Paper ID #9265Technology in classrooms: How familiar are new college students with thepedagogy?Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on student learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education.Mr. S. Cory Brozina, Virginia TechMr. Steven Culver, Virginia Tech
State. He has forty years experience teaching design related and solid mechanics courses, and has developed expertise in the areas of robotics systems, and micro-robotics. He is an ASEE and ASME member.Timothy G. Southerton, RIT Mechanical Engineering Tim Southerton is currently a fifth year mechanical engineering student at RIT in the BS/MEng Dual Degree program. As a student who enjoyed the Stamp-based Robotics class as an undergraduate, he was very interested in an opportunity to restructure the curriculum for Arduino compatibility. Once involved in the project, he decided to see it through as the teaching assistant for the lab portion of the revamped course, which proved to be an enriching experience. After
fabrication in educational settings. He looks at the experiences of students in classroomsutilizing making in the curriculum and discusses the advantages of using digital fabrication in aneducational setting. In his observations, he found making to be an asset in the classroom whenutilizing contextualized learning of STEM topics, by creating meaningful, concrete tasks for aproject or concept.Edward Pines and colleagues [5] explored the possibilities of “Broadening Participation ThroughTngagement in the Maker Space Movement” and shared the lessons they learned in usingmakerspace activities as a partnering component to traditional engineering curriculum. Theycontribute an interesting discussion on how to balance the interests of the various
Paper ID #25688A Mixed Methods Analysis of Goals and the Impact of Peer Mentoring forParticipants in the WISE Honors ProgramDr. Jennifer A Gatz, Stony Brook University Public STEM education teacher of AP Biology and AP Research for Patchogue-Medford School District. Ph.D. in Science Education from Stonybrook University, 2017. Research affiliate at Stony Brook Univer- sity’s Institute for STEM education evaluating persistence, motivation, social and academic integration of women in science and engineering at the undergraduate level.Dr. Angela M. Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of
of the importance of engineeringdesign’s integration with society, in our critical review we found it was mostly grand statementsbeing made in the introduction and conclusion, without much real substance in the meat of thepaper. This was most prominent in A4’s paper. The second paragraph mentions the importanceof covering “social issues like the environment” (A4, p.83), and in the conclusion they concludethe students “have shown significant progress in […] developing an appreciation of theengineering involved in creating wealth for society” (A4, p.90). Whereas, during the textualanalysis of the remainder of the paper, there were almost no other codes for society.This is again evident in A1, where the second sentence of the paper states
# Curriculum Objectives Fundamental Objectives 1 Demonstrate competence in the operation of Psychomotor software simulation tools and hardware design environments. 2 Simulate quantization noise effects and theoret- Models ically predict quantization noise power spectra at the output of a fixed–point filter. 3 Synthesize basic digital logic and basic DSP Design functions (buffering, table lookup, arithmetic, etc.) in an FPGA. 4 Design filters that meet a given set of realistic Design, Creativity system parameters. 5 Implement filters of various flavors and com- Instrumentation, Data Analysis plexities that execute on an FPGA using dis- tributed arithmetic. 6
to frequent changes in available tools, challenges mightnever go away as far as transferring curriculum inventories and PD content to new circumstances.Furthermore, teaching with technology often requires customization and the needed technologies must beboth content specific and pedagogically suitable at the same time.28 While latest technologies offer morecapacity for applicability, their optimum utilization may necessitate knowledge of tools’ operationalunderlying principles for easier transfer into new circumstances and better integration.21, 28, 44, 69, 73There is an important feature of interdisciplinary education that can be best described by Aristotle’s well-known statement, “the whole is more than the sum of itsparts,” or the theory
registered into all four of these courses, thusestablishing a cohort. This cohort was comprised of random students, without regard to theirdegree plan, placement tests, etc. All other first semester students were enrolled in thetraditional non-cohort curriculum. About a month prior to the start of the semester, each of theinstructors (MATH, PSYC, CSCI, and ENGL), and the IFYEP project coordinator (Dr. Mattes)attended several meetings (roughly 6 hours total) to establish a sequence of weekly topics thatwould easily allow for subject integration across the courses. An example of a weekly themethreading through the four core courses is illustrated in Fig. 1, along with an indication of howadditional major-specific first-semester courses could be
integrity in particular water bodies. 3. Historic exclusion of Māori from academics, as Māori were historically considered more suited to labors of the land than the mind. 4. Present-day school scheduling of subjects in ways that are culturally marginalizing, often resulting in students who are either weak in calculus or their cultural identity. 5. Institutional devaluing of identity and background, through curriculum rules regarding elective subjects.Specific examples help to describe the nature of these five barriers.Historic cultural conflict. An extract from The New Zealand Book of Events (1986) commentsthat on May 1, 1979, engineering students at the University of Auckland planning to perform amock Māori haka during the
do notfeel stretched to meet their full potential for a multitude of reasons. The reasons include the "nochild left behind" clause, where more focus is being placed on those students who are struggling.This practice leaves more advanced students bored and neglected. This issue highlights thenecessity for a more challenging curriculum, instead of just meeting the minimum criteria. Inorder to uphold the state requirements, teachers have to be focused on all their students passingthe assessment exams to graduate on to the next grade rather than imparting education tostimulate their minds. This is an issue that needs to be addressed at a fundamental level.There is a need to be truly innovative in education to address the needs of all students
. These newstandards emphasize nurturing students' ability in problem-solving and lifelong learning, thus toenable them to integrate mathematics and science with technology to solve real-worldproblems. Implementation of these goals requires mathematics and science teachers todevelop new curriculum and approaches. This has presented a great challenge to teachers,especially to those working in rural school districts. Compared with their counterparts in urbanschools, rural school teachers usually work in a more isolated environment, and have lessfinancial resources and opportunity to conduct professional development. As such, it is moredifficult for them to implement the new standards.To implement the new standards, mathematics and science teachers
engineers from industry towork with manufacturing faculty and students in both education and research. TheCenter has successfully developed an organization that can be responsive to bothacademic needs for process and to corporate needs for agility. The Education StrategicPlan integrates curriculum, culture and outreach. This paper provides an overview ofeach of the elements of this comprehensive effort.IntroductionThe vision for the Education Strategic Plan of the Engineering Research Center forReconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (ERC/RMS) was driven by the desire to give theUM manufacturing curriculum and outreach activities an identity which would capitalizeon the uniqueness of the ERC/RMS research challenge. Typical courses onmanufacturing
. He is integrally involved in the design and delivery of the Pre-Freshman and Cooperative Education Program and others of that ilk at OSU, as a part of his specific interest in soft skill development, diversity, recruitment and retention initiatives.Mr. Nicholas Rees Sattele, Ohio State University Nicholas is an Undergraduate Research Associate with The Ohio State Department of Engineering Ed- ucation. He is in the process of completing a B.S. in Computer Science and Engineering in the In- tegrated Business and Engineering Honors Program at Ohio State. His interests include incorporating Entrepreneurial Minded Learning into engineering coursework and interdisciplinary innovation. c
systems for Industry 4.0 through integration of the IoTtechnologies not creation of them. Thus, we kept this important distinction front and center in ourcurriculum. Another unique feature is the use of a formal software engineering methodology byMechanical Engineering students to develop high quality code.In this paper, we present an overview of the curriculum developed for the new course. We providedetails of the instructional design elements and assessment results from the first offering of thenew course.2 Overview of the new curriculumThe mechanical engineering program at WSU Vancouver has a senior-level elective course onmicrocontrollers. This course is part of a 3-course sequence in the mechatronics option track. It isa 3-credit semester
discuss results from the analysis ofclosed-ended and open-ended survey questions, and identify future work.Pre and Post-Survey for Short-Term Program ImpactA survey was administered at the start and at the end of the workshop to measure the influence ofthe workshop experience on participant’s familiarity, confidence and engagement in conductingengineering education research and using research to inform teaching or curriculum. The preand post-survey instruments were designed to answer the three primary evaluation questionsgiven in the previous section and had five distinct constructs (Table 2) using close-ended itemswith an associated response scale. The first construct on familiarity with the issues of educationresearch and the second construct
Educational institutions are increasing their efforts to integrate females into non-traditional technical programs. Adjustments, such as curriculum and recruitment andretentions efforts, are being made to ensure that females feel welcome and a part of theprogram’s standard regimen. Industrial Technology stands at the vanguard of successfulparadigms that prepare females in such non-traditional areas as managerial and technicaldegree programs. Marshall (2000)26 contended that the common goals of IndustrialTechnology programs are to increase enrollments and to offer a curriculum designed toprepare students for management and technical careers. O’Meara & Carmichael (2004)34added that emphasis should be placed on both recruitment and retention efforts
northeast area of the USA, has been a resident of Fargo, ND since 1996.Dr. Austin James Allard, Turtle Mountain Community College Austin Allard is a Pre-Engineering Instructor at Turtle Mountain Community College. He earned a doc- torate degree in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University. His work deals with using manufactured drones to map ecological areas. He is dedicated to using engineering solutions to investigate environmen- tal issues close to home.Teri Ann AlleryAnn Vallie, Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish CollegeDr. Bradley Bowen, Virginia Tech Bradley Bowen is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the School of Education’s Integrative STEM Education program. He has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia
is engineering classroom, with an inclusive curriculum havingclassroom-based interventions, we will focus on organizational diversity promotion factor asan indicator of climate perception.Our proposed model based on the literature review is as follows:Figure1: Proposed Model (showing the relationship of Perceived climate, sense of belongingand engineering identity based on gender)Current StudyThis study sits within a larger study designed to help all engineering students develop aninclusive professional identity. In addition to having excellent technical skills, students withan inclusive professional identity [23] seek out diversity in teams, leverage diversity toimprove team dynamics and outcomes, and consider a wide range of potential
, withproblem-based learning. Cassel et al.2 coordinate the activities of Ensemble - Computing Portalwhich is a NSF sponsored National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Pathways project for comput-ing education materials, and provides access to other repositories, e.g., YouTube Education.Several educators and researchers have done work on integrating testing into CS/IT courses through-out the college curriculum. Wong20 describes an approach that integrates software testing through-out the CS curriculum starting from CS1 through to the final senior project course. The approachemphasizes introducing testing modules (possibly the same module) into several courses in thesequence (varying the breath and depth of delivery) using a minimally intrusive and non
by a graduate of a course or program. Using this approach, the STEPSteam was able to ensure that curriculum design, content, delivery, and assessment wasbased on an explicit identification of the integrated knowledge, skills and values neededby both students and society.The learning outcomes for the STEPS courses (STEPS I taken in Sophomore 1 andSTEPS II, taken in Junior year) require that students: ≠ Demonstrate competency in applying the steps of the engineering design process to solve open-ended problems. ≠ Demonstrate ability to present design solutions in oral presentation and written reports. Page 14.963.6 ≠ Practice
NRP guidelines, detailing the requirements, were streamlined to be less than twelve pagescompared to the 20+ page documents of their predecessors.10 For student chapters, an advisor is either a faculty member or university administrator.11 The NAC provides up to 31 different awards to chapters based on their NRP performance across the student andprofessional chapters annually.12 Up to three different chapter awards for NRP v.3. 11 Figure 1. NRP v.3’s chapter activity in the SHPE annual cycle.2.3.2 Chapter v.3 Ecosystem Integration In addition to chapter ecosystem integration within the NRP v.3 report
percentage of student transfers are unable to keep a tightly controlledcohort of students progressing through the curriculum. Students usually have varied course loadsand different priorities due to family, financial needs or other responsibilities. Therefore, there isa need for an individualized approach to advising. The school’s administration faces challengesscheduling courses and allocating diminishing resources to satisfy student demand. In addition,faculty needs to assess the efficacy of their curriculum in a program, and collecting longitudinalstudent data is difficult. A web application system (mobile compatible) using a multi-agent approach has beendeveloped to allow the students (agents) to take more control over their
AC 2008-1296: THE ENGINEERING LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: A PROPOSEDMODELNadia Kellam, University of Georgia Nadia Kellam is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Georgia. Her research involves an integration of systems and engineering ecology with engineering education, resulting in a deeper understanding of student learning through a complexity lens. In particular, she is developing the Ecological Inspiration for Engineering Education research program, which involves an innovative approach of borrowing concepts from healthy, ecological systems and applying these to engineering education systems. Ecological concepts such as distributed cognition, systems
time study. Systems engineering is an integral part of an engineeringproject. Funded through a NASA grant “Center of Excellence in Systems Engineering for SpaceExploration Technologies”, MSU established the Systems Engineering and Management Institute(SEMI) in May 2009. The goals of SEMI include but are not limited to: integrating systemsengineering curriculum into the existing engineering education and research programs at MSU;and providing the students with an opportunity to choose a concentration or minor in systemsengineering. One of the three exchange students assigned to MSU assisted Dr. Chen, the interimdirector of SEMI, in laying the foundation of SEMI’s curriculum and developing a small casestudy on a systems engineering application
Technology Officer, at UT Brownsville, he implemented state of the art networking using campus wide fiber ring with redundant links. He established diskless computer labs to provide uniform computing platform across campus, and modernized classrooms to make them congenial to online learning. He was the PI on NSF funded BCEIL (Beowulf-based Curriculum Enrichment Integrated Laboratory) and Co-PI on NSF funded MCALL (Multimedia based Computer Assisted Learning Lab).Dr. Hansheng Lei c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Holistic Approach for Enhancing Distributed Education with Multi-Campus Course Delivery MethodsAbstractTo create an emerging teaching and
onlyencourage students to take ownership of their learning outcomes, but also allow the instructorsmore in-class time for hands-on programming sessions.On another note, an interesting perspective is the apparent extensive use of the tutorials globally(a total of 44,926 views as of 12-27-2012, 3,751 of which are within the state of Georgia and16,376 within the U.S. as tracked by YouTube Analytics). This work lays the foundation for theeffective integration of the VLE into the global engineering community – to be used as asupplement in face-to-face traditional, hybrid and/or fully online programming courses asrepresented by the current trend in the engineering curriculum 16.Conclusions and Future WorkThis paper presents an overview of MatLab Marina – a
curriculum.IntroductionSince 2006 the popularity of computational thinking (CT) - skills for solving problems byadopting the theoretical concepts of computer science - has been increasing substantially,leading to an increase in the amount of research and experiments on the CT method. Yet,there are limited numbers of inquiry investigate approaches to incorporated CT into acurriculum. Betül Czerkawski researched ways to integrate CT across all curriculum, throughsurveying instructional CT designers. She constructed the survey using the ADDIEinstructional design model. One of her findings showed that the Mind Map(s) (MM) strategycan establish a better connection between CT and instructional design [1]; however, verylittle research existed to investigate the correlation
experience in the industryenvironment. Successful integration of workplace and education is expected to result inincreased focus, interest, and success for all our students [7]. These experiences are alsoexpected to positively affect course curriculum and teaching effectiveness through increasedfeedback by students and industry [7].The MET and SM curricula are rigorous, as both programs are math and physics intensive andare considered STEM programs. Both of them require courses such as (but not limited to)algebra, calculus, chemistry, physics, probability and statistics, industrial hygiene, human factorsand ergonomics, fire protection systems, system safety analysis, hazardous materialmanagement, introduction to solid modeling, applies statics
Paper ID #34970Creating a Diverse Next Generation of Technically- and Community-MindedSTEM Professionals (Experience)Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Denise M. Driscoll, Purdue University Dr. Driscoll is an experimental social psychologist with ex- pertise in stereotyping and prejudice, attitude and persuasion, diversity and inclusion, and managerial and intercultural business communication. Her experiences as an academic, diversity consultant, and admin- istrator over the last 30 years have helped her integrate broadening participation and inclusion practices across research
achieve success.Gender and Cultural Contextuality in the ClassroomSome scholars using surveying data and focus group information have found that while womenthat are both academically and intellectually capable, they lack confidence in their abilities in S& E.6 Reasons for lack of self-confidence included feelings of isolation, negative experiences inlaboratory classes, lack of role models and a cold classroom climate.9In short, current curriculum and teaching practices may leave women in a position where theydon’t “see” themselves in engineering. Classroom examples don’t include them, and for womenof color, the same examples may also be of an exclusive cultural context as well. The picture offuture engineers and scientists seems to be one in