70 90 115 130 150 Licensed & Copyright 2019 Mitchell R. Hammer, Ph.D. 97 Figure 1: Intercultural Development Continuum and IDI ScoresQuantitative Data AnalysisIDI datasets of student that completed the HE minor were selected from a broader IDI dataset.Quantitative analysis was conducted to detect changes intercultural competence, specificallyevaluating if shifts from orientations within Monocultural Mindset to Intercultural Mindsetutilizing the Intercultural Development Inventory IDI scores that were generated via the
careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?,” Gend. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 369–386, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1080/09540250500145072.[8] R. Van Veelen, B. Derks, and M. D. Endedijk, “Double Trouble: How Being Outnumbered and Negatively Stereotyped Threatens Career Outcomes of Women in STEM,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 150, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150.[9] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for Undergraduate Engineering Students: Model of Co-Curricular Support,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 406–430, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20123.[10] D. Bilimoria and L. Xiangfen, “Effective practices to increase women’s participation, advancement and leadership in US
Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Nguyen is a Distinguished Professor at UCSD. His current research interests are video processing and machine learning algorithms with applications in health monitoring/diagnosis and 3D modeling. He received the IEEE Signal Processing Paper AwardProf. Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University; Florida State University Dr. Petru Andrei is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Florida A&M University and Florida Stat
Paper ID #36635Impact of lab experiences on student knowledge andconfidenceEileen Haase (Senior Lecturer) Eileen Haase is an Associate Teaching Professor and Associate Director of Undergraduate Studies in Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. She is also chair of the JHU Applied Biomedical Engineering Master's Program.Natsuki Furukawa I'm a PhD student at Johns Hopkins University majoring in Biomedical Engineering. I obtained my Bachelor's degree (2017) and Masters degree (2019) in pharmaceutical sciences at The University of Tokyo before coming to the US. I had the opportunity to be involved in a
the Design a Shoreline task.Development of Interactor Training MaterialsBeginning in August 2019, we developed a comprehensive set of interactor training materialsand plans to accompany the Design a Shoreline task. These materials supported about 10 hoursof interactor training. As with development of teacher materials, we followed the establishedmodel for developing interactor training materials from previous work done by the second authoron science tasks [40].Collectively, the interactor training materials are designed to prepare the interactor to deliverstandardized performances in response to varied participant approaches [42]. The trainingmaterials include documentation of task goals, teacher expectations, how the discussion fits intoa
extended into other domains, as it has been for general systemsthinking, another key element of system architecture.References:[1] E. Dano, “Augmented ARCADIA Capella based approach for the system architecture of engineered systems,” Presented to INCOSE Canada, Feb. 13, 2023, website: (https://incose- org.zoom.us/rec/play/qK0_yMxsAgwT5GZEEVwggAltKpDmQJk5NBM0AhCMzrE6- KOLNozMAIvUxqLVWkn5BKTY3iair6zxiZFx.mZjttg633nJRGoTs?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=liVYN xq9T3aSYjYJFK5FOg.1677558111981.d3e6fc0a4ca18c2e12583257a0238e66&_x_zm_rhtaid=581).[2] E. Dano. “System architecture, the missing piece of engineering education,” Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Section (MAS) ASEE Fall Conference, Philadelphia, PA., Sept. 2021.[3] R. Arnold
in the context of humanitarian engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 243–261, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20307.[3] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems Thinking Assessments: Approaches That Examine Engagement in Systems Thinking,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Aug. 30, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/systems-thinking-assessments-approaches- that-examine-engagement-in-systems-thinking[4] M. D. Bedillion, K. H. Muci-Kuchler, C. M. Birrenkott, M. Lovett, and L. O. Pottmeyer, “A Combined Online Learning / In-Class Activity Approach to Teach Systems Thinking and Systems Engineering Skills to
ASEE skills gap survey found that project management was one of the skills thatstudents felt least prepared for after completing their undergraduate degrees [3]. In a survey ofrecent engineering graduates, two-thirds did not realize how much of their work included projectmanagement [6]. Interestingly, many did not consider project management to be “realengineering”.In a survey of 41 undergraduate and graduate engineering students, 93% believe that goodproject management skills are very important for the engineering profession [7]. However, thosesame respondents rated the quality of their education in project management was not very high.This is not surprising as the only real opportunity for most students to use project management isin their
Paper ID #36520Culture and the development of a unique sub-system for theeducation of engineers for industry in the U.K.: A historicalstudy. Part 1. The culture.John Heywood (Professor Emeritus) John Heywood completed 60 years of membership with ASEE in June. His first paper to ERM was in 1973. He has some 190 authored and co-authored publications including 6 books on aspects of engineering education. His "Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction" received the best research publication award from the Division for the Professions of the American Educational research Association" . His
Engineering and the Department of Sociology for assessment of the Professional Formation of Engineers (PFE). Professor Sepahpour did his undergraduate studies at TCNJ and has advanced degrees from New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He is the recipient of two (2) Best Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Divisions of Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Experimentation and Laboratory Oriented Studies (DELOS). He has served as the Chair of the Divisions of ME and DELOS of the ASEE. Prof. Sepahpour is an active member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and ASEE and has published and presented extensively through these societies. © American Society
/dci-arrangement/ms-ets1-engineering-design (accessed April 8, 2021).[31] Allen D, Tanner K. Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 2005;4:262–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113.[32] Carlsen R. Effectiveness of Incorporating Inquiry-Based Learning into Pre-Laboratory Exercises. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences; 2017. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28206.[33] Brame CJ. Active Learning. Science Teaching Essentials, Elsevier; 2019, p. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814702-3.00004-4.[34] Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning
Annual Conference and Exposition. 1323. Neeley, K.A. (2019). Stuck on the verge or perpetually reinventing? What papers from the 2018 annual conference tell us about change and continuity in liberal education for engineers. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.24. Neeley, K.A. (2022). Engineering communication in ASEE 2000-2020: A historical approach to defining a collective enterprise. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.25. Neeley, K.A. & Luegenbiehl, H. (2008) Beyond inevitability: Emphasizing the role of intention and ethical responsibility in engineering. In Philosophy and design: From
. SAGE, October-December 2015, 1-13.(3) Trigwell, K.; Prosser, M. Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education 22, 1991, 251-266.(4) Knight, M.; Cooper, R. Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 2019, 65-92.(5) Banerjee, J. K. Mastery Learning for Undergraduates in Engineering. Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, July 2021. https://strategy.asee.org/37485.(6) Hjelmstad, K. D.; Baisley, A. A Novel Approach to Mastery-based Assessment in a Sophomore-level Mechanics Courses. Proceedings of
. Putting the Pieces Together: Linking Learning Outcomes, Assessment, and Curriculum.Center for Academic Excellence: Summer Institute on Integrative Learning. Fairfield University. 7[11] D. Belfadel, R. Munden, M. Arambulo, M. Zabinksi, and James Cavallo. Use of the ArduinoPlatform in Fundamentals of Engineering. ASEE: Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida.June 2019.[12] Daniel Raviv. Hands-on Activities for Innovative Problem Solving. Proceedings of the 2004American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.[13] M. Eodice, A.E. Geller, and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project. Logan, UT: Utah StateUniv. Press, 2017
U.S. Science and Engineering 2020,” Natl. Sci. Board Sci. Eng. Indic., 2020.[2] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[3] K. Hamrick, “National Science Foundation Statistics on Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science & Engineering,” Natl. Sci. Found., 2019.[4] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Singer, and J. Mathews, “Parent and Family Influence on First-year Engineering Major Choice,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf. Content Access Proc., 2020.[5] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2020.[6
R. Welch, “The ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Assessing 20 Years of Instructional Development,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 6(A), pp. 1758–1786, 2019.[2] A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, S. J. Ressler., N. Dennis, D. Larson, C. Considine, T. Nilsson, J. O’Brien, and T. Lenox, ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Tenth Anniversary, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22-25, 2008.[3] A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, S. J. Ressler, N. Dennis, D. Larson, C. Considine, T. Nilsson, R. J. O’Neill, J. O’Brien, and T. A. Lenox, Ten Years of ExCEEd: Making a Difference in the Profession, International Journal of Engineering Education. 25(1), pp. 141-154, 2010.[4] A. C. Estes
-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Her current research interests include professional development for K-12 science teachers; factors influencing student career interests; diversity, inclusion, and equity in STEM; and student identity development. She graduated from Florida International University with a Ph.D. in Physics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Topological Data Analysis in Social Science Research: Unpacking Decisions and Opportunities for a New MethodAbstractThis research paper describes a new statistical method for engineering education, Topological DataAnalysis (TDA), and considers the important decisions made during analysis and their impact onthe
Paper ID #28065Assessment Analysis Results of How Freshman Engineering Students Buildan Entrepreneurial Mindset through Freshman Engineering Discovery CoursesProf. Hyunjae Park, MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY Research Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Opus College of Engineering Marquette Uni- versity Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1881 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Assessment Analysis Results of How Freshman Engineering Students Build an Entrepreneurial Mindset through Freshman Engineering Discovery Courses Hyunjae
Paper ID #24850Senior Mechanical Systems Design Capstone Projects: Experiences and As-sessmentProf. Raghu Echempati P.E., Kettering University Professor Echempati is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, (Flint, Mich.). He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and SAE. He has won several academic and technical awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Senior Mechanical Systems Design Capstone Projects: Experiences and AssessmentAbstractOrganizing and completing an undergraduate senior design capstone project course that lastsonly ten to
consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creation of an Engineering Epistemic Frame for K-12 Students (Fundamental)AbstractIn implementation of K-12 engineering education standards, in addition to the professionaldevelopment teachers need to be trained to prepare students for future engineering careers,assessments must evolve to reflect the various aspects of engineering. A previous researchproject investigated documentation methods using a variety of media with rising high schooljuniors in a summer session of a college preparatory program [1]. That study revealed thatalthough students had design
Electronics and Communication Engineering from India.Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University of Michigan faculty, she
research focus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. She is currently a Member-at-Large for the Pre-college Division of ASEE. Dr. Carrico’s consulting company specializes in research evaluations and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State University, MBA from King University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s
Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. His research interests include mechatronics, dynamic systems, and control with applications to piezoelectric actuators, hysteresis, and perception. He serves as the faculty advisor for the LTU Baja SAE team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 From Industry to the Classroom: A Low-Cost Hardware-In-Loop Simulator for Classic Controls ExperimentsAbstractControl system design and validation can be a frustrating experience for many students. Thesestudents benefit from the inclusion of a laboratory component that provides a hands-onexperience to complement lecture. However, physical space and funding for educational labs arealways
developers of the Rose-Hulman Sophomore Engineering Curriculum, the Dynamics Concept Inventory, and he is a co-author of Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, by Beer, Johnston, Cornwell, and Self.Dr. Amir H Danesh-Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Danesh-Yazdi is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Good Strategies to Avoid Bad FBDsAbstractDrawing a good free-body diagram (FBD) is generally acknowledged by mechanics instructorsas a critical step in solving mechanics problems. In this paper we will summarize recommendedprocedures and mnemonics that have been
ofChange: Combining Social Inclusion in the Professional Development of Electrical andComputer Engineering Students,” Systemic Practice & Action Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 237–245, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11213-010-9183-3.[3] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022,” Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/[4] M. Cote and A. Branzan Albu, “Teaching socio-cultural impacts of technology in advancedtechnical courses: a case study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 5, pp.688–701, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1551329.[5
, 2019.[8] E. A. Adams and M. B. Burgoyne, "Integrating Humanitarian Engineering Design Projects to Increase Retention of Underrepresented Minority Students and to Achieve Interpersonal Skill- Related Learning Outcomes," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] K. C. Mittag and S. Taylor, "Activities for Students: As the Ball Rolls: A Quadratic Investigation Using Multiple Representations," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 62-68, 2009.[10] B. E. Peterson, P. Averbeck and L. Baker, "Sine curves and spaghetti," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 564-566, 1998.[11] S. A. Johnson and A. Thomas, "Exchange: Using Squishy Circut Technology in the Classroom," in 2011 ASEE Ammia
College, College ofEngineering Leadership Council, Provost’s office, and ASEE community) in an inclusivemanner. Feedback to implemented changes and plans for change were constantly sought. Thecoordinators have been kept abreast of the philosophical and pedagogical tensions that exist in anon-discipline-specific course, and have been able to make balanced, compromised decisions.As discussed above, the three-year redesign period was necessary and helpful in iterating on thecourse, as the coordinators were able to improve the course continuously in an agile andmanageable fashion. In addition to the redesign elements that were planned for each year, theteam identified additional opportunities for improvement through annual instructor meetings
disadvantage backgrounds and underrepresented populations. He is a board member of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium and is actively engaged in initiatives that promote diversity equity and inclusion in engineering education. He has held faculty research-internship positions with Air Force Research Laboratories, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Furthermore, he is a member of the Eta Kappa Nu, Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Dr. Barry J. Sullivan, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department Heads Assn Barry J. Sullivan is Director of Program Development for the Inclusive Engineering Consortium