Paper ID #19299Evolution of an Introductory Electrical Engineering and Programming CourseProf. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Pro- fessor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. In this role he has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, semiconductor device characterization, design and
that is embedded in an AerospaceEngineering curriculum. PBL focuses on writing assignments that are authentic, situationalassignments in response to real project demands rather than responding to hypotheticalsituations. To generate enthusiasm for the course, the topics chosen for each of the writingassignments were selected to be of personal and/or professional value to the students.Based on the results of student surveys, this paper documents the improved capability forstudents to present technical information and convey meaning more precisely by using a PBLapproach. This improved capability is the result of students being exposed to situational,professional and STEM-specific writing tasks. Both quantitative and qualitative results from acase
Paper ID #38244Developing an Interview Protocol to Elicit EngineeringStudents’ Divergent Thinking ExperiencesShannon M Clancy (PhD Candidate) Shannon M. Clancy (she/they) is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Their current research focuses on undergraduate engineering student experiences with divergent thinking and creativity as well as engineering culture and curriculum. This work is motivated by their
. --Nobel Laureate Herbert SimonComputing and communications technology can be integrated (Kozma and Johnston, 1991)into the instructional design to facilitate the teaching process. By Page 7.23.6 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition6 Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”using a set of guidelines, in the form of an instructional design/development model that assistswith the process of design, an effective learning environment can be constructed. Developerswill be required to answer questions similar
-26). Cambridge, UK : Pergamon.13. Wiggins G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Va. Page 7.1319.914. Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing. In D. H. Jonassen, Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 151-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Proceedings of the 2002 Americal Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
; FromTele-Laboratory to E-learning in Automation Curricula at the University of Pisa, IFAC World Congress2005, 20059: Euan Lindsay, Dikai Liu, Steve Murray and David Lowe; Remote Laboratories in EngineeringEducation: Trends in Students’ Perceptions, Proceedings of the 2007 AAEE Conference, 200710: Dimitris Karadimas and Kostas Efstathiou; An Integrated Educational Platform Implementing Real,Remote Lab-Experiments for Electrical Engineering Courses, Journal of Computers,2(2),200711: Jan Machotka, Zorica Nedic and Özdemir Gol; Collaborative Learning in the Remote LaboratoryNetLab, International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, 200712: David Lowe, Steve Murray, Euan Lindsay, Dikai Liu, and Chris Bright; Reflecting ProfessionalReality in Remote
interest are promoting student en- gagement via techniques such as hybrid teaching, flipped classroom and problem-based learning. Page 26.1026.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Introducing Software Specifications to an Undergraduate Software Engineering ProgramIntroductionThe complexities of developing clear and well-defined specifications and their important role inthe success of a software project are widely recognized. This recently led to increased attentionin corresponding courses in the Software Engineering curriculum. One of the challenges
can beeven more competitive in a global marketplace where technical skills are necessary but notsufficient for success. Some colleges and universities are leveraging their Industrial AdvisoryBoards to refine skills requirements for graduates and obtain feedback about areas forimprovement to better prepare students for industry8. Corporations will benefit by gainingtalented new hires who can ‘hit the ground running’ to rapidly adapt to the environment and addvalue from the start. Page 14.977.6ConclusionsUniversities and the technology industries that they support can partner to introduce specificbehaviors as an integral part of course content
graduating from the United States Air Force Academy(USAFA). In 2010 there were 28 graduates. In 2020 there were 15 ECE graduates. This declineis not necessarily unique to USAFA. The United States saw only 10% of the global science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) bachelor’s degrees in 2018 [1]. About half ofstudents who enter a STEM program do not graduate with a STEM degree; most of thesestudents drop out during their first or second year of college due to the increasing difficulty andcomplexity of STEM programs [2], [3], [4]. To motivate and engage students, undergraduateeducators must design a curriculum that integrates hands-on learning early in the program that isrelevant and can provide students a sense of ownership of their educations
the students engaged in aclassroom and to add value to the course. A typical Machine Design course truly integrates thecore concepts taught in Linear Algebra, Statics and Mechanics of Materials courses to a greatextent that no other course sequence exists in an undergraduate engineering curriculum, the onlyexception could be a Capstone Design course that usually requires many other pre-requisites inorder to give a truly multi-disciplinary design experience. Use of some of the math and/or CAEtools as a part of a machine design course is believed to help performing parametric studies andto evolve alternative designs. Due to its nature, students should be taught to appreciate open-endedness and ambiguity of design requirements that are inherent
as polytechnicinstitutions. Engineering has not, however, been broadly embraced by liberal arts institutions,often being seen as being overly career-focused and not sufficiently broad in its educationalapproach. Liberal arts institutions also tend to be much smaller in size, which can make itchallenging to furnish an engineering program with the specialized facilities and equipment itrequires. Furthermore, liberal arts institutions typically have comparatively larger core curricula,which can make it challenging to design a robust engineering curriculum that is completable infour years.A few small engineering colleges exist (e.g. Harvey Mudd, Rose-Hulman, and Olin College)whose enrollment ranges from a few hundred to a couple thousand
Michigan. Her educational research interests include conceptual understanding of electrical engineering concepts and assessing the impact of curriculum changes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Incorporating Giving Voice to Values (GVV) into an Engineering Ethics CourseAbstractThe Department of Engineering and Society instructors at the University of Virginia recentlydeveloped a new course on Engineering Ethics aimed at second- and third-year students. Unlikeprevious courses in the department, the mid-level course emphasizes micro-ethics and employsthe Giving Voice to Values (GVV) framework. The emphasis on micro-ethics is timely andappropriate
to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation Science Standards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Measuring Engineering Perceptions of Fifth Grade Minority Students with the Draw-an-Engineer-Test (DAET) (Work In Progress)IntroductionResearch continues to combat the national decline in STEM fields through motivationalstrategies that can be applied in teaching students 1,2,3,4. Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) underscore the importance of making engineering education available to all students,especially minorities in STEM 5. NGSS creates a holistic approach to understanding engineeringby blending scientific and
program, that has particularly been designed by the LimaTechnical College for employed technical professional.The presentation will focus on delivery of the Materials Management course, credit as well asnon-credit, which provides training in Material Resource Planning (MRP) to technical personnel.This hands-on course provides flexibility and convenience while incorporating a very importantlearning component – interactive media with an integrated assessment system.Specifically, the following will be presented: • Need analysis and development of the course material, • Principles of an interactive delivery system, • Program assessment, and • Future plans.It is the authors’ intent to justify the benefits and
and curriculum delivered is defined with the assistance of the industriesproviding the job market (taken within the context of what is available from the university).In their article the authors conclude by suggesting two areas where customers (employers)should be allowed to penetrate the educational system in order to facilitate integration. Theseareas are curriculum development and information sharing. Curriculum development isrepresented in the Figure 3 model as being influenced by the customer needs. Informationsharing is facilitated bi-directionally through the development of an active industry advisoryboard that works with the lead university and the partner community colleges
Paper ID #12044What does it take to deliver an active hands-on course?Dr. Steve C. Hsiung, Old Dominion University Steve Hsiung is a professor of electrical engineering technology at Old Dominion University. Prior to his current position, Dr. Hsiung had worked for Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Seagate Technology, Inc., and Lam Research Corp., all in Silicon Valley, CA. Dr. Hsiung also taught at Utah State University and California University of Pennsylvania. He earned his BS degree from National Kauhsiung Normal University in 1980, MS degrees from University of North Dakota in 1986 and Kansas State University in
Complement an Integrated Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, UK. August 2002, 2002.[13] Richardson, J.; Dantzler, J., "Effect of a freshman engineering program on retention and academic performance," in Frontiers in Education, 2002.[14] C. Pomalaza-Ráez and B. H. Groff, “Retention 101: Where robots go… students follow,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2003.[15] A. Saterbak, M. Embree and M. Oden, "Client-based projects in freshman design," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.[16] IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM
Engineering Education, 2012 Technological Literacy as an Element in the Structure, Assessment, and Evaluation of Engineering and Engineering Technology Degree ProgramsAbstractThe goal of teaching technological literacy is to foster greater technological literacy in society.Efforts in this area have been focused largely on developing technological literacy in studentswho are not majoring in engineering or engineering technology.Our majors need to be technologically literate as well. While meeting the specific educationalgoals of the major area, the program curriculum in engineering and engineering technologydegree programs also needs to help students develop general technological literacy. Theseconcepts
requirement, and is open to students of any major andacademic level. The objective of the course is to provide “theoretical and practical knowledge ofelectronic circuits, instruments and devices”. Hands-on experience in building and testingelectronic circuits is an integral part of the course. The class typically meets for three 50-minutesessions per week. This course starts with an introduction to electricity and ends withmicrocomputer architecture.The following sections present student background, course-level assessment approach,curriculum and laboratory methodology, textbook issues, student feedback, and DO’s andDON’Ts in offering such a course. Since a good number of students in this course are
Engineering Education, 2014 Viewing student engineering through the lens of "engineering moments":An interpretive case study of 7th grade students with language-based learning disabilities (Research-to-Practice, Engineering Across K-12 Curriculum)AbstractThough there is a growing consensus that engineering instruction should be incorporated intoUnited States K-12 classrooms,1,2,3,4 little research has focused on what student engineeringlooks like in these classroom setting. Topics for investigation include how students understandengineering tasks, which behaviors can be viewed as age-appropriate engineering, and howstudents may coordinate these behaviors to create a coherent engineering process. In
learner. To Rogers, experiential learning is equivalent topersonal change and growth and affirms that learning is facilitated when: (1) the studentparticipates completely in the learning process and has control over its nature and direction, (2) itis primarily based upon direct confrontation with practical, social, personal or research problems,and (3) self-evaluation is the principal method of assessing progress or success1. David Kolb(1939) described experiential learning as an integrative process of concrete experience, reflectiveobservation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. In summary, Experientiallearning theory defines learning as "the process whereby knowledge is created through thetransformation of experience
. The program has developed an academic innovation ecosystem in which S-STEMscholars will be embedded in order to benefit from the talents and knowledge of over 300underrepresented engineering peers. However, the NSF scholars will be the strategic focus of theBEATS’ academic and social integration programs that include specialized counseling, mentoring,and professional development but will not exist as a separate S-STEM cohort apart from peers. Tothat end, a collateral project objective is to further develop a more cohesive multiculturalcommunity in which S-STEM low income and “At Risk” scholars can gain a strong sense ofbelonging, self-efficacy, teamwork and collective sense of academic purpose.3) Thirdly, the project team seeks to gain
just recently published a co-edited volume on Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation. Page 13.195.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Investigation of Gaps in Design Process Learning: Is there a Missing Link between Breadth and Depth?AbstractTeaching ‘design’ is an integral part of undergraduate engineering preparation. Most four yearengineering programs include a first year course focused on the engineering design processwhere students are exposed to the wide range of issues that must be considered with regard to the‘real life’ activity of designing a product or a process
Antonio, Texas, 2012.[7] H. S. Saad, “Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing.” ASEE Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[8] F. Zhong and G. Hou, “An Integrated Curriculum for Technical Writing in Higher Education in China.” ASEE Conferences, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] T. Bridgeford and K. S. Amant, Academy-Industry Relationships and Partnerships, Taylor & Francis, 2017.[10] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Achieving the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025,” ASCE, Reston, VA, August 2009.[11] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education,” ASME, New York, NY, September 2012.[12] ABET, retrieved from https://www.abet.org.[13
integration at an early stage in the process. Integratingtechnical and non-technical subjects can be used to develop efficient integration, e.g., computer,industrial design, and marketing2; and also, for breaking down established approaches andprocesses to give a new outlook, e.g., the integration of the arts and STEM into STEAM.3 1 Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2023, American Society for Engineering EducationOthers have focused explicitly on art and engineering design through integrated studios toincrease creativity.4 Here, we approach interdisciplinary design
education and equity pedagogies. Her research interests include both formal and informal STEM education, with specialization in the integration of engineering and computer science into science education through preservice and inservice educator development.Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Enhancing teamwork skills through an interdisciplinary engineering service learning collaborationAbstractThe purpose of this research paper is to explore whether participation in an interdisciplinarycollaboration program partnering Preservice Teachers (PST) and Undergraduate EngineeringStudents (UES) results in an increase in teamwork
need to beintroduced. The terminology defined in Table 1 and assessment process delineated in Figure 1are being used in two ABET accredited programs, Agricultural and Biological Engineering(ABE) and Food Process Engineering (FPE). The two looped educational assessment processmirrors the two loops of EC2000 [1]. In the outer 3-5 year loop, the process allows constituentsto provide input to and feedback on each ABE program. The faculty integrates this informationinto the ABE mission and vision statements, educational objectives, program outcomes (PO),performance criteria (PC), and, ultimately, the curriculum. The inner loop of the process focuseson course level evaluations and analysis of student and graduate performance followed by an
and animation capabilities are integrated in an environments to make the learningas enjoyable and efficient as possible. A detailed description of the approach is presented in the nextSections. III. Course StructureWe envision the following arrangement for a graduate level engineering course. However, the structure canbe modified to fit it into a short course or a tutorial. A course is partitioned into forty semester like lessons. Page 5.99.2Similar to a one-hour classroom lecture, each lesson takes about an hour to go through. The lessons areplaced in a web site, which is specified in
group of CSUC ME majors exists. The persistence of 50% of fall first-timefreshmen in ME prior to the first offering of the experimental course in fall 1990 suggests thatthe course may have a positive effect on reducing attrition.Bibliography1. Wanous, J. P., Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, and Socialization of Newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1980).2. Roth, B, Faste, R., Nelson, D., Wilde, D. & Adams, J., Integration of Creativity into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum: An NSF/ASEE Faculty Professional Development Workshop. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University (1989).3. Petroski H., To Engineer Is Human (video recording). Chicago, IL: Films Inc (1987).4. 21st Century Jet (video recording). Seattle
focus of all programs arebased on the goal of increasing within graduating students, job specific skills and improvedindustry awareness, which will make the students better suited to fill the present workforce gapmore quickly upon hire. The pilot program was focused in three main areas: slightly enhancedcourses from the engineering technology curriculum, a company and industry specificminimester course and an internship program. The paper also describes a unique industry-university partnership example that includes industry-site course offerings to develop jobspecific skills that expand to the project management level workforce. In an industry centric andcompany specialized minimester course, the students stay at a state-of-the-art, remote