math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological
Electrical Engineering (2022) from the University of Florida and a Master’s degree in Educational Technology (2016) from the Universidad Tecnologica de Santiago (UTESA). He also holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electronics Engineering (1998) from the Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM). He is fervently dedicated to understanding and improving student learning through active classroom engagement. He is passionate about exploring effective pedagogy, striving to captivate students’ attention, stimulate their curiosity, and ignite their passion for learning.Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the
Paper ID #38526Nuestro Impacto: An Insider Look into the Connections between Our PastExperiences and Current Teaching and Mentoring PracticesDr. Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her research areas of interest are hidden curriculum, multi-modal methods, mentoring, and professional development.Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro is an instructional assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida.Dr
, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best
college math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and
Paper ID #6347Development of a design- and project-based framework to include scientificreasoning in an undergraduate, introductory-level bioengineering laboratorycourseDr. Idalis Villanueva, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Villanueva has been a lecturer in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering in the University of Maryland at College Park since fall 2011. Prior to that time, Dr. Villanueva was a postdoctoral fellow performing research for the Analytical Cell Biology Sector in the National Institute in Neurological Dis- orders and Stroke within the National Institutes of Health for two years. Her work focused
Paper ID #21884What Does Hidden Curriculum in Engineering Look Like and How Can ItBe Explored?Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and
of whichneeds special mention. I would like to thank Dr. Edward J. Berger, Associate professor ofEngineering Education at Purdue University, for lending his equipment for data collection. I alsowant to thank Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Assistant professor of Engineering Education at Utah StateUniversity for providing advice on collecting and interpreting EDA data. Finally, I want to thankmy adviser, Dr. Michael Loui, Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor in Engineering Education, forproviding financial support for this project through his discretionary funds.References[1] W. Sun and X. Sun, “Teaching computer programming skills to engineering and technology students with a modular programming strategy,” presented at the 2011 ASEE
standards for accessibility and interactions. Elife, 9:e62668, 2020.[3] Justin Neves, John N Lavis, and M Kent Ranson. A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health Research Policy and Systems, 10(1):1–11, 2012.[4] Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, Saira Anwar, and Zahra Atiq. How multi-modal approaches support engineering and computing education research. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2):124–139, 2023.[5] Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on and Saira Anwar. Situating multi-modal approaches in engineering education research, 2022.
the intersection of international student status and mental health," in Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing DIversity (CoNECD), 2021.[5] A. S. A. P. Donna Riley, "Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 335-356.[6] K. Tonso, "Engineering identity," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 267-282.[7] J. A. M. R. A. R. Idalis Villanueva, "Uncovering the hidden factors that could compromise equitable and effective engineering education," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Jose, CA, 2018.[8] B. Jones and R. Egley, "Learning to
speakers Sheri Sheppard,Sara Atwood, Elif Miskioğlu, Adam Carberry, Kaela Martin, Kelly Cross, Nicole Pitterson,Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, Rachel Kajfez, Marie Paretti, Sarah Zappe, Holly Matusovich, BrianHelmke, Maura Borrego, and Paul Gannon for sharing their expertise with the VCoP. Finally, weappreciate the VCoP members who participated and provided valuable feedback.References[1] A. L. Pawley, A. R. Carberry, M. E. Cardella, M.-I. Carnasciali, S. R. Daly, J. L. Gorlewicz, G. L. Herman, M. M. Hynes, S. S. Jordan and N. N. Kellam, "The PEER Collaborative: Supporting engineering education research faculty with near-peer mentoring unconference workshops,” presented at the 121st American Society for Engineering
problem may shed interesting light on theexpert-novice split, and is given some attention in some of Litzinger’s other work7. Additionally,further investigation into the team-coding approach as a developing methodology for verifyinginter-rater reliability and saturation is recommended due to its perceived increase in efficiencycompared to parallel individual coding efforts.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Nicholas J. A. Wan, BradRobinson, Maria Manuela Valladares, and Dr. Kerry Jordan for helping with data collection andproviding a quiet lab in which to conduct the study. Garin Savage helped with transcription
, aligned with collaborative autoethnography, that this panel andpaper were a truly collaborative effort. All authors (panelists) contributed equally to the panelpreparation, panel discussion, conceptualization and writing of the paper, and subsequent dataanalysis, despite the author order listed. We would also like to thank our panel organizers, Drs.Lily Wang and Idalis Villanueva Alarcón from the ASEE Women in Engineering Division.References[1] J. L. Doumont, “Panel Discussions,” in English Communication for Scientists, Cambridge, MA: Scitable by Nature Education, 2010. Accessed: Jan. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists- 14053993/126085065/[2] G. Roehrig, H. El
one of the mostimportant research question of this area. In the future, as we focus on further developing ourprocess, we should also focus on identifying the readiness of our students and if so, the forms ofthe activities that suits their need to be engaged.References[1]. Villanueva, Idalis, and Louis Nadelson. "Are We Preparing Our Students to BecomeEngineers of the Future or the Past?." International Journal of Engineering Education 33, no. 2(2017): 639-652.[2]. Daly, Shanna R., Erika A. Mosyjowski, and Colleen M. Seifert. "Teaching creativity inengineering courses." Journal of Engineering Education 103, no. 3 (2014): 417-449.[3]. Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. "Understanding student differences." Journal ofengineering education 94
Breviglieri Schultz. Braille technology beyond the financial barriers: A braille literacy platform to effectively combat braille literacy crisis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, pages 41–46, 2018.[8] Idalis Villanueva and Marialuisa Di Stefano. Narrative inquiry on the teaching of stem to blind high school students. Education sciences, 7(4):89, 2017.[9] Amanda Lacy, Seth Polsley, Samantha Ray, and Tracy Hammond. A seat at the virtual table: Emergent inclusion in remote meetings. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2):1–20, 2022.[10] Sathiyaprakash Ramdoss
normative behaviors, interactions, expectations, and dynamics that exist fora specific social group. Climate was then defined as how an individual (or groups of people)interacts with and assesses this culture. There is an inherent expectation of those who fit withinthat culture to have a stronger alignment with these normative behaviors and therefore are morelikely to have positive experiences. For example, work led by Idalis Villanueva Alarcón hasexplored the normative behaviors expected for engineers training in graduate programs, with herwork demonstrating how these norms are communicated explicitly and implicitly via aspects ofthe hidden curriculum [28], [29]. These norms would be considered part of engineering culture,whereas a new engineering