Environments (AWISE) projects. Her research interests include gender equity issues, the epistemological development of college students, and promoting meaningful learning in web-based environments.Demei Shen, University of Missouri DEMEI SHEN is a doctoral
AC 2008-309: USING THE NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONALENGINEERS’ (NSPE) ETHICS EXAMINATION AS AN ASSESSMENT TOOL INTHE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason Durfee, Eastern Washington University Jason Durfee is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University, he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, computational fluid dynamics, professional ethics, and piano
succeed in classes. Combined, these circumstances lead to studentsengaging in academically dishonest behaviors. What is needed, then, is a shift toward a culturethat prioritizes integrity, teaching, and learning. At our university, we have begun to institute thischange through a comprehensive, education-based approach.Here we are outlining the educational preventative portion of our university’s approach. Thisapproach focuses on increasing the benefits of ethical behavior rather than increasing the cost ofunethical behavior, even though academic dishonesty still receives harsh consequences.Proactive approaches like this one are often more adaptable11 and involve the entire universitycommunity in uniting to form a culture of integrity, teaching
AC 2007-2158: THE ROLE OF INFORMATION WARFARE IN INFORMATIONASSURANCE EDUCATION: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVEAndrew Hoernecke, Iowa State UniversityThad Gillispie, Iowa State UniversityBenjamin Anderson, Iowa State UniversityThomas Daniels, Iowa State University Page 12.1462.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Role of Information Warfare in Information Assurance Education: A Legal and Ethical PerspectiveAbstractTypically, information assurance (IA) professionals utilize information warfare (IW) techniqueslearned in professional development courses when performing vulnerability and securityassessments. With cyber crime on the rise
the plight and the future of polar bears. IntroductionA new approach to engineering ethics, one based on the notion of a morally deep world,has been developed and reported.1 The morally deep world was first developed within thecontext of environmental ethics. A key element in its development in environmentalethics is the identification of an integral community. The present work makes the case forextending the identified integral community to include not only the environment but alsoother segments of society which have not been included in engineering ethics cases in thepast. Prior to examining a case study in which the morally deep code will be utilized, abrief review of the philosophical underpinnings of
presently know it enable humankind andall of creation to fulfill that dream? My response to that question is no, not as engineeringis practiced today at the beginning of the 21st century. While engineering is a professionwith a strong ethical dimension, and while we have explicitly stated in our various codesof conduct that we must hold paramount the public safety, there has been until veryrecently no reference to addressing two of the most important issues of our times –poverty and underdevelopment and environmental degradation. It is as if engineering as aprofession is somehow excused from such deliberations or that if we serve our employersfaithfully and professionally, it will somehow all work out in the end. I do not believe itwill somehow
Paper ID #6108Implementing a Campus-Wide RCR Training Requirement for Doctoral Stu-dentsDr. Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jason Borenstein is the director of Graduate Research Ethics Programs and co-director of the Center for Ethics and Technology at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His responsibilities include adminis- tering a Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) policy for all new doctoral students at Georgia Tech and instructing undergraduate and graduate courses on topics at the intersection of science, engineering, and ethics. Dr. Borenstein is also an assistant editor of the journal
Paper ID #7266Improving Undergraduate Engineering Ethics Through Application of Engi-neering Management Theory: An Empirical Study of a New Course’s ImpactDr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering-Engineering Management from University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S degrees from Montana State University in Industrial and Man- agement Engineering. He is an assistant professor in Industrial and Management Engineering at Montana State University where his primary research interests are engineering education, leadership development and
including prevalence[11, 12, 13, and 14]; motivations [15]; personal characteristics and attitudes of perpetrators [12,16, and 17]; detection [14]; deterrence [15, and 18] and the correlation between academicdishonesty and the students’ ethical behaviors going forward into their careers [19]. Many ofthese studies [11, 15, 16 and 17] have used surveys of students and/or faculty as the main sourceof data. Anyanwu [20] provides case studies that indicate that plagiarism may often be a result ofstudents’ failure to understand the rules of proper citation. Others concentrate on academicdishonesty in laboratory setting [13] or in test taking [11, 16, and 17] or consider a wide range offorms of academic dishonesty in the aggregate [15].Some studies [15
Paper ID #6367Collaboration between Private Sector and Academia: Are We CompromisingOur Engineering Programs?Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla earned his Ph.D. in Integrated Engineering from Ohio University. He is an associate professor of Applied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality Design, Biometric and Computer Security, Clean Technologies, Automation and Technology-Ethics. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and university
Paper ID #6623Educating Engineering Students about Ethics: Experiences at Brown Univer-sity and Trinity CollegeMr. David K. Ware, David Ware worked for 36 years as in-house counsel for United Technologies Corporation (UTC), serving as vice president and Counsel at the Pratt & Whitney Military Engines Division from 1993 to 2012. Dur- ing his tenure at UTC, he was responsible for a wide variety of business and corporate legal matters. His work included enforcement of the company’s Code of Ethics, and the integration of ethical considerations into business decision-making. He has lectured at Trinity College and Brown
Paper ID #5684Ancient Structural Failures and Modern Incarnations:Dr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technol- ogy, where she regularly teaches courses in rhetoric, business/technical writing, and ethics. She is also a part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She has been active in ASEE for more than 25 years, serving as a regular conference presenter and moderator. She was OIT’s campus representative for seventeen years and served in various section leadership
AC 2012-3416: ENGINEERING ETHICS, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: A SYNERGISTIC APPROACHTO IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNINGDr. Roger Painter P.E., Tennessee State University Page 25.544.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Engineering Ethics, Environmental Justice and Environmental Impact Analysis: A Synergistic Approach to Improving Student Learning Roger PainterAbstractEngineering ethics is being taught to Environmental Engineering students in context with thebroader aspects of environmental justice issues. The content regarding
AC 2012-4208: ETHICS EDUCATION AND RESOURCES: A SUMMARYOF ISSUES FACING THE FIELD AND RESOURCES TO ADDRESS THEMDr. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Computer Science Department and Integrated Engineering program at Min- nesota State University, Mankato. She is a 2011-12 AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow at the National Science Foundation.Dr. Taft H. Broome Jr., Howard University Taft H. Broome, Jr., is a professor of civil engineering at Howard University
AC 2012-3211: FRAMEWORK TO ADDRESS ETHICAL ISSUES IN MULTIPLE-AUTHORED AND MENTOR-SUPERVISED ENGINEERING PUBLICA-TIONSDr. Islam H. El-adaway, Mississippi State University Islam H. El-adaway is Assistant Professor, civil and environmental engineering, Mississippi State Univer- sity, 501 Hardy Road, 235C Walker Engineering Building, P.O Box 9546, Mississippi State, MS 39762. Email: eladaway@cee.msstate.edu.Dr. Marianne M. Jennings, Arizona State University Marianne M. Jennings is professor, legal and ethical studies, Department of Management, Arizona State University, Main Campus, P.O. Box 874006, Tempe, AZ 85287. Email: marianne.jennings@asu.edu
years now, teaching both undergraduate and postgraduate courses in English. K. S has published papers in intramural and extramural publications and presented papers at several conventions, conferences, and seminars.Mehmet Cetin, Temple University Mehmet Cetin is a doctorate candidate of civil engineering at Temple University. He has a master’s degree. His research interests are engineering education, civil engineering materials, and transportation engineering. Page 25.836.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Interrupted Case Method for Teaching Ethics in Transportation
AC 2012-3569: MICROETHICS AND MACROETHICS IN GRADUATEEDUCATION FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS: DEVELOPING ANDASSESSING INSTRUCTIONAL MODELSDr. Heather E. Canary, University of Utah Heather E. Canary (Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2007) is Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Utah. Her work appears in The International Encyclopedia of Com- munication and Communication and Organizational Knowledge: Contemporary Issues for Theory and Practice. She has published articles in the American Journal of Public Health, Communication Education, Health Communication, the Journal of Applied Communication Research, the Journal of Business Ethics, and Management Communication Quarterly, among
AC 2012-5106: ON INTEGRATING APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY RE-SPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES: A CASE STUDY FROMHAITIDr. William Joseph Frey, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez William Frey teaches business, computer, and engineering ethics at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. For several years, he directed the university’s Center for Ethics in the Professions. His interests, besides practical and professional ethics, include moral pedagogy and moral psychology. He is active in the So- ciety for Ethics Across the Curriculum and the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics and has presented and participated in workshops at ASEE since 2000. He is also a Co-investigator on the project Graduate Research and
AC 2010-1336: FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF THE SOCIETALAND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGYAlejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette ALEJANDRA J. MAGANA is Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Network for Computational Nanotechnology and the School of Engineering Education, at Purdue University West Lafayette. Alejandra's research interests center on how scientists and engineers reason with computing and computational thinking to understand complex phenomena. She is also interested in investigating how scientists and engineers perceive and experience the societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Based on her findings her goal is to identify and develop the
AC 2010-1506: INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES TO INTEGRATING ETHICS INTOTHE CURRICULUM AND STRATEGIES FOR OVERCOMING THEMKelley Walczak, University of Michigan Kelley Walczak is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student development, campus culture, learning styles, and qualitative methodology. She is currently a member of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, American Educational Research Association, and ACPA-College Student Educators International.Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Cynthia Finelli, Ph.D., is Director of the Center for Research and Learning North at U-M. She
constituencies the profession serves. AsBebeau notes, one’s response to an ethical problem partially depends upon how he or sheconceptualizes his or her role.2 For this reason, it is used extensively in the investigation ofprofessional integrity and it has become central to the study of professional ethics in fields suchas medicine, dentistry, law, and social work, and others. Within the last couple of decades, field-specific instruments for inventorying role orientation have been developed for the purpose ofassessing an individual's level of professional integrity as well as for appraising educationalprograms designed to teach professional ethics.For the past two decades there has been considerable scholarly disagreement concerning thenature of a
AC 2010-1787: TESTING FOR ETHICAL SENSITIVITY TO RESPONSIBLECONDUCT OF RESEARCH AMONG MULTI-NATIONAL STEM RESEARCHERSMichael Bowler, Michigan Technological UniversitySusie Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological UniversityTom Drummer, Michigan Technological UniversityJoseph Holles, Michigan Technological UniversityJoanna Schreiber, Michigan Technological UniversityTed Lockhart, Michigan Technological UniversityDebra Charlesworth, Michigan Technological UniversityJingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University Page 15.1200.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Testing for Ethical Sensitivity to Responsible Conduct of Research among Multi
Paper ID #10542How Engineering Students view Dilemmas of Macroethics: Links betweenDepth of Knowledge and Ethical LiteracyDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 1988 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, Atlanta, in 1989 and 1995, respectively. She received the M.Ed. from the University of Wash- ington in 2008. She is currently an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, and she was previously
AC 2011-874: INCORPORATING SOCIETAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES OFNANOTECHNOLOGY INTO AN INTEGRATED USER NETWORK RE-SULTS FROM THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUC-TURE NETWORKKatherine McComas, Cornell University Associate Professor, Department of Communication, Cornell University, and Societal and Ethical Issues Coordinator, National Nanotechnology Infrastructure NetworkNancy Healy, Georgia Institute of Technology Nancy Healy is the Education and Outreach Coordinator for the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN). NNIN is an NSF-funded user support network of 14 universities which also provides nano-education outreach activities and programs. NNIN provides informal and formal activities to a K-gray age
AC 2012-3445: CHANGING ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION: UN-DERSTANDING ILL-STRUCTURED PROBLEMS THROUGH ARGUMENTVISUALIZATION IN COLLABORATIVE LEARNINGProf. Michael H.G. Hoffmann, Georgia Institute as Technology Michael H.G. Hoffmann’s research focuses on the question of how creativity, cognitive change, and learn- ing can be stimulated by constructing diagrammatic representations, and by experimenting with those representations. This idea has first been developed by Charles S. Peirce in his concept of ”diagrammatic reasoning.” Since 2004, he developed ”Logical Argument Mapping (LAM),” a method and diagrammatic system of representation that is supposed to stimulate critical thinking. LAM has been implemented in the
Engineering Education, 2012 Comparing Engineering Student Use of Solution Manuals and Student/Faculty Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty Abstract Since 2002, student access to engineering textbook solution manuals has dramaticallyincreased due to the advent of their electronic availability.1, 2 Newfound access to electronicsolution manuals poses fresh ethical questions concerning when and how their use is considered“honest”. Research3 indicates that undergraduate engineering students agree that the instructor/institution holds the primary responsibility for defining and limiting acts of academic dishonesty,not the student. Anecdotal evidence1 suggests that faculty may perceive academic dishonesty inthe use of solution manuals
Challenges of the Developing World Through Service Learning in Ti Peligre, HaitiIntroductionEngineers from across the globe are seeking to develop an international code of ethics1 thatwould hold engineers accountable to a common set of professional ethical standards in aglobalized world2. Development of this global code hinges on unifying individual perspectivesinto a viable and cohesive document that incorporates standards of conduct that every“reasonable person” would agree upon1, 3, 4. These standards could, theoretically, be found in theprocess of consensus through interaction: over time, multinational interactions can lead to aglobal consensus on the principles that should form the basis for an international code of ethics5
: classical engineering, multidisciplinary engineering or engineering technology; 4-year and 2-year programs; not to mention the plethora of areas within these programs.Many departments try to fit the incoming student into their particular mold. They assume that if astudent is at their doorstep, their department or program can provide the best educationalenvironment for the student. Many times this works well, but often the student is placed in asuboptimal environment because the student’s unique characteristics and aspirations are notconsidered in creating the best possible educational program-student match. All of us ineducational institutions have an ethical obligation to help the student discover which program isbest for them.This paper offers a
Important than Course ContentAbstractIn many academic programs there are times when students fail in their moralresponsibilities and succumb to the easy way out: they cheat. The overwhelmingresponse to such events is assigning a failing grade and making the studentsrepeat the course, or in some cases, dismiss them. What may not happen isremediation of the moral issue leading to a more ethical person. Of course, whatwe want as faculty and engineers is a graduate who has exemplary ethics. Takingthe course over, getting a new grade may do this but are there other ways?This paper is about a real incident and a method of resolving the ethical/moralsituation in favor of the course content. It is about learning what is right bystressing what is wrong and