B. The multidisciplinarity of EPICS can create challenges but we have developedassessment tools that can be used for all majors. The assessment are based on the ABETlanguage but with “engineering” replaced by “your discipline” and “technical” with“disciplinary”. This allows each student to read into his or her expertise and be evaluated againstthe criteria. Using terms like “professional preparation” allows the tools to be used acrossmajors effectively. In addition, Peer Evaluation and Feedback are also done for each student ineach team. They include self-evaluation and anonymous evaluations from peers that are used tosupplement the individual documentation.Project EvaluationsProject Evaluations are done for each team. The individual grade
couldn’t whip out my laptop during an exam. I painstakingly turned it on andstarted using it. In the Jimmy Carter days, I used reverse polish notation, and there wereno graphing calculators available for use in examinations.Now – my past experiences made me aware that there is definitely a way to store anumber in a calculator. Yet how to do this was not obvious to me in peering with myreaders down at the tiny notation on the calculator side-buttons. During an in-classexercise, hand-calculating a series of secant slopes, I realized how it would be useful tostore the outcome of X times “e” raised to the X, where X was 1.003476. As anexperienced “networker,” I have realized that simply “asking one who knows” is a fasterway of figuring out how to do
role of peer networks and student-led initiatives in promoting sustainabilitywithin engineering education. By leveraging student changemakers’ enthusiasm and innovativethinking, we can collectively work toward a more sustainable future in engineering educationand practice.Keywords: Sustainable Engineering, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), StudentChangemakersIntroduction and BackgroundOver recent years, numerous initiatives, funding opportunities, and research collaborations havebeen working to advance engineering education’s focus on a sustainable future. This focus onsustainability was initially catalyzed in 1987 by the United Nations Brundtland Report, whichcalled upon humanity to pursue sustainable development, and was furthered and
into effective online teaching strategies. She wishes for her contributions to enhance course interaction and ensure student perseverance in asynchronous engineering education for peers who rely on online learning options. In summer 2023, Youla was awarded a fellowship by The Office of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (UReCA) at the University of Oklahoma. This fellowship enabled her to complete a Systematic Literature Review on asynchronous online engineering education under the title ”Teaching Online Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review”. Her research has contributed to identifying emerging themes in six finalist scholarly papers on asynchronous online engineering education and has offered
Technologies Corporation.Amy Rigby, www.amywriting.com B.S., Telecommunication-News University of Florida Amy Rigby is a freelance writer and marketing consultant. She has worked for the University of Florida’s College of Engineering for four years and has been providing writing services for the Integrated Product and Process Design program for two years. She runs her own business in which she provides small businesses with copywriting and marketing services.Maureen Milch B.A., Theater Arts Rollins College M.A., Architecture University of Florida Maureen Milch is a consultant and previously served as the Program Assistant for the Integrated Prod- uct and Process Design Program for five years, a program that
material through lectures and readings, and then they are evaluatedindividually [5]. The traditional approach has been especially difficult to sustain in engineeringeducation, as students frequently struggle with complex concepts that require deepcomprehension [5]. Furthermore, conventional lectures may not sufficiently prepare students toeffectively utilize their knowledge and skills in practical situations [5]. The constraints of thisapproach have sparked a significant increase in enthusiasm for collaborative learning strategiesin engineering education, in part aiming to tackle these difficulties and shortcomings [6][7].Collaborative learning represents a pedagogical shift that encourages students to actively engagewith their peers, working
this study was obtained from a classroom fieldwork that took place fromAugust 2022 to February 2023. The study utilized a variety of methods to gather data. First,the instructors were asked to write reflective notes about their teaching experiences, whichwere used as autoethnographic accounts for analysis. Second, a research assistant attendedweekly instructor meetings and in-person classes at NYCU to observe the classroomdynamics between the instructors and the students. We are thus able to track how this courseevolved during the semester. Third, the research assistant conducted qualitative interviewswith the students after the semester ended to gain insight into their motivation for enrolling inthe course and their thoughts on the most
5 FS BME 674 Medical Imaging 3 S CIS 200 Programming Fundamentals 4 FS ECE 512 Linear Systems 3 FS ECE 540 Applied Scientific Computing for Engineers 3 FS ECE 772/3 Theory & Techniques of Bioinstrumentation Lecture/Lab 3 F Sub‐Total Credit Hours 36 COMMUNICATION CORE Credits Semester ENGL 100 Expository Writing 1
, ethnicity, ornationality, or from more narrowly focused occupational, peer-to-peer, and family roles [28]. Anengaging social climate that fosters positive interactions among peers and faculty can help [29].Students’ sense of belonging, in turn, influences their motivation and achievement in STEM[30]. Individuals who develop a strong sense of belonging in a particular group have awarenessof implicit and explicit expectations or cultural-historical “repertoires of practice” that influencesocial interactions, social roles and social norms within that group [31]. Making connectionswithin social networks and accruing different forms of “social capital” [32] valued by groupmembers is accomplished through positive social interactions with existing group
to stay in college if they connected both academically and socially tothe institution2. Alexander Astin’s research found that the quality and the quantity of studentsinteractions with peers and faculty were important factors in developing student engagement inthe life of the institution3.Lenning and Ebbers4 (1999) wrote that Alexander Astin and Vincent Tinto models showed theimportance of “community” learning and involvement among students and faculty. The “involvement” model (Astin) and the “student departure” model (Tinto) provide theoretical and conceptual reasons why student learning communities should impact college students positively, and much research supports both models. The models suggest that learning
co-lead designer of Hands- on Standards STEM in ActionTM —a set of learning modules for preK-5th grades - in use in 35 countries and selected as finalist for two international awards. Dr. Strobel received the 2018 Science Educator of the Year Award from the Academy of Science - St. Louis and the 2018 STEM Excellence Award from the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), and served as an Invited Member on the National Academy of Engineering Committee for Implementing Engineering in K-12. Dr. Strobel founded the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), has served on the board of IEEE Transactions in Education, and currently serves as Associate Editor for the Australasian
projects including aFIRST robot design/built with high school students, systems for remote villages, and anassistive technology device. In total 366 student-course projects were completed, rangingfrom extra credit to 100% of the course.Assessment tools included several college-wide surveys and interviews of faculty,students, and community partners and student reports and presentations. The MEundergraduate student surveys from spring 2006 totaled 89 and do not include first yearstudents because of the common courses. The average number of S-L courses taken was2.4. To statements that S-L helped increase interest in learning, increase commitment tothe community, improved writing and speaking skills, leadership ability, personal abilityto “make a
system (i.e., whereeveryone receives the same grade). For more details on the division of tasks as defined by thegrading rubrics, see Appendix A.Emphasis on Communication SkillsPreviously, students were required to complete short prelab assignments for each lab activitycontaining basic conceptual questions on the unit operation in question. Following the labactivity, students filled in a worksheet with the relevant data. For the demonstration-styleactivities, the students were given previously obtained data and required to write a reportanalyzing the data and the unit operation. All assessments were graded by graduate student TAs,but feedback was generally neither timely nor detailed. Writing skills were not assessed in anyformal or consistent
amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender
using a computer andcommunication infrastructure. Remote labs offer students a convenient opportunity to accessequipment 24 hours a day, seven days a week without geographic proximity restrictions. Thisapproach also promotes collaborations among peers and offers improved accessibility to studentswith disabilities [7]. Unlimited access to resources in the remote laboratory context could havefar reaching consequences for education and can present a paradigm that promotes student-centric environments and autonomy that contributes to motivation [8]. The benefit of remote 2experimentation is not limited to higher education but can extend to industry
complete selected writing prompts to aid the program directors with RET program assessment.The SDSM&T RET program is situated in Rapid City, the second largest city in South Dakota –a state with a total population just below 800,000. Due to the rural nature of the host state andinstitution, the RET program faced unique challenges. For example, the small size of SDSM&Tallowed for a RET program that spanned a variety of departments throughout campus, with noone department having a research agenda robust enough to serve all ten teachers. Distance wasanother factor. Traditionally about half of the teachers involved in the program had residencesbeyond a commutable distance; therefore housing accommodations were secured on
), Mississippi State, MS. He worked for the US Army Corp of Engineers Engineering Research and Development Center on the development, design, and implementation of groundwater treatment technologies. His research interests are the development of technologies for the remediation of contaminated media and the development of non-traditional feedstocks for producing biofuels. Dr. Hernandez has over 80 technical presentations at state and national conferences and over 15 peer reviewed publications. He is the principal investigator on projects funded by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and private industries.Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Hossein
- making/discussion, reflection, PBL, debatePrf-Sr-Priv Private, ProfIssues, Sr, ethics codes, workplace professionalism, NA 16 NA / 50 Lg, MS Civ69 EE25 leadership / peer evaluated discussion of contemporary issue, case study, reflection journalID Institution Course, Student Topics / Pedagogy Pre Post Pre/post cc Rank, Majors% n n response rates, %Risk-Elect Public
professionalism, NA 16 NA / 50 Lg, MS Civ69 EE25 leadership / peer evaluated discussion of contemporary issue, case study, reflection journalID Institution Course, Student Topics / Pedagogy Pre Post Pre/post cc Rank, Majors% n n response rates, %Risk-Elect Public, Cost/Risk tech risk, safety, uncertainty, whistleblowing, NA 8 NA / 89 Lg, R1 elective, So
STEM-based games; (C)A weekly seminar meeting with outside presentations of general interest, such as job-hunting,resume-writing, information about scholarships and fellowships, and the process to apply tograduate school; and (D) A Poster Session so that students present the engineering experiencesthey have gained. These four components are designed to provide students with the opportunityto develop and exhibit strong analytical skills, communication, high ethical standards, andprofessionalism through written and oral presentations and discussions with fellow students,industry experts, and faculty.In 2013, SOCHE again implemented an assessment tool in an effort to better understand theneeds of the 43 participating students. Of these students
. Demonstration type labs seem to haveevolved primarily to deal with increasing enrollment, which has gone up dramatically in recentyears. Unfortunately, it has been difficult for the infrastructure to keep up with the increase.Since a broken piece of equipment in the first of six lab sections makes it impossible to teach theremaining sections, the emphasis had shifted in many cases to protecting the equipment above allelse. In the Measurements and Analysis class, for example, the pressure experiment was by andlarge performed by the TA, with the students watching and writing down data. In anotherexample, the strain lab required several inconvenient work-arounds to allow students to adjustthe zero setting on a Wheatstone bridge. In real life this would be
.................................................................................................................................................................................. 240Machine Vision, PLCs and Motion Control for Manufacturing Engineering Undergraduate Students.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 247Research and Practice Group Methodology: A Case Study in Student Success ......................................... 255The Design and Construction of a Tiny House: Small Is Beautiful ................................................................. 268An Outline for a Practical Course in Computer-Aided Design and Analysis in Civil Engineering...... 283A Service-Learning Collaborative Project in a Mechanical Engineering Technical Writing Class ..... 289Increasing
’ perspective, hence there isa moral obligation concerning how they write. Reporting is the process where the authors hope tobring people together. Following Kvale's [39] guidelines, when the authors reported the analysisresult in the next section, they contextualized and interpreted the quotes while making themrelevant to the general writing. The authors rendered the conversations into a readable, writtentext format, and the maximum length of the interview quotes is no more than half a page. Onlythe most essential quotes are presented. ‘How to dialogically engage in reading and writing andmake the piece reader-ly?’ was a concern while they were writing up the piece. The goal is neverto generalize the stories. Everything we look at here is not
strive to be an advocate for gender equity.Dr. Lisa Borello, University of Dayton Dr. Lisa J. Borello serves as the Executive Director of the Women’s Center at the University of Dayton. In this role, Dr. Borello advances gender equity on campus via educational programming, research, and policy development; the Women’s Center, established in 2003, serves all faculty, staff and students. She also serves as Research Professor of Applied Sociology in the Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social Work at UD. Dr. Borello has spent more than 20 years working in higher education in diverse roles ranging from strategic communications to grant writing to managing a research lab. She conducts research on women’s
hardware implementations. For example, instead ofwriting code for the communication protocol for RGB LEDs, students could write the code as“leds.turn on(ind=3, color=color.red)”, which is much easier to understand.We recognize that teaching students how to learn is more important than teaching content, so wealso wrote a technical document for all the modules we developed and instructed them on how touse them to find the information they may need. We posted the documents for the modules on awebsite, so students are able to access these documents during and after the class. Experiment planningThere are a great variety of experiments that can be done with the proposed setting. However,due to the limited time and the level of students, we chose
construct and modifying sessions to fit the needs of different audiences. An additionalchallenge was that we were given widely varying amounts of time to present the sessions. Thismeant that it was very important to have clear learning objectives.As an example, the learning objectives for a session for K-8 teachers and a session for highschool counselors are compared in Table 1. To make the table readable, we do not write out thefull learning objective. We placed verbs from different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy [1] toindicate how the learning objectives differ for each audience, because different audiences requiredifferent depths of understanding. In addition, each topic is given a level of importance for theparticular audience, indicated by low
post-instructionfor the CAEN section, which was for Architectural and Civil Engineering majors. The very smallresponse counts and less pronounced changes in the ratings did not result in significantdifferences although increased understanding was reported for all prompts and the studentsindicated they saw real-world applications for the information they had learned.Ratings for all five of the learning-objective based statements for the EECS section, ElectricalEngineering and Computer Science, resulted in significant changes. These were for robot chassisconstruction and wiring, experience using a computer board, ability to write Python programs,and being motivated by competing with classmates. Like for the other sections, students reportedbeing
instructors and graduate engineering students. Students also takea weekly two-hour course in which the focus is on writing and oral presentations. This courseinstructs students on how to write reports and give oral presentations about their projects. Bothcourses use undergraduate course assistants, who have been through the 1st-year program, toassist the instructors. Engineering students choose from one of five engineering disciplines atBinghamton University, when they declare their major at the end of the fall semester.A two-question survey was given to the 1st-year engineering students in the first week of class inthe fall semester. Two multiple choice questions were asked: (1) currently, what engineeringmajor do you intend to declare in December
" ismotivated by a "strategic search for meaning" [11], [12].Approaches to learning are often manifested in the practice of learning strategies, which arebehaviors that students use for studying and learning course material, such as memorizing, re-writing course notes, planning and organizing materials, questioning self and others, andreflection [13]–[15].When students describe their approaches to learning and related strategies, they are answeringthese two questions [11]: What do I want to get out of this? (i.e., the product of study) How do I get there? (i.e., the process of studying)The former question is task-, motive-, and goal-oriented, while the process-focused questioninvolves choices of learning approaches and strategies in view of
spacesParticipants discussed experiencing exclusionary and harmful encounters and practices in STEMhigher education and entrepreneurial spaces. Dr. Wu noted, “As a woman, as a minority, there'salways so many different challenges that's there. It's always there, it’s always there.” One ofthese challenges was not having access to supportive interpersonal relationships in theiruniversities and academic departments. Dr. J remarked, “I came to [university] recognizing that no one's going to help you, Dr. J, so you'd better write the papers, and you'd better write the proposal. That's exactly what I did, I wrote the papers. I wrote the proposals. I was the PI. I was the first author on most of my papers. People were not saying, "Oh Dr. J