andlarge-scale engineering projects. Table 4 Modules and Contents of ACEE Curriculum Mathematical Modeling, Introduction to Engineering, Systems Science andEngineering Fundamentals Engineering, Principles of EngineeringEngineering Design Computer Graphics and Basic Data StructureEngineering Management Management, etc.Engineering Practice Wheeled Robot Technology, etc.3.1.2 A Professional Model for Engineering Education InnovationZhejiang Polytechnic Institute benefits from ZJU’s traditional strengths in multiple disciplines,engineering research and education, a well-developed framework for government-industry-universitycooperation, as well as a mature
literature, manyundergraduate and graduate courses are designed on these topics covering: 1) developing andsetting goals and objectives, 2) developing and implementing a healthy business model, 3)establishing growth strategies, 4) key features of a successful leader, sustaining business, andmarketing management, 5) establishing financial stability- approaches and strategies, 6)identifying channels to reach customers, 7) developing continuous and sustainable customerrelations, 8) developing strategies for business growth, 9) how to develop cash-flow, capitalinvestment needs, income-expense tables, cost-benefit analysis, and marketing strategies, 10)advancements in product development, analysis, and simulation, 11) advancements in
school districts, nonprofits, and corporations to expose youngsters toexciting math, science, and engineering design activities led by engineering undergraduates. Italso includes a residential summer engineering program for precollege students and theirundergraduate engineering student mentors. Once admitted to engineering, incoming collegestudents gain access to a system of academic Best Practices that includes first-year commoncohorts for math, science and engineering courses, collaborative learning workshops, academicsuccess tools, personal skills enhancement, formalized peer mentoring, and service learning.Returning and transfer students access supplemental collaborative learning workshops in supportof sophomore- and junior-level engineering
traits in recent collegegraduates (Hart Research Associates, 2007). There is no doubt that these expectations arecritical for STEM majors who are entering the ever-changing, high-tech workforce as well asthose pursuing academic careers. In the Engineer of 2020 (2004), the National Academy ofEngineers (NAE) highlighted the importance of education that prepares students for a rapidlychanging, global, technologically advanced, and innovative workplace. In order to be successfulin such an environment the NAE outlined the characteristics of the future engineer. Amongthese characteristics are strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity, agility, andflexibility.Creative work in most disciplines is more than having eccentric or unique
AC 2009-1372: A SURVEY OF MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDESTOWARD ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTSJed Lyons, University of South Carolina Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Faculty Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing laboratory experiments and other hands-on active learning experiences for pre-college, undergraduate and graduate students.Bethany Fralick, University of South Carolina Bethany Fralick is a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Carolina, conducting research on engineering education.Jennifer Kearn, University of South Carolina Jennifer
be used to assess students’ abilities.These traits can serve as criteria for the development of rubrics.Bibliography1. Nelson, S. "Impact of Technology on Individuals and Society": A critical thinking and lifelong learning class for engineering students. in 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2001. Reno, NV.2. ACNielsen, Employer Satisfaction with Graduate Skills. 2000, ACNielsen Research Services.3. National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 results summary. 2006, IUPUI Information Management and Institutional Research.4. Dewey, J., How We Think. 1910, Lexington, Mass: Heath.5. Siller, T.J., Sustainability and critical thinking in civil engineering curriculum. Journal of
design thinking. To clarify how the best answerscontains a conversational storytelling theme whether for an interview, discussing aresearch project, or teaching a new class, we begin by offering the methods of the coursethrough which planned prompts/questions are utilized as a tool to encourageconversational storytelling. Then the theory and practice of conversational storytelling inthe classroom setting contains an entrepreneurial parallel that is organized around adiscussion of four concerns. Finally, implications are considered.Method The mixed-methods of socio-cognitive psychology, design thinking, andprojective cues30 used in this work fulfill multiple purposes. Projective cues refer to thediagnostic imagination prompts directed at
\’.. ~%,, {~~~ 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.,,,yyy’,: .— - .....Improvement of Synthesis ‘Curriculum Activities. Presented by Stanford: Institute for Research on Learning,Meyers, Isabel Briggs, and Mary H. McCauley (1990) A guide to the development and Use of the Meyers- Briggs Type Indicator Consulting Psychologists Press, 3803 E Batshore Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Moore, Pamela L. et al. (1995) Do Freshman Design Texts Adequately Define the Engineering DesignProcess? ASEE Annual Conference Proceeding. pp. 164-170. Mullins, Carrie and Cynthia J. Atman. (1994) Freshmen Engineer’s Strategies for Solving Open-endedProblems [sic]. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 220-223. GLORIA ROGERS is
AC 2010-745: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF FACULTY BELIEFSRELATED TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONKirsten Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. She has received her Masters degree in Educational Psychology, with an emphasis in educational and psychological measurement, at Penn State and is a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Sarah E. Zappe, is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional
maylast over 40 years. It must provide a foundation for life-long learning and career development.3 What do Key Customers Require?Like practicing engineers, engineering educators also produce a product. From a design point ofview, it is necessary to clearly define our criteria in order to best achieve the optimal outcome.There is a need for some breadth of education, both technically and in the liberal arts. There isalso a need for some depth in one or more specific technical areas. The catch, of course, is thatstudents must be prepared for such a wide array of possible positions following graduation.The vast majority of engineering graduates enter the workforce directly, so programs shouldlogically be tailored to best meet this need. But even
academic unit focused on local and regional sustainability in support of WPI’s interdisciplinary degree requirement, the Interactive Qualifying Project. Rick also oversees WPI’s Global Perspective Program, a worldwide network of 35 Project Centers to which more than 700 students per year travel to address problems for local agencies and organizations under faculty supervision. Rick’s teaching and research interests include service and experiential learning, engineering design and appropriate technology, and internationalizing engineering education. He has developed and advised hundreds of student research projects in the Americas, Africa, Australia, Asia, and Europe. Rick has published over 55 peer-reviewed or
combat in war,drilling temperatures using a green lubricant, and wind speed.In the junior level courses, students take more courses in their selected specialty. Exercises andprojects in sustainability reinforce the multidisciplinary nature of engineering. The engineeringeconomics course examines the economics of recycling, a course on production planningdesigned a factory for fuel cells, a team of students did research on the design of a MaterialsRecycling Facility for our city, and a course on simulation has homework involving the design ofa faculty to reduce energy use. These projects and exercises remind students that success inengineering requires the use of many engineering disciplines and the integration of engineeringknowledge with
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing systems; computer-aided design methodology; and engineering education.Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in
Paper ID #8249Exploring Engineering in China in a Global and Societal ContextProf. Keith W Buffinton, Bucknell University Keith W. Buffinton is Dean of the College of Engineering and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tufts and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford. Following his graduate studies, he worked as a post-doctoral researcher in the Institute for Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland. From 2001 through 2004 he served as co-director of Bucknell’s Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management and
Theme Responses Examples Course materials 17 case studies, syllabus Training and best practices, input from professionals, experience 7 field experience Resources 4 financial (for projects), software Projects 4 identifying partners/locationsThe discussion on barriers uncovered several themes, as well as strategies to overcome thebarriers. The companion poll to this discussion is found in Table 11. Foremost among the barrierswere curricular constraints. Many participants felt that their curriculum does not allow much, orany, flexibility where a course on EA could be
’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311-336.Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education Monograph Series, 1(8).Wallace, J. E., & Haines, V. A. (2004). The benefits of mentoring for engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(4).Yoder, B. (2012). Going the distance in engineering education: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology, and computing students. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
combined increases of productivity and flexibilitywill improve the connectivity and quality of life for users. According to British BroadcastingCorporation News (BBC News, Wednesday, 2 March, 2005), the total revenue from full-trackmusic downloads using mobile phones9 will be almost $1.8 billion in 2009. Motorola's Razr V3phone was noted in 2005 for its sleek design and especially for its ability to download audio andvideo from wireless LAN. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Impact of Wireless Technologies on USA EconomyRecently, market research conducted by Telecommunications Industry
engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider the broader impacts and effects of their work beyond the technical. Her cur- rent research interests include investigating pedagogical interventions in the classroom to build technical, professional, and lifelong learning skills.Dr. Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines Linda A. Battalora is a Teaching Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines) and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow. She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola University New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and
, an M.S. in Sociology with graduate minors in Mathematics and Statistics from Iowa State University in 2015, and a Ph.D. in Sociology from Duke University in 2022.Alicia Nicki Washington, Ph.D., Duke University Dr. Nicki Washington is a professor of the practice of computer science and gender, sexuality, and femi- nist studies at Duke University and the author of Unapologetically Dope: Lessons for Black Women and Girls on Surviving and Thriving in the Tech Field. She is currently the director of the Cultural Compe- tence in Computing (3C) Fellows program and the NSF-funded Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for
skills needed for the practice of ECE. The course is focused on designing, debugging, and building walking robots using concepts from both electrical and mechanical engineering3. The entire course is centered on the laboratory and the construction of the robot. This includes using hand tools, soldering, using test equipment, building circuits on breadboards and on printed circuit boards, computer programming, etc. "They [the instructors] use the StiquitoTM, the robot building, as more of an engine to teach us other stuff, like basic circuitry, various equipment and how to use it, with basic computer programming ... all kinds of little things, making it well rounded."6. Develop a physical intuition for electrical and mechanical
the purposeof the project and the specific research and writing strategies one selects. Adams and colleagues,for example, examine “storytelling in engineering education” with the explicit goal of betterunderstanding the emergence of an “engineering education research community.” Their focus is,in other words, accounting for an observed convergence and possibly contributing further to it.They invited eight scholars, including three co-authors, to prepare “story poster” presentations atthe national Frontiers in Education conference (supported by the IEEE). The organizers askedpresenters to respond to a structured set of questions designed to evoke “insider knowledge”pertaining to “driving passions and goals, processes such as getting started
practice, project and cooperative work experience will bring this into focus andthe faculty see this as a skill that needs growth or attention. Exactly how to achieveprofessionalism in our classes is a provocative discussion, though team projects, settingstandards for work and responsibility for quality and timeliness are part of the written andunwritten syllabus, in hopes to impact exactly these skills.Problem solving is on all lists and continues to be deemed important. It is more important to tiethis to societal context and real world problems, looking at hands-on and service-learning to helppractice this in impactful ways.Creativity! This was not high on the faculty list as lacking, but very high for the engineer of2020 and high on the student
design and analysis of practical buffered crossbar packet switches, network security and forensics and wireless sensor networks. She was associated with Networking Research Laboratory at New Jersey Institute of Technology and MySYNC Laboratory at Stevens Institute of Technology for her postdoctoral research. She has served as a technical committee member in IEEE HPSR 2011, 2012, IEEE Sarnoff 2010 and 2011, and IEEE Greencom 2011 and ChinaCom 2008. She is a member of IEEE Com- munications Society, IEEE Women in Engineering, and American Society for Engineering Education. For further information: http://iris.nyit.edu/˜zdong02
his spare time, Dr. Kump works to combine his research with his love of electronic music performance, teaching machines the craft of songwriting. With extensive course and curriculum design experience, Dr. Kump is continuously committed to developing engineering programs that best prepare students for the ever-changing demands of industry leaders. His teaching interests include online and HyFlex education, as well as classroom flipping and education research-based tasks. He created Maritime College’s ENGR 396 Machine Learning course and has been recognized by Open SUNY for excellence in online teaching, pioneering the School of Engineering’s online course offerings.Van-Hai Bui Dr. Van-Hai Bui received his B.S
increase the teaching efficiency such that these topics arecovered and opens space to promote research and self-learning.The PBL environment designed for the linear programming course have some opportunity areasbut, in a general sense, the results shown that is close to impact all the participants in a positiveway, developing modeling skills, interactive learning and self-confidence to making decisionsusing the results provide for a mathematical model. Also, the course format allows to openopportunities to assess and improve soft skills such as communication skills, team work,leadership and citizenship.Even though this research found very useful the use of PBL environment, it is important toremark the time required to prepare, design and manage
and non-technical dimensions of engineering and transformingengineering education so that it more effectively prepares graduates for workplace success.Previous research suggested that interest in “Engineering and …” permeates ASEE and isconcentrated in but not limited to the division most closely associated with the topic. This paperdescribes a transferable method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods to identifyareas of convergence using papers published in the Leadership Development (LEAD) and theEngineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENT) as evidence. These areas of convergenceare: (1) program design and effectiveness, (2) individual capabilities (including traits andthinking tools), (3) teams and groups, and (4
challenged, discussed, and updated to ensure it remains relevantwith the current research and understanding of how people most effectively learn. However, it isimportant to note that the model does not exist as a list of best practices—instead, it is acollection of fundamental components of teaching and learning within which a variety ofpractices can be applied. Model of Teaching & Learning C&ME faculty manage a student-centered learning experience which includes: • Knowledgeable, approachable, and enthusiastic instructors who: • Provide structure for new knowledge • Clearly articulate learning objectives • Utilize a variety of learning activities
conclusions drawn. First, there is a need for increased efforts to advanceand expand quantitative research related to the role of HBCUs in graduating Black engineersincluding dual engineering programs with PWIs. Secondly, an analysis of research and practice-based funding allocations for engineering at HBCUs should be conducted.ConclusionBy highlighting model programs and processes, thoroughly examining challenges faced by MSIson their path to producing the diverse students needed in the STEM workforce, this reportprovided a thorough and in-depth synthesis of the current state of STEM at MSIs, anexamination that was not previously available. Given the need to invest more in understandingand researching STEM education across the pipeline to increase
. Additionally, they participate in a discussion series with readings relevant to the field,often on contentious topics (embryonic stem cell research, the role of design in biomedicalresearch, biomedical ethics, etc.). In other classes in the third year of study in our curriculum,students focus on concise, clear technical writing, as well as oral presentations. Other requiredcourses within our Engineering School emphasize the global, societal, and ethical impact ofengineering endeavors.The sections that follow describe the methods we have implemented in our BiomedicalEngineering Capstone Course sequence to address the need for additional professional skillsdevelopment in our undergraduates. The overarching aims of these methods are not necessarilyunique
studentparticipation, and the impacts those activities had on the traditional lecture sessions. 2. Introduction In the past two decades, the extensive research on teaching methods has provided an increasingamount of insight in the most effective active teaching and learning processes1,2. The outcomes ofdifferent studies vary, but a major consensus is that active learning works3: at worst, active learningdoesn’t harm students’ outcomes; at best, it doubles students’ retention4. Consequently, activelearning was incorporated in fields such as STEM,5,6 history and political sciences,7 and business8.Each field, however, focused on different active elements: business school courses are traditionallyknown as mostly case-study based, while engineering courses