environment;undergraduate students learn the basic principles in class and performed in hands-on practices inlaboratory by POGIL approaches. Also, we encouraged students to participate in undergraduateresearch projects which resulted in the improvement of research skills to potential employers inmanufacturing or for advanced study in graduate programs.17-20 As a result of the assessment andevaluation, we were able to identify strengths and weaknesses to reform the traditional-transmission format for students’ learning effectiveness in the formative and summativepurposes.The formative and summative evaluations helped us optimize the results to develop and improvethe course contents in Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology. Using the system approach
AC 2011-335: USING AN EXTENSION SERVICES MODEL TO INCREASEGENDER EQUITY IN ENGINEERINGElizabeth T. Cady, National Academy of Engineering Elizabeth T. Cady is a Program Officer at the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education of the National Academy of Engineering in Washington, DC.Norman L. Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering (Washington) Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding Director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). CASEE facilitates research on and deployment of, innovative policies, practices, and tools designed to enhance the effective- ness and efficiency of systems for the formal
program was originally designed to address the specific educational objectivesof the Civil Engineering Program which state “Graduates of the Civil Engineering program willdemonstrate professional responsibility and a sensitivity to a broad range of societal concernssuch as ethical, environmental, economic, regulatory and global issues.” While this educationalobjective was originally adopted for civil engineering students, it is applicable to all engineeringstudents regardless of discipline. Specific educational outcomes for the program include: 1) Thebroad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context, 2) Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning,and 3
observations2 , discussion questions, verbal protocols 3, and several multiple choice style instruments 4–6. Theefforts to develop effectuation as education have also included textbooks7 and instructionalmaterials available from the ‘Society for Effectual Action’8. While each of these pieces ofscholarship approaches effectuation education differently, they all provide an increasing body ofknowledge on which to teach effectuation. Most relevant to our work has been the ongoingdevelopment of the survey instruments which seek ways to quantify and measure effectualbehavior for research and teaching.However, the instruments and methods designed to measure effectuation are collectively limitedin two critical ways. First, they perpetuate a problem noted in
): The student’s design and evaluation of the system didn’t refer to the egghatching temperature requirements. The analysis comments on the system performance were eitherunreasonable or missing. Page 26.1163.17(h) Graduates of the Engineering Program will demonstrate the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societalcontext.In the final course design project, the students were asked to was to research and determine the egghatching temperature requirement (part of the assignment description included below
topics that have core research faculty. In two of theOptions, biological processes and environmental processes, students take elective classes fromamongst those offered by the other programs. In this way, some of the key elements identified inthe “New Frontiers in Chemical Engineering Education” workshops are integrated into theundergraduate curriculum while, simultaneously, holding students accountable for the samedepth of learning which has served OSU ChE graduates for many years. Moreover, thisintegration is accomplished in a reasonable scope commensurate with the resources of theprogram.3. ENGR 221 - The Science, Engineering and Social Impact of NanotechnologyENGR 221 has been approved at the university level and was delivered for the first
most likely to graduate in ME. Pathways of ME starters and ME graduates areillustrated. Nearly half of all ME graduates started somewhere other than ME.Key outcomesThis research has involved considerable work in developing effective data displays. As a result,an additional outcome of this project is a new course, ME 497/597 Visualizing Data, developedand taught by Dr. Richard Layton at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. The course is aboutthe principles and practices of designing truthful and compelling visual displays of quantitativedata. This work involves principles of rhetoric, human perception, graphic design, data analysis,and computer programming.The course goals are that after taking this course, students will be able to
revised to be more of a true wireless“networking” course. The emphasis has been placed on end-to-end network connectivity,integration into wired networks, and overall facility network design including wirelesscomponents from inception. In addition, as industry acceptance of controller based, lightweightaccess point (LWAP) networks has become a more accepted practice for control andmanagement of wireless networks, these topics have been integrated into the course as well.The result of these changes is a course that takes students from understanding the IEEE 802.11series of standards on a single access point and client to being proficient at designing andimplement enterprise level, managed, controller-based networks integrated with the
Poster Presentation Practice Final Poster Presentation 4 (Ethics) Reflect on ethical and/ or Poster Presentation File (Potential Impacts Sect.) societal issues as related to your Inclusion and Bias in STEM reflection activity semester project or field of study 5 (Research) Gather and evaluate Project Research & Bibliography Assignment relevant and reliable information Project Problem Statement Assignment and data from a variety of sources Final Poster Presentation 6 (Student Success) Demonstrate Academic Planner Assignment key skills necessary for success in
recentgraduates. They need to understand the purpose of licensure laws, the career paths that require alicense, and the depth and scope of engineering licensure exemptions. A study was designed toanswer the following research questions: How many jurisdictions within the United States have licensure exemptions for engineers who perform tasks commonly considered engineering practice? Are there patterns in the number and type of exemptions found in licensure laws? Do civil engineering graduates practice in areas that are commonly exempt? What should undergraduate engineering students know about licensure exemptions?Research MethodsThe study used licensure exemption data from fifty states, four territories, and the District
, students in this course have been offeredthe option of attending a hands-on library workshop and receiving extra credit on a relatedproject report. Since several hundred students enroll in over 25 sections of this course each fall,the workshop format was developed as an alternative to traditional one-shot library instruction,which is not practicable on this scale. To better assess how the workshops were serving thestudents in these large classes, a group of instructors from the class and the engineering librarianworked together to evaluate student success with research projects and overall informationliteracy within the freshman engineering curriculum. The first initiative was to design a citationstudy assessing submitted projects for quality and
surrounding area in termsof socio-economic development. It’s a large state university attended primarily by commuters. The State of California isexperiencing a budgetary shortfall that limits resources allocated to the university system,including SJSU. This is important because faculty have to bootstrap all activities related toentrepreneurship. In fall 2003 the total SJSU enrollment was 28,932. Demographics of the student bodyfollow: • Overall median age was 26.2 years, 23.9 for undergraduates and 32.9 for graduate students • 21,396 undergraduate students, 7,536 graduate students (others were working on a second baccalaureate or seeking needed creditials. • 65% were full-time • Ethnic
direct governement employee. One response to the survey isgiven in Figure 4.2 Figure 4.1Selected quotes from other former students concerning their assessment of the competition: “Being on the team taught me what it meant to be an actual engineer and how to approachreal world problems. Unlike problems I was given in class that always had correct answers, in thereal world there are constant tradeoffs and it is being able to figure out the best balance of tradeoffsthat produces the best design. If it weren’t for the team, I don’t think I would have continued withmy major as an aerospace engineer.” “Yes. Class teaches you all the theory but not how to apply it in a practical manner
, Greenfield Coalition for New Manufacturing Education, a multi-university-industrycoalition housed at Focus: HOPE organization in Detroit, MI, has been working hard to producesuch graduates, called a Renaissance Engineer.Greenfield Coalition education programs focus on instilling real-world experience into the studentpool by embracing “learning factory” techniques and e-learning technologies. The design and Page 8.740.1development of an Operations Management (OM) course reflect this set of beliefs and practice. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003
the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C. Lucena, will
the‘Digital Ladies’ in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. The following sectionswill explain the various operational aspects, impacts and challenges associated with the program.Program StructureStudent board: A WiME board handles the idea-conception, planning and execution of allprofessional development and social activities. The WiME board consists of a group of 4-6women ME students. The chair of the WiME board is usually a senior student, who has severalyears of active participation in planning, organizing and participating in WiME activities. Sheworks closely with the vice-chair, who is a junior student and is the chair-elect for the next year.The WiME board consists of at least one student from each year as well as one graduate
systems for the civil infrastructure, engineering education, and technology transfer through education and community outreach.Dr. James Giancaspro, P.E., University of Miami James Giancaspro, Ph.D., P.E. is an associate professor of civil engineering with an emphasis on struc- tures and mechanics. He has two years of industry experience and 17 years of teaching and research experience at the University of Miami, where he is also currently a graduate program director. His current engineering education research interests include instructional technology in mechanics, undergraduate student retention, and graduate student support.Max Cacchione, University of Miami Agile technology executive with 20 years of experience
Paper ID #16910Identification of Misconceptions Related to Size and Scale through a Nanotechnology-Based K-12 ActivityMs. Joyce Seifried, The College of New Jersey Joyce Seifried is currently an undergrad at The College of New Jersey in the both the Technological Stud- ies and Special Education Departments anticipating graduating in 2017. Her summer of 2014 research was based on using nanotechnology in the high school classroom by teaching students about hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces as well as using silver nanoparticles as a DNA nucleotide base indicator.Dr. Manuel Alejandro Figueroa, The College of New Jersey
feedback control. Prof. West is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award and is a University of Illinois Distinguished Teacher-Scholar and College of Engineering Education Innovation Fellow.Prof. Craig Zilles, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Craig Zilles is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research focuses on computer science education and computer architecture. His research has been recognized by two best paper awards from ASPLOS (2010 and 2013) and by se- lection for inclusion in the IEEE Micro Top Picks from the 2007 Computer Architecture Conferences. He received the IEEE Education Society’s Mac Van Valkenburg Early Career Teaching
of technology to teach in secondary classrooms.Ms. C. Danielle Grimes, Mississippi State University Danielle is a fourth year doctoral student in Biomedical Engineering at Mississippi State University. She graduated Cum Laude from Mississippi State University with a Biological Engineering bachelor’s degree in May 2014, and Danielle was inducted into the Bagley College of Engineering Student Hall of Fame in April 2014. She is a current NSF GRFP Fellow. Danielle is also the standing Division Chair for the Student Division. Her research interests center around women and minorities in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Illuminating a Computing Pathway for
Engineering (IMSE) in the College of Engineering (COE) at the University of South Florida (USF). Chilton received her BA in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Agnes Scott College (Decatur, GA). Chilton received her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering and Emory University School of Medicine (Atlanta, GA) while also earning her graduate certificate in Engineering Entrepreneurship. Chilton has over 20 years of experience in a variety of academic, research, technology, government, consulting, and private industry settings, particularly in biotechnology. Prior to USF, Chilton’s previous work in the biotech industry includes developing innovative cell culture systems for
Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering education, as well as control and optimization of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power and energy systems, multi-agent systems, robotics, and biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Con- trol, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Time Management and Self Efficacy in Different Learning
companies such as Ecopetrol, Texas Instruments, and Ericsson. His research interests focus on inclusive STEM learning and teaching methodologies for students with physical disabilities.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Experiences of Students
multiculturalism the phrase “thinking outside of the box”was suggested. This is a very useful metaphor both for multiculturalism and for the kind ofcreative problem-solving that we want to teach in engineering. The best engineering designsolutions often come about by thinking “outside of the box” of our assumptions about theconstraints or ground rules for that problem. Similarly I think the goal of multicultural educationis to enable us to think at least briefly outside of our solipsistic or cultural boxes. III. Specific ideas for teaching and application to a course So-called neutral teaching may actually keeps courses less accessible to students fromnon-traditional backgrounds. For example, as one study showed2, there were no
issues of softwareand data security. Industry’s need for innovation, research and development, and a broaderunderstanding of the complexities of software development is contributing to this growth insoftware engineering employment opportunities. The Internet and its impact on distributedapplications, service-oriented computing, and cloud computing, are also creating a demand fornew and better software applications, many involving social computing, ubiquitous andpervasive computing, and mobile computing.Over the last 20 years, at least 50 graduate software engineering degree programs have beenestablished. The Graduate Software Engineering Reference Curriculum (GSwERC) committeerecently conducted a survey of 28 of these programs, finding that many
of Transportation Safety and Secu- rity. He also serves on the editorial board of the African Geographic Review and is an Associate Editor for the ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. He has authored or co-authored more than 150 technical articles, conferences papers, design manuals, and project reports on a range of transportation topics. Steven currently focuses his professional efforts on transportation is- sues in developing countries and cultivating international relationships to facilitate collaborative research, education and technology transfer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Betting on the Progress – Forging a
out ABET’s accreditation practices, and their underlyingcauses, as a way of assisting ABET, their volunteers, and the academic institutions that rely on1 Formally incorporated as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, ABET has presented itself asABET and ABET Inc. since 1980.their services to improve upon their practices and outcomes. We close with several, stillpreliminary recommendations addressed to these three audiences.MethodThe data presented in this study is the product of a broader, exploratory study of changeprocesses and governance in U.S. engineering education. Organized around a basic, multi-sited,multi-scale research design, our research team carried out 277 semi-structured interviews at 43academic organizations
larger campuses or theory-based programs. • Emphasize the junior year as the start of a new curriculum and help all juniors to feel part of the same cohesive cohort. • Add distance courses to enable remote students to complete the curriculum Student Learning Outcomes for the Bachelor Degree Option Graduates of the Computer Systems Technology option will demonstrate: • An ability to identify and apply current technical concepts and practices in the core computer systems technologies of database management, web technology, computer programming, digital media, and network/system administration. • An ability to analyze, design, implement, test, and maintain complex computer
Chair for Undergraduate Studies. His research areas are in the fields of dynamics, controls, vibrations, and acoustics. He is also active in course and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Optimizing Efficiency and Effectiveness in a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Using Focused ModulesIntroductionLaboratory experiments are a mainstay of undergraduate engineering education. Instructionallaboratories are used to satisfy a number of learning objectives, and they are often used as avehicle for assessing ABET student outcomes for design of experiments, solving engineeringproblems, and using modern tools of engineering
includingunderstanding of class content through the laboratory module, course impact on their attitudes,and integrating their learning. The students were also asked to identify the best thing about thelaboratory, how to improve it, and reasons for which they would recommend/not-recommendthis module to a friend. Of the 32 students, 94% stated they had developed a moderate to greatgain in collection of test data and analysis plus modeling of system behavior. In addition, 88%of the participants indicated a moderate to great gain in their confidence of materialunderstanding. The students’ written responses reported that they enjoyed the opportunity to gooutside while using their personal laptops to collect field data, perform signal processing inMATLAB, and use FEA