, earning styles, and class attendance as external factors.Scholarly Factors Many universities base college admissions solely on class rank or on high school gradepoint average. According to Crystale Marsh, Michael Vandehey, and George Diekhoff[38]: “standardized [sic] test of academic aptitude do not assess the motivational skills necessary for success (Kerr, Fagley, & Miller, 1998) and fail to provide an ecologically valid assessment of the complex array of skills that are needed in college (Oldfield, 1994); Thompson & Kobrak, 1983),. High school performance fails to predict, with a high degree of accuracy, college success. First, the high school curriculum may not have prepared the student for
to supportstudents electing not to attend campus-sponsored advising interventions6. At the ColoradoSchool of Mines, an ethnographic study found that low-income, first-generation students facespecific barriers to feeling like they belong, including financial pressure, curriculum overload,lower family support, and lower confidence in technical skill, but that they could establish asense of belonging in engineering when their prior knowledge and experiences were validated7.A case study at the University of Maryland at College Park revealed that mismatches betweenstudents’ epistemological identities and the intellectual climate influence the decision to leave orstay in engineering8. Engineering departments at the University of Washington found
building through commonresidence hall living assignments, common course scheduling, a specialized SLS seminar, timemanagement and study skills training12, supplemental academic advising10, professionaldevelopment and social events5. Research tells us that formalized mechanisms for structuringthis integration are significant for many students of color and those from lower socioeconomicbackgrounds whose prior social and academic experiences are less closely aligned with thestructure and culture of university life13.SLS students were encouraged to enroll each semester in an interdisciplinary service learningseminar focused on professional skills development and collaborative problem solving with localAmerican Indian communities. “Hands-on” experience
speech processing theory and analysis in the classification of human vocal patterns for determining speaker demographics (i.e., dialect, language, etc.), speaker characteristics (i.e., gender, dimensions, etc.), and speaker state (i.e., emotion, stress, etc.). Additionally, Dr. Moore’s interests in engineering education have involved improving the implementation of technology in distributed education for creating active learning environments. He has been awarded grants from HP and Microsoft to support his research efforts in this endeavor. In 2005, Dr. Moore received an NSF CAREER award for the development of new techniques for extracting and integrating features of the voice source into
Paper ID #6036Engineering Student Involvement: Comparison of Two Dissimilar Institu-tionsDr. Kerry Meyers, Youngstown State University Dr. Meyers background is in Engineering Education with experience in programs that might influence an incoming student’s experience, affect retention rates and the factors that determine the overall long term success of students entering an engineering program. She is the Director of the STEM College’s First- Year Engineering Program, the entry point for all beginning engineering students designed to provide a smooth transition from high school to University. She previously served as the
Clemson University. Dr. Caldwell is a member of ASME and Pi Tau Sigma.Dr. Colleen M Halupa, LeTourneau University Dr. Colleen Halupa is currently the Director of Curriculum Design and Technology at LeTourneau Uni- versity. She has an A.S. in medical laboratory technology, a B.S. in healthcare management, an M.S. in health administration, and an Ed.D. in curriculum and instruction with a concentration in educational lead- ership, and management. Prior to her career in academia, Dr. Halupa was a biomedical sciences officer in the United States Air Force. Prior to her retirement from the military, she held varying positions in health administration and education and served as the program director for all of the Air Force
member.Since the inception of the Douglass Engineering Living-Learning Community in 2012, 42 first-year women have participated and completed the program. Of those women, 38 havesuccessfully stayed in an engineering curriculum (90% retention rate), and 29 have continued tolive together in another residence hall. To assess the effectiveness of this program on thepredictors of retention, all students participating were asked to complete the LongitudinalAssessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE) developed by The Pennsylvania StateUniversity and University of Missouri. This instrument measures several outcomes related toretention and is widely used to better understand students’ feelings towards engineering. Focusgroups were also used to generate
The Capstone Design Course and Its Failure to serve as An Effective Outcome Assessment Tool By Thomas R. Currin Ph.D.,P.E. Southern Polytechnic State UniversityAbstract:This paper presents t he results of a 5 year study at Southern Polytechnic State University of theeffectiveness of a capsto ne design course as an outcomes assessment tool. The study clearlydemonstrated that the course has merit in the curriculum but fails as an outcomes assessment tool.It is shown that the primary difficulty faced when attempting to use a capstone design course asan assessment tool lies with the quantification of
a large node-link diagram. This explicitmapping of expert knowledge structures has been shown to promote conceptual understanding instudents. Because concept maps become visually cluttered and unusable when they get too largethough, an interactive visualization tool was developed to maintain the advantages of conceptmaps as learning tools while managing the visual clutter in maps that cover entire courses oreven an entire curriculum. In this paper, the authors discuss the process they took in integratingthe educational literature with the information visualization literature to understand how to bestmake an information visualization that addresses educational goals. Results from a heuristicanalysis using Munzner’s four level validation
, he was a science educator at Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). Dr. Spiegel also served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development company and as founding Director of the Center for Integrating Research & Learning (CIRL) at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University. Under Dr. Spiegel’s leadership, the CIRL matured into a thriving Center recognized as one of the leading National Science Foundation Laboratories for activities to pro- mote science, mathematics, and technology (STEM) education. While at Florida State University, Dr. Spiegel also directed an award winning teacher enhancement program for middle grades science teachers, entitled
curriculums. In this case, we have created the skeleton for a framework that allows the user/instructor to navigate menus to change values for different measurement nodes on different pieces of equipment to emulate different scenarios (Figure 6). The end result is an outputted spreadsheet that can be loaded into the software to reproduce your desired scenario. At the end of the project, this will allow instructors to continue to use the simulator in new ways that were never even considered during the design process. Figure 6: Custom Scenario BuilderCurrent Development AreasRight now, there are two aspects that are being looked at for current feature development toenhance the troubleshooting of the simulator
individual diversity(i.e. breadth of experience of an individual) of both faculty and students. Foor et al.63 alsorecommend faculty to pay attention to “us” and “them” classroom dynamics that are establishedas a result of “capital differences” among diverse students and to be aware that students withaverage grades can also excel as engineers. In general, Foor et al.63 insist that faculty must makeunder-represented students feel “more welcome” in engineering colleges. Thus faculty cancertainly help students develop the critically required social capital29 and cultural wealth26.Insight 2: Research-based instructional strategies influence academic integration of all thestudents, more so of women. Faculty members use of research-based
programs becomeeligible for graduate assistantship funding as soon as their graduate career level is activated.Since research is a major component in R1 institution’s mission, such early career opportunitiesare vital to student’s success as this fosters the exposure to research at an early stage, whichfurther hones and develops students’ professional and technical skills. The 4+1 program couldfoster an effective educational paradigm by integrating undergraduates to collaborate and workwith graduate students to enhance their technical and professional skills [7].Background and MotivationSTEM Education in the U.S. has undergone drastic changes over the past years due to concernsrelating to the quality of education being offered to prepare the next
equitable STEM experiences. Such a requirement could foster an interestin STEM subjects and careers in more, diverse students, while reducing the focus on STEMpipelines. This would parallel the situation in some other countries where the college track requiresall students to follow the same curriculum, regardless of gender. In another way, it would alignwith education in the humanities and social sciences where the focus is not explicitly on careersand pipelines, but on knowledge. Harvey Mudd College has had success in reaching gender parityin computer sciences by starting first year students at the same place, making certain that all takeIntroduction to Computer Science, thereby eliminating the effect of women feeling less preparedbecause of prior
recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Ten Years Later – Where Are They Now?AbstractThis paper explores the educational and career trajectories of the alumnae of an outreach activityfor girls. The outreach activity was originally developed using an integrated marketing approachto attract girls into engineering programs.1 The program, a two day, overnight experience forrising 9th, 10th and 11th grade girls, focuses on showcasing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity, including activities developed from that perspective. Started in 2005 and held annuallysince then, a total of over 500 girls have
Paper ID #19036Can I really do this? Perceived benefits of a STEM intervention program andwomen’s engineering self-efficacyChristina S. Morton, University of Michigan Christina S. Morton is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. Christina has professional experience in Academic and Student Affairs, serving as an Academic Success Coach at Johnson C. Smith University and a Residential Direc- tor at North Carolina State University. Her primary research interests are in the motivation and persistence of underrepresented minorities in Science
was 2.13, while the students whohad taken the robotic version of Engineering Problem Solving 2 scored 3.00 in Mechatronics.While the difference in the grades is noteworthy, the small number of data points made a class-by-class comparison inconclusive. This will require further study in subsequent semesters.ConclusionsIn order to better serve engineering students who respond to hands on learning, a robotic versionof a MATLAB programming course was developed through a pilot program. After being taughtunder the pilot for two years it was integrated into the regular curriculum. It was brought into thecourse offering as a variant of the regular version, and so uses the same syllabus and book as theregular version. Some modifications to the course
AC 2008-2650: COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS: DOESGENDER MAKE A DIFFERENCE?Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND, PhD, is the PI of three academic scholarship programs and a fourth program for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University from 1993-2004. She received the ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and won the Narional Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of
banks, envelope detection, spectrograms and signal reconstruction are explored andformalized in different parts of this project. To promote interaction across disciplines, thestudents work in randomly assigned teams of two that often pair up Biomedical Engineering(BME) students with Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) students. For many students,the lab presents the first exposure to a collaborative engineering design effort, in contrast to thecommon independent exercise of tackling a “tough homework problem.” Although thislaboratory project is quite challenging, it was well liked by the diverse population of BME andECE students. Efforts are underway to integrate an online post-lab survey during the upcomingterm to enable a more
information software is compared to that of a controlgroup, which was not provided with the software. The results indicate a reduction in thenumber of information integration errors, the time needed for data analysis and the perceivedworkload of the designer. These results have implications for the engineering educationclassroom where design is an integral part of the curriculum.1. IntroductionThe design process is a complex information intensive activity requiring the designer tocoordinate and integrate a large amount of information from different sources, formats, mediaand locations to arrive at a solution for a given design problem. With increasing globalizationof products and services, engineering design firms have been forced to improve
curriculum in the Professional Orientation course is structured with little emphasis onprogramming per se and a minimum of Logo programming commands (approximately 20) areused. In addition to the development of thinking skills (procedural, logical, analysis andsynthesis), Logo tasks and the results of the Logo programming are also used to fostercomprehension as well as skills in observation and communication. The formal exposure to Logois purposefully spread over six weeks, with one class per week, so that students have time toexplore Logo and to progress in the development of thinking skills at an individual pace. Most ofthe students usually need more time than one class period to finish a Logo tutorial. Students, whodo finish in time, usually
Don't Know 1 3 64 64 rating average 5.81 4.64 SE 1) I can succeed in an engineering curriculum; SE 2) I can succeed in an engineering curriculum while not having to give up participation in my outside interests (e.g. extra curricular activities, family, sports)An overwhelming majority of women engineering students are confident in their ability tosucceed in an engineering curriculum; 53 out of 64 women engineering students were inagreement with this statement. Fewer women engineering students were confident that theycould succeed in engineering while not having to give up
Science and Management Program, and her research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: kgt5@txstate.eduDr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the College of Educa- tion at Texas State University. Araceli is Director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research and teaches graduate courses in Integrated STEM Curriculum and Instruction. She collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiates with NASA Educator Pro- fessional Development and NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education. Araceli holds
communicate effectively; • an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engi- neering practice.This complex set of skills cannot be provided by a few courses in an engineering curriculum.Ideally, the ability to work in teams and to use the computer as a platform supporting interdisci-plinary integration and communication should be cultivated in students from the very beginningof, and throughout, the undergraduate experience. It is therefore crucial that courses be devel-oped integrating teamwork, computation, data acquisition, data analysis, and information tech-nology into the very process of learning.At Penn State, we have begun to offer sections of introductory dynamics in a manner that
Paper ID #22662Second Year of Using the Sidekick Basic Kit for TI LaunchPad with Elemen-tary School StudentsMs. Tara N. Kimmey, Colorado STEM Academy 5th/6th grade teacher in Westminster, Colorado. She earned her Bachelor’s of Science in Liberal Studies from Longwood University in 2011 with a concentration in Elementary Education. She then went on to earn her Master’s of Science in Curriculum and Instruction in Special Education K-12 in 2012.Dr. Cameron H. G. Wright P.E., University of Wyoming Cameron H. G. Wright, Ph.D., P.E., is a Professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of
to give a lot of benefits to an employee, they would most likely hire amale. I do not really believe there is any bias involved with this because the company just doesnot want to spend extra money on benefits.” The students’ comments were particularly surprisinggiven that 40% of the faculty of the Computer Science and Engineering Department is female,giving the students ample opportunity to observe successful females in computer fields.The IAT assignment’s failure to raise the awareness of students of issues related to the gendergap made a new approach necessary. As part of a learning community investigating possible usesof Problem Based Learning in the curriculum at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, theauthor began to develop a
/ libraries / operating systems from the environment used by instructors in grading. The programs written by students may not execute correctly in the different environment and this creates confusion among students. The proposed system eliminates this problem because every student uses the same back end that is virtualized by Docker container. Codecademy ( https://www.codecademy.com/ ) presents stepbystep coding instructions to beginners in an interactive online programming environment. A similar approach is CS Cycles (http://cscircles.cemc.uwaterloo.ca/ ), which integrates universitystyle curriculums, embeds thousands of online autogradable practice assignments, and an
the integration of active learning and technology-enabled frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teach teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Prof. Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University Robert J. Culbertson is an Associate Professor of Physics. Currently, he teaches introductory mechanics and electrodynamics for physics majors and a course in musical acoustics, which was specifically de- signed for elementary education majors. He is director of the ASU Physics Teacher Education Coalition
.” Influences on Attitudes towards STEM. It is important to understand students’perspectives of learning STEM subjects. As they expressed, math was a big challenge for them,because it was related to science, engineering, and other STEM subjects. The concepts andproblems in math (e.g. algebra and fractions) were difficult to understand and were lessinteresting than other subjects. While, in science learning, students had troubles to comprehendthe concepts, integrate the knowledge, and solve complicated problems. However, studentsbelieved their capabilities to get good grades and push forward in math and science learning. After participating in two-weeks STEAM camp, students indicated the cooperativelearning environment was an important factor
education. He received his BS in physics from MIT, and his MS and PhD in physics from The Johns Hopkins University. He joined the faculty of IUPUI in 1995.Prof. Rebecca Susan Lindell Rebecca Lindell, PhD, is a former physics faculty member at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville*. With over 20 years experience in the fields of Physics and Astronomy Education Research (PER), Re- becca is an award winning curriculum developer and has received national recognition for her redesign of her introductory astronomy course at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. She has redesigned or as- sisted in the redesign of numerous physics courses at every level. She founded Tiliadal STEM Education in 2014 to allow her to