students (which isvaluable), nor faculty-student relationships (which is also valuable), but also amongstfaculty as an essential component of post Covid education.In the past ten years, this single online, pre-engineering collaborative accounts for theequivalent of over 2% of Native American engineering students annually graduating witha bachelor’s degree in engineering [9], accomplished through building trust andcommunity. Throughout the program's tenure, student-student relationships, student-instructor relationships, and instructor-instructor relationships were all intentionallyfostered through the structure of the collaborative. The students are very capable andthe program supports their efforts through a culturally-appropriate emphasis
community engagement. Moreover, the curriculum incorporateshuman-centered design and key engineering processes to foster engineering habits of mind suchas systems thinking, optimism, and ethical consideration in engineering as well asentrepreneurial mindsets such as the three C’s (creativity, collaboration, communication).Throughout EPICS High, students continually explore potential problems in the community thatcan be solved by the skills they are learning in the classroom. Ultimately, students learn to workwith members of the community to create engineering solutions that are designed to address real-world problems. Preliminary research shows that EPICS High promotes positive outcomesamong high school students9,10. In a small study on an
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationlearn from it – they were also the most time consuming for instructors. On average, we§ spentabout 15 minutes per essay, reading it and writing comments – usually providing anotherperspective and asking a couple of questions to prompt students to explore in more depth someidea that they have written about. This may put a limit on the frequency or effectiveness of thisexercise for classes over a certain size.Nevertheless, reflective essays were responsible for some of the most rewarding interactions wehave had with our students. After the last session of one course, 4 students came to thank one ofus for the written feedback, saying they had
depends critically on a mutual commitment to partnerships, especiallythose that link engineering education to professional practice; and (4) Research on engineering ina global context is urgently needed.6 These recommendations suggest that the engineeringcurriculum should be modified to include global competences, and that the educationalinstitutions and the private industry around the world should collaborate among them to providemobility, internships, projects, and research initiatives to the faculty and students in a globalcontext.In this hemisphere, the Engineering for the Americas (EftA) initiative is an academic, industrialand government grass roots effort that has evolved over the past five years. Its aim is to enhanceengineering and
requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood. (p. 125)18So how do basic and contextual listening relate to each of four design strategies? Listening indesign for technology may be constrained. For instance, in one of our research interviews, aformer graduate student and current faculty member stated that his undergraduate educationand early industry experience taught him that, in design contexts, he needed to “listen to thespec.” By that, he meant that he needed to listen to the specifications that were implicit orexplicit in the client’s explanation of the problem and desired solution. That trained his ear tobe a basic listener and to consciously filter out information that did not
Program by Volunteer College Students for Middle School Youth from Underprivileged BackgroundsIntroductionInnoWorks is an innovative science and engineering program designed by volunteer collegeundergraduates for middle-school students from disadvantaged backgrounds, the flagshipprogram of United InnoWorks Academy, a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organizationfounded in 2003. The primary goals of InnoWorks are to (1) provide underprivileged studentswith an opportunity to explore the real-world links among science and engineering disciplines,(2) foster teamwork, enthusiasm, and career interests in science and engineering, and (3) usecurrent neuroscience and educational research to develop mentoring, teaching
US Dept. of Education, including the AWAKEN Project (funded by NSF-EEP), which examines learning, instruction, teacher beliefs and engineering practices in order to foster a more diverse and more able pool of engineering students and practitioners, and the Tangibility for the Teaching, Learning, and Communicating of Mathematics Project (NSF-REESE), which explores the role of materiality and action in representing mathematical concepts in engineering and geometry. Dr. Nathan is on the editorial board for several journals, including The Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-Peer).Amy C. Prevost, UW-Madison Ms. Prevost is a doctoral student in Education Leadership and Policy Analysis at the
City, little change in the course sequence is needed; however faculty mustrestructure their syllabi to introduce the design early, and center individual and group projectsaround one aspect of the design. Obviously, an entire course is not be devoted to Sooner City;rather it provides motivation for learning theory and application. Opportunities to connect theprogram to other departments are being explored.2) $Just-in-Time# LearningWe believe, as do faculty at other institutions6,14,23, that student interest, and hence learning, ismaximum when they can see the application behind the theory. Sooner City was chosen preciselyfor this reason, i.e., to provide justification and motivation for learning design concepts. Weintroduce the appropriate
– personal responsibility, self-esteem,college preparatory, magnet high school that offers its students atechnology-rich learning environment. Its culture and climate sociability, self-management, integrity, and honesty;fosters innovation that goes beyond the classroom. For example, • Thinking skills – creativity, decision-making, problem-a collaborative effort with AITE led to the creation of an online solving, learning ability, visualization skills, andlearning program – Best We Can Be – that engenders learning by reasoning ability;facilitating supportive interpersonal networks between students
community organization such as the YMCA or Boysand Girls Club. These projects engage students in STEM activities for early exposure toengineering. Projects can focus on specific ranges such as K-8, K-12, grades 5-8, or grades 9-12. Mentoring-centered projects represent mentorship among various levels such as near peermentoring between undergraduate and high school students, graduate and undergraduatestudents, graduate student peer mentoring, and mentoring of graduate students by faculty andcollege administrators. Professional development projects provide training to enhance specificskills (e.g., research and academic skills, experiential learning opportunities, allyship, orinclusive language). Accessibility-focused projects develop tools in
importantly, freshmen,many of whom have never “failed” before, learn to appreciate that failure is a crucial componentof creativity and an essential part of solving challenging problems.Previous researchers have shown the significant value of collaborative versus competitivelearning [9]. The importance of developing teamwork skills in college is emphasized by ABETas one of the primary “a through k” objectives: an ability to function on a multi-disciplinaryteam. Both problem-based learning and cooperative learning provide the essential skills requiredfor ABET accredited programs [10, 11]. A critical component of the Modeling and Designcourse success is the collegial atmosphere. Students from diverse backgrounds and educationalexperiences work in teams
graduates joining large softwaredevelopment organizations generally spend their first several months of employment perform-ing corrective and perfective maintenance tasks. Finding the right piece of source code rel-evant to the change request in an unfamiliar software project is among the initial challengesfaced by such new developers. Thus, it is crucial for the Software Engineering educationalprogram to equip the students with core skills to effectively and efficiently locate a concern inthe code base and relate the code to other Software Engineering artifacts.The field of tracking a concern throughout the development life cycle is known as softwaretraceability. This line of research has its root in Gotel and Finkelstein’s seminal work10 on re
and the overallgrade of the student which serves as a factor to determine student’s success in a classroom.First year engineering curriculum includes two semester course sequence: Fundamentals ofEngineering I (offered in the first semester) and Fundamentals of Engineering II (offered in thesecond semester). Data is presented from the first semester course offered at the regional campusof a large, research institution. Fundamentals of Engineering I course include the followingsections as three main components of the coursework. a) Introduction to data analysis tool suchas Microsoft Excel, b) Computer programming in MATLAB, and c) Design project. Teamworkand collaboration are heavily weighted for the assessment of student performance in the
Professor and Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He was formerly a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, As- sociate Department Chair for Graduate Studies and Research, and Director of Northeastern University Piezoactive Systems Laboratory at Northeastern University. An ASME Fellow and former Chairs of both ASME Mechanical Engineering Department Heads and Chairs (MEDHC) and ASME Southeast Mechan- ical Engineering Department Heads (SMEDH), Dr. Jalili is an innovative leader and researcher, known for bringing the resources of engineering education and research to undergraduate and graduate students, industry partners and community outreach programs. An active researcher, Dr. Jalili has been PI or Co-PI on
encounters with the Other. (This is most obvious in her latest new course, A Global State of Mind.) Whatever the subject, her courses are grounded in accountability–to the text, to oneself, and to one’s fellows.Ms. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the
-term groups; informal ad-hoc short-term groups,and long-term base groups lasting possibly for a year. Certainly, inventories of strategiesand practical guides for cooperative learning have enriched the literature base on learningcommunities. [17]In a similar vein, team work and small group learning both set the stage for theestablishment of a community of learning among students. The criticality of thiscommunity becomes increasingly evident as one considers the diversity in the workplaceand the necessity for graduates to be prepared to interact professionally with others quitedifferent from themselves. Team work and small group learning also set the stage for therecognition of different types of assets which individuals bring to the table
anaerodynamics course at Howard. The evaluation and research plan (created in collaboration witha third party program evaluation center at the University of Iowa) is described, which focuses onexact descriptions of the implementations of the new interface at partner sites, especially asexperienced by the students, including preliminary data on immediate student outcomes asdocumented from site testing for Fall 2003. Also discussed are conclusions and future work. Page 9.450.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering
crucial for them to quicklydevelop their scholarship foci, and research plans to allow them to achieve tenure.A successful tenure program requires a balance of teaching, scholarship, and service; however,developing a robust research and scholarship agenda while trying to maintain the excellence inteaching and a broad service agenda is a challenge. In addition, teaching-oriented colleges oftenlack research laboratories, have a very limited number of graduate students, and offer little or nostartup funds to new faculty. Because of economic constraints, both administrators and facultyare being asked to do more with less support [6]. Simply put, the “action figure” portrait oftoday’s engineering/engineering technology professor[7], who has to do it
energytechnologies.8 PV is a rising field in engineering, having an average growth of 40% per year overthe last twenty years.9 Among other skills, the field requires an understanding of electricalengineering, materials engineering, semiconductor physics, and sustainability. Great strides are being taken in PV engineering to remove barriers of participation andencourage the cooperation of others in related engineering fields.10 For example, curricularefforts are underway to enhance the interdisciplinary nature of PV, aid students in their learningof PV and increase their persistence in the field.6 To facilitate these efforts, engineeringeducators are starting to identify misconceptions inherent in learning PV, enhance educationaltechnology resources
for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering graduates. LaMeres teaches and conducts research in the area of computer engineering. LaMeres is currently studying the effectiveness of online delivery of en- gineering content with emphasis on how the material can be modified to provide a personalized learning experience. LaMeres is also researching strategies to improve student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineering. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of
noting at this point, however, thatwhile we hypothesize unidirectional relationships between our sets of variables, we limit ourinvestigation to predictive relationships and not causal relationships. Figure 1 illustrates our conceptual model about the relationship between the outcome andpredictor variables. Figure 1. Conceptual model for predictor variables and outcome Throughout this paper, we aim to answer the following research question: Do thepresence of curricular opportunities for learning multidisciplinary lesson content,engineering-design activities, agency in STEM practices, data practices, collaboration, andevidence-based reasoning predict the level of student cognitive engagement in iSTEM lessons? Based on
suggested by a company,including a feasibility study of the technical and economic viability of the potential product. Afull business plan is produced when the feasibility study looks promising. For example, BrownUniversity has a two semester course where teams of engineering students work closely withcompanies to explore commercialization5. Cooper Union, working closely with the theirengineering alumni, friends and extended family, is delivering authentic opportunities forengineering students in teams of about four students to develop a business plan for a product orservice of their choice6. Case studies, guest lectures and off campus visits are used to providestudents with the necessary tools and motivation. The College of Engineering at Penn
for Engineering Education Annual Conference &ExpositionCopyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”Recommendations for further research include a longitudinal follow-up study to trackstudents behaviors and outcomes, additional research to determine the reasons for secondsemester attrition, and studies both replicating the original design with the same studentpopulation and studies extending the research to other student cohorts with both the sameand also different teaching teams in the same institution as well as other technical andnon-technical colleges with similar student populations to confirm or refute the findingsof this study and to determine their value in other settings.I. IntroductionIn his examination of
been written about the importance of preparing engineering students to workeffectively on multidisciplinary teams, very little has been published identifying the skills neededto do so from the perspective of engineers currently practicing within industry and others whowork with or supervise them. As engineering educators, we wanted to know if there are skillsspecific to the success of multidisciplinary teams, as differentiated from general teamwork skills,with the ultimate goal of incorporating the skills into our course learning objectives andactivities. Further, we were unable to find research focused specifically on the importance ofmultidisciplinary teamwork skills and their prevalence among newly graduated engineers fromthe perspective of
to show the basic retention numbers andthen allowed for further deeper exploration of student retention by showing the retention brokenout by many different subcategories of students.IntroductionLearning communities have a long history including the Meiklejohn “Experimental College” atthe University of Wisconsin in 1920. In the past couple of decades they have emerged as a wayto improve the retention for first year students.During the 1980’s and 1990’s there was a renewed interest in improving undergraduateeducation in the United States. The Boyer Commission in 1998 released its report, ReinventingUndergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities1, on the state ofundergraduate education. It recommended 10 ways to
engineering undergraduate students into the College’sscholarship – such as conducting research and presenting the findings. In this paper theprograms implemented for each strategy are presented followed by results documenting theimpact of the strategy on retention and student success. Finally, the conclusion sectionsummarizes the highlights of the accomplishments and the challenges faced. This paper willhelp serve as a resource for others planning similar programs for engineering undergraduatestudents. The University of Cincinnati (UC) is an urban, comprehensive, research-intensive, publicinstitution with over 42,000 students. The UC College of Engineering and Applied Science(CEAS) has over 3,000 undergraduate and 650 graduate students, and grants
well as howother engineering departments might take advantage of the federal appropriation and ultimately affect thepipeline of entering engineering freshmen.Background of the STEM Pipeline ChallengeThere are many reasons cited for the increased attention on strengthening mathematics and sciencepreparation of K-12 students. Foremost among those reasons however is the need to equip our futureworkforce with the skills and tools required to compete in a changing global economy. An adequate levelof mathematics and science preparation is seen as a necessity for the many technical professions that willconstitute the workforce of the future. If graduating high school seniors do not have the prerequisiteability in mathematics and science, then the
well as howother engineering departments might take advantage of the federal appropriation and ultimately affect thepipeline of entering engineering freshmen.Background of the STEM Pipeline ChallengeThere are many reasons cited for the increased attention on strengthening mathematics and sciencepreparation of K-12 students. Foremost among those reasons however is the need to equip our futureworkforce with the skills and tools required to compete in a changing global economy. An adequate levelof mathematics and science preparation is seen as a necessity for the many technical professions that willconstitute the workforce of the future. If graduating high school seniors do not have the prerequisiteability in mathematics and science, then the
well as howother engineering departments might take advantage of the federal appropriation and ultimately affect thepipeline of entering engineering freshmen.Background of the STEM Pipeline ChallengeThere are many reasons cited for the increased attention on strengthening mathematics and sciencepreparation of K-12 students. Foremost among those reasons however is the need to equip our futureworkforce with the skills and tools required to compete in a changing global economy. An adequate levelof mathematics and science preparation is seen as a necessity for the many technical professions that willconstitute the workforce of the future. If graduating high school seniors do not have the prerequisiteability in mathematics and science, then the
at the sociallevel. The use of chat rooms for non-academic purposes during class time is becoming an issuein the university.The concept of using chat rooms for an environment where students cooperate to solve academicproblems is quite new at Zayed University. It needs to be further explored as it has the potentialto facilitate discussion for learning. On the other hand faculty members can play a critical role asadvisors and mentors in this environment. However, experience has shown that most facultymembers are not interested in participating in chat room sessions for a number of reasons,including being cautious and having time constraints. Faculty members actually prefer