, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic improvement rather than an additional barrier. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An examination of the gender gap among Middle Eastern students in Engineering: A systematized reviewAbstract:This systematized literature
student centeredenvironment.The objective of this project was to introduce a new module on electronics to students enrolled ina first year engineering program. The module was incorporated in an engineering problemsolving course and was designed to include reading material, practice problems, hands-onactivities, and a project. This paper describes the content of the module, how the module wasimplemented, and its impact in students’ perception of engineering.Methodology:Sample Size: 42 students enrolled in an engineering problem solving course participated in thisstudy. All students were enrolled in a first year engineering program at a land-grant institution inthe mid-Atlantic region; none of the students have been accepted in a major
Courses Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 107 b. Phase Rubric specifically designed for Fall 2010 courses b) Industry & Student Surveys to ensure continuous improvement of rubrics and the industry members participationThe case study involved several steps. The first step was to perform a literature review in orderto determine best practices of incorporating industry participation in the assessment of studentprojects. As anticipated, these courses leveraged active participation into a formal
current educational theorists and practitioners, supported by leadingwork in the cognitive sciences 4-8. Researchers in these fields increasingly recognize that, inorder for students to become full members of a 'community of practice,' it is essential that theyhave opportunities for 'legitimate participation' 4 in the practices of that community. WPI’sGlobal Perspective Program has exploited the converging interests of the federal government,cognitive science, and engineering education.However, as WPI students increasingly take advantage of the opportunities that WPI offers tocomplete academic work off campus, the likelihood of a serious incident occurring off campusincreases as well. One need only read the popular press to become nervous about
careers.(Antley, 2020). In 1997, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) releasedEngineering Criteria2000 (EC2000), an outcomes-based undergraduate accreditation standard designed toencourage the development of “soft” engineering skills such as teamwork, communication, and groupproblem-solving (Volkwein et al., 2004). This report addressed a need for engineering education to bettersupport non-technical outcomes for students (Sarin, 2000) such as increasing effective communication,providing a broader understanding of the global and societal impacts of engineering solutions, andreenforcing how to use engineering tools and skills in practice (Lattuca, Terenzini, & Volkwein, 2006).Programming and Models of Mentoring and
particular), and efforts in K-12 education can have a positive impact on increasing female interest and persistence in STEM at all grade levels. Fostering Teamwork o Best Practices: Identifying and employing research informed educational models developed to increase achievement for all students o Classroom Quality: The teacher ensures an effective educational environment by gauging quality indicators o Enhancing Classroom Creativity: Managing inclusive learning environments to enhance classroom creativity by inquiry activities that support unique and independent thought, problem solving, and critical thinking o Implementing
communication practice. Our study arose from adesire to better understand the extent to which the current Electrical Engineering curriculumprepares students to meet all of the communication challenges they will encounter in theengineering profession, where communication most definitely does occur in many forms andsettings. This study, therefore, does not focus on specific student outcome data; rather, it focuseson finding the best framework for analyzing what those outcomes are.Study MethodologyTo evaluate how successfully the Electrical Engineering program is integrating communicationskills into the curriculum, a structural rubric was needed to organize all categories of learningactivities associated with communication and to provide a method for
one for some of the designs. Other problems arose when somegroups tried to use a spring mechanism to initiate ball flight. This and other issues like whatlessons were learned from this experiment are discussed in the paper. IntroductionIn the engineering education literature, Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is generally consideredthe best way to achieve the educational learning objectives as set forth in a Bloom’s taxonomy.There has been a lot of work in the literature citing the benefits of PBL in enhancing studentlearning and discussing the issues associated with its implementation1,2,3,4. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
Feedback Form.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://courseevaluationsupport.campuslabs.com/hc/en- us/articles/360038360953-IDEA-Diagnostic-Feedback-Form[16] D. J. Bernstein, J. Jonson, and K. Smith, “An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching,” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 83, pp. 73–86, 2000. 5[17] M. Dennin et al., “Aligning practice to policies: Changing the culture to recognize and reward teaching at research universities,” CBE - Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 5, 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032.[18] S. Thomas, Q. T. Chie, M. Abraham, S. J. Raj, and L. Beh, “A qualitative review of the literature on peer review of teaching
Paper ID #40799From De Facto To De Jure and Beyond. It’s More Than Just Weather. WhatThe ”Chilly” Climate Really Feels Like for Black Doctoral Students inSTEMDreama Heaven Rhodes, Arizona State UniversityMotahareh Darvishpour Ahandani, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus I am Motahareh Darvishpour Ahandani, and I am currently pursuing my Ph.D. in Engineering Education System and Design at Arizona State University. I serve as a Research Assistant and bring with me six years of industry experience as a woman engineer. My research interests revolve around the mental health of international engineering graduate
the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She plays a leadership role in Purdue’s first-semester first-year engineering course which serves approximately 1,800 students each year. Her research focuses on the development of engineering thinking skills (primarily operationalized as design thinking and mathematical thinking) amongst students as young as 4-years-old, college students, as well as practicing professionals.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a Professorial Re- search Fellow at Central Queensland University. He has degrees from Swarthmore
-basedProcess Asset Libraries (PAL) to store software engineering best practices, implemented as awiki and improves the use of agile processes. Greer[12] addressed a range of research areasincluding the application of agile methods to safety critical software development, therelationship of agile development with user experience design and how to measure flow in leansoftware development. Similar research is done by Gary et al.[11] on the basis of agiledevelopment process. Procter et al.[26] used a case study of a project to create a Web 2.0-based,Virtual Research Environment (VRE) for researchers to share digital resources in order to reflecton the principles and practices for embedding eResearch applications within user communitiesusing agile
tend to rely more on their auditory receptors. Regardless of the specific form it is presented in, feedback needs to be perceptible for the recipient to be able to take advantage of it.• Robust. To maximize the impact of feedback, the provider should take into account the diversity of the audience by giving multiple, possibly redundant, views of the same piece of feedback. This ensures that there is no “single point of failure”, i.e., no reliance on a single method for transmitting the information.• Easy to assess. For feedback to be effective, assessing its relevance and quality should be easy (i.e., be low-cost) for the recipient. Ideally, credible examples (e.g., from the available literature) should
the Microelectronics Journal on Quality Electronic Design, 2005. His research interests include VLSI circuit and system design, CAD methodology for VLSI design, and bioelectronics.Prof. Zinta S. Byrne, Colorado State University Zinta S. Byrne is a tenured full professor of psychology at Colorado State University. Her previous careers were as software design and development engineer, an R&D project manager and a program manager for Hewlett-Packard Company, and management consultant for Personnel Decisions International, before becoming a professor at CSU. She is author of ”Understanding Employee Engagement: Theory, Research, and Practice” and ”Organizational Psychology and Behavior: An Integrated Approach to
practice problems, and took a group quiz at the end of the week.Groups were changed each week. Assessment was by comparing changes in exam performance between the control and studygroups and through a survey. Comments in the survey indicated a change in student attitude when assigned to a group.Students revealed a desire to be supportive in their groups, and said they prepared accordingly –an encouraging result. However, less encouraging, students confessed to preparing less for groupquizzes, knowing others in their groups would provide what they lacked. Exam scores did notindicate a significant difference between the control groups and the test groups.IntroductionThe flipped or inverted classroom has been widely researched and continues to be
/sanjay-tewari/10/9. M. K. Orr, S. Tewari, D. E. Hall, and N. D. Pumphrey, "Work in Progress - Does a Technology-Rich Transportation Engineering Experience Increase Interest in Civil Engineering?," in 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Roanoke, VA, 2015. Available at http://fyee.asee.org/FYEE2015/papers/5110.pdf10. M. Svinicki and W. J. Mckeachie, McKeachie's Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, 13 ed. Belmont, CA 94002-3098: Wadsworth Publishing, 2010.11. S. Creel, "The Impact of Assigned Reading on Reading Pleasure in Young Adults," Journal of Research on Libraries & Young Adults, vol. 6, p. n, 2/24/2015 2015. Available at http://www.yalsa.ala.org/jrlya/2015
success in engineering. Justin completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education (’22) and M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics (’21) at Purdue University, and two B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Secondary Mathematics Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (’17). Atop their education, Justin is a previous NSF Graduate Research Fellow and has won over a dozen awards for research, service, and activism related to marginalized communities, including the 2020 ASEE ERM Division Best Diversity Paper for their work on test anxiety. As a previous homeless and food-insecure student, Justin is eager to challenge and change engineering engineering education to be a pathway for socioeconomic mobility and broader systemic
Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 61, 2020 [2] E. N. Wiebe, M. Faber, J. Corn, T. L. Collins, A. Unfried, L. Townsend, “A Large-scale Survey of K-12 Students about STEM: Implications for Engineering Curriculum Development and Outreach Efforts (Research to Practice),” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2— 19073, June 2013 [3] J. Cruz, N. Kellam, “Beginning an Engineer's Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major,” Journal of Engineering Education, 107 (4), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20234 [4] BC’s curriculum, https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/adst/11/engineering (retrieved on
taught Industrial Design for over 29 years at various institutions: Rhode Island School of Design, Ohio University, The Art Institute of Pittsburgh, The Art Institute of Colorado, Pratt Institute, Parsons School of Design, and the Istituto Europeo di Design in Madrid, Spain. He has practiced product design and exhibit design in New York City, Denver and Madrid, Spain, and has helped write a patent and developed concepts for Colgate Palmolive among other companies. He has written two books, Perspective Sketching and Hybrid Drawing Techniques for Interior Design. Hi area of specialty is concept drawing for product design, digital rendering, design thinking, and product development.Jake Scoggin, University of
(Science FEAT). His extensive background in science education includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) honored Dr. Spiegel for his efforts in teacher education with the Innovation in Teaching Science Teachers
Page 25.190.2 Introduction and BackgroundFaculty development has been defined as institutional or external activities used to renew or assistfaculty in their roles,[2] and enhance faculty member’s “knowledge, skills, approaches, anddispositions to improve their effectiveness in their classroom and organizations.”3 Facultydevelopment activities may be brief (a seminar or single-session workshop) or longer term innature.[3] Faculty development can also be described as a planned program to prepare facultymembers for their academic roles, including teaching, research, administration, writing and careermanagement.[4] It can be used as a mechanism to improve practice and manage change
graduate course in Sustainability andInternational Standards. The course conveys the importance of voluntary internationalstandards, such as from ASTM International or the International Organization forStandardization (ISO), to sustainability. The curriculum uses an innovative experiential learningapproach whereby students research and develop a standard using the ASTM Internationalprocess. One driven student joined ASTM International and worked to see her class projectcatalyze the publication of ASTM E 2348 Guide for Framework for a Consensus-BasedEnvironmental Decision-Making Process.IntroductionIn 2004, the Oklahoma State University Environmental Institute established a graduate-levelcourse covering sustainability and international standards
participantsfelt that they were better prepared for future studies or employment, they did not feel like thesummer research experience had a significant impact on their future career or degree plans.Finally, while almost all of the participants described their summer research experience aspositive, areas for improvement included better planning and access to mentors, as well as morestructured activities for the teachers to adapt their research activities for the classroomIntroductionResearch experiences for undergraduate students have long been identified as a powerful tool tosupport and prepare participants to pursue graduate education in a science, technology,engineering or mathematics discipline1–3. Initiatives to promote these experiences such as
-2007. • Summer 2006 Dissertation Fellowship, Wayne State Univ., 2006. • Albort Travel Award, Wayne State Univ., 2005. • Best Poster Award, Fifth Graduate Research Symposium, Wayne State Univ., 2005. • Best Presenter Award, Fourth Graduate Research Symposium, Wayne State Univ., 2004. • Second Prize of Tsinghua Scholarship, Tsinghua University, China, 1999. • Second Prize of Tsinghua Scholarship, Tsinghua University, China, 1998. JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS 1. Li, J., S. Feaster, and A. Kohler, ”A Multi-Objective Multi-Technology (MOMT) Evaluation and Analysis Framework for Ammonia Synthesis Process Development”, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Volume 47, 2019, Pages 415-420. 2. Li, J., and M. Li, ”On-line Bayesian
Paper ID #18562Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First-Year Introduction to Engineer-ing CourseDr. Chao Wang, Arizona State University Chao Wang received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is currently a senior lecturer in Ira. A Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Teaching Entrepreneurial Mindset in a First Year Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractWith a mission to graduate engineers who can create personal, economic, and societal valuethrough a lifetime
criticisms have been one of the motivating features behind the development ofstrategies that may use slide presentations more effectively to promote student learning, suchas the interactive slide presentations that are the focus of this study. A number of studiessupport the idea that modified slide design, well-developed handouts to accompany slides,and increased student note-taking can enhance student performance. For example, Alley et al.[2,3] studied how slide design impacts student performance. Traditional slide design containsa short phrase or keyword as the title, and bullet points which relate to the title phrase. Alleyet al. [2,3] proposed a new slide design approach, which employs a “succinct sentenceheadline … supported not by a bullet
Paper ID #6832Implementing a Student-Suggested Course in Engineering Career Develop-mentDr. Julie E. Sharp, Vanderbilt University Dr. Julie E. Sharp, M.A.T., M.A., Ph.D., is Professor of the Practice of Technical Communications in the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, where she teaches written and oral communication courses in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and the General Engineering Division. Her teaching and research interests include job search communication, learning styles, and integrating com- munication in engineering courses. In 2012, she won an Apex Award for Excellence in
thesurvey. Twenty one students out of a class of fifty one, voluntarily participated in the FocusGroup meetings. One of the researchers (who was not the instructor of the course) met with theparticipants face-to-face in an on-campus location and audio-recorded their verbal responses.The following paragraphs summarize participant responses under themes, which best reflect theguiding questions used during the Focus Group meetings.Engagement with course materialsThe use of mobile devices to create content for the e-portfolio reportedly increased studentengagement with course materials. The act of creating videos, verbalizing and demonstratingeach step of a problem solution helped students, review course materials, to think deeply and toretain
programs accredited by ABET, Inc. He has advised more than 100 graduate students, including 26 Ph.D. students, and served as Principal or Co-principal investigator for more than $14 million of publicly and privately funded research. Russell is a respected researcher, author, and editor. He has published more than 200 technical papers in the areas of contractor failure, prequalification, surety bonds, constructability, automation, maintainability, warranties, and quality control/quality assurance. In addition, he has authored and published two books: Constructor Prequalification (1996) and Surety Bonds for Construction Contracts (2000). Russell served as Editor-in-Chief of the ASCE Journal of Manage- ment in Engineering
sophomores, juniors and seniors interested in the program. • Descriptions of their research areasApplications are reviewed at the college level and they are supported to the extentthat funding allows. Each faculty member (or interdisciplinary faculty team) who isselected will receive support for a graduate student and prototype materialdevelopment.Design RationaleGiven the learning outcomes for the program, key program design decisions weremade during early development. The rationales for some of these design decisions arepresented in the following paragraphs.Multidisciplinary Teamwork: To develop knowledge and skills associated with thisoutcome, undergraduate students should work on a project in teams in which otherteam members are from