prerequisite reveiws. Programs must provideacademic and career advising, including major-specific mentorship, and facilitate transfer studentintegration through credit articulation. Additionally, they should promote student involvement inprofessional organizations, access to support services, and recognition of prior learning to ensurealignment with ABET standards.Our ABET report detailed how the CSULB BME program ensures academic preparedness andfosters inclusivity through structured admissions policies and support systems. Pre-majors mustcomplete foundational courses with a minimum grade of “C” and maintain a 2.5 GPA to declarethe major. The report highlighted the seamless integration of transfer students, who enhanceprogram diversity, through
rig-orous academic instruction with a military framework. The paper explores VMI's capstone pro-jects' historical development and significance, highlighting how the military structure uniquelyshapes their design and implementation. This study investigates the academic and career impactsof these projects, drawing on feedback from students and faculty. Additionally, it identifies op-portunities for improvement, including fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, enhancing part-nerships with industry, and refining assessment criteria. Finally, the role of continuous improve-ment mechanisms, such as ABET accreditation, are assessed to ensure the ongoing relevance andeffectiveness of VMI’s capstone programs. This research aims to provide insights
-KubiAbstractGraduate programs in Engineering Management typically require students to complete a set of corecourses to ensure they have the necessary academic background and foundational knowledge for successin the program. These core courses often include probability, statistics, mathematics, and operationsresearch, tailored to the focus and specialty of the engineering management program. However, manyfirst-year graduate students face challenges in keeping up with these core courses, which can significantlyimpact their consequent academic success and, ultimately, their professional careers. This study aims toinvestigate the relationship between graduate students' performance in their first engineering managementcourse and their overall academic success
Improving EmployabilityThe VIP model equips students with practical skills highly valued in the job market, such as teamwork,problem-solving, and technical expertise. Cullers et al. [6] found that students participating in VIPprograms, which combine multidisciplinary research with academic coursework, demonstrated significantimprovements in practical skills and career readiness. These programs offer students an interdisciplinaryexperience that fosters collaboration with professionals and researchers, directly linking academicknowledge to real-world applications. The research indicates that VIP students were not only moreengaged in their studies but also better equipped to transition into careers after graduation. Furthermore,by working on
Professional Development, StudentOrganizationsIntroductionStudent chapters established by professional societies, like the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE), provide opportunities for students to network with industry professionals,gain exposure to various career options, develop leadership skills, and enhance their professionaldevelopment beyond the academic experience. These activities collectively prepare students for asmoother transition into their professional careers after graduation. ASCE, established in 1852, isthe oldest professional engineering society in the United States [1]. ASCE operates under acollection of volunteers associated with local or regional professional younger membergroups/forums, branches, and sections that oversee
Paper ID #47922Designing and Implementing Integrated Project Based Courses for First- andSecond-Year Environmental Engineering StudentsDr. Kathryn Plymesser, Montana State University - Bozeman Dr. Plymesser hold a B.S. (Case Western Reserve University ’01) and Ph.D. (MSU ’14) degrees in Civil Engineering. She began her academic career at Montana State University – Billings with a teaching and research tenure-track appointment. Dr. Plymesser joined the Civil Engineering Department at Montana State University in 2016. Her research is focused in ecohydraulics and fish passage with a particular fondness for the application of
introductoryengineering courses. Similarly, Samsuri et al. [6] utilized the How People Learn framework todesign an effective introduction to engineering courses. In addition, Nguyen et al. [7] investigatedproject-based learning strategies to improve the learning outcomes of diverse students enrolled inintroductory engineering courses. As such, introductory engineering courses have played a crucialrole in engineering education to motivate, prepare, and support the career decision-making of first-year students at a college level.Impact of Peer MentoringSeveral studies have shown that peer mentoring positively impacts university students' academicperformance and social integration. Eddy and Hogan [8] highlighted the impact of peer mentoringon improved academic
research interests related to technology and society, gender diversity and engineering education.Dr. Susanna Maria Bairoh, Academic Engineers & Architects in Finland TEK Susanna Bairoh holds a Doctor of Science (Economics) degree from Hanken School of Business and a Master of Social Science degree from University of Helsinki. She works as Research Manager at TEK (Academic Engineers & Architects in Finland) and is responsible for leading and managing TEK’s research activities and the research team. Through her research, she aims at improving gender equality, diversity and inclusion in technology workplaces and careers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Perceived
: Discover Engineering ● Iterate and evolve the definition of what it means to engineer and be an engineer. ● Recognize the value of engineering for all regardless of one's potential career. ● Explain and apply ethical & societal considerations when exploring an engineering problem. Yellow Thread: Engineering in Society ● Explore the impacts of past engineering successes and failures on society as a whole. ● Recognize and investigate the world's greatest challenges and the role that engineering plays in solving these challenges (e.g., Engineering Grand Challenges, UN sustainability goals, etc.). ● Integrate cross-disciplinary thinking and expertise to inform design solutions that
over the past three years. Most of thesestudies investigated opportunities of how these new tools support students’ learning, from first-year students [5-7] to senior capstone design [8-10]. Some explored ways to enhance writing[11, 12] and other critical skills [13-15]. Many examined potential ethical issues and urged thatcaution must be applied while adopting AI into instruction [7, 16 – 19]. However, few of theseefforts really encouraged or engaged students to prepare themselves for their careers [20-22],although the expectations and requirements for future engineers from the workplace havealready been significantly reformed [23, 24].Contrary to popular belief, college students do not necessarily show the expected sensitivity tonew tools
Design programimplies a focus on the design of materials and finishes for aesthetic purposes only, in fact,Interior Design students learn about principles of sustainable design and the LEED certificationsystem overseen by the U.S. Green Building Council. They are assigned to consider sustainabledesign principles in their capstone design projects and complete a LEED checklist. This enablesthem to collaborate effectively with architects and engineers in their future careers. Meanwhile,students in the renewable energy course have by then been exposed to sustainable designprinciples and applications of renewable energy at various scales including residential andcommercial scales. Therefore, the students in the renewable energy course are well
Pennsylvania State University.Vaishnavi Wagh, Pennsylvania State UniversityCatherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Measuring practical energy literacy: Exploring
careers in EmTechfields. Figure 3. REP Scholars Program Activities.TechUp Space Series: REP collaborated with industry professionals from underrepresentedgroups to discuss about the role of AI, including ethical and responsible use, as well as cloudcomputing in the workplace, focusing on applications, practical tips, and implications.Additionally, the #IamRemarkable workshops empowered participants with self-promotion skillsand career-building strategies [15]. One workshop is offered each major term.EmTechConnect: MDC faculty with industry experience serve as mentors to REP scholars,providing guidance on academics, career planning, and personal development [16], [17]. Eachprogram concentration is paired with a dedicated
Paper ID #39415Conceptualizing Program Quality in Engineering Education Ph.D. ProgramsDr. Le Shorn Benjamin, University of Houston Dr. Le Shorn Benjamin has amassed over a decade of experience in the field of education. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administra- tion, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. She is the recipient of the Robert Newby Award for Diversity Efforts, the Central Michigan University College of Graduate Studies 2019 Outstanding Dissertation Award, a Central Michigan University Department of Educational Leadership
-campusinstruction.Key findings include the growth in civil engineering knowledge for each cohort regardless ofdelivery method. Learners consistently identified innovative activities like debates and livedemonstrations as the most impactful for student learning. They identified hands-on activitiesand field visits as the most engaging and memorable. At the end of each course, instructors self-identified as gaining knowledge of research-based educational methods, greater ease in teachingand managing a classroom, and confidence in assessing student learning. The innovativeteaching approach to pre-college education has encouraged new cohorts of high school studentsto pursue engineering as a career and current graduate students to pursue engineering educationas a
) is due to the historical and demographic foundations that are not inclusive to womenand people of color that these fields were built upon. In their research, Lee et al. [1] andBlackwell et al. [2] both discuss how these factors continue to contribute to theunderrepresentation of women and people of color in the STEM industry. This is attributed to the“leaky pipeline” phenomenon where women lose interest in engineering as their careerprogresses due to continuous barriers such discrimination, inequitable resources andopportunities [2]. This further contributes to the loss of interest in STEM as young women andpeople of color achieve new milestones in their careers. Fixing the “leaks” in this pipeline,starting with addressing the dysfunctions
influence students’ interest in engineering and impactfuture career choices [8].BackgroundProblem-Based Learning (PBL)Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered instructional approach that empowerslearners to conduct research, integrate theory and practice, and apply knowledge to solve ill-structured problems. In PBL, learners work together in collaborative groups to constructunderstanding through problem-solving [9], [10]; [11]. Through engagement in the problem-solving process, learners acquire knowledge and develop higher-order thinking skills [11]. PBLis based on the idea that learners should not be passive recipients of knowledge because passivityhinders a deep understanding of the presented material and its application to real-world
with young girls interested in STEM related education.The Core concept behind SiS : interactive teaching methods. Students in SiS experience STEM,vs. passive learning or ‘information download’. Our Fundamental mission is to empower younggirls. STEM can be theirs at any age! For more information please see [1] Our paper looks at the problem of low gender representation from the lens of attractingyoung girls into STEM fields [2], [3]. We acknowledge the benefits of STEM initiatives targetedtowards attracting girls in school to consider pursuing Engineering degrees and careers [4], [5],[6],[7]. Further, we consider initiatives aiming to address this disparity as significant andirreplaceable. We build on this narrative to posit the
contributes to women’s recruit- ment, retention, and graduation within the TCE. Thompson has mentored student leaders throughout her career, most recently with women-centric organizations in the college. She has served as a Chancel- lor appointed member of UT’s Commission for Women and a board member with NASPA’s Center for Women. Thompson has received numerous recognitions and honors, including the 2017 NAMEPA Out- reach Program Award, 2017 NAMEPA Wings to Succeed Award, 2014 Outstanding New Professional, 2014 NACADA Region III Excellence in Advising – New Advisor (NC), and 2012 Gold Winner-Student Health, Wellness, Counseling and Related-Excellence Award. Thompson earned a Master’s degree in business administration
Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University (2016–2019), Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (2011–2016) and held faculty and administrative positions at Virginia Commonwealth University (2008–2011) and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1998–2008). Her research interests include: Broadening Participation, Faculty and Graduate Student Development, International/Global Education, Teamwork and Team Effectiveness, and Quality Control and Manage- ment. In 2003, she received the CAREER award from the Engineering Education and Centers Division of the National Science Foundation. Dr. Adams is a leader in the advancement and inclusion of all in science, technology, engineering
campus, were important in the major selection process.To focus exclusively on which factors affect students’ aspirations to study chemical engineeringneglects the bulk of the process that produces chemical engineering graduates. For example, thereare many points in their academic careers that women may choose to enter or exit a chemicalengineering program. The problem of attrition in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) more broadly has been widely studied. The most famous study is theethnographic study conducted by Seymour and colleagues that investigated reasons why studentschoose to leave STEM. One of the most cited reasons for leaving STEM in the original study waspoor teaching in STEM courses; this remained true in the
Paper ID #38320Investigating Engineering Practice Using Ethnographic Methods:Experiences of Student Observers at Multiple Field SitesProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is a Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D
Using Student Learning Outcomes in Construction Internships P. Warren Plugge, PhD Central Washington University Ellensburg, WashingtonAbstractInternships or co-operative learning experiences have proven a value for young professionals orstudents to gain hands-on experience and knowledge in their chosen degree and career path.Companies find value in this process as a process to identify potential candidates that would besuitable to hire as careered paid positions within the company and in many cases provide theopportunity to hire the student prior to their graduation. Construction management academia
Forrest Mims III’s Getting Started in Electronics. Prototypingcircuits with physical components provided mastery experiences that built a sense of personalself-efficacy and identity as an engineer, launching many engineering careers. We advocate forproviding these mastery experiences to non-electrical engineering majors to develop technicalliteracy. To this end, we developed an electronics course aimed at a broad, interdisciplinaryaudience which guided students through a series of projects teaching the fundamentals ofsoldering, circuits, and microcontrollers, then a guided, open-ended circuit design project. Wemeasured self-efficacy and sense of identity before and after participating in the design project.We found a 13% increase in self-efficacy
Chem- ical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, and the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a
. space lander that can keep items (such as people) inside the lander after impact. paper Mars helicopter, model of a space habitat. working robot arm. Mars rover.An end-of-program survey found that the program did increase students’ interest in engineeringand knowledge of engineering careers by providing them with challenging real-life applicationsof engineering.IntroductionThis paper describes a one-week morning summer program entitled, ‘Becoming an Engineer.”The program was provided for middle school students to introduce them to the engineeringdiscipline and what engineers do and was the vehicle for demonstrating the work in whichengineers engage. Through a program Students were also introduced to the profession
degree in Physics from Indiana University in Bloomington and a BS in Engineering Physics at UIUC.Karin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in Cambridge, MA. She earned a bachelor’s degree in biological engineering from Cornell University
teaching assistant. Currently, he is an aerospace acoustics and vibrations engineer, while simultaneously pursuing his Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comThe Challenge of Challenges: Virtual Engineering Design Challenges During the COVID19 Pandemic (Evaluation)IntroductionEngineering design competitions for K-12 students have been a consistent recruitment strategyfor many universities. Most of these activities also serve as a learning experience for students asthey consider future career paths. In the recent past, a number of these competitions andexperiences have involved
Paper ID #35948Hands-On Activity for Conceptual Understanding of Rigid Body KinematicsTroy Cristobal, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Biomedical engineering undergraduate at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.Ms. Eileen W. Rossman, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Eileen Rossman has a worked in various industries for over 14 years before starting a career teaching en- gineering. Her industry experience includes field support for Navy Nuclear refueling with Westinghouse, analysis and programming of pipeline flow solutions with Stoner Associates, and design
important step in the career development of engineering andengineering education faculty. However, access to engineering graduate school is inequitable dueto several structural and institutional barriers that negatively impact students with marginalizedidentities. These barriers include, but are not limited to, admissions criteria that implicitly favorWhite men from backgrounds of substantial educational and financial privilege [1], unspokenWhite patriarchal norms regarding who belongs in engineering graduate education [2]–[4], andchilly institutional climates where students face alienation, micro- and macro-aggressions, andlack of institutional support [5]–[7]. While prior work has called attention to the barriers thataffect marginalized students