, Marchioli Collective Impact Award, the Effective Practice Award from Online Learning Consortium, and the Joseph M. Biedenbach Outstanding Engineering Educator Award from IEEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Learner Capstone Panels for Immersing Undergraduates in Mechanisms of Engineering Research Soheil Salehi, Ramtin Zand, and Ronald F. DeMara Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Central Florida Orlando, FL 32816Abstract A novel and transportable approach to integrating research methods, professional
25213, 2019.8. R. S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M-I. Carnasciali, J. Nocito-Gobel, C. Li, and A. Rana, “EML indices to assess student learning through integrated e-learning modules,” Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conf., Tampa, FL, Paper 24668, 2019, 21 pp.9. C. Rundel, “Chapter 8: Inference for means with small samples. Statistics 102 lecture presentation,” Retrieved from , 2013.10. K. Singh, and M. Xie, Bootstrap: A statistical method, Rutgers University, Retrieved from , Jan. 2020.11. F. W. Scholz, “The bootstrap small sample properties,” Technical report BCSTECH-93-051, Boeing Computer Services, Research and Technology, 2007.12. R. H. Lock, P. F. Lock, K. L. Morgan, E. F. Lock, and D. F. Lock, “StatKey,” Retrieved from <
experiences with “people like me who areengineers” and “envision[ing] people like me as engineers” and demographic information.These surveys are also provided in Appendix A.The college student surveys were administered using Qualtrics at the beginning and end of theFall 2019 Semester. The elementary student surveys were administered as hard-copies in theclassroom before they received their first letter and during the final week of the college semester.Post-surveys were delivered to the elementary teachers two days before the campus visit withinstructions to have each of their students bring the survey with their random ID anddemographics page already completed to facilitate completing the survey at the end of thecampus visit. One fifth grade teacher
engineeringFollowing an iterative process of review and consultation, ABET has adopted a revised list ofjust seven outcomes [3] which will take effect in the 2019-20 accreditation cycle. 1) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2) an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3) an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments
engineering, and integrated resource management. She is Past President of the Institute of Industrial & Systems Engineers (IIE), holding a Fellow membership status, a Fellow of the American Society for En- gineering Education (ASEE), a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM), a member of the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) and a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). She is a licensed Professional Engineer in Kansas.Dr. Edgar C. Clausen, University of Arkansas Dr. Clausen currently serves as Professor, Associate Department Head and the Ray C. Adam Endowed Chair in Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include bioprocess
Element Analysis. In addition to traditional face-to-face classes, he has designed and taught courses in fully online and completely flipped formats. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Extent of pre-class video viewing in multiple flipped engineering coursesAbstractThis paper presents data on the extent to which pre-class videos were viewed by students in threedifferent undergraduate flipped engineering courses (numerical methods for engineers, fluidmechanics and engineering statics).Flipped classes are typically characterized by pre-class preparatory activities that are followed bymore active/collaborative in-class activities. Engagement with pre-class activities is essential forthe flipped
developmental science and mindful of the challenges they will face in the future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of an Embedded Expert Model on Course Transformation in EngineeringIntroduction and Background The need to improve undergraduate STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, andMath) education is widely recognized [1, 2]. Concerns about the quality of STEM educationhave been fueled by high levels of attrition in STEM majors, particularly among women andstudents from underrepresented minority groups, as well as the need for a more scientificallyliterate citizenry. There is now a substantial literature on teaching practices that can improvestudent learning and academic
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of faculty development workshops on instructional faculty at Hispanic-serving institutionsAbstractThis research paper will examine the experiences of instructional, non-tenure line (non-tenure-track/tenured) faculty at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) during and after participation in amulti-institutional faculty development workshop series. As engineering programs increase insize, the demand for instructional, non-tenure track faculty increases. These instructional facultyrepresent a large percentage, from 25% to over 50%, of the faculty members at both two andfour-year institutions. Given their high number of contact hours with engineering students
environment which best supports education of the nextgeneration workforce prepared to tackle problems described by GCs and SDGs. As well, thispaper serves as a call for the national and international organizations (e.g., ASEE, ABET,ENAEE, etc.) to come together with local and governmental agencies as well as student- andcitizen-driven initiatives (e.g., Engineers for a Sustainable World or Engineers Without Borders)to address the objectives of GCs and SDGs.)4. Global Venues Bringing Attention to the GC-SDG IntersectionsIn 2009, shortly after the NAE identified the Grand Challenges, academic leaders designed a co-curricular framework, NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) to integrate intoengineering programs so that students and educators
science and engineering application. Her research interests are in efficient manufacturing of high performance composites. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Active learning in an introductory materials science courseAbstractA lecture-based introductory materials science course was converted to an active learningexperience without altering the scheduling of the course, classroom location, or faculty contacthours. Group lab activities, using simple and inexpensive materials, were incorporated into thecourse to enhance student engagement and understanding. Throughout a 15 week semester, 10labs were performed. Each lab was completed and submitted during a class period, with studentsworking
&M UniversityDr. Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University Astrid Layton is an assistant professor at Texas A&M University in the Mechanical Engineering depart- ment and received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. She is interested in bio-inspired system design problems and is currently working at the intersection of ecology and engi- neering for the design of complex human networks and systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Analysis of Factors Impacting Design Self-Efficacy of Senior Design StudentsIn many engineering senior design programs, students are taught an engineering design processthat
Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the UW in 1998 after seven years on the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Her research focuses on engineering education pedagogy, engineering design learning, assessing the consid- eration of context in engineering design, and understanding undergraduate engineering student pathways. She is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and the ASEE. She was the recipient of the 2002 ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education and the 2009 UW David B. Thorud Leadership Award. Dr. Atman holds a Ph.D. in Engineering and Public Policy from
mentors and role models. And finally we would like to thank thecampers and their families, without whom the camp could not exist.References:1. Bombaugh, Ruth, “Choosing a career at age 13,” Proceedings of the 1999 National Civil Engineering Education Congress, Charlotte, NC, Oct 16-Oct 20 1999, p 113-115.2. Mills, Gregory W., “Introducing middle school students to civil engineering technology during summer camp,” Proceedings of the 1995 Annual ASEE Conference, Anaheim, CA, Jun 25-28 1995, v. 2, p 2019-2023.3. Chittenden, C. Nicole, “Project STEP: creating positive experiences for future scientists,” Proceedings of the 11th Biennial University/Government/Industry Microelectronics Symposium, Austin, TX, May 16-18 1995, p 23-26.4. Das
Learning Analytics,” Learning Analytics, pp. 61–75, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4.[7] N. Kardam, S. Misra, and D. Wilson, "Is Natural Language Processing Effective in Education Research? A case study in student perceptions of TA support," presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/43887[8] Katz, M. Norris, A. M. Alsharif, M. D. Klopfer, D. B. Knight, and J. R. Grohs, “Using Natural Language Processing to Facilitate Student Feedback Analysis,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. Content Access, July 26-29, 2021. [online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-natural-language-processing-to-facilitate-student-feedback
context of MSFW students in STEM fields?A. Construct GenerationThe survey instrument in this study was a combination of two existing validated instruments onCommunity Cultural Wealth (CCW) and Funds of Knowledge (FofK). One of the instruments isfrom a conference proceeding on ASEE titled Critically Quantitative: Measuring CommunityCultural Wealth on Surveys [33], which was developed by looking at underrepresented groups inSTEM fields. While the instrument in the study is consistent with Yosso’s [15] framework andgoes deeper in detail about the type of constructs for CCW. For this study, only the social construct(10 items) was used and renamed as social networks. The second instrument comes from a journalpaper titled Recognizing the funds of
Paper ID #41360Aligning Engineering Curricula with Energy Industry Demands—The 3PModel of Policy, Pedagogy, and PracticeMr. Hua Chai, University of New South Wales Hua Chai received his B.E. Degree in Electrical Engineering from North China Electric Power University, China, in 2014. He received his M.Phil. Degree in Electrical Engineering at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, in 2019. He is currently a Ph.D. student in the Energy Systems group, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, UNSW. His research interests include curriculum design and development in power engineering. As one of
student outcomes by supporting autonomy: Implications for practice and policy,” Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 115–122, 2019.[22] A. Agrawal, J. Carroll, J. M. Case, and N. P. Pitterson, “A comparative study of curricular differences and their influence on students’ formation as engineers,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[23] P. Pausigere, “On Bernstein’s sociology of pedagogy and how it can inform the pedagogic realisation of poor and working-class children in South African primary maths education,” Educ. Res. Soc. Change, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2016.[24] D. H. Jonassen, “Engineers as problem solvers,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and
-institutional perspectives, thecommunity also brings together teams that are at different stages of the change process, withdifferent levels of experience with changemaking. The inter-cohort aspect of the communityallows us to examine the diffusion of knowledge and practices in the network.Data Collection & AnalysisWe leverage our access to the exhaustive set of meetings to systematically address howtransformative learning, development and exercise of change agency take place in a cross-institutional, cross-cohort community of transformation. To that end, we analyzed the totalpopulation of the monthly CoT sessions (N=31) from 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 academicyears. All teams that were funded at the time (N=21) from the first four cohorts of
financial burdens. Second, the work can remain a livingdocument, which will create less friction as the course is updated over the years.Finally, to serve the stated course goals even better, the author wants to update the class model toone of ungrading [13, 14], specifically standards-based grading [15]. As the top goal is forstudents to fully engage with the laboratory work and to become independent makers, givingthem multiple chances to make a functional product, along with formative feedback to push themtoward mastery, makes a lot of sense. The current class structure is already amenable to thisapproach, so it will be the next experiment that is attempted.References [1] James W Bales, “A project-based introduction to electronics,” in 2011 ASEE
remote learning classes,” in Proc. 2022 ASEE Ann. Conf. and Expo., Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 26-29, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41421[5] F. T. M. Ayasrah, K. Alarabi, M. Al Mansouri, H. A. A. Fattah and K. Al-Said. “Enhancing secondary school students' attitudes toward physics by using computer simulations,” Int. J. of Data and Network Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 369–380, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.017[6] D. R., Sokoloff, and R. K. Thornton, “Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 399, no. 1, pp. 1061–1074, Mar. 1997. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344715[7] D. B. Lopez-Tavares and J. Orozco
industry," Education + Training, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 532-559, 2015. doi: 10.1108/ET-07-2014-0076.[6] A. García-Aracil, R. Isusi-Fagoaga, and I. Navarro-Milla, "Employers’ perceptions of young higher education graduates’ employability in Belarus," Research in Comparative and International Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 104–122, 2023. doi: 10.1177/17454999221145545.[7] E. Forcael, G. Garcés, E. Bastías, and M. Friz, "Theory of Teaching Techniques Used in Civil Engineering Programs," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 145, no. 2, p. 04018010, 2019. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000401.[8] J. Daley and B. Baruah, "Leadership skills development among
Grant Nos.2024301 and 2130924. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] D. MacMillan and M. Laris, “After midair failure, critics ask: Did Boeing learn from Max crashes?,” Washington Post, Jan. 12, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/12/boeing-max-safety-crashes/[2] N. Kallioinen et al., “Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2415, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415.[3] W. T. Lynch and R
its various academic programs [2]. UCD lists five reasonsfor performing research by undergraduate students. According to UCD, these are: 1. Exploring career directions 2. Building transferable skills and enhancing resumes 3. Learning to publicly advocate for and defend work 4. Getting a leg up on graduate or professional school 5. Contributing knowledge and impacting the worldAlthough it has some obstacles and challenges, a paper in the 123rd annual ASEE conference inLouisiana in 2016 demonstrated that undergraduate research still has many benefits, as perceivedby the students themselves [3]. The paper was on the efficacy of undergraduate research basedon a survey of undergraduate students. The students’ most common
. 2021, pp. 1-5, doi:10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637253.[7] A. J. Swart, LM. Coughlan, N. Joannou, “Student perspectives of a peer mentorshipprogramme introduced at a university of technology in South Africa”, Global Journal ofEngineering Education, vol 23, no. 3, pp. 220, Dec. 2019.[8] L. S. Nadelson, P. L. Dickrell, K. DeJesus, “Mentoring for Making: Peer Mentors Workingwith Learners in a Making-Focused Engineering Course”, Presented at the 2024 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, USA, June 2024, doi: 10.18260/1-2--47770[9] A. C. Alves, F. Moreira, C. P. Leão, S. Teixeira, “Tutoring Experiences in PBL of IndustrialEngineering and Management Program: Teachers vs Students”, Presented at the ASME 2017International Mechanical
mechanical engineering at UC-Riverside, specializing in biomechanics. Prior to joining UCR, she was a researcher at UC-Berkeley and received her doctorate from Stanford University. She was named a University of California Provost’s Engineering Research Faculty Fellow, a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, a DARE Doctoral Fellow, and a Stanford Graduate Science and Engineering Fellow. Eskandari is a recipient of ASEE’s Early Engineering Educator Award and the prestigious K. Patricia Cross Future Leaders of Higher Edu- cation Award from the Association of American Colleges and Universities. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Provoked Emotion in Student
education and his M.S. in electrical and computer engineering, both from Purdue University. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University.Mr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Harding University I am an undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability.Dr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of
Authors:The first task in surveying OER authors in engineering was to compile a list of contacts to reachout to. Locating OER has thankfully become easier as lists and databases of these resources havebecome more common, but this also presented our first choice as there are multiple lists of OERin engineering, some with more than a hundred resources. Because we were submitting the paperto the ASEE Libraries Division, we decided it would be appropriate to use the ASEE EngineeringLibraries Division Open Textbooks for Engineering list [12] as our central resource foridentifying authors. This list contains over a hundred resources and is consistently updated toinclude the most recently published OER. In addition to this database, the authors added a
from the University de Guanajuato, México, and her MS and PhD degrees (both in Civil Engineering with Environmental emphasis) from Kansas State University. Her research interests are in water and wastewater treatment, natural treatment systems for water remediation, sanitation in developing countries, engineering outreach, service learning, and engineering education. Dr. Palomo has served as chair of the student council, ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI), she served as division chair and is current member of the Board of Directors of the Environmental Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Palomo also serves as an ABET Program Evaluator. She is a 2009