because it includes factors such as fear of evaluation (i.e., ”I avoidevaluations if possible and have a dread of others evaluating me.”), feelings that success cannotbe repeated (i.e., “When I have succeeded at something and received recognition for myaccomplishments, I have doubts that I can keep repeating that success.”) and feelings of beingless capable than one’s peers (i.e., “I often compare my ability to those around me and think theymay be more intelligent than I am.”)8. The Clance IP Scale is a series of Likert-scale questionsthat yields a score from 0 to 100. Scores closer to 100 indicate more intense imposter feelingsand greater success anxiety. Scores falling in the range of 0 to 40 correlate to “few” imposterfeelings, 41 to 60 to
this combined enterprise.Roughly 1/3 of the design teams have both ME and EE members, 1/3 have only ME members,and 1/3 have only EE members. All teams are required to respond to the needs of an externalcustomer, maintain personal logbooks, prepare a problem statement with specifications, presenttheir solution in various design reviews, fabricate a working prototype, write a design report, anddocument their design process on a course web page (http://seniordesign.engr.uidaho.edu). Page 11.895.3Our capstone course design parallels many other capstone programs across the country6,7 andfollows the methodology advocated by standard design
54% 59%It is important, therefore, for SJSU faculty to make a conscious effort to develop and deliverteaching material to reach an ethnically diversified student population.Description of SJSU’s Neat Ideas FairThe Silicon Valley Neat Ideas Fair (www.cob.sjsu.edu/svnif) was first held in November 2004 asa forum to promote creativity and innovation at SJSU by generating and highlighting NeatBusiness Ideas. It was conceived as an opportunity for students from different disciplines topresent their creative ideas to their peers across campus and to industry professionals, to interactand build entrepreneurial teams, and secure feedback from many sources on their ideas.The main aims of the Fair were to encourage students
in the sciences and quantitative disciplines. Page 12.993.2 Continuity: Access to institutional and programmatic opportunities, material resources and guidance that support advancement to increasingly complex content in the sciences and quantitative disciplines.While the level of each characteristic can vary, all are required for an individual to pursue anengineering career. Girls graduate from high school with skills and knowledge equivalent tothose of their male peers. However, substantially fewer girls continue in engineering and thephysical sciences which suggests distinct differences in engagement
each combination of events throughout both tests (S=slow, A=average, F=fast, C=correct, I=incorrect, O=on-task, O’=off-task). (b) On-task vs. off-task events. (c) Speed of responses throughout test. (d) Correct vs. incorrect responses.D. Eye GazeThe eye gaze and head pose technique had an average of a 24.2% error for the 6th grade test, a32.1% error for the 7th grade test, and a 34.8% error for the 8th grade test. However, for thestudents who scored considerably higher than their peers, they exhibited up to a 65% error. Fig. 3shows the relationship between the subject’s test score and the amount of time his or her gaze iselsewhere in the room
complete the exercises in class. In the first matrix exercise (Fig. 1), students consider the four ideal-gas processes presentedin four rows: (i) a constant-pressure expansion, (ii) a constant-volume process in which thepressure increases, (iii) a constant-temperature expansion, and (iv) an adiabatic, reversible(constant entropy) expansion. Prompts written in the columns required students to (i) write amathematical expressions for the relation of pressure-to-volume and the relation of temperature-to-volume, (ii) create a plot of pressure versus volume, (iii) create a plot of temperature versusvolume, and (iv) develop and enter an expression for moving boundary work. In the second matrix exercise (Fig. 2), students consider the same four
of the BMES-idea national student design competition and writes a quarterly column on senior design for IEEE-Pulse magazine. In 2012 he received the National Society of Professional Engineers Engineering Education Excellence Award for linking professional practice to engineering education.David B. Rank, Root Cause Consortium, LLC David has more than 28 years in the workforce with 19 of those working for Harley-Davidson, Inc.. The majority of his Harley-Davidson R experience was as their Softail R Platform Director, developing and caring for that family of motorcycles with his management team. Over the years, he has participated in international assembly bench-marking studies, manufacturing capability assessments and
empty vessel waiting to be filled; they come to us with preconceived notions.These are fortunate times for college teachers. There is so much fresh research and newinformation being released on theory and methods of learning and teaching. People like KennethEble, professor of English at the University of Utah, who dedicated much of his college career to Page 8.1054.2investigating and writing about college teaching. In his book, The Craft of Teaching 2, he says "Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
, engineers do not try to find the root of theproblem, but concentrate efforts on optimizing existing solutions which may not be based on themost suitable principles. That seems illogical, since using correct physical principle tends to givea simple and robust solution 12, 4, 6, 15, 19. On the other hand what could be the right solution isoften beyond the reach of the particular problem solver working on it, or it is deemed too costlyto pursue or implement. In 1716 Frenchman Mr. Gautier wrote an interesting observation in his“Text on Bridges”. He was the first to complain in writing about scientists of the day, who hadno interest in practical matters, e.g. arches in bridges 20. Little over three decades later,structured training in science and its
(NCEA) researching significantly funded industry projects examining the design and modelling of specialist conductivity instrumentation and modelling for foods in the dairy industry. Since 2009, he has been a lecturer in electronics and communications engineering at the Faculty of Engineering and Surveying at USQ. He has published commercial research reports, trademarks, patent, and academic peer reviewed research papers both nationally and internationally including two recent publications directly relating to improving STEM engagement in schools using remote access laboratories and robotics. His research interest includes surrogate instrumentation systems, remote and non-contact measurement, remote laboratories, and
in math, science, or engineering than their male peers. TheCollege of Engineering at San José State University has also witnessed an overall decrease in thenumber of women engineering students, dropping from 19% in 2001 to 14% in 2011.Table 1. Women Undergraduates in the College of Engineering at San José State University Full‐time Students First‐time Freshmen New Transfer Students 25.0% 22.4% 22.4% 21.2% 20.0% 17.1% 17.9% 17.8% 18.1% 16.2% 14.4% 13.7% 13.6% 15.0% 18.8% 16.4% 17.6
performance parameters and contrasts thisinformation with key parameters of the NBN. The study suggests that a digital divide will remainfor locations that have to rely on satellite Internet access, even once the NBN has been deployed.IntroductionIn step with the developments in technology and society, educators have embraced computer andInternet-based learning and teaching tools. This includes administrative tools such as CourseManagement Systems (CMS), e.g. Moodle, as well as tools with a strong learning and teachingfocus, such as peer assessment tools. Such learning tools are used by both, distance as well asface-to-face education. Modern distance education relies heavily on Information andCommunication Technology (ICT) to provide students with an
. Wyne has been with the ABET USA for more than 10 years and is currently serving as a Commissioner for Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC) of ABET. In addition, he is a Guest Editor for a journal, Associate Editor, and is serving on editorial boards for four international journals. He has also served as Chair and Co-chair of numerous conferences, workshops, tracks, and panels, in addition to serving on the program committee for more than 60 international conferences. Wyne has given invited talks on numerous occasions and published a number of articles in peer-reviewed international journals and peer-reviewed international conferences.Mr. Gregory Stuart RogersMr. Preston Jay Mendoza, National University Business
Fischetti, M., “Working Knowledge: Fresh from the Sea”, Scientific American, Vol. 297, Issue 3, pp. 118-119. Page 15.345.9Appendix A : Pre-Project Survey Name e-mail address Major Do you live on campus or off campus? Best times to meet outside of class Is there any student you cannot work with? Rate your skills in the following areas from 1-10 : Handiness (mechanical abilities with tools) Math Computers Writing Leadership (managing a team) Page 15.345.10Appendix B
an M.A. in creative writing from Iowa State University.Ann Burnett, North Dakota State University Ann Burnett is an Associate Professor of Communication at North Dakota State University. Burnett holds a Ph.D. degree in Communication from the University of Utah and an M.A. degree in Communication from the University of Northern Colorado.Roger Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Green holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming. Page
Beyond Boundariesrelative to transforming undergraduate engineering education have been in the areas of: • Leading a change management process • Getting broad faculty involvement • Applying research on engineering education innovation from peer institutions and educational research.The work of the Engineering Beyond Boundaries (EB2) Task Force and Roundtable has beenfully supported from the college administrative leadership and increasingly has formed the basisof the college’s strategic plan. Department Chairs and Faculty have been invited to engage in theplanning process as members of the Task Force and/or Roundtable to provide ideas and create
now more commonly considered as a process wherestudents become active learners and teachers become facilitators who help them to constructtheir own knowledge and skills (Barr & Tagg, 1995; Decorte, 1996; Nicol, 1997, 2006). InPhysics Education Research (PER), active-engagement strategies have been widely adopted andhave shown to be one of the most successful methods of improving students’ learningexperience. These researches have been focused on student-centered learning such as inquirybased learning, peer-instructions as well as developing and implementing innovative learningmaterials inside classrooms. However, it is worthy to point out that in this very important highereducation innovation process, little attention has been paid to
Page 24.157.4not learned otherwise14. While there is certainly a place for good lectures in effective teaching,faculty need to involve students in discussions, team-based activities, laboratory experiences,peer-led learning, and hands-on participation to maximize learning outcomes.While the Kolb Experiential learning model is a good standard for experience-based learning, itis difficult for instructors to implement without further explanation. With more research havingbeen done on experiential learning, several elements of implementation stand out: 1. Leadership education should be implemented early on in an academic career – Early implementation gives more time for students to develop the leadership skills desired. Because the
Projects course that is required for all freshman in the College of Engineering at LTU. He has published 31 peer-reviewed journal articles. At LTU, Meyer offers a number of outreach programs for high school students and advises many projects for undergraduate students. Page 24.809.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Introducing High School Students to Biomedical Engineering through Summer CampsAbstractSummer camps provide many high school students their first opportunity to learn about
for two years as the Dean of the Graduate School and additional two years as the Interim Associate Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Studies. Dr. Latif was responsible for the graduate education ac- tivities for 14 Master’s Degree programs, development of new degree programs and courses. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Missouri—Columbia and an M.S. from South Dakota State University (SDSU); both degrees are in Agricultural Engineering. He holds a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Chittagong in Bangladesh. Dr. Latif has authored/co-authored numerous refereed journal articles and peer reviewed conference proceedings articles and has made national and interna- tional conference
students who thought that they could not draw—many students didnot like it in the engineering curriculum and the drawings took too long to do. So, we returned tobasic sketching. Now we are seeking new methods that are consistent with the RGP.Feature-based representationsThis method comprises traditional sketches where the designer stops after blocking out the mainfeatures and adds additional description by writing a text description of the feature. Theprinciple here is: do not transmit information that the recipient does not need in order to act(make a decision). The first corollary is: always include everything that is necessary to make thedecision either graphically or in text. The second corollary is: the purpose of a feature
of desks and the group tried to verbally guide a blindfolded peer through itsafely. At another station the students attempted to instruct a teammate in how to draw a “VT”without the teammate knowing what was being described. The third activity was instructing ateammate in how to build a structure out of Legos. The groups rotated through the stationsduring the activity period. Each station clearly emphasized the importance of precision and aneed to avoid assumptions when writing an algorithm, as well as general concepts of problemsolving and teamwork. Page 10.616.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education
students and have been instrumental in the success of Center-sponsored events,organizing volunteers, initiating special study sessions and countless other ways that havedrawn our diverse group of students together.All graduate students are housed together in the Student Office Space in the IntegratedManufacturing Systems Laboratory and are assigned desks based on their research ThrustArea affiliation. As a result, students within each Thrust Area consult with their peers ona daily basis and assist each other. This space helped in creating the “ERC spirit” amongstudents and was highly beneficial for team development. In the words of Dr. ShirleyJackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “it takes a village comprised ofintergenerational
themainspring argument in this paper. The only legitimate type of knowledge, in the context of ourcompulsory education system designed for social reproduction and global economic advantage1 This is not a broad epistemological discussion rather its focus is limited in the use of knowledge in TechnologyEducation.2 Peter McCleary, “Some Characteristics of a New Concept of Technology” in the Journal of ArchitecturalEducation 42, no 1 (Fall 1988). This article helped to develop and define aspects of this type of knowledge.3 Based loosely on the definition of science in the American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, ThirdEdition.4 Michel Foucault, Knowledge/Power: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, ed. C. Gordon. (NewYork
peer and /or instructor facilitated discussion, in and out of the classroom as well as online. Service-learning thus challenges students to apply their learning, to evaluate their owneffectiveness and that of the individuals and organizations with whom they work, and to setpersonal development goals. It requires that they interact with a diverse range of people otherthan their instructors and fellow students and that they take on often unfamiliar and high-responsibility level roles. It gives them opportunities to work in teams, to write, to present topublic as well as academic audiences, to make connections between their studies and the rest oftheir lives, and to develop their critical thinking abilities. It exposes them directly to issues
from different countries by comparingstatistics such as graduation rates, etc. Such direct comparisons may be too simplistic. Otherfactors, i.e., social, economic, political, etc., must be considered. For example, Thai students maybe under more pressure to conform and graduate with their peers within four years in the field Page 9.985.8they had first chosen while American students may not be subjected to such pressure. As a result, “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”the American students
Beliefs 213 4.23 9 10 23 52 119 Supervisors 213 3.62 16 13 57 78 49 Public Laws 210 3.43 22 23 64 44 57 Customers/Clients 209 3.39 20 30 53 60 46 Peers 213 3.38 16 24 76 56 41 Company Policies 213 3.30 13 36 72 59 33 Profession 213 3.17 25 30 67 66 25 Design Codes 207 3.14 31 30 59 53
Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3268or paper" (p. 326). They also note that, given the popularity of this technique, it's quitesurprising that they could only find thirty controlled experiments of hypermedia that made use ofobjective outcomes. Further, they suggest that the lack of supporting evidence for the efficacy ofhypermedia is most likely partly due to flaws in experimental design. In a similarlycomprehensive assessment of the existing literature, Tergan echoed their sentiment, writing that"…because of inherent shortcomings in design and research the potential ofhypertext
all members is required to complete a project effectively. 9. Foundations in technical report writing. An effort coordinated with the English Technical Department. Reports 10. Foundations in preparing and presenting information in oral presentations. Oral Briefings 11. A Tool: Foundations in using the USAFANet and the WWW. Computer Nets 12. A Tool: Slide and figure preparation using MS-PowerPoint. PowerPoint 13. A Tool: Foundations in using MS-Excel to create and use spreadsheets to catalog data Spreadsheets and to make calculations.from the instructor’s suggestions for improvement. We have found that the feedback sheetimproves student
realization ofplace and develop future direction. Additionally, the work of Arthur Chickering (1969)has provided a theoretical framework for these objectives and, together with institutionalexperience, has provided an increased awareness that engaging students from multipleperspectives is more often than not responsible for helping students develop academicallyand socially.Success as a college student requires development of a strong personal network ofsupport, connection among peers and purposeful awareness of their course of study.Studies of how college effects students by Pascarella and Terenzini (1991) offer citationafter citation as to the value and importance of the concept of mentorship, i.e., connectionto faculty, staff, students and others