2019 Frontiers in Education (FIE 2019), 2019.[16] S. H. K. Kang, K. B. McDermott, and H. L. III Roediger. Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19:528–558, 2007.[17] M. A. Kraft. Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 2019. (preprint, Annenberg Working Paper, Brown University).[18] Beth Levant, Wolfram Z¨uckert, and Anthony Paolo. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(5):995–1003, 2018.[19] Trent W Maurer, Laura Frost, Diana Sturges, Simone Charles, Deborah Allen, J
Paper ID #31377Creating a Makerspace for Cross-disciplinary Teaching and Collaborationwith Limited FundingDr. David G Alexander, California State University, Chico Dr. Alexander’s research interests and areas of expertise are in teaching pedagogy, capstone design, renewable energy systems, thermal sciences, vehicle system modeling and simulation, heat transfer, new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology transfer. He is PI and adviser of the Department of Energy Collegiate Wind Competition 2016. He is also working on an undergraduate research project modeling solar cells using a thermodynamics approach and
research questions: A RQ-I: How effective is the PrBL (practice based learning) model to train students in M2 ? B RQ-II: Does engagement in M2 affect STEM knowledge acquisition and self-concept?Our paper is organized as follows. First, we will provide context on Making through section 2,‘Relevant Background’, explaining how our inquiry in this EAGER arose from the intersection ofMaking, manufacturing, and production engineering concerns. Following after, in section 3, ‘TheM2 Model’, we illustrate how our model of combined Making with real-world situatedness andconsider its implications for engineering education. Section 4 describes how we applied the M2Model to an CTE classroom in the Colonias community. We illustrate our findings in
: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] “Graduate Attributes,” Engineers Canada. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/Graduate-Attributes.pdf (accessed Mar. 10, 2020).[3] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering- programs-2019-2020/ (accessed Mar. 10, 2020).[4] B. Frank, D. Strong, and R. Sellens, “The professional spine: Creation of a four-year engineering design and practice sequence,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc., 2011.[5] W. Clark, D. DiBiasio, and A. Dixon, “A project-based, spiral curriculum for introductory courses in ChE: Part 1. curriculum design,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 222
defined problem, they develop higher level of creative confidence.This can have positive impact on self-efficacy as a science or engineering major. Moreover, thisapproach allows having greater emphasis on sociotechnical approach by applying scientificknowledge and technical skills to address societal and human needs using entrepreneurialmindset. Our future efforts will further explore the impact of user innovation module and thewhole course on students’ perception of and understanding about entrepreneurial mindset usingconcept map approach.References:1. Trilling, C. and Fadel, B. (2012), “21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times”, Jossey-Bass (a Wiley Imprint) ISBN-13: 978-0470475386. https://www.amazon.com/21st-Century-Skills
. Thathaving been said, the practical knowledge of how a feedback controller functions, and how theyare used in an industrial setting, can be imparted in a couple of lecture hours, although not withany real understanding of control theory. The student is left with a technician’s understanding ofcontrollers, adequate to use and design with them, but not a deep understanding.The processes that are found in the process industries have hundreds of simple feedback loops,but few with dynamics that both a) difficult to control, and b) tackled well by linear controltheory. It is useful for a chemical process control engineer to understand how to deal withprocesses with significant dead time using some form of model predictive control, and how torecognize and
, active aerodynamic control systems, Tesla turbine design, and improving pre-requisite knowledge retention.Dr. John W. Sanders, California State University, Fullerton Dr. John W. Sanders is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Fullerton. He holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and a B.S. in Engineering Physics and Mathematics from Saint Louis University. His research interests include clean energy, solid mechanics, micromechanics of mate- rials, fracture mechanics, and STEM education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Curriculum
implementations and investigations. Keywords: Literate Programming, Computing Education, Writing OPEN ACCESS Related ASEE Publications Volume 11 [7] J. W. Bruce, B. A. Jones, and M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh. “A Literate Programming Approach for Issue Hardware Description Language Instruction,”. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2 ASEE Conferences, 2019. URL 10.18260/1-2--31966. *Corresponding author [8] B. A. Jones and M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh. “Employing Literate Programming Instruction in a Submitted 1 Aug 2019 Microprocessors Course
Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 1990.[6] B. Garbers and K. Periyasamy, "A Light-Weight Tool for Teaching the Development and Evaluation of Requirements Documents," in ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, 2006.[7] D. Brown, "Requiring CS1 students to write requirements specifications: a rationale, implementation suggestions, and a case study," in SIGCSE '88 Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Atlanta, 1988.[8] W. Hankley, "Software Engineering Emphasis for Engineering Computing Courses: An Open Letter to Engineering Educators," in ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, 2004.[9] J. Preston and S. Acharya, "Using Software Engineering Concepts in Game Development - Sharing Experiences at
-546.23. K. C. Judson, Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How And When?, Journal of Engineering Education,Vol. 101(1), 2012, pp. 1.24. M. Crow, Supportive University Relationships Help Companies Find Bright Engineering Graduates, IEEEPower and Energy Magazine, Jan/Feb, 2005, pp 34-37.25. C. I. Celio, J. Durlak, and A. Dymnicki, “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Service-Learning on Students”,Journal of Experiential Education, Vol. 34(2), 2011, pp. 164–181.26. R. Chiou,, R.G. Belu and B. Tseng, “Infusion of Green Energy Manufacturing into Engineering and TechnologyCurricula”, ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, November 15-21, 2013, SanDiego, California (CD Proceedings).27. R. Belu, “Project-based
specific than level 1. Level 2 information corresponds to student performance as demonstrated through work submitted during the senior year in the senior design class (CPRE/EE 491 and CPRE/EE 492) and in the portfolio class (CPRE/EE 494). The student work consisting of various design project deliverables and portfolio items are reviewed and scored by faculty. Rubrics are used and cover all ABET student outcomes (a) – (k) except outcome (b), which is given special attention using level 3 assessment. The senior year is an opportune time to assess student learning in a summative manner. 3. Level 3 is finer grained and more specific than the other levels. It provides more in-depth examination of a student
: http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6134/download [Accessed Jan. 15, 2020][10] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning." Educational psychologist 26, no. 3-4 (1991): 369-398.[11] B. Stephanie. "Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future." The clearing house 83, no. 2 (2010): 39-43.[12] S. Hurtado , NL. Cabrera, MH Lin , L. Arellano, LL. Espinosa. Diversifying science: underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Res High Educ. 2009;50:189–214.[13] PW. Schultz, PR. Hernandez, A. Woodcock, M. Estrada, RC. Chance, M. Aguilar
-field- biomedical-engineering/ [Accessed: Dec. 30, 2019][3] Z. O. Abu-Faraj, “Career development in bioengineering/biomedical engineering: A student's roadmap,” in 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 20-24, 2008, pp. 1564-1567.[4] M. Anderson-Rowland, “Understanding freshman engineering student retention through a survey,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI, 1997.[5] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, “An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors,” Journal of Engineering Education
information literacy program for first-year engineering students,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference 2012, 2012, p. 12. [8] M. L. Strife, M. G. Armour-Gemmen, and R. A. M. Hensel, “Re-tooling information instruction delivery and assessment for the freshman engineering class: the good, the bad and the ugly,” presented at the 120th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013. [9] Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), 09- Feb-2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. [Accessed:12-Dec-2019].[10] B. Quigley and J
. Haynes, D. Schowalter,“CONSERVATION OF ENERGY FOR CAMPUS BUILDINGS: DESIGN,COMMUNICATION AND ENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH PROJECT BASEDLEARNING,” Paper presented at 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL,June 2006.[9] E. Constans, K. D. Dahm, K. Hollar, J. Kadlowec, A. J. Marchese, B. Sukumaran, C. Sun,and P. von Lockette, “The Sophomore Engineering Clinic I: Integrating Statics, Solid Mechanicsand Product Development in a Sophomore Level Design Course,” Paper presented at 2001 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001.[10] K. D. Dahm and J. A. Newell, “Baseball Stadium Design: Teaching Engineering Economicsand Technical Communication in a Multi-Disciplinary Setting,” Journal of SMET Education:Innovations and
datawhich are elements of authentic learning. This pedagogy allows the students to relate the mathand science concepts to engineering and real-life use.The effectiveness of the approach was assessed using a quasi-experimental within-subjectresearch design. The intervention was a week-long professional development workshop forteachers (Figure 1a) followed by a week-long summer camp for middle school students (Figure1b). The teacher professional development workshop included elements of best practices [23] i.e.(a) Content focus, (b) Active learning, (c) Collaboration, (d) Use of models and modeling, (e)Coaching and expert support, (f) Feedback and reflection. The teachers learned the basics ofphysics of flight, aircraft flight controls and practiced
-technical employees (p≈ 0), business managers (p ≈ 0), clients (p ≈ 0), government (p ≈ 0) and the general public (p ≈0). The Likert-type scale distributions for both populations for these categories can be seen inFigure 1. Figure 1. Comparison of the Likert-type scale data distributions for freshmen and post-graduate employees describing frequency of interactions with different audiences (A: technical employees (same project area), B: non- technical employees, C: manager (business), D: client, E: government, F: general public).For technical employees, only 53% of freshmen expected that they would have interactions withengineers within their project area multiple times per day as opposed to 67% of post-graduateemployees. Similar
; Exposition, Tampa, Florida Jun 15-19, 2019, 26562. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32782.[15] P. M. Secola, B. A. Smiley, M. R. Anderson-Rowland, and D. R. Baker, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gender Equity Training in Engineering Summer Workshops With Pre- College Teachers and Counselors " presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico Jun 24-27, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/9237.[16] G. Pfeifer and E. A. Stoddard, ""Equitable and Effective Teams: Creating and Managing Team Dynamics for Equitable Learning Outcomes" in Kristin Wobbe and Elisabeth A. Stoddard, eds. Beyond All Expectations: Project-Based Learning in the First Year," ed, 2019.
in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Amy F. Golightly, Bucknell University Amy Golightly is an associate professor of education at Bucknell University. She earned her B. A. in psychology from the University of Saint Thomas, and her Ph.D. in school psychology from the University of Iowa. Her main research interests lie in understanding factors that facilitate or hinder learning and conceptual change in undergraduate students, and in development of assistive technology to help college students with disabilities. She is currently involved in collaborative research projects focused on these topics in chemical and electrical engineering
and Control participants away from to move Minimum) for all cars (cumulative compared the control) from from for all cars) to control starting starting point to point to control) final position) Column A B C=A-B D E=D-B F=(E/C)100 CA Couple 59 20 39 26 6 15.4% Corporate 60 21 39
religion; and individual traits that helped studentssucceed despite social identity-related barriers. Faculty also emphasized the importance ofestablishing a culture of science. While STEM faculty felt supported by the institution, they alsoquestioned whether the administration fully recognized the unique needs of STEM faculty, staffand students.Introduction1.1 S-STEM BackgroundThe National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) program supports academically talented students who are low-incomeand have financial need as defined within local institutional contexts [5], [6]. Program fundingcomes from monies allocated to NSF through the HI-B Visa program [7]. From its inception in1999 to
. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.,” Qual. Health Res., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–88, Nov. 2005.[22] F. Marton, “Phenomenography--Describing Conceptions of the World around Us,” Instr. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–200, 1981.[23] R Core Team, “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austri, 2016.[24] C. Deasy, B. Coughlan, J. Pironom, D. Jourdan, and P. Mannix-McNamara, “Psychological distress and coping amongst higher education students: A Mixed method enquiry,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, p. e115193, 2014.[25] E. Godfrey and L. Parker, “Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol
developing this understanding is supported by validThis ASEE paper will a) summarize the NOEK framework used to frame the VNOEK; b) instruments, the creation of which was the purpose of this work.describe the development of the VNOEK questionnaire; (c) discuss the validity and reliability ofthe VNOEK; (d) describe the participant groups in the validation study; and (e) discuss the use of Development of the Views about Nature of Engineering Knowledge (VNOEK)the VNOEK for work with K-16 teachers
the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015/06/14, June 2015. Available: https://peer.asee.org/24872[4] S. B. Velegol and S. E. Zappe, "How Does a Flipped Classroom Impact Classroom Climate?," presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016/06/26, June 2016. Available: https://peer.asee.org/25479[5] L. E. Sullivan-Green, R. Mathur, and A. H. Feinstein, "Flipping STEM Classrooms Collaboratively Across Campuses in California," presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017/06/24, June 2017. Available: https://peer.asee.org/28370[6] C. A. Aji and M. J. Khan, "Flipped Classroom and its Impact on
of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propa- gation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Colorado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres worked as an R&D engineer for Agilent Technologies in Colorado Springs, CO where he designed electronic test equipment.Mrs. Elizabeth B Varnes, Montana State University After earning a BSEE from Clemson University, I worked for the Department of Defense for 11 years. During that time I earned a MS in Engineering
, vol. 92, no. 4,pp. 325-328, 2003/10/01 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x.[4] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” 2018. [Online].Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/E001-19-20-EAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdf [Accessed: 2-February-2019].[5] Wilson, S.A. "Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom andcommunication during an industrial internship." In Proceedings of the American Society forEngineering Education 2019 Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. (2019).[6] Howe, M. M., & Dwyer, K. K. (2007). The influence of diaphragmatic breathing to reducesituational anxiety for basic course students. Basic Communication Course Annual, 19(1), 9.[7] Rubin, R. B., Rubin, A. M
students will use a waterproof DROK B3950 temperature probe(rated for -25°C to 125°C), which utilizes an NTC thermistor for thermal sensing. Thermistors, aform of resistive temperature detector (RTD), are especially made to have a high sensitivity totemperature, as shown by the resistance/temperature lookup table for a B3950 thermistor inAppendix 6.1. This relationship, while nonlinear, can be modeled by using the Steinhart-Hartequation, which is given in Equation 1. In this expression, T is the measured temperature, R isthe resistance of the thermistor, and A, B, and C are constants. 1 = 𝐴 + 𝐵 ln(𝑅) + 𝐶 [ln(𝑅)]3 (1
Paper ID #29719Science Fiction as an Entry Point for Ethical Frameworks in Engineeringand Computer Science EducationDr. Valerie H. Summet, Rollins College Dr. Valerie Summet is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Rollins College, a liberal-arts school located in Winter Park, FL. Her research interests include human-computer interaction and CS education. She earned a BS in Computer Science from Duke University and an MS and PhD in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering
Underpinnings of How You Serve the College, Dean and Others:• Authority – vested in the position – Defined/assigned positional responsibilities with mechanisms to enforce/ensure (Associate Deans typically have at most “Delegated Authority”)• Power – vested in the person – No formal authority. Rather the capabilities of the individual through networks of relationships, personal knowledge, and personal characteristics to influence/ensure outcomes• Trust – vested in the person – Held by all that you serve as a result of the nature and consistency of your actions. A precious commodity to build and preserveUtilizing Trust, Power and Authority to Do the “Good Work”:• Your Approach – depends on your dean, your
orientation to complete theTime 1 survey and class time to complete the Time 2 and Time 3 surveys. Results are based onresponses from 1,211 freshman engineering students across two Cohorts (i.e., years of entry intoengineering).Cohort A consisted of 448 respondents (37.0%). Cohort B included participants who entered asfreshmen the following school year and consisted of 763 respondents (63.0%). Participants werelargely male (70.9%) and either White (57.7%) or Hispanic or Latino (22.4%) with a mean ageof entry into undergraduate studies of 18.29 (SD = 1.42) years.MeasuresParticipation in professional development activities for fall and spring semester of participants’freshman year in college was assessed through self-report at the end of the freshman