(Florida NASA Business Incubation Center), SATOP (Space AllianceTechnology Outreach Program), Small Business Development Center (SBDC), EconomicDevelopment Commission of the Space Coast, NASA Office of Technology Commercializationat KSC, and other local partners, neighboring universities and colleges, plans to dramaticallyreduce this problem by methodical research and facilitation of best practices for technologytransfer and commercialization leveraging a unique educational program in experientialentrepreneurship and technology commercialization.SCION Objectives:The SCION Partnership objectives are to:1) Develop education and experiential entrepreneurship programs to promote technologycommercialization and entrepreneurship awareness
competition requires the team to design and build a medium-sized robot to autonomously traverse an outdoor obstacle course. Obstacles normally consist of colored barrels, construction netting, white lines and trees. The team uses stereovision cameras as the primary obstacle detection sensor. The team is currently exploring several algorithms for path planning. Paul recently become a member of the UMR Applied Computational Intelligence Lab. He recently spent the summer developing adaptive user-interfaces as part of a research partnership with Boeing.Donald Wunsch, Missouri University of Science and Technology Donald C. Wunsch II (S’87–M’92–SM’94–F’05) received the B.S. degree
positions in Germany are beingsought for US students. European engineering students previously hosted by author PK havebeen well-trained in research and industrial applications and are desirable interns for both USengineering design courses and US companies.GOALS OF THE PARTNERSHIPWe have established a partnership between the VaNTH ERC in Bioengineering EducationalTechnology and a consortium of German universities, research institutes, and companies in thecities of Hannover and Braunschweig in the German state of Niedersachsen. ParticipatingGerman institutions include the Technical University of Braunschweig, the University ofHannover, the National Research Centre for Biotechnology (GBF) in Braunschweig, and the CarlDuisberg Society (CDG) in
students to test their entrepreneurial skills. More specifically, thesimulation hopes to highlight the value of learning by doing, experimentation, productdevelopment, and market research. The simulation is designed for individuals or team play.Typically, students will spend 30 minutes or less to complete the simulation.The online simulation allows students to test the entrepreneurial acumen to design a businessapproach to maximize revenue during a five-week timeframe while operating in the city ofBoomtown. Each week, students must determine the best combination of menu offering (icecream, frozen yogurt, or smoothies) and location (arts district, beach, city market, downtown,train station, or university) to generate revenue. Students can only
this growing field. Lastly, due to thedifficulty of giving all students adequate time to practice programming on real robotic arms,there was a recognized need for lifelike and portable simulation software. Thus, a final aspect ofthis partnership was the development of such software at Michigan Tech. Titled RobotRun, thissimulation software is now available through open source licensing to assist students andindustry personnel in learning the basics of robotics programming.Results of Academic Programming and WorkshopsNearly three full years has now passed since the development of this academic programmingbetween Bay College and Michigan Tech, so initial data regarding enrollments, graduations, andworkshop participation is now available. During
Paper ID #38814Preparing the manufacturing workforce for Industry 4.0 technologyimplementationDr. Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Indus- trial Distribution and a member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University. His research interests include automation, robotics, cyber-manufacturing and Industry 4.0; optical/infrared imaging and instru- mentation; micro/nano manufacturing; and design of technology for engineering education. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory at Texas A&M University
engineering education in high schools in rural areas.Mr. Turhan Kendall Carroll, The Ohio State University Turhan Carroll is currently a graduate research associate in the engineering education department at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. He received BS degrees in Physics and Applied Mathematics from North Carolina State University. He also worked for approximately 7 years as an engineer performing re- search in magneto-photonics. His research interests now focus on broadening participation in engineering via the use of informal education.Dr. David A. Delaine, The Ohio State University Dr. David A. Delaine is an Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University Department of Engineer- ing Education. Within
beadapted and should be applicable9,10.Course Development Background:An ongoing seminar series has been explicitly designed to bring students out of their usualsurroundings and to give them practical experience with a variety of public presentation toolsintended to help them to present more effectively and to move from a subject-centered mode ofpresentation to audience-aware communication.The Graduate Seminar is a required part of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(UIUC) curriculum, but the offerings are quite varied among those instructors within thedepartment, giving the students a wide range of topics. The instructor has extensive backgroundin engineering and industry relations.Since our department is quite widely constituted, our
gamesare too difficult or expensive to use. For this purpose, the board game Markopoly was designed to aid in the teaching ofdiscrete-time Markov chains in a junior-level industrial engineering class, ProbabilisticOperations Research (POR). Markov chains represent a form of mathematics and a way oflooking at the world that most of the students have never seen before, and many of them strugglewith the concepts – how to use them, what the different statistics mean, and which ones to use inwhich situations. Markopoly was designed to help guide students through the concepts usingmore open-ended questions than is typical for a class assignment. Four different versions of thegame were played in class by groups of two to five players, and then
theory of self-authorship3 will be introduced as the theoreticalframework for looking at the individual through the lenses of context and institution, as well asthe larger cultural paradigm. Next, the methodological framework informing the research designand the research design and methods used throughout this study will be offered. Finally, theresearch findings of identity development and formation of females who have persisted inundergraduate engineering programs and how this impacts their professional choices will bediscussed.Literature ReviewResearch reflects increased enrollments of females in STEM majors; for example, women makeup the majority of those studying the physical and life sciences (57%). Yet the proportion ofSTEM major females
- neers of Alberta, and the Medal of Distinction for Engineering Education from the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers. Dr. Sundararaj’s main research interests are in polymer blend and nanocomposite structure generation in twin-screw extruders, and modeling of polymer processes. In 2003, he received the prestigious Polymer Processing Society’s Morand Lambla Award for research in polymer processing and in 2006, he received the Humboldt Research Fellowship (Germany). He has won three best paper awards and has given over twenty (20) plenary and keynote presentations at major conferences. His interests outside work include basketball, gardening and chess.John A. Nychka, University of Alberta John was an assistant
strategy currently employed for addressing assessment and eventualABET accreditation of the program. Each of these aspects is a great challenge for any newprogram, but due to the complexity and the interdepartmental multidisciplinary requirements of arobotics engineering program great care and effort was made to assure that the foundationalaspects of the program such as projects, research, and student learning were all complementaryto current and future success of the program. The author also discusses innovative approachesused in teaching within this program. The perspectives and impact of multidisciplinary designs,approaches, and experiences of the robotics engineering degree program on constituentsincluding students, faculty, administration
Project engineering practice.(e) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of Senior Design Project engineering solutions in a societal context. IQP(f) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, including statistics as Production Planning and well as integral and differential calculus. Control Production Planning and(g) An understanding of fundamental physical laws. ControlCommunication Skills(h) An ability to communicate effectively. Senior Design ProjectTeamwork
becomes imperative that research is done to documentopportunities, issues, and effectiveness of the implementation of theoretically based pedagogicaltools in real classrooms settings with typical instructors.BackgroundIn order to observe, quantify, and research these relationships, an instrument for measuringclassroom and instructor dynamic must be used. The Reformed Teaching ObservationProtocol1,2 (RTOP) is a tool that assesses to what extent a given instructor's classroom behaviorsalign with research-based best-practice principles of classroom practice that promote studentengagement and effective teaching and learning. It gives researchers a valid and reliablequantifiable insight as to how “reformed” the instructor’s actions are based on best
environment in the classroom. In 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). ASEE, 2017. Paper No. 19953. [9] Peter J. Clarke, Debra L. Davis, Raymond Chang-Lau, and Tariq M. King. Impact of using tools in an under- graduate software testing course supported by WReSTT. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 17(4):18:1–18:28, August 2017.[10] Michael Prince. Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3):223–231, 2004.[11] Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor. What is Collaborative Learning? In A.S. Goodsell, M.R. Ma- her, and V. Tinto, editors, Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment
holds a M.S. and B.S in Computer Science with a concentration in software engineering from the same university. Her primary research interests are in the areas of low- power high performance digital systems design, asynchronous design, self-timed digital system design and STEM education. As a result of her work, she has numerous peer reviewed journal and conference publications. She recently authored a book entitled ”Low Power Self-Timed Size Optimization for an Input Data Distribution,” which explores innovative techniques to reduce power consumption for portable electronic devices. She was recently awarded the 2016 Chair’s award for Rookie Researcher of the year in the Computer System Technology department. Dr
were incorporated into curricula only as presentation items, if coveredexplicitly at all. In any case, students were not being required to do any related work. It is well-recognized, however, that students learn best when they have to do something themselves.Therefore, programs must ensure that there are discrete modules covering these topicssomewhere in their curriculums, and preferably in multiple contexts. For example, anintroductory course could include a lecture on the regulatory environment affecting the field.Then, the capstone design report could require a discussion of regulatory issues, if any.Contemporary issues, societal issues, etc., certainly are easily fit throughout the curriculum.Besides preparing the students for their
/industry andin colleges/universities) collaboration might improve success. Using a quantitative study,researchers attempted to determine whether disconnects for change are a derivative oftechnology and innovation. After all, the process of innovation be it locally or globally, isparamount to future successes. The team of experts within notes the paradigm of Pracademics –a cross between Practice and Academics - as one way to afford best practices within College-Industry (CI) collaboration and for innovation at-large between colleagues. Before addressingC-I, however, an understanding of how certain technological tools are chosen for progress-forward entities.IntroductionDefining the term innovation provides the first basis to our study, as: "an
modalities(examples provided in Figure 7). Students also discuss strengths-based leadership and thediversity of skills within their peer group. We illustrate this idea using the Four Domains ofLeadership Strength (Rath and Conchie, 2008) and point out to our students that by celebratingtheir strengths, they can develop highly functional teams that overcome their individualweaknesses. Further, we implement best practices, making evidence-based adjustments to ourteaching. We model being receptive to constructive criticism by checking with students aftereach unit to see what is or is not effective for their learning. We routinely use this studentfeedback to tweak activities and improve the course. In this way, we generate a classroomenvironment in
conduct research and seek for investigating the best practice, includingconceptual update, structural optimization, pattern innovation, quality assurance, and categoricaldevelopment along with the expected outcomes [4], [7]. In all, the three-stage policy documents depict the directions and guidelines of theChinese reformation of engineering education. The main goal of NEE is expressed as “activelydeploy, set up, and construct engineering disciplines and majors that serve national strategies,meet industry needs, and face future development, and cultivate a group of various cross-composite excellent engineering and scientific talents with innovative and entrepreneurialcapabilities, cross-border integration capabilities, and high-quality [2
Session Number 1566 PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Nabil A. Ibrahim Ph.D. AVP Graduate Studies & Research, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0025ABSTRACTThis paper deals with the value of corporate partnership in the development of a programin Manufacturing Information Engineering at San Jose State University (SJSU), known as2+2+2. The program has been developed in partnership with several high schools, threecommunity colleges and six high-tech industrial companies in Silicon Valley. Thecurriculum has been carefully articulated to enable students to move seamlessly
Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt serves as the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and on the AAAS Committee for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F
100kin10, which wasincubated by Carnegie, over 150 otherindividual commitments to answer thecall, collectively impacted over 40,000STEM teachers.• Includes funders that havecollectively and committed over $60Min towards the goal. AP Engineering Course• Still in planning phase• Important opportunity to add “E” to STEM, increase student awareness of engineering• One of the few opportunities to have a national impact in a decentralized system• Support from Engineering Deans is critical! Graduating More Undergraduate Engineers• 1 Million STEM Graduates Goal: The President, based on a PCAST analysis, has called for producing one million additional college graduates with STEM degrees over the next decade. Fastest path is increased
administrators of the mechanical department and the EngineeringCollege did not pursue the proposal. It’s possible that such an arrangement would have createdmore problems than it solved and could have had a negative impact on the existing CETprogram.The reason for starting a CE program at our University has never been to increase studentenrollment. The motivation is simple and centered around how best to serve our primaryconstituents – the students. A CE program would provide a track for interested and capable CETstudents to pursue an ABET-EAC BS degree in civil engineering at our University. There areseemingly straightforward and compelling advantages of a CE program – elimination oftemporal and spatial licensure issues, easier graduate school
have provided entire engineeringcourses oriented toward sustainability. 14Even more ambitious efforts exist to introduce sustainability content across engineering curriculain a variety of ways. One initiative entails infiltrating sustainability content into a variety ofexisting courses in an undergraduate civil engineering program to ensure that coverage of suchcontent was not subject to variations in specific instructor interests. 15 Another initiative entailsdevelopment of a graduate civil engineering/green construction program that combinescoursework, directed research projects, and international exchanges in a format similar to design-based, service-learning experiences. 16 Educators developing new curricula sometimes rely onABET
. d. For the “life-long learning” outcome, one can use examples of undergraduate research projects and examples of library literature searches found in project reports. Some programs also put forth the number of students who apply to graduate school.No Mappings of SOs to PEOs,No matter how the PEOs and SOs are defined by the program, the PEV will expect to see amapping of the PEOs to the SOs in the self-study. One example of such a mapping is shown inTable 12.Insufficient Posting/Publishing of SOsThe SOs represent a commitment to the learning experiences of the students in the program, andthus should be clearly conveyed to all constituents by adequate posting and publishing the SOs,such as: a. In the university catalog within
State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research inter- ests include the predictive design, analysis, and implementation of resonant micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) for use in chemical and biological sensing, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the dynamics of parametrically-excited systems and coupled oscillators; the behavior of electromechanical and thermomechanical systems, including energetic materials, operating in rich, multi- physics environments; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design
production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Jeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Jeanne Christman is an Associate Professor and Associate Department Chair in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology. She holds a BS in Electrical En- gineering, an MS in Computer Science and a PhD in Curriculum, Instruction and the Science of Learning. Utilizing her educational background, her teaching specialty is digital and embedded system design and her research areas include engineering education culture, equity in engineering education
curriculums are fundamentally designed to build upon skills gained from previouscourses. Student success in those courses basically depends on their academic fortitude, selfconfidence, and effective teaching. This approach will concentrate on the latter by suggesting anapproach that deliberately integrates IT into the classroom which negates impacts that stiflesstudent learning.We propose a four step IT integration framework as a guide for all IT into course work. Thisapproach provides not only a deterministic model for adding technology to courses but alsoincludes an assessment vehicle that measures the effect of technology on students’ confidenceand their grades. We will use a required IT course, IT305 – Theory and Practice of IT Systems,as an
the homework worksheet to class, and engage in short, 1:1meetings with classmates (approximately 8 minutes per pair) during which time they explaintheir paper to their partner, with the opportunity to collaboratively work out any questions theyhave about the data or the research. This enables non-STE students to harness the expertise ofthe STE majors, while those with stronger techno-scientific backgrounds are challenged toexplain their papers in layperson’s terms to a non-major audience. Students exchange pairsapproximately 5 times, and then the class is surveyed for superlatives- “the most importantfinding,” “the most unexpected application,” “the application likely to impact the most people,”etc. In practice, this generates an extremely