Session 2793 An Effective Engineer Design and Teambuilding Experience for Non-Engineers Robert J. Rabb, John S. Klegka United States Military AcademyAbstractPart of the balanced core curriculum of the United States Military Academy (USMA) requiresengineering education for all graduates to promote their ability to be creative problem solvers.This core curriculum provides a fundamental understanding of physical systems for allgraduates. Although all graduates receive a B.S. degree in various disciplines, many will majorin a non-engineering area
skills and knowledge needed todesign and test the hypotheses and perform data collection and analysis of biologically-basedengineering problems are introduced. Technical communication skills (oral presentation andtechnical paper writing) are an integral part of the class. The emphasis of the course program isto deliver an understanding of the “process” of investigating a problem using the scientificmethod to biomedical engineers, and not focusing on the “correct” answer. The laboratory classprovides hands-on experience in proper laboratory use, experimental design, methodologies, andas well as building communication skills that are needed for careers in the various biomedicalengineering fields.IntroductionStarting a new biomedical engineering
enjoyment. This paper first presents a description of Project-Interactions and the methods used. Wethen continue into the results of the project, presenting the final projects that each of the childrenhave built. Here, we just provide an overview of the outcomes; we later discuss several of theprojects in greater detail. From this, we move into how this will drive our future research.Methods Project Interaction consisted of five, one-hour workshops for each of the groupsparticipating. There were four groups; two consisting of 10 children and two that consisted of 10sets of a child and a guardian. There were two separate head teachers, who had jointly worked ina pilot workshop and with similar curriculums. These two teachers were each
accreditation bodies as an integral part of engineering ethics. For example, the ABETcriterion pertaining directly to ethics evolved from a mere “understanding of professional andethical responsibility” in Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) to “an ability to recognize ethicaland professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, whichmust consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, andsocietal contexts” in the ABET 2019–2020 cycle. The “broad education necessary to understandthe impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context” in EC2000 was joined bythe economic and environmental contexts, in addition to “an ability to design […] to meetdesired needs within
2 others.In addition to the survey conducted by the Office for Summer Programs, the instructor alsosurveyed the camp attendees at the conclusion of the camp. This survey focused on studentsatisfaction with the curriculum, the SIK and the experiments, team presentations of the designprojects, and how much the camp increased their interest in studying computer, electrical, orsoftware engineering. Table 6 reports the number of responses in agreement with each categoryfrom the 15 students taking the survey (one student departed early before the survey wasadministered).The results of the student evaluations in Table 6 confirm the success of the camp as an outreachactivity design to stimulate student interest in STEM topics. In responding to the
Inc., the program has been an incubator/technology center engaging students and technology-based companies in project work thatprovides students employment with the challenges and excitement of real professional practice.Over 1500 internship positions have been offered to 575 students working on a range of design,prototyping, and testing projects for over 84 client companies.The challenges of educating the 21st century engineer call for innovative approaches in bothcurricular and co-curricular programs. The global economy and highly competitive workplace oftoday are creating needs for a solid technical education combined with professional practiceexperiences in the undergraduate curriculum. Many programs focusing on industrialpartnerships
, there is not an actual educational plan to integrate virtualtechniques into classroom teaching in order to improve the technical skills of the new upcomingworkforce15. The main goals of the cyber RP simulator are: 1) Motivate students in studyingmore internet based rapid manufacturing systems, 2) Strengthen and build up the technical,problem solving and communication skills of students in order to practice in the classroom, andapply it in the real working world.Problem IdentificationMany manufacturing industries are trying to virtually connect all its operations; an example of Page 23.361.6this is using E-manufacturing16. By E-manufacturing it
programs have freshman-level courses that are designed to introduce studentsto the engineering profession, teach problem-solving and design skills, and motivate the students.Engineering graphics is a subject that is also usually taught at the freshman level, sometimesintegrated with the introduction to engineering course, other times as a stand-alone course. Solidmodeling software has become widely used in education over the past decade, primarily inexisting engineering graphics courses. Because solid modeling is an integral part of the productdesign cycle, it can be used as a gateway to explore engineering design and to relate courseworkto real world applications. The use of solid modeling software at the freshman level also has thepotential for
Paper ID #25863Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the MiddleSchool Level: An Investigation of Gender DifferencesJeanna R. Wieselmann, University of Minnesota Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction and National Science Foun- dation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. She is interested in integrated STEM curriculum development and teacher professional de- velopment to support gender-equitable
regarding team-projects. This list is also replacedsemester.CLASS SUPPLIES: This page provides a list of the class supplies and tools a student musthave in his/her possession by the second week of the semester.SCHEDULE: This is the most important button listing the dates of each class. By clicking on aparticular date, students get the exact agenda for that day: topics to be covered, in-classassignments, group discussion subjects and any item due for submission.BIBLIOGRAPHY: This bibliography is provided to supplement a mandatory “ElectronicLibrary Search” exercise after a specialized lecture/demo by an experienced library staff.ASSIGNMENTS: This page describes the details and specifications of each assignment so thatstudents precisely know what to
Education, 37(2), 125-132.7. Andrews, T., & Patil, R. (2007). Information literacy for first-year students: An embedded curriculum approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 253-259.8. Berland, L., McKenna, W., & Peacock, S. B. (2012). Understanding Students' Perceptions on the Utility of Engineering Notebooks. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2).9. Berndt, A., & Paterson, C. (2010). Global engineering, humanitarian case studies, and pedagogies of transformation. In Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 2010 IEEE (pp. 1-19). IEEE.10. Brophy, S., Hodge, L., & Bransford, J. (2004, October). Work in progress
Paper ID #43892Positive Leadership: An Intentional Approach to Faculty Leadership DevelopmentDr. Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan Dr. Heidi Sherick has worked in higher education for 30 years. Currently, Heidi is the Director of Leadership Development in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She provides one-on-one coaching for faculty in new executive leadership roles as well as for newly promoted faculty (Assistant to Associate).Valerie N Johnson, University of MichiganMs. Heather Wagenschutz, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Positive
. Page 24.1251.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The use of metacognitive writing-to-learn prompts in an engineering statics class to improve student understanding and performanceIntroductionWriting-across-the-curriculum initiatives tend to focus on the idea of using writing as a means todeepen student understanding of concepts and rhetorical practices in the discipline.1, 2, 3 It iscommon practice in these programs to integrate as much writing as possible in differentdisciplinary contexts.4, 5 , 6 The supposition is that writing naturally enhances learning in most, ifnot all, learning spaces. This notion dates back to Janet Emig’s classic
Engineering in 2009 from the Imperial College of London and his doctoral degree in 2020 from the University of Georgia, College of Engineering.Jack Yang, New York University Tandon School of Engineering ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Interactive Platform for Team-based Learning Using Machine Learning ApproachAbstractThis complete evidence-based paper explores the feasibility of developing an interactiveplatform with chatbot feature to facilitate project-based learning. Teamwork pedagogy is widelyused in engineering courses, particularly in first year (cornerstone) and senior-year (capstone)design courses, but also across the curriculum. Faculty have several
design and implementation. The demonstrations planned for theseclasses would involve motion-control of gear trains, inverted pendulums and simple linkages. Thisrepresents an opportunity to introduce the students to the idea of electronic systems interactingwith mechanical systems.ExperimentsENGR 4461 & 4462 - Senior design I & II : A major goal of these courses is to develop a vehiclefor the realization of the complete integrated process of system conception, design, fabrication,and operation. This process requires an interdisciplinary approach involving aspects traditionallyhoused in each of the three areas of Electrical, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. Weintend to introduce year-long projects involving students from each of
2006-1484: SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTS AS PLATFORMS FOR ANUNDERGRADUATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COURSEPhillip Sanger, Western Carolina University PHILLIP A. SANGER Phillip Sanger is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Technology and serves as the Director of the Center for Integrated Technologies at Western Carolina University. He holds a B.A. in Physics from Saint Louis University and earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Wisconsin Madison. Technology development including MRI magnets and SiC power devices plus economic development has been his career foci
. By letting students determine forthemselves how processing conditions affect material behavior, Material World will enable themto use scientific inquiry as an integral part of the learning process. This paper describes theconcept, technological hurdles, and implementation plan for Material World within the contextof other state-of-the-art courseware being delivered on the Internet.2. INTRODUCTION2.1. Laboratory ExperiencesVirtually all U.S. degree programs in Mechanical Engineering include a course on EngineeringMaterials. These courses often include hands-on laboratory experiments (e.g., the University ofSouth Carolina’s EMCH 371). There is no substitute for the knowledge students can gain byphysically touching the materials and
initial funding was supplemented by the donation of fourAtlas Copco Model GA11 15-HP rotary screw air compressors, many filters and various aircompressor lubricants from a local air compressor company. Subsequently, four undergraduatestudents were employed to work on independent projects to develop this experimentation facility sothat measurements of air compressor performance and energy efficiency data could be obtained. Twoof these students used this experience to assist them in finding jobs after graduation, one of thestudents has chosen to remain working on the project as a graduate Research Assistant, and the fourthstudent continues to work as an undergraduate Project Assistant in this lab and in another researchlaboratory
mechanical,electrical, and computer systems. The curriculum focuses mainly on linear systems theory,feedback control, and mechatronics. An integral component of the Systems Engineeringcurriculum is its capstone design course. This course provides students with a comprehensivedesign experience bridging the gap between textbook problems and real life applications.Students work in teams to complete a semester-long design project. Each team must propose aproject, prepare schedules and reports of their activities, and design, build, and test a prototype.One of the many challenges facing students in this course is the selection of a project that ismeaningful and representative of their engineering discipline.For nearly a decade automotive manufacturers
firms. It is an essential and powerful analytical tool used to design products withever shorter development cycles. [2-4]. Today this tool is primarily taught at the graduateengineering level due to the fact that FE theory is very mathematics-intensive which in the pasthas made it more suitable for graduate engineering students who have a more rigorousmathematical education. This has changed most recently with the advent of high speedinexpensive computers and workstations and fast algorithms which simplify the FE software.Introducing new material into the already packed 4 year engineering programs poses challengesto most instructors. The need for integrating FE theory and application across the engineeringcurriculum has been established and
with a variety of audiences. 2. To expose students to a diverse set of future career opportunities available to STEM PhD holders.With an immersive training experience in mind, the SciComm program integrated a variety ofknowledge-based learning activities about communication, practice with communicating, andpractical experience communicating with various audiences. Program participants also engagedwith peers, practitioners, and professionals throughout the program. The program curriculum included three primary components: a) bi-weekly seminarmeetings, b) communication challenges, and c) mentorship by University alumnus/a. The threecomponents were designed to integrate hands-on learning and practical application to helpstudents
State University course “provides an overview of the salient math topics mostheavily used in the core sophomore-level engineering courses.”4 “The course will also provide anintroduction to the engineering analysis software Matlab, which is used throughout theengineering curriculum. While time constraints will preclude a formal treatment of Matlabduring lecture, application of the software will be integrated with each laboratory assignment.”4Having taught the WSU course, the author wasconcerned the new model might resemble the WSUcourse too closely. Since both courses have a goal ofincreasing student
develop web based 3-D visualization and animation toexplain the various environmental conscious concepts and elements. The objective of thisresearch paper was to showcase the energy saving elements used in an energy conscious single-family home design using 3D animation and virtual walkthrough. The model and animation canact as an excellent teaching tool to explain the various concepts integral to an energy consciousdesign, as the instructor would present the entire scheme in a virtual world so that the studentscan understand the concepts with more clarity and ease. The model would also help generateawareness among common people about energy conscious design as the web interface is easilyaccessible and user friendly
Session 2468 Active Engagement Pedagogy for an Introductory Solid Mechanics Course Jaspal S. Sandhu, Eberhard Bamberg, Jung-Wuk Hong, Mary C. Boyce Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Mechanical EngineeringAbstractAdvances in information technology (IT) are enabling universities to effectively integrate com-puters into the curriculum. An initiative to comprehensively transform the pedagogical format of2.001-Mechanics and Materials I, a sophomore-level Mechanical Engineering course at the Mas-sachusetts Institute of
to help with the transition from high school to college and provides academic support.Patrick O’Donnell American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Procedures and Outcomes of an Engineering Living-Learning CommunityAbstractAt a university serving around 21,000 undergraduate students, a first-year engineering programpartnered with the campus residence life to create an Engineering Living – Learning Community.The goal of this program is to allow students in a certain major to live and learn with their peers.Learning opportunities come from common curriculum and strategic programming, which isdeveloped in tandem by the
engineering education; and the faculty, staff, and studentsof the Department of Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia’sSchool of Engineering and Applied Science throughout the years for their dedication and efforts.A special thanks goes out to Steve Patek for an interesting and thought-provoking discussionregarding the project assignment algorithm.References1. Ceddia, J. and Sheard, J., “Evaluation of WIER – A Capstone Project Management Tool,” Proceedings ofthe International Conference on Computers in Education (2002), volume 1, pp. 777 – 781.2. Gupta, J.N.D. and Wachter, R.M., “A Capstone Course in the Information Systems Curriculum,”International Journal of Information Management, 18(6), December, 1998, pp
Paper ID #43871Work-in Progress: Aligning an Engineering Hands-On Learning Programto College Strategy: Reducing Implementation Barriers to Support Faculty,Students, and Their SuccessMs. Rachel Sharpe, University of Colorado Boulder Rachel Sharpe is a Senior Engineering Projects Consultant at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program at the University of Colorado Boulder. Rachel’s work as a senior engineer has allowed her to collaborate with faculty members across seven departments, contributing her expertise to the development and successful implementation of over thirty hands-on lab activities. Rachel has overseen the
, learning communities, online discussions, instructional design for online learning, and innovative technology for learning. She can be reached at htn126@psu.edu. Page 15.169.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Investigation of First Year Students’ Perceptions of Global AwarenessAbstractMost engineering educators recognize the importance of emphasizing the so-called “soft-skills”in the undergraduate curriculum in order for graduates to be competitive in the global workforce.Of increasing interest for many engineering programs is engaging students in
the ROBOLAB software. During the institute, a group of 28 K-12teachers spent 2 weeks at UTA learning how they could integrate Lego® Mindstorm products,which are controlled by the ROBOLAB software, into their classrooms. Each K-12 teacherreceived a Lego® Mindstorm kit and the ROBOLAB software. Approximately ½ of theteachers had previous experience using ROBOLAB in their classrooms. One goal of theinstitute is to provide a way to integrate technology into K-12 classrooms in a manner thatincorporates extensive active learning. The Lego Mindstorm framework provides an extensivehands-on environment for accomplishing this goal. The incorporation of hands-on, activelearning techniques like this have been shown in the past to provide a tremendously
applying much of thecourse content to calculate seepage, stress and the potential for liquefaction.As a discipline, geotechnical engineering is dynamic and deeply connected to the drama ofhuman fortunes and misfortunes. In didactic settings, however, mastering its concepts andtechniques can be experienced as complex, tedious, and disconnected from meaning. To supportstudents in achieving the intended learning outcomes, the instructors of this course have, overtime, come to incorporate both transmedia and IE elements, using an iterative process of design,testing, and adaptation to refine and optimize the curriculum and its components. Four types ofunderstanding — mythic, romantic, theoretic, and ironic — and their associated cognitive toolswere