method and what kinds of uses itwould have in engineering or industry more broadly. At the end of each week, there would be anexample problem for the students to solve. These would often be easy but aimed at getting thestudents to better understand the usefulness. See one example in Figure 1 below. Figure 1. Example of simple computational problem at the end of a one-hour lectureIn addition to the practice problems and the presentation in class, each student had to write areport that detailed either: (1) two different methods from the class used to solve real-worldproblems from their anticipated career trajectory or (2) a detailed report on one of the methodsand how it was used normally in their anticipated career trajectory (i.e. how did
of a new teaching career for a second author. Bychance, both landed right in the middle of an ABET visit and “W” (UWT writing coursedesignation) preparations and thus had the opportunity to contribute firsthand by developing andteaching two new required discipline-specific engineering ethics courses.Fortunately, our new colleagues had prepared well during their first year on board which greatlyfacilitated the ABET and “W” course designation preparations. Six new faculty had been hiredduring the previous year to begin the initial preparations to launch the two new programs. Five inME and one in CE [1]. The remainder would be hired in the subsequent year as the CE programwas staggered to start one year after the ME. After the inaugural
project. Results to assess this approach through surveyconducted by students will be presented.IntroductionPower electronics is an engineering discipline that deals with the conversion of electrical powerfrom one form to another1,2. Power electronics has become increasingly important nowadayswhere billions of kilo-watts of electric power are being re-processed every day to provide thekind of power needed by loads3. At Cal Poly, the growth in power electronics industry has beenobserved by the increasing number of power electronics companies who came and visited on-campus career fair. This was further accentuated by the growing interest among our electricalengineering students in power electronics. Since 1999, the power electronics courses at Cal
testing programare shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.At the end of the six week program, the group of students are required to present there researchfindings to parents, teachers, and friends. This program has been useful in recruiting studentsinto the engineering field. In addition, it has been recognized that students learn to work ingroups effectively.Student FeedbackThe program has been very effective in providing students with the opportunity to succeed incollege. In addition, the research projects performed by these students have encouraged many ofthem to pursue careers in Engineering. Success stories and student feed back are found below. “Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for
increased as we did more and more projects together.How did we become co-mentors? Among four mentor types (traditional mentor, step-ahead mentor, co-mentor, spouse mentor),10 our relationship was strengthened by the co-mentor aspect. Our academic experiences (2 to 34 years) and ranks (assistant to fullprofessor) provided traditional mentor and step-ahead mentor. Traditional mentor is“similar to a wise and capable elder” and our library director served in that capacity.Step-ahead mentor is “analogous to a protective older sibling who smoothes the path forthe protégé.” Our group consisted of full-, associate-, and assistant professors, whorepresented hierarchical layers of academic careers, and were natural step-ahead mentors.However, being an all
Factors that Inhibit or Enable Success of Capstone Design Teams LeRoy Alaways Department of Mechanical Engineering Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19087Engineering capstone is considered the final and crowning design course in the engineeringcurriculum. A typical design team is made up with three to five students and is multidisciplinaryin nature. These teams are assembled either by project choice where a member is assigned to aproject, or by group choice where a project is chosen by an existing self-forming group. A self-forming group is characteristically a group of friends that clumped together during theireducational career. No
. Agreeableness involvespositive interactions with people. Finally, openness to ideas allows for an individual to seek outcreative solutions to helping others and the inclusion of groups that are often overlooked.This study uses longitudinal interviews with engineering students and early-career engineers atthree timepoints over seven years to characterize the moral exemplars selected by participantsand, in turn, to use these moral exemplars as a tool for assessing the ethical perceptions of theinterviewees. This study is part of a series of ongoing longitudinal projects focused onengineering students’ and early-career professionals’ views of engineering ethics and socialresponsibility [13], [14].MethodsThis study is part of a longitudinal research
undergraduate programs provide a foundation of didactic education forstudents to prepare them for a variety of post-graduate career paths including medicine,biotechnology, research, and entrepreneurship. Senior design (also called “capstone”) coursesserve a crucial role in helping to prepare bioengineering students for many career options. Thesecourses also serve to directly address several ABET criteria for engineering programs such asgeneral Criterion 5d: “a culminating major engineering design experience”. Senior designcourses also provide a rich platform to deliver many other ABET program criteria includingfunctioning effectively in a collaborative team, conducting appropriate experimentation andanalysis, and applying new knowledge with appropriate
“My First Year Teaching In a College Of Engineering” By Martene Stanberry, Ph.D. The first year of teaching as a faculty member in a College of Engineering provided mewith many opportunities for professional growth. It served as a time to set a foundation on how Iwill teach, do research, and serve the university and community in which I am a part. During thistime it was important to meet the challenges and expectations of the Department of MathematicalSciences, the College of Engineering, and Tennessee State University (TSU) as well as achievethe career goals and aspirations I had set for myself. There are several important factors to consider when making the transition to
Use an exit survey, university wide alumni survey that allows to add CM specific questions, and an employer’s survey A comprehensive Capstone project provides assessment Use course assessment tools for evaluating program Use Building Thesis class and several other survey type measurements Use individual Capstone projects in which each student must demonstrate his/her proficiency in estimating, scheduling, safety, and project planning Have own internal tools for assessment Gather industry feedback and input at different venues, including career fair questionnaire and Capstone presentations to industry and collecting feedback Exit interview, alumni surveys; input from our
expect that our students will: • Become more interested in math and science • Learn how math and science concepts are used in various careers • Become familiar with a university campus • Share experiences with teachers and classmates upon returning from ACE Academy • Serve as leaders in their schools' math and science clubs and organizations. • Form positive connections with engineering students, faculty, and staff • Further their education after high school graduation • Consider working for ALCOA and other local companies in their futureProgram StructureStudents are nominated to the program by their math and science teachers, and mustexhibit interest and potential in those areas. The application process
“My First Year Teaching In a College Of Engineering” By Martene Stanberry, Ph.D. The first year of teaching as a faculty member in a College of Engineering provided mewith many opportunities for professional growth. It served as a time to set a foundation on how Iwill teach, do research, and serve the university and community in which I am a part. During thistime it was important to meet the challenges and expectations of the Department of MathematicalSciences, the College of Engineering, and Tennessee State University (TSU) as well as achievethe career goals and aspirations I had set for myself. There are several important factors to consider when making the transition to
Use an exit survey, university wide alumni survey that allows to add CM specific questions, and an employer’s survey A comprehensive Capstone project provides assessment Use course assessment tools for evaluating program Use Building Thesis class and several other survey type measurements Use individual Capstone projects in which each student must demonstrate his/her proficiency in estimating, scheduling, safety, and project planning Have own internal tools for assessment Gather industry feedback and input at different venues, including career fair questionnaire and Capstone presentations to industry and collecting feedback Exit interview, alumni surveys; input from our
academic disciplines. We aim to conduct studies tracking changes in students’ perceptions to AI Tool over their academic careers focusing on how early exposure to these technologies’ influences learning
Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the
local middle school children reinforce theirtechnical understanding and develop critical teaching and mentoring skills while seeing theimmediate impact of their knowledge [4]. Furthermore, service-learning experiences exposeengineering students to diverse perspectives and constraints, preparing them to address themultifaceted global challenges they will face throughout their careers, from sustainability andaccessibility to resource limitations and social equity. Engineering students are better equipped toquestion their assumptions, suspend judgements, and approach problems more openly. Thiscontextualized learning ultimately produces more well-rounded engineers who understand both thetechnical excellence and societal responsibility their
and universities, professional organizations, workforce developers,and private industry, we must understand the cultural, linguistic, educational, familial, andgender barriers women and minorities face.Barriers Women and Underrepresented Minorities Face in STEM in College and Careers Authors in [9] completed a systematic review of the literature to create an index ofbarriers that prevent women and minorities from seeking degrees and jobs in technology andengineering fields. The first barrier is a global issue that is related to gender bias [10]. Women allover the world are working in engineering and technical fields at a consistently low rate becauseengineering and technical jobs have been held primarily by men. Women must fight
impactful, such asteamwork to build belonging providing benefits, while focusing on weighty topics such as ethicsmight be viewed as detracting from fun and/or creativity.More broadly, the American Freshman study [19] found that among 95,505 first-time, full-timefreshmen in fall 2019 attending U.S. universities (all majors) the most commonly cited “veryimportant” reasons in deciding to go to college were being able to get a better job (83.5%) and tolearn about things that interest me (83.4%). In addition, the objectives most commonlyconsidered essential or very important were being very well off financially (84.3%) and helpingothers who are in difficulty (80.0%). Akosah Twumasi et al. [20] explored factors impactful inyouth career decision making
womenincluding a lack of role models, implicit biases discouraging participation, limited exposure toSTEM fields, and stereotype threat; however, the impact of introductory mathematics onstudents’ desire to pursue an undergraduate STEM degree remains an area of interest for manyeducators and researchers. The significance of mathematics in a student’s intellectual growth isimmense, as it enhances their analytical thinking, problem-solving proficiency, and logicalreasoning. Additionally, it creates a strong base for pursuing STEM fields, which can lead toprofitable career prospects. [23] showed that mathematics courses could be the turning point forwomen in deciding not to choose STEM careers, which supports the finding that “if womenpersisted in STEM at
”, “Diversity Efforts” and “Faculty Endowed Recognition” awards. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administration, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. Dr Benjamin's research agenda explores issues related to minoritized student experiences, doctoral-level program quality, and engineering education. She is constantly envisioning novel ways to promote educational equity and consistently applies an educational quality lens to her scholarship.Kristin L Schaefer (PhD Student) Kristin Luthringer Schaefer is a licensed professional engineer (PE) and a licensed secondary teacher (grades 6-12), both in Texas, as well as the owner of her own
their experiences in some levels of detail so thatwe get to see how the grant changed the life and career of some very deserving Students.2. RMSE program The importance of mechatronics as a relevant and vital area of expertise has become widelyacknowledged by both academia and industry, as was stated in [4]. In the same article, it waseven suggested that perhaps all mechanical engineers should be mechatronic engineers. Theauthor of another article with the attention-getting but perhaps overstated title “The end of theM.E.?” [5] has, in a similar vein, implied that the traditional Mechanical Engineering programneeds to be revitalized. That jobs based on just the use of these traditional skills are more likelyto be outsourced is a directly
explores the experiences of early-career Black engineers and engineering students engaged in leadership. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her M.S. in Human Systems Engineering from Arizona State University. Before starting her graduate studies, she worked in industry in operations as a manager. Katreena is committed to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusivity and hopes that her work will impact the culture and environment of the engineering education ecosystem. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com “Is This Good For Me?": Exploring the Experiences of Black
impact of thecultural backgrounds on early-career engineering faculty members’ perceptions andunderstanding of creativity and (2) the selection of creativity-fostering methods in instruction.The use of “(inter)national” within the title of this essay is intended to represent two ways ofcomparing and contrasting: (1) faculty that were born in the same continent or similar culture,which is expressed through emphasizing the prefix inter- within parentheses, as well as (2)faculty living and working in a country different from their country (or culture) ofupbringing, expressed through the term international. Our research questions include:⚫ How do early-career engineering faculty members’ perceptions of creativity vary across their
at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Professor Binowski has dedicated her career to expanding the reach of computing to women and other under-served groups and to engaging her students in industry practices and experiences which can make the world a better place.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. Dr. Brawner served as an Extension Services Consultant for NCWIT from the program’s inception in 2008 until
Paper ID #36843Board 363: Promoting the Dispositional Dimension of Competency inUndergraduate Computing ProgramsDr. Bonnie Kathleen MacKellar, St John’s University Bonnie MacKellar is an associate professor of computer science at St John’s University. Her research interests include semantic models in medical informatics, and software engineering education, including HFOSS, and the role of competencies in preparing students for careers in computing.Dr. Natalie Kiesler, DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education Natalie Kiesler completed her doctorate in Computer Science at Goethe University Frankfurt
amentored-career pathway experience that reflects their interests. We interviewed Rachel twice, inFall 2021 and again in Spring 2022. Our first interview in Fall 2021 was conducted at SPU,where we interviewed all 16 participants in the first cohort. The first interview protocol wassemi-structured and focused on the three different pathways offered by the program and theirperceptions of them: graduate school pathways/research, professional pathways/internships, andentrepreneurship pathways. Rachel was one of the 16 interview participants, and her interviewstood out to us because of a strong impression of lacking self-efficacy and being worried abouther future career pathway. The lead author was the primary interviewer and followed up withRachel and
Calgary report no link between their laboratories and coursecontent or future career development. Therefore the goal of this research endeavour is to identifyactions that can be taken to improve the students’ learning experience in undergraduateengineering laboratories.Critically reflective surveys were developed using Ash and Clayton’s Describe, Examine,Articulate Learning (DEAL) model and the revised Bloom’s taxonomy and released to currentengineering students in a third-year materials science course at the University of Calgary’sMechanical and Manufacturing Engineering program. The purpose of these surveys was toevaluate where students feel their laboratories do not connect to their classes or careers, and whatsteps can be taken to improve
mentors, and their motivations and/or persistence. The first part of her career was spent designing residential split system HVAC equipment and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) unitsfor Trane in Tyler, TX. Kristin has taught about design, engineering, and manufacturing to students of all ages in various places including to preschoolers via Schaefer Engineering’s STEM outreach, to senior mechanical engineering undergraduates at TAMU, to eighth graders in KatyISD at Beckendorff Junior High, and to freshmen mixed major undergraduates at UH. Kristin is also the mom of one smart teenage boy whose journey through learning differences and Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) has enabled her to connect with and support students with a broad spectrum
related to what was covered in class that day. The thirdquestion was consistent week-to-week and served as a general means to collect broad feedbackand insight from students. Both the second and third questions were short answer, meaning thatresponses were typically a sentence or two long. The data being used from these surveys comesfrom the second question of the exit surveys from six weeks of class wherein students wereasked to reflect on the semester project. The six specific questions can be found below: 1. Have you ever made a connection between the musical instrument project and your experiences with engineering and other engineering coursework? If so, what? (Week 6) 2. Would you consider an engineering career in the arts? Did you
Paper ID #38229Parental perspectives: Examining caregiver experiences andperceptions of growth and learning within an out-of-schoolelementary engineering programPeter N. Knox (Doctoral Candidate) Postdoctoral Fellow University of VermontKelli Paul Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Jungsun Kim (Research Scientist)Jing YangSawsan WerfelliAmber Simpson (Assistant Professor) Amber Simpson is a Assistant