through experience, it is desirable that new college graduatesdisplay a reasonably high level of competency at engineering design. In fact, it is now arequirement of many new managers2. This is also reflected in the program accreditationrequirements of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)8 and theEngineering Council9, the two major international organizations that set accreditation criteriafor engineering programs.As a result, over the last twenty years, engineering departments have begun to introduceengineering design courses into their curriculum1,10. The main objective of these courses is tobridge the gap between theory and practice in order to allow students opportunities todevelop those skills that will be necessary
problems better than by listening to lectures. Because staticsand strength of materials deals with hypothetical loadings on diagrammatic representation ofstructural components, students have difficulty making the connection to design scenarios even ifthey are capable of solving assigned problems. By linking the studio with the structures class,students learn to design systems and components for a given set of parameters over which theyhave control. When the student owns the design, there is more interest in finding the solutionand there is a complete understanding of the problem. By designing the entire system, ratherthan a single component, the student understands the relationships between components.Second: “Reflection on learning develops
23.1271.6identified.4. ScaleThe visual concepts emphasized here are universal elements, variety, visual interest, scale.Project 4: Establish two rectangular compositions employing multiple shapes and multiplevalues. One should be primarily objective, the other primarily non-objective. Select the best one,refine and print your image at a scale at least twice as tall and twice as wide as the normalprinted page (15 X 20”). Crop, composite, and mount your finished product leaving a 1”boarder all the way around the image (17 X 22”).Engineering Connections: Trigonometric (angular) relationships, symmetry, balance,equilibrium, and boundary conditions. How are intrinsic properties such as density, temperatureor stiffness reflected? by shape, composition or value
– What makes a 3-D shape a 3-D shape?, Page 23.1375.75.3- Reflecting on your design, and 7.5 – Which 3-D figures roll the best?. Step 3.3 is designedto get students to articulate their understandings of 3-D objects in terms of geometric shapecharacteristics. Step 5.3 asks students to contemplate their proposed design for the communitycenter by prompting a discussion of shape nets and reflection on students’ designs. Step 7.5requires students to determine, from a list of 3-D shapes, which will roll best, and provide ajustification. These steps have been evaluated using the Knowledge Integration Framework2; asapplied to this work, this framework
a corporate environment. Therefore, accurately reflecting the true opinionsof apprentices to partner companies is crucial to ensuring these apprentices are set-up for longterm success at those companies, given the companies' investment into those students during theapprenticeship program.In the following paper, the authors will explore the preparation and application stages, as well asthe technical and social elements involved in apprenticeships within partner companies. Thepaper will also include apprentices' perspectives on each of these aspects.Apprenticeship Preparation and Application ProcessThe development of the apprenticeship program in partnership with the college has also involvedthe creation of a career development pipeline to
the following: Ability to determine the domain of differentiability of a function. Ability to determine the differentiability domain of a composition function. Ability to apply the chain rule correctly. Ability to determine the domain on which the chain rule is applied.APOS theory is briefly explained in [10] as follows: An action is a transformation of objects perceived as essentially external and as requiring, either explicitly or from memory, step-by-step instructions on how to perform the operation. When an action is repeated and the individual reflects upon it, the individual can make an internal mental construction called a process which the individual can think of as performing the same
iterativeprocess [42]. However, the vast majority of the design activities involved more of a trial anderror or tinkering approach to building the prototype.Table 3. NGSS Promoted in Engineering Interventions Category N NGSS Physical Science Core Ideas 24 NGSS Life Science Core Ideas 10 NGSS Earth & Space Science Core Ideas 8 NGSS Engineering Design Performance Expectations* 3-5 ETS1-1: Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes 33 specified
among engineering students isalso worth noting, as different types of strengths and supports are commonly associated withthese conditions.Fairly large numbers of engineering students self-identified as maybe neurodivergent, whichlikely reflects a lack of clarity on what conditions “count” as ND (using a medical model),variability in formal diagnosis, and/or lack of general familiarity with the term. The write-inresponses reflect this range of framing. Some of the conditions listed are not traditionallyconsidered forms of neurodivergence under a medical model (e.g., anxiety) but are moreclassically considered mental disorders or internalizing disorders (Andrews et al., 2008). Thehigher percentage of female compared to male students identifying
disclosed in the application. The final participation pool was from four different engineering departments, representedmultiple gender and sexual identities, disability statuses, and racial identities. Additionally, manyof the students in the program were international students. Exact identities and participationdemographic statistics have been withheld to protect participant anonymity.Program Facilitation The program itself was based on the success of other first year mentorship programs at theuniversity [11]. The mentorship program officially began in January of 2024. The mentors werefirst invited to attend a one-hour onboarding and mentorship training, in which they were providedwith program specifics, and we reflected on
]. With the increase in research publications, the focus on impact indicators has broadened,with citation counts remaining a widely accepted measure. Yet, they are not direct measures ofquality [7]. Despite controversies around these metrics, they continue to be used in academicdecision making. An additional metric that is being used more for evaluating scholarship are downloadcounts [8, 9]. Using downloads reflects a broader view of research impact, considering the actualusage and dissemination of scholarly works. While there is a correlation between downloadmetrics and citations [10], there are situations where this is not the case. For example, papers withfewer citations might be extensively downloaded and used by practitioners
Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the United International College (UIC) in Zhuhai China. She has trained with ASCE’s Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative, been exploring and applying evidence-based strategies for instruction, and is a proponent of Learning Assistants (LAs). Her scholarship of teaching and learning interests are in motivation and mindset, teamwork and collaboration, and learning through failure and reflection. Her bioengineering research interests and collaborations are in the areas of biomaterials, cellular microenvironments, and tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. She serves on leadership teams for the Whitaker Center of STEM Education and the
development. These business achievements are reflected in his academic activities through the designing of lectures and mobility programs with practical implementation perspectives. Ishizaki has been actively presenting and publishing his academic achievements at international conferences in the Asia Pacific region and North America such as APAIE, WERA, and NAFSA. He earned a Master of Business Administration majoring in international business at the University of Southern California in the United States of America, and a Bachelor in Law at Hitotsubashi University in Japan.Dr. Maria Anityasari, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology Maria Anityasari is the Director of ITS Global Engagement. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh
, enhanced teamwork and sustainedprofessional development.The professional identity of doctoral students is defined by their acknowledgment andrecognition of their major through rigorous study, research, and practical applicationof their academic disciplines. Furthermore, it reflects their eagerness to proactivelyadhere to professional and occupational norms, and to pursue this career as a personallifelong goal.[11,12] Identity in the field of engineering education also focuses on theoverall process of an individual's transformation from an "outsider" to a community inthe field of engineering, such as awareness and perception of the content ofspecialized knowledge in engineering, the significance of the profession, thecharacteristics of the
ConclusionsA. Student metacognitionMetacognition involves a person critically analyzing their own understanding. Within engineeringeducation, this reflective practice by the student enhances learning and problem solving. Thereare numerous classroom structures or techniques we can use to build these skills. ChatGPTprovides interesting ways for a student to engage with material, and may further a student’sunderstanding of their own learning processes, problem-solving strategies, and perhaps identifyknowledge gaps.The process of initially re-engaging with the test question without the assistance of AI, provided ameans to both reflect on their own work, as well as explore more traditional means of correctingor expanding their original code outside the
suffer from high attrition rates[2] [4] [5]. If factors that improve the chances of student success in this type of course could beidentified, they could be used to reduce attrition rates and improve educational outcomes in amore scalable fashion.The purpose of this research is to understand if identified student attributes and behaviors arerelated to higher levels of success in a free, online, voluntary, noncredit, introductory Pythonprogramming course. The course was developed by the authors and provided to over 900students in several cohorts, with the same general curriculum delivered online via GoogleClassroom over a period of 18 months. Students in these courses were evaluated using multiple-choice quizzes, participation in reflection
proved to be daunting, for both participants and organizers.For best possible participant availability the workshop was held during an academicbreak on consecutive days. However, the short calendar span was not conducive toin-depth reflection or detailed course planning, and there was definitely no time forimplementation and testing. Although enthusiasm was high after the workshop, thebeginning of the spring academic semester quickly pushed planned activities to theback burner, and momentum fizzled. Course assignment changes and changes infaculty positions further complicated implementation of the course changes plannedduring the workshop. In addition, the planning and presentation of the workshop contentwas up to the organizers, and this
methods to diverse learning needs, as reflected in varying ratiosof correctness in pre-/post-lecture tests [15]. Collectively, these studies underscore the importanceof recognizing each class as a unique entity, catering to the diverse learning styles and backgroundsof students.In this research, we aim to broaden the application of pre-post lecture assessments, elevating themfrom feedback tools to more refined instruments that measure learning at different cognitive levels,as defined by Bloom's Taxonomy (Figure 1b). Our strategy involves aligning key lecture learningoutcomes with pre/post assessment questions, crafted to probe varying cognitive depths. Thismethod will provide instructors with a more nuanced understanding of student
collection of additional information,consideration of external constraints, and thoughtful reflection on the solution process. Theseskills are recognized as crucial for future engineers in their daily professional lives. However,there are concerns from employers and researchers that undergraduate students may not beadequately prepared to address such problems upon graduation [1‒3]. To make things worse,courses in thermofluids require a robust understanding of mathematics and extensively utilizephysics to explain physical systems. Heat transfer, in particular, introduces complex subjects thatmay appear even more difficult for students studying engineering technology.There have been some attempts at addressing the students’ problem-solving abilities
duties or roles, where teaching faculty alternate in delivering classes or dividethe course credit load based on specific weeks or assignments [4]. This method does notmaximize the potential of coteaching, which should enable instructors to interact with each otherin class be used to leveraging the collective knowledge and expertise of multiple teachers withinthe same classroom to enhance student learning outcomes [1], [5]. This collaborative teachingmodel fosters a dynamic learning environment, addresses the varied learning needs of students,promotes active engagement, and provides differentiated instruction. Furthermore, co-teachingencourages shared responsibility, reflection, and professional growth among teachers, ultimatelyenhancing the
was a teachingphilosophy that students learn by doing and that should apply to project management. Bydefault, project management is an active learning exercise that involves a diverse group ofindividuals. The literature in project management education supports this underlying personalbelief. “Preparing students for professional practice is enhanced by the use of ‘authentic’ tasksand assessments that reflect the practices and outputs encountered in the profession” [1]. Inorder to be authentic, it needs to be a real executable project. The literature also speaks about thedisappointment with practitioners on the skills of students and that has been confirmed withadvisory boards in our college.In addition, students who took the previous version
, our research delves into the realm of student-teacher dynamicsthrough the lens of learning styles, as evaluated by the Silverman-Felder Index of Learning Styles(ILS). This study aims to contribute to the discourse within engineering education by examining thecorrelation between the alignment of student and instructor learning styles and its impact onstudent academic performance. The Silverman-Felder ILS, a well-established tool, delineateslearning styles across four dimensions: active/reflective, verbal/visual, sensing/intuitive, andsequential/global. We operationalize alignment as the proximity in four-dimensional space betweena student's ILS score and that of their instructor. Initial findings based on a cohort of 300 Cadets atthe United
. (d) Alumni/ae support, especially in bringing Clinic projects to the College, has multiplied.(3) The Clinic has been absorbed into the mainstream of the curriculum. Design is not merely acapstone activity provided too late to motivate students to learn engineering principles. The designstem occupies curricular space in all of the undergraduate years. [See End Note 4 for description.](4) Peer teaching has become a powerful force in educating of engineering students at HMC.(5) The Clinic has proven a successful tool for continuing education of faculty members.(6) Curricular flexibility results; projects mirror current client interests: 15% of the upper-levelcourses immediately reflect latest technological interests of industry and of academia
assess the students’ work.Curriculum development at each school will proceed gradually, collaboratively, and in aprincipled manner that is free of peripheral constraints and features ongoing cycles ofassessment, reflection, and revision. The curricula related to the Initiative will be developed andrevised in relation to relevant California and national content standards. In the long-term, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2007, American Society for Engineering Educationcurricula will be developed at the middle- and high-school levels, based on implementationexperience at the elementary level.A long-term goal of the Initiative is to develop a
Overseas InstitutionsMany well-established U.S. specialized/professional accreditation agencies have in recent yearsbeen offering international accreditation evaluations, and status, as appropriate: engineering,business, and soon teacher education. In each case, the move to offering full accreditation abroadhas reflected an evolutionary process on the part of the accrediting agency, often starting with aMemoranda of Understanding (MOU), then some sort of "substantial equivalency", then fullaccreditation. There are many issues involved in evaluating foreign institutions utilizing U.S.standards. This paper draws upon the experience of the author in quality assurance andaccreditation in the U.S. and abroad to explore such issues by examining
factors in the formation of the program, to explainthe role of the interdisciplinary connection with professional counseling in the program, and tobriefly depict the results of the first year. We conclude by reflecting on the student experiencesof the first year and considering the generalization of this program across other universities.Structure of AnsanmI. Overall DescriptionAs previously introduced, Ansanm is a partnership among Harding‘s engineering andprofessional counseling department, as well as the Peltan Christian Primary School. Eachpartner has a clear role in the relationship to the other partners, and the learning grows out ofthese relationships. This paper primarily portrays Ansanm through the lenses of the engineeringeducation
requires significant timeand effort by faculty leaders both in the planning stage and during the time abroad. During thetrip segment of the course, typical days began at 6:30 or 7:00 a.m. with group breakfast andpreview of the day’s activities, aggressive daily agendas that often included travel, gatheringpoints throughout the day to review and reflect on observations as a group and between studentsand faculty individually, and group activities ending with dinner and discussion between 8:00and 10:00 p.m. In addition, the faculty team believes that staying in small hotels or hostels andusing public transportation allows students the greatest opportunity to experience local cultureand interact with people in the target cultures. The team was able to
instruction. The presenters have experience of implementing theseweb-based tools in instructional technology and engineering courses at Arkansas TechUniversity and will cover case studies highlighting implementation of flipped instruction incollege level courses. An important element of implementing flipped instruction in classrooms is to assess itsimpact on student learning outcomes and their self-efficacy. The self-efficacy construct is usedas a measure of students' self-judgment that reflects what students believe they can do with theskills they possess. The presenters will introduce the audience to approaches that can help themdevelop instruments to measure self-efficacy of students in their flipped courses and compare theresults with lecture
that might alleviate some of the problems within a design without changing theoverall student concept. We also found that even though we attempted to avoid video games aspart of the instructional material, a majority of the final projects had a game-type theme.OutcomesPre-camp and post-camp surveys were collected from students to investigate changes in interestand self-confidence with respect to computer programming. Feedback from pre-service teacherswas also collected through reflective discussions. Response from participants (both students andteachers) was positive. Student confidence in programming ability, enjoyment of programming,and interest in continuing to program increased. Pre-service teachers discussed ideas for incorpo-rating more
evaluation of criterion 3i.Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2Students can also be required in their courses to perform case studies on industrial products oraccidents, and evaluated on their reports, forcing them to research the project beyond theconfines of the classroom. Alternatively, students can be required to learn rudimentary use ofunfamiliar computer programs to solve problems outside of class, and evaluated on theseassignments to reflect their ability to learn the use of the program on their own.As an example, one of the authors (MD) gave an assignment in a Heat Transfer
of life-long learning.StudyStudents used for the survey were from two different classes, 63 from EE 301 (junior and seniorlevel core electrical engineering course for non-EE engineering majors) and 161 from IT 105(freshman level introductory Information Technology Course). The students who took thesurvey received scores broken into four categories, see (1), ranging from -11 to 11 each foractive/reflective learners, sensory/intuitive, visual/verbal, and sequential/global where -11 meanshighest to the left category and 11 means highest to the right category. The absolute value of thedifference between each of their scores versus their respective instructor’s score in the samecategory was then taken. Those four differences were then added. The