University of Washington include introductory and honors courses in bioengineering, tissue and protein engineering lab courses, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and bio- engineering capstone writing and research/design courses. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in engineering, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educa- tional outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington.Dr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington Alyssa C. Taylor is a lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Washington. She received a B.S. in
learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at CSM. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s
Paper ID #26687Stakeholder Perspectives on Increasing Electric Power Infrastructure IntegrityDr. Efrain O’Neill-Carrillo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Efra´ın O’Neill-Carrillo is a professor of power engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez (UPRM). He holds a Ph.D. (Arizona State), an M.S.E.E. (Purdue), and a B.S.E.E. (UPRM). His profes- sional interests include energy policy, sustainable energy, distributed generation, power quality, social and ethical implications of engineering and technology. He has authored or co-authored over 70 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers. O’Neill
activities includedliterature searches, electronic and mechanical design, selection of materials, designing andconducting experiments with human participants, computer programming, and documenting theirwork. Occasionally lab work required visits to indoor and outdoor off-campus locations. Eachstudent lived in a private bedroom and shared a living area, kitchen, and a bathroom with threeother students in the program. Students attended weekly seminars with topics including programexpectations, written and oral communication, ethics, graduate school, the experiences of peoplewith disabilities, and job search strategies. Students created and delivered presentations for localhigh school students at the end of the summer program. Students made optional
about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt is a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, leadership, and diversity.Dr. Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University Dr. Audra Morse, P.E., is a Professor and Department Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan Technological University. Her professional experience is focused on water and wastewater treatment, specifically water reclamation systems, membrane filtration and the fate of personal products in treatment systems. However, she has a passion to tackle diversity and inclusion issues for students
content of the static events and technical reports were supposed to include adescription of how each Team intended to implement the automated driving system in the vehicle,with sufficient detail to satisfy the organizers and judges that the students were making a seriousengineering effort to design the autonomous vehicle. Safety and social concerns related toautonomous driving were also to be addressed, including a discussion of the ethical and moraldilemmas faced by an autonomous driver and how these decisions should be made. Any Team notdemonstrating good engineering practices or submitting a frivolous report could be disqualifiedby the organizers at any time in the competition.Teams that demonstrated satisfactory performance in the static
-layered mentoring structure for the students.Literature ReviewStudent veterans in engineeringAlthough veterans’ transition to higher education is an arduous process plagued with multiplechallenges and a need for identity re-configuration, the unique set of skills and dispositions theypossess are known to contribute to their academic resilience and perseverance. For studentveterans in engineering programs, many of their former military experiences prepare them todevelop clear and effective communication skills and teamwork capacity, which are highlyvalued in engineering fields [10]. Based on their prior military experiences, student veterans arealso likely to possess a strong work ethic and a keen interest in practical problem-solving. Theirstrong
2014 he was awarded by FAPESP with a post-doctoral research at the Centre for Ethics, Law and Public Affairs at the same university. His research focus relies on Engineering and Community Services; Socio-Legal Studies, Science and Technology Studies, Political philosophy, Sociology of Environment and Intellectual Property Rights.Dr. Cristiano Cordeiro Cruz, Aeronautics Technological Institute (Brazil) I currently develop a post-doctorate research at the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) with a schol- arship from FAPESP (#2018/20563-3). I hold a PhD degree in Philosophy (University of S˜ao Paulo, 2017), a bachelor degree in Philosophy (Jesuit Faculty of Philosophy and Theology, 2008), a master degree in
influence over therelational dimension by cultivating social trust by exhibiting competence, care, predictability,and commitment to diversity. But in doing so, what should the guiding principles of students’behavior with communities be?4. Theory 2: How should engineers behave with communities?In a different writing, we have shown how engineering ethics benefit the relationships thatengineers have with corporate employers while not serving as appropriate guides in theirrelationship with communities. [22] To overcome the limitations of engineering ethics (the codesand the forms in which they are taught), we developed a set of criteria for socially responsibleengineering (SRE), which I highlight here with examples of how students began developingthese
Paper ID #21682Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of PracticeStyleDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Senior Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, inclusion/equity & qualitative research methodology.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) estab- lished in 2010. Development of personal capability has been central to
described by Sharp and Rowe [6], are offeredfor all engineering majors at a relatively small university; others still are integrated into theuniversities’ co-operative education programs [7] or career services [8], [9]. The timing of eachof these courses varies from the students’ first year [2], [5] to their senior year [10], and topicscovered range from resume and cover letter writing to ethics to interviewing strategies. Oneprogram [11] also touches upon personal finances, and navigating benefits and retirementsavings. These existing courses have proved effective and are useful to the students who haveenrolled. The goal for the courses in the current paper, however, is to make these coursesmandatory for all students in the mechanical engineering
Methods Ethnography, a primary tool of anthropologists, is a common method used to understand culture from the perspective of insiders of that culture. Ethnographic methods include participant observation, field memos, autoethnography, interviews, and focus groups interviews.35, 36 The methodology of this paper is rooted in critical ethnography, which “begins with an ethical responsibility to address processes of unfairness or injustice within a particular lived domain”.21 Decolonizing Anthropology: For the scholar-activist doing qualitative work with the aim of ameliorating oppressive conditions, identity can act as a point of departure for theorizing. People with social identities that are underrepresented in institutions of power experience
that those feelings influence their thoughts, beliefs, and actions [17]. In engineering, weoften devalue the affective aspects of these discussions, and sometimes forget to bring up themoral/ethical aspects of our positions. This architecture develops the moral imagination ofengineering students by examining how their actions impact others.The ability to make meaning of complex, open-ended problems is critical to the success ofprofessional engineers in the workplace [18] and has been examined as a specific difficulty thatengineering students have [19]. The Four Voices architecture provides an alternative to simply"finding the best solution" to the issue being discussed. Instead, it asks participants to considerhow and why different parties
theirdiscipline knowledge.”8 Wasson also identified a need to integrate SE concepts, principles, andpractices into engineering programs. This will significantly upgrade the knowledge and skills ofnew engineering graduates to meet demands of the public and private workforce6.At the undergraduate level, the Western Kentucky University created a new SystemsEngineering (SE) Minor to upper division civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering9. Theintent is to prepare the student for their capstone design course. Their course consists of systemsengineering process, requirements, design fundamentals, subsystem fundamentals, trade studies,integration, technical reviews, and case studies and ethics. The minor in SE offers students toexpand their perspective on
Paper ID #22331Quantifying Changes in Creativity: Findings from an Engineering Course onthe Design of Complex and Origami StructuresDr. Justin L Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. He is currently the Vice Chair of the American Society of Civil
of engineering, science, or technology. What matters is the learningoutcome (aim).She identifies three learning aims for technological literacy that should be offered throughoutundergraduate education. They are; Teaching for Citizenship; Teaching for Living Skills andCompetencies: Teaching for Employment Competencies.Teaching for citizenship “would involve ethics, politics and philosophy and ways in whichtechnological developments can impinge upon and challenge our understanding of moralreasoning”. For example, advances in medicine are an ever present reminder of this effect.Among other matters they raise important questions about the right to die. Kielsen argues thatthese decisions are not to be left to technocrats alone but for the average
licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder Marissa H. Forbes is a research associate at the University of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach physics for the Denver School of Science and Technology (DSST), where she also created and taught a year-long, design-based DSST engineering course for
Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a
understand, and the document states that the goal was not to be aninclusive of all engineering. Additional recommendations for K-12 engineering instruction havecome from the 2009 NAE/NRC report, which state that engineering at this level shouldemphasize engineering design, incorporate developmentally appropriate mathematics, scienceand technology skills and promote engineering habits of mind11. The engineering “habits ofmind” mentioned in this document refers to the values, attitudes and thinking skills associatedwith engineering and these include: (1) systems thinking, (2) creativity, (3) optimism, (4)collaboration, (5) communication, and (6) attention to ethical considerations11. Therefore, asmore K-12 schools and teachers are integrating
on multidisciplinary teams 3.6 4.7 4.3 3.6 4.0 4.3 3.8 3.9 4.9(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering 4.3 3.6 3.8 3.5 4.6 4.1 4.2 3.5 3.9 problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3.5 3.6 3.7
experiment, fail, andlearn. Students were challenged in courses to explore and understand the root cause of theproblem they were assigned, the sustainability of technical solutions, and consider the ethics ofproposed actions; these objectives harking back to the intent as described in 1996.Assessments conducted in the Program’s International Leadership of Engineering andDevelopment course highlighted the value of virtual international collaboration but also pointedtoward the need for travel-based experiences. These results led to the expansion of virtual andtravel activities. 2 The perceived need for enhanced global awareness and enhanced worldviewintegrated within the leadership curriculum drove an investigation into how best to deliver
quantitative thinking [22; 23; 24]. In light of the persistence of this issue, we argue that the engineering education community is 2 uncertain “about what matters”, both in the sense of why this problem matters (e.g. is diversity a question of equity and ethics? Or putting together a more diverse and thus competitive American workforce?) and how to address the problem (see discussion of polarization below).Polarization “[that which
business acumen 4% 23% 46% 27% 0% 26 High ethical standards, integrity, and responsibility 0% 15% 27% 46% 12% 26 Critical thinking 0% 12% 27% 58% 4% 26 Willingness to take calculated risks 4% 19% 46% 23% 8% 26 Ability to prioritize efficiently 12% 15% 19% 50% 4% 26 Project Management: supervising, planning, scheduling, budgeting, etc. 4% 15% 27% 50% 4% 26 Teamwork skills and ability to function on
ofEngineering (NAE) Engineer of 2020 report.47 In this paper, we focus only on the ABEToutcomes, which were listed on the survey as shown in Table 2. Page 26.371.8Table 2. ABET Criterion a-k outcomesMath a Ethics c aScience CommunicationPlanning/conducting experiments b Global/societal context d bAnalytical skills Environmental context dDesign Economic issues dTeamwork
from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and accessibility. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Method to Inform and Improve the Traditional Aerospace Engineering Discipline I. Abstract This overview paper demonstrates the valuable attributes of phenomenography forinvestigating the
assignments will follow t Bloom's taxonomy(Bloom 1956) where each new assignment moves to a higher level with each module. Forexample, Module 1 is descriptive and focuses on knowledge acquisition, Module 2 focuses oncomprehension and understanding of materials to formulate questions, Module 3 moves toapplication, while Modules 4 and 5 will focus on analysis, evaluation, and creation. With eachModule there will be a set of tasks undertaken and an assessment. The final product will be asynthesis of engineering knowledge and social, political, economic, and ethical considerations. Module 1: Introduction. New knowledge/ tasks: The social science professors and the engineering professor will discuss the role of computer technology in community
supportsystems and the existence of service-connected disability. However, these students aspire to besuccessful against all odds, have an elevated work ethic, and employ a heightened level ofleadership, teaming, and communication. These assets can be invaluable for student veterans andtheir peers as they pursue careers in engineering. Results thus indicate that student veterans’military time and training do lend themselves as useful tools in navigating the transition toundergraduate engineering and ensuring success as engineering students. The identification ofthese unique skills and challenges affords us a better chance to understand these aspects oftransition and to facilitate change that better supports future student veterans with
onthose beliefs. The program is also grounded in John Dewey’s proposition that higher education isto assist individuals in developing the skills to be effective in their preferred occupation. Thisprogram focuses on developing professional competencies such as people and projectmanagement,leadership, and ethics, as well as perseverance, stress management, and the ability toreflect and modify one’s process of learning. Treveylan’s [9] studies on “the work that engineersdo” call for more emphasis on professional skills such as communication and the ability toperform effectively on teams. Treveylan advocates for students teaching others because“education, like engineering practice, relies on special kinds of social interactions” and thatstudents
traditionalengineering coursework. Throughout the process of developing a product for commercializationand pitching this venture to potential investors, it is not difficult to imagine a wide range ofABET outcomes being addressed, in ways that traditional engineering curriculum is lacking.These exercises could align with ABET outcomes (2) an ability to apply engineering design toproduce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, andwelfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, (3) an ability tocommunicate effectively with a range of audiences, and (4) an ability to recognize ethical andprofessional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which mustconsider
on pedagogicalmethods, or seeing methods used by other instructors. SEEFs shared common motivations ofjoining a career involving instruction motivated by experiences during student teaching roles,and a desire to improve teaching practices. In addition, the SEEF community referred to Barkleyet al.’s handbook [29] on collaborative learning techniques provided a wealth of teachingmethods, along with Godsell’s sourcebook [30] which provided perspective on differentmethods, their implementation and evaluation, among many other sources. However common toall the SEEFs was interpreting the application of these methods to fit their discipline. Forexample, in Computer Science the jigsaw method was used to explore the ethics of human-computer