Exposition, Conference Proceedings.11. Dodge, R.N. (1978). “Development of the Successful Transfer Engineering Programs in the CommunityColleges,” Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.12. Christie, B. (2008). “Results of Seven Year Community Outreach Program to Improve the Pipeline ofUnderrepresented Minorities Studying Science, Engineering , or Mathematics at College Level,” ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.13. Treno, J.M. and Grant, D.S. (2009). “Work in Progress – A Research-based Tool Kit for Communicating UniqueMessages about Engineering to First Generation College Students,” 39th Frontiers in Education ConferenceProceedings
, and apply what they have learned. Part of XXXXX’s National Science Foundation mission is to provideeducation and experiences promoting Florida advanced manufacturing college and career pathways, and for manystudents, the educational technology punch packed by integrating robotics into mainstream curriculum andextracurricular activities is an ideal way to jumpstart the process.BibliographyBarger, M., Gilbert, R., & Boyette, M. (2011). “Best Practices for Student Robotics Camps.” ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education.June 26-29.Boyette, M., Batton, B., & Barger, M. (2014). “ET Degree Paves the Way for Florida’s Manufacturing Workforce.”A Pipeline to
to recognize the absence of any reference to experimental design in the CEPC as the“design of experiments” is required by ABET6 General Engineering Criterion 3(b).The requirement of including an experimental experience in “at least two technical areas of civilengineering” is new and stems from a perceived reduction in the practical hands-on skills ofstudents entering engineering, an apparent trend towards a reduction in laboratory courses fromengineering curricula, and aligns with the BOK2. Following Bloom’s Taxonomy, the verb“conduct” implies the level of achievement for such tasks as experimental setup, measurement,and data collection is Level 3, Application. The verbs “analyze” and “interpret” imply the levelof achievement for processing
Paper ID #13177Preparing Students for Industry by Integrating Commercial Software intoCourseworkProf. Joseph A. Untener, University of Dayton Joe is a professor of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton. With degrees from General Motors Institute and Purdue University, and experience with General Motors and other engineering and manufacturing companies, he teaches courses in Mechanical Engineering Technology, and co-authors text with Robert L. Mott.Prof. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott, P.E. is professor emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton. He is a member of ASEE
78 Best Practices Guidelines for Successful Capstone Projects in Accelerated Technology Programs Bhaskar R. Sinha, Pradip P. Dey, Gordon W. Romney, Mohammad N. Amin, Debra A. Bowen School of Engineering and Computing National University, San Diego, CAAbstractA practicum or capstone project is an effective and useful end-of-program academic exercise thatreinforces the ability of students to implement knowledge and skills they have learned in theprogram. Every academic program structures its capstone
Paper ID #13398Nano-satellites and HARP for Student Learning and ResearchDr. Hank D Voss, Taylor University Dr. Hank D. Voss, Taylor University Dr. Hank D. Voss received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois in 1977. He then worked for Lockheed Palo Alto Research Laboratories prior to coming to Taylor University in 1994. He is currently a Professor of Engineering and Physics at Taylor University. Some of the courses that he regularly has taught include Principles of Engineering, Intro to Electronics, Statics, Advanced Electronics, Jr. Engineering Projects, FE Review, Control Systems
up. In Figure 2 (a) the originalgrey scale image is shown. The first step is to perform an image threshold application toconvert the image from grey scale to black and white. The student may perform a histogramto see the distribution of the grey levels to determine a good threshold value. In Figure 2 (b)the histogram of the image is shown. The values range from 0 to 255. The student may trydifferent values and see the result. In Figure 3 (a) the image with a threshold of 128 is shown.The student can see that there is some background grey areas that were darker than thethreshold value of 128 which means it had a value less than the threshold. The student maythe try a smaller value. In Figure 3 (b) the image with a threshold of 96 is shown
Volume of work produced Attendance Page 26.777.7 Punctuality (a) (b) (c) (d)FIGURE 1: Comparison of Responses for Communication Questions (a) Speaks with Clarity and Confidence, (b) Writes Clearly and Concisely, (c) Makes Effective Presentations, and (d) Exhibits Good Listening and Questioning Skills Page 26.777.8 (a
? of the positive and negative step response will be Select one or more: the same. a. The steady-state error will be reduced True b. The settling time will get faster False c. The overshoot will be reduced Q2: The settling times will be the same. d. The reset time, or time to get to zero steady-state error will be reduced True Q5: Which of the following will be true if
. RENDERING THE ARM IN THREE DIMENSIONS The arm is rendered using three dimensional (3D) graphics, see Figure 2a. The user can zoomin and out, select the coordinate axis that points up and move the eye position vertically andhorizontally using the controls shown in Figure 2b. Page 26.180.4 a bFigure 2: (a) The 3D rendering of a 3 link R2P arm. (b) The 3D view controls. There is a two dimensional (2D) view as well. While any arm can be rendered in 2D, themotivation is to display the popular two link rotational arm shown in Figure 3a that appears inmany books because of its
ignored the significantdifferences-in-kind between researchers’ and instructors’ knowledge. Upon reflection it is asmall leap from the constructivism we hope to apply in our classrooms to a more collaborativemodel of curricular innovation and adoption.References1. Brown, S. A. & Montfort, D. B. Curricular Materials and Methods for Student Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics of Materials. in Annu. Conf. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. (2013). Page 26.1085.62. Brown, S. A., Findley, K. & Montfort, D. B. Student Understanding of States of Stress in Mechanics of Materials. in Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. (2007). at 3
anticipatepersonnel support and system maintenance, as well as the obvious natural gas demand.Table 2: Recent yearly moist and dry grain compared to natural gas usage Page 26.1691.7Figure 4: The five on-site power meters tracking electrical usage for billing by DTE Energyat the MAC Marlette facility. Meters (A), (B) and (C) are meters for the site office building,the work shop and the older silos used for specialty storage needs respectively. Meter (D)#9413322 tracks electric energy usage at the front area of the facility and meter (E) #6030724tracks electronic energy usage in the back-leg receiving area of the facility. These two lattermeters track the
innovative behaviors. Page 26.740.2Research PurposeThis paper explores whether a specific trait or tendency may be connected to innovation:empathy. This quantitative study is guided by the following research questions:RQ1: What is the relationship between the empathy and innovation amongst engineering students?RQ2: To what extent are empathic tendencies predictive of innovative behavioral tendencies?Using a model developed out of social psychology,13 we define empathy as a multi-facetedphenomenon built upon four distinct sub-constructs: (a) fantasy, (b) perspective-taking, (c)empathic concern, and (d) personal distress. Here we explore whether
(Image 4d). In creating their stories, participants were supposed to link the cracked objects’photos to any other images or texts or illustrations they liked. An iPhone application was used tofacilitate linking these images. Participants took three days to two weeks to work on their stories. Image 4 - Left to right: (a) a liquid rubber-coated ceramic cup; (b) the break; (c) the paint; (d) the storyBefore going through the process of creating the stories, the participants had mentioned that thebroken objects have little or no value and they should be discarded. However, when they cameback to share their images and stories, they had changed their minds about those objects andsome of them saw the objects as an art piece and a “representative of a
withinternational collaborations, preparing for an international conference, observations as youtravel, challenges, and expectations.2. a) What did you learn from the Wednesday plenary and the Women in STEM and Diversitypanels? b) Is there a research benefit to meeting someone in person versus using technology toconnect?3. a) Please describe the impact of having a mixed group of faculty (external to your university)and graduate students. b) Has this trip facilitated any collaborations or research ideas that moveyou closer to your academic goals? c) How can an excursion like this one contribute to career-life balance? Page 19.30.104. How does this picture of
inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a Distinguished Lecture at the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2014 Annual Conference. Dr. Atman joined the
Chicago inOctober 2013. The meeting resulted in the proposed criteria shown in Appendix B. The initialpaper described those changes regarding natural science, probability and statistics, risk andreliability, technical breadth, sustainability, ethics, experiments, and project management in detail.Appendix C offers an abbreviated rational for this proposal.The CEPCTC implemented a communication plan that disseminated the proposed criteria andsought input from the various constituents. The sub-committee identified 25 stakeholder groupsranging from CE Department Heads and ABET Program Evaluators to the ASCE RegionalGovernors and the ASCE Committee on Education.InputOnce the draft proposed CEPC was prepared and disseminated in December 2013, the
. Students present their team research project on Day 7. After presentationsstudents reflect on a) the content and how this experience has impacted their views onengineering, b) the mechanics of giving a good presentation, and c) on teamwork by completinga reflective writing assignment considering how they interacted as team members. Feedbackfrom these reflections is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the module. Page 26.915.5Results and DiscussionFrom an instructor’s perspective the module has been hugely successful. Inclusion of conationhas increased overall satisfaction with teamwork experiences, thereby creating positiveexperiences for students
Paper ID #12204Introducing Actor-Network Theory Via the Engineering Sophomore YearMs. Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a doctoral student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at CU Boulder. Her research investigates sociocultural environments of engineering undergraduate, particularly within the environments of impactful required mathematics courses. Adapting concepts from the Learning Sciences, Janet hopes to bring new ideas to engineering education that will illuminate previously overlooked social phenomena and improve the engineering experience for all students.Dr. Daria A Kotys
project based learning approach assists the students to achieve thefollowing goals: a) work in multi-disciplinary teams, b) perform an independent research study,c) analyze the functionality of a given circuit and propose alternative designs, d) simulate thecircuit using PSPICE, construct circuit on breadboard, e) test the functionality of the circuit, f)build a PCB prototype, and g) perform market analysis for the manufacturing of the circuit. Theexpected outcomes of the given project agree with the skills of an entrepreneurially mindedengineer, as specified by the Kern Family Foundation, that are believed to contribute to theability of an engineer to develop breakthrough innovation6. These outcomes are: effectivecollaboration and communication
women in manufacturing. (a) Survey questions used to asses student’s (b) Average responses of survey questions for all manufacturing awareness in critical areas participants (c) Female student responses (d) Male student responsesFig. 9: Pre- and post-module responses for questions 1-4 [Note: (Q1) Career awareness, (Q2) Manufacturing crisisawareness, (Q3) Interest in manufacturing industry, (Q4) Continued learningIn addition to the above four questions, the students were also asked to identify three key wordsthat they would connect with the manufacturing industry. Out of the ten available words, half of
HigherEducation and Society The Review of Higher Education, Volume 27, Number 4, Summer 2004.[6] Sochacka, N. Walther, J. Wilson J. and Brewer, M. “Storiel ‘Told’ about Engineering in the Media.”[7] Clewell, B. & Fortenberry, N. (Eds.) (2009). Framework for Evaluating Impacts of BroadeningParticipation Projects.[8] Weerts, D. J., Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities forcommunity engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32 (1).[9] Bartel, Caroline A. “Social Comparisons in Boundary-Spanning Work: Effects of Community Outreachon Members' Organizational Identity and Identification” , Administrative Science Quarterly 2001 46: 379.[10] Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of
Robot Simulator and convert Quaternions to/fromaxis angle representation. We will use the Python programming language to make our manualcalculations and confirm ROS is working as expected (see Figure 1). Python is an interpretedlanguage and supported by the Robotic Operation System (ROS). ROS Python and tf Figure 3 – Lab SetupThere are four sections to this lab: a) Setup and RVIZ features b) Converting from Quaternion to Axis Angle Representation c) Frames of Reference d) Robot Arm Movement SequenceSetup will guide you through startup of RVIZ, Robot State Publisher and terminals. Features ofthe RVIZ display will be explored. We will convert Quaternions to Axis Angle representation toget useful
: (a) how a person identifies himself or herself, and(b) how others identify them in different contexts25. Traditional approaches for helping studentsfrom underrepresented groups persist and succeed in engineering, such as Women and Minoritiesin Engineering Programs, focus on the underrepresented students themselves. These efforts areaimed at helping students adapt to a culture that is different from them, and in some situations,they may help underrepresented students recognize themselves as engineers. But identity is two-sided, where peers/colleagues must identify students as engineers25. Programs focused onsupporting the underrepresented students do nothing to encourage others to viewunderrepresented students as engineers. Unfortunately
integrated approach,” IEEE Transactions onEducation, 53(1), 38-44, 2010[4] Ayar, M.C., Yalvac, B., Ugurdag, F., and Sahin, A. “A Robotics Summer Camp for High School Students:Pipelines Activities Promoting Careers in Engineering Fields,” Proc. American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conf. & Exp., Atlanta, GA, Jun 2013.[5] Parallax, Inc. Boe-Bot Robot, Online:http://www.parallax.com/product/boe-bot-robot[6] Parallax, Inc. Ping))) Ultrasonic Distance Sensor, Online:http://www.parallax.com/sites/default/files/downloads/28015-PING-Sensor-Product-Guide-v2.0.pdf Page 26.774.18[7] Parallax, Inc. QTI Sensor, Online: http
personal development, social impact, academic enhancement, university mission, andethics13. Students were asked to pick and respond to two out of five reflection prompts. Theinstrument is included in Appendix B. An open-coding approach was taken to identify emergentcategories in the reflection responses14-15. One member of the research team first read eachstudent’s response to determine a set of categories compiled into a rubric. The rubric was thenused to code each student’s response. A second rater then used the rubric to test its reliabilityacross raters. A second member of the research team coded each student’s response using thefirst rater’s codes until agreement was reached. Changes to the coding rubric were made toestablish a high inter
wild” will be noted. Based on this feedback, we have produced four new variations on the inquiry-‐based Page 26.463.2activities. These involve: a) replacing the students’ experiments with simulations; b) replacing the students’ experiments with the students observing the experiment 1 as an in-‐class demonstration; c) the students’ watching the simulation as an in-‐class demonstration and d) replacing both
., Sauter, R., Bahaj, A. S., James, P. A. B., Myers, L. E., & Wing, R. (2006). Unlocking the Power House:Policy and system change for domestic micro-generation in the UK.Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., & Kolokotsa, D. (2008). Towards a multi-objective optimization approach forimproving energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 40(9), 1747-1754.Mitchell, R. M. The Global Energy Challenge, a 21st Century Students Guide to Ethical Energy Usage.Bull, S. R. (2001). Renewable energy today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(8), 1216-1226.Martinot, E., Chaurey, A., Lew, D., Moreira, J. R., & Wamukonya, N. (2002). Renewable energy markets indeveloping countries*. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1), 309-348
different coding categories. A t-test was performed to identifystatistically significant differences between the students’ and the educators’ average number ofcomments and average percentage of comments.Results and DiscussionOn average, educators provided significantly more comments than the students (Figure 1). Basedon the character count, educators’ comments were also longer than the students. The breakdownof comments by Focus and Substance of feedback is shown respectively in Figure 2 and Figure 3. (a) (b) Figure 1. Students’ and educators’ (a) average number of comments and (b) average comment length. Significantly different categories have been marked with *** p<0.001.In the
Paper ID #13056Exploring the Expanding Impact of a Sustainable Development EngineeringCourse Through a Critical Evolutionary ReviewMr. Kevin Orner, University of South Florida Kevin Orner is a Ph.D. student in Environmental Engineering at the University of South Florida, where he studies nutrient management of wastewater. Kevin was a Teaching Assistant and course instructor for the Sustainable Development Engineering course in Fall 2014. After obtaining a B.S. in Civil and Envi- ronmental Engineering with a certificate in Technical Communication from the University of Wisconsin- Madison, Kevin served for two years as a Peace