Problem Based Learning Principles for projects with “soft” evaluation. 1 M. S. Stachowicz, 2L. B. Kofoed Laboratory for Intelligent Systems, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, USA, The Warsaw School of Computer Science, Warsaw, Poland mstachow@d.umn.edu1 Department of Architecture, Design & Media Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark, lk@create.aau.dk2IntroductionInspired by a design workshop course offered at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department(ECE) at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD) [1] we could see
affiliates, consultants, or business associates, unless: i. the information is or becomes publicly known through lawful means; ii. the information was part of my general knowledge prior to the COURSE; or iii.the information is disclosed to me without restriction by a third party who rightfully possesses the information and did not learn of it from the SPONSOR. This definition includes, but is not limited to, (A) schematics, techniques, development tools, processes, computer printouts, computer programs, design drawings and manuals, electronic codes, formulas and improvements; (B) information about costs, profits, markets, sales, customers, and
Paper ID #35243System Architecture, the Missing Piece of Engineering EducationDr. Eric B. Dano, BAE Systems Dr. Eric Dano received a B.S. in Physics from the U.S. Naval Academy, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engi- neering from the University of Michigan, where his research focused on radar design and the Experimental Study of the Microwave Radar Backscatter from Transient Deep-Water Breaking Waves. He has worked at Sanders Associates/BAE Systems for over 23 years, where he has built on his experience as a former USMC Electronic Countermeasures Officer to architect and design a myriad of military systems. Eric currently
A COST-EFFECTIVE ANTENNA POSITIONING SYSTEM FOR MODERN RADIO-FREQUENCY (RF) AND MICROWAVE ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS J. T. ANDERSON, M. R. WEISZ, J. A. MEYER, D. L. HANSON, B. D. BRAATEN AND D. A. ROGERS Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo, ND Contact person email: benbraaten@ieee.orgINTRODUCTIONRecently, the microwave test equipment in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department(ECE) at North Dakota State University (NDSU) was significantly upgraded. A new AgilentE5071C 8.5 GHz ENA series network analyzer and an anechoic
Paper ID #35146Engineering Leadership: Transitioning from ”Soft Skill” to Hard DataDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Dis- tribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc. His education includes a BS in Engineering from the University of New Orleans, an M.Engr. in Electrical Engineering and a D.Engr. from Texas A&M University, and an M.A. in Organizational Leadership from Gonzaga University. Dr
Grades A B C, D, F, W Total Fall 2020-Section 1 8 2 3 13 Fall 2019 10 7 6 23 p-value = 0.51, the results are not statistically differentSection-2 had more than half of class total capacity. So, this section was taught in a hybrid modewith theory lectures taught as synchronous online sessions and lab classes were conducted in-person with half the class present at a time. Online lectures were conducted on Zoom platform.Pre-pandemic students used to perform laboratory experiments in groups of two. However,during pandemic students performed experiments
others on campus, theuniversity implemented an academic calendar that split the Fall 2020 semester into two blocks (abouteight weeks in length), with courses finished in these units of time. The intention of the blockscheduling was to, (a) reduce the level of traffic on campus as only half of the courses were offered ineach block; and (b) if one a block was able to finish with face-to-face instruction without beinginterrupted by a return to fully online instruction, the quality of that part of schoolwork would beprotected. While this consideration was well-intended, it required teaching plans to be completelyreworked, with the worry that instruction would be rushed without allowing students sufficient time todigest and absorb the content.Even
model accuracy. Additionally, using a larger sample size and a morediverse population, further evaluation can broaden the application of these results. The presentresults should be considered exploratory and interpreted within the context of study limitations.A manuscript is in development with more detailed information related to the theoreticalunderpinnings of the variables, suggestions for the specific use of the information, and furtherdetail into the methods used. Details are limited in this format and this paper is meant tointroduce a larger project to this audience. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1900348.References[1] B. Christe & C. Feldhaus., “Exploring Engineering
EducationalPsychology, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 817–835, Nov. 2009[2] D. L. Shea, D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow, “Importance of assessing spatial ability inintellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study.” Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 604–614, 2001[3] S. A. Sorby, “Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for EngineeringStudents,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–480, Feb. 2009[4] H. Wauck, B. S. Woodard, Z. Xiao, T. W. Li, and B. P. Bailey, “A Data-Driven,Player-Centric Approach to Evaluating Spatial Skill Training Games,” in Proceedings of theAnnual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Virtual Event Canada, Nov. 2020,pp. 349–361[5] Z. Xiao et al., “A
the29 students attending that remote lab. The feedback from the students provided in the remarkssection showed a ubiquitous complaint from most students about the remote instruction, more thanany other aspect of the remote lab. This proved the previous inference that the teaching assistantsneeded more detailed training to apply remote learning techniques. (a) Students satisfaction (b) Students preferences Would have Preferred Satisfied deferred remote Unsatisfied Both are
-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 249, 1999.[7] M. Basadur, G. B. Graen, and S. G. Green, "Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41-70, 1982.[8] W. G. Hunter, "Some ideas about teaching design of experiments, with 25 examples of experiments conducted by students," The American Statistician, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 12-17, 1977.[9] J. R. Mohrig, "The problem with organic chemistry labs," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 81, no. 8, p. 1083, 2004.[10] J. R. Flora and
full of variety with the salient point being a passion for teaching and helping all individuals overcome common communication challenges.Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University Michael Alley is a professor of teaching for engineering communications at Pennsylvania State Univer- sity. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Writing (Springer, 2018) and The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2013). He is also founder of the popular websites Writing as an Engineer or Scientist (www.craftofscientificwriting.com) and the Assertion-Evidence Approach (www.assertion- evidence.com).Lori B. Miraldi, Pennsylvania State University Director of the Engineering Ambassadors Program College of
University Carol B. Muller most recently served as Executive Director for Wise Ventures, an initiative in the Of- fice of Faculty Development, Diversity and Engagement at Stanford University, a role which included support and direction for Stanford’s Faculty Women’s Forum, Gabilan Fellows programs, the Inclu- sion@Stanford cross-campus community of practice, Wise Research Roundtables, and faculty mentor- ing and advising initiatives (2012-21). She also serves as adjunct lecturer in Mechanical Engineering, where she co-developed the course ”Expanding Engineering Limits: Culture, Diversity, and Equity.. A American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
Paper ID #34304WIP: Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on a First-Year Engineering CohortRanging From Learning Methods, Personal Decisions and UniversityExperienceDr. Monica B. Setien, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Monica Setien-Grafals is a postdoctoral fellow at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University under the Revolutionizing engineering and computer science departments (RED) NSF grant. Her research interests include student learning, flipped classroom, engineering design, neural engineering and optoge- netics. She received her BS in BME from Syracuse University and her Ph.D. in Biomedical
Paper ID #34117Accessible Playground Design: A Community-Connected ElementaryEngineering Unit Focused on Designing Accessible Playground EquipmentDr. Tejaswini S. Dalvi, University of Massachusetts, Boston Tej is an Assistant Professor of Science Education and is affiliated with Department of Curriculum and Instruction and Center Of Science and Math In Context. She has a PhD in theoretical physics and has active research in field of elementary science and engineering education.Dr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of
Paper ID #34639Course Strategy: Low Stakes Assessment Approach to Engineering Economyinstruction using Revised Bloom TaxonomyMr. Michael B. O’Connor P.E., New York University Michael O’Connor, Retired Professional Civil Engineer (Maryland and California), M.ASCE, is a mem- ber of the ASCE Committee on Developing Leaders, History and Heritage, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBoK), and Engineering Grades. Michael has been a practicing Civil Engineer with over 50 years of engineering, construction, and project management experience split equally between the pub- lic and private sectors. Programs ranged from the San
Paper ID #35221Improving Student Outcomes with Final Parallel Program Mastery Approachfor Numerical MethodsDr. Sam B Siewert, California State University, Chico Dr. Sam Siewert has a B.S. in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from University of Notre Dame and M.S., Ph.D. in Computer Science from University of Colorado. He has worked in the computer engineer- ing industry for twenty-four years before starting an academic career in 2012. Half of his time was spent on NASA space exploration programs and the other half of that time on commercial product development for high performance networking and storage systems. In 2020
Paper ID #34707Students Teaching Students: An approach to improving Capstone designperformance while enhancing learning for allDr. Kimberly B. Demoret P.E., Florida Institute of Technology Kimberly Demoret is responsible for the Aerospace Engineering capstone design program at the Florida Institute of Technology, where she has been an Assistant Professor since 2015. Prior to joining Florida Tech, she worked for eight years at Kennedy Space Center on development of launch systems in support of NASA’s space exploration goals. She also spent 20 years in the Air Force as a developmental engineer and manager, earning her PhD in
Paper ID #35706The Use of Mixed Methods in Academic Program EvaluationMr. Michael B. O’Connor PE P.E., New York University Michael O’Connor, Retired Professional Civil Engineer (Maryland and California), M.ASCE, is a mem- ber of the ASCE Committee on Developing Leaders, History and Heritage, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBoK), and Engineering Grades. Michael has been a practicing Civil Engineer with over 50 years of engineering, construction, and project management experience split equally between the pub- lic and private sectors. Programs ranged from the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s
Paper ID #32483Applying the Framework of Fink’s Taxonomy to the Design of a HolisticCulminating Assessment of Student Learning in Biomedical EngineeringDr. Emily Dosmar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology B.S. Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ph.D. Biomedical Engineering, Illi- nois Institute of Technology Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. B. Audrey Nguyen, The University of Akron B.S. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University M.S. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University Ph.D. Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University
stakeholders aiming to translate ideas into products that improve health and healthcare delivery. Break- throughs in science and engineering at Caltech are legendary - and numerous. Translating these research advances to improve healthcare requires breaking through barriers and adaptive tailoring to sustainably address needs and solve problems. At Caltech, Dr. Tolomiczenko works with a diverse set of internal and external stakeholders to foster collaborations that will result in new paths to cures and improved access to affordable, high-quality healthcare.Ms. Nadine B. Afari, CHOC Children’s Health Orange County Nadine Afari MSc, Manager of Research Programs, CHOC Children’s Health Orange County and the University of
YES! Expo – Inspiring Youth to Pursue Education and Careers in Science and Engineering Peter J. Cattelino, Lynn A. Artman, Susan Amato-Henderson, John B. Lehman, and Brian G. Hannon Michigan Technological UniversityIntroductionOur nation faces a serious crisis of youth losing interest in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Math (STEM). Michigan and other technology and manufacturing centers have alreadysuffered significantly from this decline. Additionally, women and minorities are vastly under-represented in STEM fields. Until these trends are reversed, the nation will struggle to develop ahighly skilled and knowledgeable workforce for
, diversity in engineering and engineering education, management of large watersheds, mitigation of repetitively flooded structures in southeast Louisiana, experimental testing of large parts, residual stress measurement using laser interferometry, and materials testing (fatigue, shear, etc.). She, her husband, two engineer daughters and engineer son-in-law all reside in New Orleans.Mr. Michael B. O’Connor, New York University See profile American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Merits of a Civil Engineering Certification Program to Validate Fulfillment of the CEBOKThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE
structures (if available), 3) creating a basic structure model, and 4)placing a model within an imported geo-location and adjusting for terrain differences. Inaddition to the in-class tutorial, students also received a document with step-by-step instructionsand the in-class tutorial was recorded via Zoom so the students could re-watch later. Fig. 2shows two screen captures from the tutorial. (a) (b) Fig. 2—(a) Importing a geo-location and (b) placing a finished model within the imported geo- location (existing, imported SketchUp models in the background).Design Project The instructor presented four hypothetical design project sites to the class after theSketchUp
Open Education Resources (OER): She is Chair of the Colorado Department of Higher Education’s Open Educational Council and has received three state grants for developing OER programs at Mines.Ms. Brianna B. Buljung, Colorado School of Mines Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science librarian at the United States Naval Academy and a contract Reference librarian at the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS from the University of Denver in 2011.Mr. Alexander Luis Odicino, Colorado
Paper ID #32187Creating an Inclusive, Vibrant Learning Environment within a Large,Software Engineering Program – Experiential Learning Experiences Createdfor Students, Faculty, and Senior Design Coaches & SponsorsProf. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Margaret Bailey, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Bailey teaches courses and conducts re- search related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the
, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Stephen Moyer is a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Ed- ucation. Prior to starting graduate work he worked in the aerospace industry as a software engineer, and in the automotive industry as a manufacturing engineer. He has a BS in Mechatronics Engineering from UNC Asheville and NC State University, and is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B. Knight is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Special As- sistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research
, image and video coding, and artificial intelligence.Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur
much fromthe REU experience if they only interact with people who are like themselves.In practice, we implement these ideas in our application review by employing a modified draft pickprocess. After each of the reviewers has assessed each application based on their assigned goal(access to research experiences vs. competitiveness for graduate studies), they take turns choosingstudents for the cohort. By sequentially building the cohort together, the cohort criteria are combinedwith the individual criteria. For example, suppose that Reviewer A selects a student in round 1 whois from school X. Reviewer B had two comparable students in mind for round 1 selection, one ofwhich was from school X and the other from school Y. Knowing Reviewer A’s
online synchronousand asynchronous training sessions (see Appendix A for list of sessions) and six weeks ofworking on a team project with PPs and mentor guidance (see Appendix B for projectrequirements and judges’ rubric). Graduate student coaches from a summer seminar worked with21 interns who volunteered for the extra sessions. Survey results in July and August werecompared to the baseline measure at the beginning of summer to show gains in self-reported skilllevels.The Skill Development scales were taken from an instrument used with 39 universities’engineering colleges as part of the study of Vision 2020 by Lattuca and her colleagues (Lattuca,Trautvetter, Codd, Knight, & Cortes, 2011). Likert-type scales were used for all survey