obtained in preceding course work to determine and understand how theoryand empirical models apply, and sometimes deviate, from the specific application orexperimental setups. Hence, the students must identify and specify their objectives andexperimental approach using a request to experiment form (Appendix B) and define appropriatemodels and correlations for comparison to the results obtained.Grades are distributed between individual and team assignment efforts, as shown in Table 2.Individual assignments include team lead responsibilities, safety, individual performance, andquizzes, accounting for 25% of the grade. Over the past five years, we have implemented a teamlead responsibility where each team member leads an experiment. The individual is
important step inestablishing its quality and competitiveness in the field of engineering education. Accordingly, theprogram educational objectives and student outcomes were developed to support the department’smission, industry needs, and ABET requirements. The initial student outcomes excerpted from ABETwere [5]:Table 2: Program Student Learning Outcomes (Excerpted from ABET, 2017-2018 [5]) Student Learning Outcomes (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social
. Sageev and C.J. Romanowski, “A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in theWorkplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communications Skills, Journal of EngineeringEducation (9)4, 685-693, 2001.24. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the NewCentury, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004.25. R. Martin, B. Maytham, J. Case, and D. Fraser, “Engineering graduates’ perceptions of howwell they were prepared for work in industry,” European Journal of Engineering Education30(2), 167-180, 2005.26. P. Galloway, “The 21st Century Engineer,” American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exhibition, paper AC2008-191, June 2008.27. H.J. Passow and C.H. Passow, “What Competencies
., & Ware, R.,& Renna, M. (2022, August), Redesigning Writing Instruction Within a Lab-Based CivilEngineering Course: Reporting on the Evolution Across Several Semesters Paper presented at2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41443[10] Buswell, N. T., Jesiek, B. K., Troy, C. D., Essig, R. R., & Boyd, J. (2019). Engineeringinstructors on writing: Perceptions, practices, and needs. IEEE Transactions on ProfessionalCommunication, 62(1), 55-74.[11] Genau, A. (2020, June), Teaching Report Writing in Undergraduate Labs Paper presented at2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2--35279[12] Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate
Paper ID #40149Strategic Outreach for Nuclear Workforce Pipeline Development andMaintenance at a Historically Black College University (HBCU)Dr. Antony Kinyua, Morgan State University Dr Kinyua is an Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and currently affiliated to the Physics and En- gineering Physics Department at Morgan State University (MSU) as a Lecturer. He teaches Physics, Engineering Physics and Earth Sciences. He has more than 30 years experience in College teaching and research utilizing Nuclear and Related Analytical Techniques (NRATs) in material analysis, climate and environmental pollution monitoring.Ezana
. and Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008) “Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education,” Learning and Instruction, 18(2), pp. 109–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008.[13] Trigwell, K. (2011) “Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education,” Instructional Science, 40(3), pp. 607–621.[14] Cilliers, P. (2010) “Difference, identity, and complexity,” Philosophy Today, 54(1), pp. 55–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201054135.[15] Onyura, B. et al. (2016) “A mandala of faculty development: Using theory-based evaluation to explore contexts, mechanisms and outcomes
academic plan for finishing theirbachelor’s degree, and almost all students (84%) had an academic plan at least for at least the firstyear of their major program. Most (77%) students have checked their academic plan with anadviser at UWT. The most commonly-cited reason for not checking in with an adviser was thatthe standard academic plan was already well mapped out. At least one respondent reportedgetting information about academic planning from peers instead of from an advisor.Next Steps and ConclusionsTo summarize, we seek to increase: a) knowledge of engineering programs and careers, b)successful outcomes for graduation and transfer, and c) a greater sense of belonging andcommunity for our underserved and low income students. Hence, our focus
Development, 2011.[4] J. Mohammed, K. Schmidt, and J. Williams, “Designing a new course using backward design,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[5] K. Lulay Pe, H. E. Dillon, K. E. Eifler, T. A. Doughty, D. Anderson, and J. I. B. De Jesus, “Increasing engagement in materials laboratory with backward design and quadcopters,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017. doi:10.18260/1-2--28517[6] H. Dillon, N. Schmedake, K. E. Eifler, T. A. Doughty, and K. Lulay, “Design of a curriculum-spanning mechanical engineering laboratory experiment,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016. doi:10.18260/p.26679[7] K. Sutterer, “Sophomore year
Paper ID #40856Implementation of an industry-inspired undergraduate constructionmanagement project - A semester long feedback-based projectDr. Samaneh Gholitabar, New York City College of Technology, City University of New York Dr. Gholitabar is an assistant professor in the Department of Construction Management and Civil Engi- neering Technology at New York City College of Technology of the City University of New York. Before this position, she worked as a project manager at STV Inc., where she led projects in the redevelopment of the LaGuardia Airport. Dr. Gholitabar holds a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a concentration in
, A. J. Cavanagh, X. Chen, W.M. Trochim, J. K. Waterhouse, M. J. Graham, and B. A. Couch. "Benefits of a college STEMfaculty development initiative: Instructors report increased and sustained implementation ofresearch-based instructional strategies." Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 21, no.pp. 21-2, 2020.[8] J. Michael. "Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning." College teaching 55, no.2, pp. 42-47, 2007.[9] K. Kiemer, A. Gröschner, A.-K. Pehmer, and T. Seidel. "Effects of a classroom discourseintervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science",Learning and instruction 35, pp. 94-103, 2015.[10] M. DeMonbrun, C. J. Finelli, M. Prince, M. Borrego, P. Shekhar, C. Henderson
Journal of STEM Education 9:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00351-1Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M. & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self- efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior 110 Part B, 403-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012Puente-Diaz, R. & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2017). Creative self-efficacy: the role of self-regulation for schoolwork and boredom as antecedents, and divergent thinking as a consequence. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal 20, 347-359.Shavavina, L.V. & Seeratan, K.L. (2003
). Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education.Research in Higher Education 39(6): 607-631.Estes, A., Nuttall, B., and McDaniel, C. (2008). Researchers and Practitioners: A Dual TrackPath to Tenure That Works. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22 – 25,Pittsburgh, PA.Gardner, S.K. and Veliz, D. Evincing the Ratchet: A Thematic Analysis of the Promotion andTenure Guidelines at a Striving University. The Review of Higher Education, 38(1): 105 – 132.Hardin, J.-M. and Hodges, T. (2006). Tenure and Promotion Requirements: Large Universitiesvs. Small Colleges. 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. June 18 – 22, Chicago, IL.McGill, M.M. and Settle, A. (2012). Identifying Effects of Institutional Resources and Supporton
knowledge of sustainable development on the scope ofthe 17 sustainable development goals [13]. As a result, the taxonomic level of learning providedby Sulitest is knowledge, as the items in the questionnaire refer to facts and concepts [13;14].Assessing knowledge involves the ability to remember facts, concepts, and theories; it is locatedat the at the bottom of the Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive objectives [13]. Although theFoundational Matrix of Sulitest is based mainly on knowledge, it is expected that the instrumentcould include questions that not only assess skills, but also mindset components in the future[13].The test is composed of four themes of knowledge: (a) Sustainable Humanity and Ecosystems,(b) Global and Local Human-constructed
Education: Defining the Essentials,” J. High. Educ., vol. 59, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 1988, doi: 10.2307/1981868.[2] A. J. Kezar and P. D. Eckel, “The Effect of Institutional Culture on Change Strategies in Higher Education: Universal Principles or Culturally Responsive Concepts?,” J. High. Educ., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 435–460, 2002, doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0038.[3] P. Eckel, B. Hill, and M. Green, “En Route to Transformation. On Change: An Occasional Paper Series of the ACE Project on Leadership and Institutional Transformation.,” 1998.[4] M. L. Baba and D. Pawlowski, “Creating culture change: An ethnographic approach to the transformation of engineering education,” presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education
introductory information on the A) Resilience and Sustainability of Engineering for Sustainable ENVISION sustainability rating Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Development: Guiding system for infrastructure [24], pages Unified Approach, pages 1-8 [48]. Principles [49]. And 11-19. [Select if you are familiar with the Listen to ASEE community Listen to ASEE community panelist general idea of sustainability] panelist Chief Albert P. Naquin Chief Albert P. Naquin from Isle de OR from Isle de Jean Charles, Jean Charles, minutes 6:29-7:29, B) Chapter 1 and 3 of Engineering minutes 6:29-7:29, 24:30- 24
, pp. 103-134, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2020.1727815[16] C.D. Xavier Hall, C.V. Wood, M. Hurtado, D.A. Moskowitz, C. Dyar, and B. Mustanski, “Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1-16, 2022. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268769[17] J. Maloy, M.B. Kwapisz, and B.E. Hughes, “Factors Influencing Retention of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students in Undergraduate STEM Majors,” CBE - Life Sciences Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2022.[18] E. A. Cech and W.R. Rothwell, “LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107
Conference, Washington, District of Columbia. 10.18260/1-2— 62752. Walther, J., & Miller, S. E., & Kellam, N. N. (2012, June), Exploring the Role of Empathy in Engineering Communication through a Transdisciplinary Dialogue Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--213793. Wang, L.M., Beamer, B., Moore, K.J., and Krain, C., Case study - Lesson plan for noise control engineering concepts for use in ABET accredited engineering programs. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2021, Aug. 1-5, 2021. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Zone 1 ConferenceAppendixStudent Learning OutcomesStudent Learning Outcomes
Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8182-8201, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2935189. 2. T. Alladi, V. Chamola, B. Sikdar and K. -K. R. Choo, "Consumer IoT: Security Vulnerability Case Studies and Solutions," in IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 17-25, 1 March 2020, doi: 10.1109/MCE.2019.2953740. 3. S. Loukil, L. C. Fourati, A. Nayyar and C. So-In, "Investigation on Security Risk of LoRaWAN: Compatibility Scenarios," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 101825-101843, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208171. 4. East Carolina University, College of Engineering and Technology, Department of Technology Systems, Information and Computer Technology, https://cet.ecu.edu/techsystems
Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, IL, November 5-10, 2006, Paper #: IMECE2006-138153 D.D. Boettner, and B.G. Crawford, “Consistency Considerations for Integrated Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics Instruction,” Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November 12-18, 20104 B. Crawford, D. Boettner, “Integrating thermodynamics and fluid mechanics instruction: Practical Solu- tions to Issues of Consistency”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Ex- position, Vancouver, BC,20115 D. A. Kaminski, and M. K. Jensen, “Introduction to Thermal and Fluid Engineering”, John Wiley
Outputscategory of blocks. Drag a Space2D block to the work area and resize it. Connect the outputnode of the Array Input block to both input nodes of the Space2D block as an attempt to plot thedata. a. Is there a problem with the final graphical output? Explain. b. Fill in the table below in describing each action you did in trying to fix the problem: List of things done Reasoning for each State what you learned step from each stepRefining Debugging RubricsTwo of the researchers coded both Python and iFlow questions together to establish interrateragreement. Although the sample size was too small to establish rigorous scoring reliability, thetwo researchers
/S0033291703001624.[16] R. N. Spreng, M. C. McKinnon, R. A. Mar, and B. Levine, "The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale Development and Initial Validation of a Factor-Analytic Solution to Multiple Empathy Measures," Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 62- 71, 2009/01/01 2009, doi: https://10.1080/00223890802484381.[17] J. A. Johnson, J. M. Cheek, and R. Smither, "The structure of empathy," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1299-1312, 1983, doi: https://10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1299.[18] S. King Jr. and M. J. Holosko, "The development and initial validation of the empathy scale for social workers," Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 174-185
, M. J., Bowman, N. A., Rockenbach, A. N., Selznick, B., & Riggers-Piehl, T. (2018).Appreciative attitudes toward Jews among non-Jewish US college students. Journal of College StudentDevelopment, 59(1), 71–89.Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Lo, M. A., Starcke, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T., &Crandall, R. E. (2017). Expanding perspectives on evangelicalism: How non-evangelical studentsappreciate evangelical Christianity. Review of Religious Research, 59, 207–230.Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Newman, L. L. (2004). Faith, Spirituality, and Religion: A Model for Understanding the Differences.College Student Affairs Journal, 23(2), 102–110.Our Beliefs | ComeUntoChrist. (n.d
Engineering Graduate Students, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19391[16] Mosyjowski, E. A., Daly, S. R., Peters, D. L., Skerlos, S. J., & Baker, A. B. (2017). Engineering PhD Returners and Direct-Pathway Students: Comparing Expectancy, Value, and Cost. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 639–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20182[17] Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls, C, and Ormston R (2014) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students & Researchers. 117-118, SAGE Publishing, Los Angeles, CA.[18] Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting Survey Instruments: An Overview of Cognitive Methods. Quality of life research, 12(3), 229-238. https
AnnualConference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii: ASEE Conferences, p. 12.331.1-12.331.17.Available at: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2133.Wallwey, C., Milburn, T. and Morin, B. (2021) ‘Scaffolding Technical Writing Within a First-Year Engineering Lab Experience’, in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Proceedings. 2021ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. Available at: https://peer.asee.org/scaffolding-technical-writing-within-a-first-year-engineering-lab-experience (Accessed: 25 March 2022).Winsor, D.A. (1990) ‘Engineering Writing/Writing Engineering’, College Composition andCommunication, 41(1), pp. 58–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/357883.
spring. Our partnership with community center brought the totalnumber of participants to over 200 students. Table 1 indicates the number of participatingstudents in each group of 7th and 8th grades and students in the after-school program and theirmeeting patterns. Two teachers who teach the students in these grades from the schoolparticipated in the project. As evident from Table 2, 91% of the student served belong tounderrepresented minority.Table 1: Number of students served, their grades and meeting patterns Cesar Batalla School Number of Students and grade Number, duration of meeting Group A 22 students (8th grade) 2, one-hour meeting Group B 20 students (8th grade) 2
marketability when searching for jobs post-graduation. Overthe next few months, the authors intend to implement the planned lab activities and learningoutcomes. Possible future work includes planning more in depth activities in the courses,establishing a formal program advisory board, incorporating additional material to meet studentand industry needs into the program, and improving learning outcomes through evidence-basedpedagogical approaches and program assessment.References[1] G. F. Burch, R. Giambatista, J. H. Batchelor, J. J. Burch, J. D. Hoover and N. A. Heller, "A Meta- Analysis of the Relationship Between Experiential Learning and Learning Outcomes," Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 17, no. 3, 2019.[2] J. H. Lee, B
requirements engineers: An exploration of RE jobs in Canada," in Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2018, pp. 1-10.[14] C. Wang, Y. Tang, P. Liang, M. Daneva, and M. van Sinderen, "What industry wants from requirements engineers in China? An exploratory and comparative study on RE job ads," in Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 2020, pp. 1-11.[15] A. Ward, B. Baruah, A. Gbadebo, and N. Jackson, "What do job adverts tell Higher Education about the ‘shape’of Biomedical Engineering graduates?," in International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and
-basedevaluation of factors like organization, description and critique of current state of the art,discussion of current debates, and recommendations for future research. An IL-related item isincluded for References, but the description is much higher level than the customized VALUErubric used for the study, since it is only one of many factors on which the students’ grades arebased. The full assignment prompt is included in Appendix B. Provided the reports and otherdata were gathered as part of regular class activities, and no student identifying information wasconnected to any of the results, IRB approval was not required for this study.The initial VALUE rubric for this project had previously been customized from AACU’soriginal version for a prior
empowering the next generation. Through her involvement in the Improving Girls’ Math Identity Through Problem Solving and Mentorship Bass Connections Research Team at Duke University, she became particularly interested in reducing student dependence upon supplemental organizations to compensate for unsupportive STEM classroom environ- ments.Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Sci- ence at Duke University and Levitan Faculty Fellow, Special Assistant to the Vice Provosts. Prior to joining Duke, she was an associate professor with tenure at the University of Florida in the Department of Computer & Information
fraction of support provided byteaching assistantships and fellowships. As a result, there is a broad spectrum of faculty perceptionof the need of a P3-like program for the students, and also its benefit to individual faculty members.When the initial announcement of the offer of P3 track was communicated to the research activeSTEM faculty, it received lukewarm reception. Overall, the faculty response to the P3 programcan be divided into three categories: (a) Highly active senior faculty with large research groups.They were successful in the current system and did not see a need to make any changes; theysimply ignored the program. (b) Mostly the junior faculty, who considered the program as apotentially attractive way of building and expanding