is the test phase, wherestudents evaluate the structural integrity of their designs with a drop test from a height of sixstories.ResultsBefore the activity was introduced, students were asked to evaluate their perceptions of aerospaceengineering and gage their interest level. Students were asked some basic demographics questions(reported in Camp Background), if they plan to major in engineering, the problem they were most(a) Students interested in majoring in engineer-ing (b) Students interested in aerospace specifically Figure 1: Results of survey for students interested in engineering and aerospace engineering.interested in solving, and then to rank on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is not
Education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. 6. Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1996). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://www.webtools.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ 7. Living with the Lab Faculty Team, L. T. U. (Ed.). (2018). living with the lab; boosting hands-on learning in engineering education. Retrieved from http://www2.latech.edu/~kcorbett/LWTL/home/main.html 8. Salzman, N., & Hunt, G. (2016). Modification and Assessment of a First-Year Engineering Course to Improve Students’ Calculus Readiness. First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, W1A–1 – W1A–4.
Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, 2002.[19] D. E. Giles and J. Eyler, “The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service-learning,” Serv. Learn. Gen., vol. 150, 1994.[20] J. Dewey, Democracy and education. New York: Collier Books, 1916.[21] M. McCall, “Leadership development through experience,” Acad. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3, 2004.[22] B. Banach, E. Foden, and V. Brooks Carter, “Educating undergraduate group workers: Increasing confidence through experiential learning,” Soc. Work Groups, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 158–170, 2019.[23] Center of Inquiry in the LIberal Arts at Wabash College, “Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education: High-impact practices and experiences from the Wabash
partner colleges with special thanks to Dr. Marilyn Barger, Dr.Richard Gilbert, and Florida Advanced Technological Education Center (FLATE) for their inputon this research.References[1] J. M. Beach, Gateway to Opportunity?: A History of the Community College in the UnitedStates. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2012.[2] A. M. Cohen, F. B. Brawer, and C. B. Kisker, The American Community College, 6th ed. SanFrancisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.[3] D. F. Ayers, "Three functions of the community college mission statement," New Directionsfor Community Colleges, vol. 2017, no. 180, pp. 9-17, December 2017.[4] K. J. Dougherty and B. K. Townsend, "Community college missions: A theoretical andhistorical perspective," New Directions for Community Colleges, vol
programs of the Biological Science Initiative:Students’ intellectual, personal and professional outcomes from participation in research. Report prepared for theHoward Hughes Medical Institute. Boulder, CO: Ethnography and Evaluation Research, 2009.[11] S.T., Ghanat, D. Garner, J. Howison, S. Banik, B. Swart, M. Verdicchio, R. Hunter (2018), Students’Perception of Summer Undergraduate Research Experience: Across the Disciplines, proceeding of 2018 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education National Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018[12] A.L. Zydney, J.S. Bennett, A. Shahid, K.W. Bauer, Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate researchexperience in science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 291-297, 2002.[13] C.M. Kardash
department of Teaching and Learning. Eugenia is mathematically bi-literate (English and Greek) and has taught mathe- matics at the middle school, high school, and college level. She currently teaches mathematics education courses to undergraduate, masters, and doctoral students. Her research explores Culturally Responsive Mathematics Teacher Education (CRMTE), which she defines as teacher education that: a) is responsive to the needs and capitalizes on the funds of knowledge of culturally diverse mathematics (pre-service and in-service) teachers, and b) seeks to prepare culturally responsive mathematics teachers who will advance the education of students whose linguistic and cultural backgrounds have not traditionally
research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Chair
in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Ms. Leslie Nolen CAE, American Society of Civil Engineers Leslie Nolen, CAE, serves as director, educational activities for the American Society of Civil Engineers. She brings over 20 years of association management experience to her work with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and graduate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Decker B Hains P.E., Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US
Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering
Paper ID #25172Are We Teaching What They Want? A Comparative Study of What AM Em-ployers Want versus What AM Frameworks RequireDr. Faye R. Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research.Dr. Marcia A. Mardis, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Marcia A. Mardis is a Professor and Associate Dean at Florida State University’s College of Communica- tion & Information and Associate
Air AirForce ForceResearch ResearchLaboratory Laboratory AFOSR Overview 12 March 2019 James A. Dodd Deputy Chief Scientist Air Force Office of Scientific ResearchIntegrity Service Excellence Distribution A. Cleared for public release. 1 Air Force Research Laboratory Space Vehicles Information Munitions
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASEU.S. ARMY COMBAT CAPABILITIESDEVELOPMENT COMMAND –ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY The U.S. Army Research Office: What we do and how to interact with us Dr. Ralph A. Anthenien Jr. Director (A), Engineering Sciences Distribution A CCDC ARL - Army Research Office12 Mar 2019 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE ARL Organizational Structure
Paper ID #25064Design of Transformative Education and Authentic Learning Projects: Ex-periences and Lessons Learned from an International Multidisciplinary Re-search and Education Program on Flood Risk ReductionDr. Yoonjeong Lee, Texas A&M University, Galveston - Assistant Research Scientist/Lecturer, Center for Texas Beaches and Shores, Texas A&M University at Galveston - Education Program Director, NSF PIRE Coastal Flood Risk Reduction ProgramDr. Baukje Bee Kothuis, Delft University of Technology Dr. Kothuis is a design anthropologist, researching flood risk reduction structures & strategies and devel- oping
researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25442Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell
Paper ID #25286Board 81: Gatekeepers to Broadening Participation in Engineering: Varia-tion in Postsecondary Engineering-Going across Virginia’s High SchoolsDr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education, directs the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering
Paper ID #26815What You Need to Succeed: Examining Culture and Capital in BiomedicalEngineering Undergraduate EducationDanielle Corple, Purdue University Danielle Corple received her Ph.D. from the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University. This fall, she will be an assistant professor at Wheaton College in Illinois. She studies organizational communication, diversity and inclusion, ethics, and social change.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com
Paper ID #27150Panel Discussion: Understanding Students’ Narratives of Grand ChallengesScholars Program as a Nexus between Liberal and STEM EducationDr. Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Yevgeniya V. Zastavker, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Physics at Franklin W. Olin College of Engi- neering and a recent Director of the Research Institute for Experiential Learning Science at Northeastern University. She earned her B.S. degree in Physics from Yale University in 1995 and her Ph. D. degree in Biological Physics from MIT in 2001. Dr. Zastavker’s research interests lie in the field of STEM edu
Paper ID #27326Panel Session: Connecting Theory and Practice in a Change Project - AndWhat I Wish I Knew Before I StartedElizabeth C. Harris, University of Wisconsin, Madison Elizabeth Harris has been part of the University of Wisconsin Madison’s College of Engineering since 2012. She approaches Engineering Education opportunities by leveraging her background in cognitive and systems engineering in addition to her background in education. She particularly enjoys working to improve the effectiveness of institutions, and the experiences of students, faculty, and academic staff by addressing the holistic ecologies present
of Washington Ms. Doten-Snitker is a Graduate Research Assistant at the University of Washington’s Center for Eval- uation and Research for STEM Equity, where she is part of a team conducting evaluation research for university-level educational and professional training, with a focus on increasing equity and participation of underrepresented and minority students and professionals. She has contributed to evaluation research for a range of programs funded by the NSF, NIH, and USAID. Additionally, she is a Doctoral Candidate in Sociology at the University of Washington, where her scholarship focuses on political processes of inclusion and exclusion.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth
Paper ID #26101Insights into the Nature of Change and Sustainability in an Ongoing FacultyDevelopment EffortProf. Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University Jill Nelson is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at George Mason University. She earned a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Uni- versity in 1998. She attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate study, earning an MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Dr. Nelson’s research focus is in statistical signal processing, specifically detection and
), which she defines as teacher education that: a) is responsive to the needs and capitalizes on the funds of knowledge of culturally diverse mathematics (pre-service and in-service) teachers, and b) seeks to prepare culturally responsive mathematics teachers who will advance the education of students whose linguistic and cultural backgrounds have not traditionally been recognized as resources for mathematics learning.Dr. Tonisha B. Lane, University of South Florida Dr. Lane’s research agenda broadly examines diversity, equity, and inclusion in postsecondary educa- tion with the objective of advancing inclusive and transformative policies and practices. Her primary research strand investigates the experiences and
matrices.Linear operators or mappings A B ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗We focus now on with the vector equation ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ 𝐝𝐘 = [ ] 𝐝𝐗. ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ 𝐝𝐗 and ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗ 𝐝𝐘 are differential C D A Bdisplacements in the linear domain and range spaces, respectively. The matrix [ ] represents C Da linear operator that acts on the domain
Association vol 50, pp. 21 – 37, 2010.[10] B. B. Caza, and S. J Creary, “The construction of professional identity,” SHA, Cornell University, 2016. [Online]. Available http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/878 [Accessed June 29, 2018][11] C. Groen, “Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation,” Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 2017. [Online]. Available https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/77392/Groen_CJ_D_2017.pdf?sequence =1 [Accessed April 5, 2018][12] C. H. Wasilewski, “Men and women in engineering: Professional identity and factors influencing workforce retention,” Doctor in Industrial
content knowledge.,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 131–152, 2005. [2] P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge : A Framework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, 2006. [3] C. Angeli and N. Valanides, “Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT – TPCK : Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge ( TPCK ),” Comput. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 154–168, 2009. [4] B. S. Cox and C. R. Graham, “Diagramming TPACK in Practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge,” TechTrends Link. Res
activities relate to the change model elements. (See Appendix B.) Themapping process has helped the team to better understand the change model and to highlightareas in need of strengthening. 2 Figure 1: Project StructureFaculty members designated “AGEP Fellows” are at the core of the project. Each participatingdepartment nominates a faculty member to serve as a Fellow for a two-year term. The Fellowsmeet monthly on their home campuses and attend semi-annual Alliance-sponsored workshops onsuch topics as the URM doctoral student experience and culturally responsive mentoring. Overthe life of the project
cohort andremoving any students from the population who have GPAs outside this range. From thispopulation, a stratified sample of approximately 100 students or more is selected to represent thecomparison group for each particular cohort year, one for the F-LEARN cohort (FTIC students)and the other for the T-LEARN cohort (transfer students). Factors used to implement stratifiedsampling included: 1) gender (two categories; M = male; F = female); 2) ethnicity (fourcategories; W = White; B = Black; H = Hispanic; O = Other); and 3) high school GPA/previousinstitution GPA indicator (two categories; below or above the median value). Each year of theprogram, there were variations within each institution’s ability to establish a comparison groupthat met
fromthese new techniques with five existing methods for statistically calculating IRR.Review of Statistical Methods determining Interrater Reliability for Nominal Data Interrater reliability can be conceptualized as a percentage agreement between two raters.Here we present a simple example to calculate agreement between two raters (A and B), who aretasked to classify the same n pieces of data into either of two categories (1 and 2). In this example,Raters A and B categorized n11 subjects in category 1 and n22 subjects in category 2. However,Rater A categorized n12 subjects in category 1, but the same n12 subjects are been categorized incategory 2 by Rater B. Similarly, Rater B categorized n21 subjects in category 1, but the same n21subjects
Research Experience For Teachers Programs and Their Effects on Student Interest and Academic Performance: A Preliminary Report of an Ongoing Collaborative Study by Eight Programs.”, MRS Proceedings, 684, GG3.6 doi:10.1557/PROC-684-GG3.6, 2001.[7] A. M. Farrell, “What Teachers Can Learn From Industry Internships.” Educational Leadership, pp. 38-39, March 1992.[8] S. Silverstein, J. Dubner, J. Miller, S. Glied, and J. Loike, “Teachers’ Participation in Research Programs Improves Their Students’ Achievement in Science,” Science, vol. 326, pp. 440-442, 2009.[9] B. D. Bowen, A. Kallmeyer, and H. Erickson, “Research Experiences for Teachers: Engineering in Precision Agriculture and Sustainability for Solitary STEM
emailed data and information every night that prepared them for the next- day activity. This contributed to the success of the workshop as the students knew exactly the activities of the day and had the files they needed to start the activity. 10) Parents were kept involved by: a) inviting them to a short presentation about the camp on Friday afternoon before the start of the workshop (the workshop started the next Monday) and b) inviting them to their children’s presentations. One of the success stories of summerDr. AC Megri 2019 ASEE Annual Conference camp is that two of the students who participated in the program were accepted into the Mechanical
Implementation of a Hybrid Teaching Environment for a Traffic Engineering Course Mena Souliman, Ph.D. Assistant Professor University of Texas at Tyler Department of Civil Engineering, 3900 University Blvd. RBS 1008, Tyler, TX 75799 E-mail: msouliman@uttyler.edu Abstract students, especially dependent learners, are less self- Students learn in different styles. They learn via hearing regulated and need persistent direction and guidance fromand visualizing. They can also reflect and act